Integrated Geophysical and Geospatial Approaches for Delineating Groundwater Potential Zones in Karachi, Pakistan

Muhammad Jahangir Khan

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

Syeda Rida Fatima Bokhari

The State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Wuhan University, China

Umair Bin Nisar

Centre for Climate Research and Development, COMSATS University, Islamabad Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan

Farhad Ali

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/eps.v1i1.520

Copyright © 2022 Author(s). Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

Availability of subsurface fresh water in coastal cities of the world is a growing problem due to sea level intrusion and less seepage. The authors have utilized an integrated data dataset in which conventional geophysical methods were used to collect primary data for the groundwater resources in Karachi and geospatial approaches were used to generate the hydrogeological model. It aimed to investigate geological/hydrogeological conditions of any aquifer system in the study area. The geophysical survey was planned to acquire electrical resistivity data in the outskirts of Karachi. The geophysical survey was carried out at twenty-one stations by adopting vertical electrical sounding technique with schlumberger configuration. The field data were processed in an iterative process to improve the signal to noise ratio and obtain smooth field data curves for delineation of the aquifer. The authors have interpreted field data to model the geological information and determine the hydrogeophysical parameters of respective layers. These parameters including the number of layers, aquifer resistivity, aquifer lithology, aquifer thickness and depth to the aquifer, are determined at each field station. The acquired dataset of hydrogeophysical parameters was used to build a geospatial database. The multi-criteria analysis and decision-making process were utilized in GIS-based program to model spatial distribution of these parameters. The results identified an aquifer system in the depth ranging from 53.3 meters to 143.9 meters. The aquifer in the area is mostly sandstone having sufficient thickness which varies from northeast to south and southwest due to undulating topography of the area. The maximum potential of the groundwater is identified in the south which is suitable for water exploration because of low resistivity zone, high aquifer thickness, and flow of drainage network.

Keywords: Aquifer, Vertical electrical sounding, Weighted overlay analysis, GIS


References

[1] Li, P., Zhang, C., Li, W., et al., 2021. Groundwater vulnerability assessment of Pingtan Island in Fuzhou City, China, based on DRASLI-QUE. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 26(3), 05020050.

[2] Motevalli, A., Pourghasemi, H.R., Hashemi, H., et al., 2019. Assessing the Vulnerability of Groundwater to Salinization Using GIS-Based Data-Mining Techniques in a Coastal Aquifer. In Spatial Modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. pp. 547-571.

[3] Pérez-Carrascal, K., García-Guarín, J., 2021. Detection of water leaks with Dowsing technique and Reynold’s transport theorem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. (1), 012004.

[4] Mondal, N.C., Singh, V.P., Singh, V.S., et al., 2010. Determining the interaction between groundwater and saline water through groundwater major ions chemistry. Journal of Hydrology. 388(1-2), 100-111.

[5] Prasad, K.A., Gnanappazham, L., Selvam, V., et al., 2015. Developing a spectral library of mangrove species of Indian east coast using field spectroscopy. Geocarto International. 30(5), 580-599.

[6] Greer, B.M., Burbey, T.J., Zipper, C.E., et al., 2017. Electrical resistivity imaging of hydrologic flow through surface coal mine valley fills with comparison to other landforms. Hydrological Processes. 31(12), 2244-2260.

[7] Thabit, J.M., AL-Hameedawie, M.M., 2014. Delineation of groundwater aquifers using VES and 2D imaging techniques in north Badra area, Eastern Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Science. 55(1), 174-183.

[8] Kearey, P., Brooks, M., 1991. An introduction to geophysical prospecting. Blackwell, Boston.

[9] Teixidó, T., 2012. The surface geophysical methods: a useful tool for the engineer. Procedia Engineering. 46, 89-96.

[10] Stewart, M.T., 1982. Evaluation of electromagnetic methods for rapid mapping of salt‐water interfaces in coastal aquifers. Groundwater. 20(5), 538-545.

[11] Khan, M.J., Shah, B., Nasir, B., 2020. GIS- Based Groundwater Quality Assessment for Drinking Purpose: a Case Study of Sindh Industrial Trading Estate (SITE), Karachi, Pakistan. Modelling Earth Systems and Environment. 6, 263-272.

[12] Al-Ruzouq, R., Shanableh, A., Merabtene, T., et al., 2019. Potential groundwater zone mapping based on geo-hydrological considerations and multi-criteria spatial analysis: North UAE. Catena. 173, 511-524.

[13] Yin, L., Zhang, E., Wang, X., et al., 2013. A GISbased DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the Ordos Plateau, China. Environmental earth sciences. 69(1), 171-185.

[14] Dashtpagerdi, M.M.,Vagharfard, H., Honarbakhsh, A., et al., 2013. GIS-based fuzzy logic approach for identification of groundwater artificial recharge site. Open Journal of Geology. 3(06), 379.

[15] Ghorbanzadeh, O., Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T., 2018. Multi-criteria risk evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 9(1), 127-151.

[16] Biswas, S., Mukhopadhyay, B.P., Bera, A., 2020. Delineating groundwater potential zones of agriculture dominated landscapes using GIS based AHP techniques: a case study from Uttar Dinajpur district, West Bengal. Environmental Earth Sciences. 79(12), 1-25.

[17] Metwaly, M., El-Qady, G., Massoud, U., et al., 2010. Integrated geoelectrical survey for groundwater and shallow subsurface evaluation: a case study at Siliyin spring, El-Fayoum, Egypt. International Journal of Earth Sciences. 99(6), 1427-1436.

[18] Khan, S., Nisar, U., Ehsan, S., et al., 2021. Aquifer vulnerability and groundwater quality around Brahma Bahtar Lesser Himalayas Pakistan. Environmental Earth Sciences. 80(13), 1-13.

[19] Nisar, U., Khan, M.J., Imran, M., et al., 2021. Groundwater investigations in the hattar industrial estate and its vicinity, Haripur District, Pakistan: an integrated approach. Kuwait Journal of Science. 48(1), 51-61.

[20] Aziz, N.A., Hasan, R.H., Abdulrazzaq, Z.T., 2018. Optimum Site Selection for Groundwater wells using Integration between GIS and Hydrogeophysical Data. Engineering and Technology Journal. 36(6 Part (A) Engineering), 596-602.

[21] Abdalla, O.A., Ali, M., Al-Higgi, K., et al., 2010. Rate of seawater intrusion estimated by geophysical methods in an arid area: Al Khabourah, Oman. Hydrogeology Journal. 18(6), 1437-1445.

[22] Olusola, F.O., Marvellous, O.O., 2020. Groundwater vulnerability mapping and quality assessment around coastal environment of Ilaje Local government area, southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications. 2(2), 74-91.

[23] Khan, M.J., Zeeshan, M., Ali, S.S., 2020. GIS-based change detection of coastal features along Karachi Coast, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Science. 72(2), 124-133.

[24] Zafar, S., Zaidi, A., 2019. Impact of urbanization on basin hydrology: a case study of the Malir Basin, Karachi, Pakistan. Regional Environmental Change. 19(6), 1815-1827.

[25] Salma, S., Shah, M.A., Rehman, S., 2012. Rainfall trends in different climate zones of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Meteorology. 9(17).

[26] Xie, J., Cui, Y.A., Fanidi, M., et al., 2021. Numerical Modeling of Marine Self-Potential from a Seafloor Hydrothermal Ore Deposit. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 178(5), 1731-1744.

[27] Sato, M., Mooney, H.M., 1960. Electrochemical mechanism of sulphide self-potentials. Geophysics. 25, 226-249.