Earth and Planetary Science

Computational Review for Fluid Flow - Heat Transfer in Stress Deformation in Porous/Fractured Media, THGMC

Eduardo Teófilo-Salvador

Division of Earth Science Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/eps.v4i1.2089

Received: 2 February 2025 | Revised: 27 March 2025 | Accepted: 30 March 2025 | Published Online: 6 April 2025

---

Abstract

The Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS), requires identifying the mathematical formulations, mechanics, thermodynamics, hydraulics, geology and chemistry. The objective was to generate a review for the recognition of codes, and software commonly used in coupled processes of fluid flow, heat transfer, and stress deformation. The main search criterion that, the codes and software were associated with the Hot Dry Rock (HDR). The literature describing closed-loop EGS injection-production, and hydraulic fracturing, was reviewed. Were grouped, packages no guide or tutorial on mathematical formulations was found, and packages with guides and formulations. The most important parameters required for simulations were identified. Simulative applications were investigated in study cases. Simulators have evolved over the years, improved, or been coupled with other codes to generate greater accuracy. Simulators require multiple parameters for porous/fractured media, heat flux, fluid flow, wellbore, and phase interactions. Despite scientific and technological advances, they are still based on the equations of continuity, energy, momentum, and transport. They use finite difference, finite element, finite volume, discrete methods, or fractional fractal methods, transforming them into complex nonlinear systems with coupled or hybrid solutions. Hydraulic leakage processes in the rock/fracture matrix, translational heat losses, and frictional effects of fluid flow on fractures or turbulence processes are not yet clearly understood in coupled simulators. There is no universally coupled simulator that depends on a single variable, giving rise to multicoupled systems such as TermoHydroGeoMecaChemical (THGMC). It is advisable to review the available information to choose the appropriate computational package for HDR studies of EGS.

Keywords: Coupled Systems; Nonlinear Systems; Complex Systems; Numerical Simulations

---

References

[1] Rutqvist, J., Wu, Y.S., Tsang, C.F., et al., 2002. A modeling approach for analysis of coupled multiphase fluid flow heat transfer, and deformation in fractured porous rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 39(4), 429–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00022-9

[2] Swenson, D., DuTeau, R., Sprecker, T., 1995. Modeling flow in a jointed geothermal reservoir. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress; 18–31 May 1995; Florence, Italy. pp. 2553–2558.

[3] Kohl, T., Hopkirk, R.J., 1995. FRACTure – a simulation code for forced fluid flow and transport in fractured, porous rock. Geothermics. 24(3), 333–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(95)00012-F

[4] Labus, K., Labus, M., Lesniak, G., 2023. Thermal properties of rocks from deep boreholes in Poland in terms of obtaining geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems. Advances in Geo-Energy Research. 8(2), 76–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2023.05.02

[5] Abid, K., Sharma, A., Ahmed, S., et al., 2022. A review on geothermal energy and HPHT packers for geothermal applications. Energies. 15(19), 7357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197357

[6] Yan, B., Gudala, M., Sun, S., 2023. Robust optimization of geothermal recovery based on a generalized thermal decline model and deep learning. Energy Conversion and Management. 286, 117033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117033

[7] Gao, X., Li, T., Zhang, Y., et al., 2022. A review of simulation models of heat extraction for a geothermal reservoir in an enhanced geothermal system. Energies. 15(19), 7148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197148

[8] Clauser, C., 2003. Numerical simulation of reactive flow in hot aquifers SHEMAT and processing SHEMAT. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany. pp. 339.

[9] Chen, B., Ramos, B.B., Sun, Y., et al., 2022. A review of hydraulic fracturing simulation. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 29, 1–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09653-z

[10] Nemat-Nasser, S., Ohtsubo, H., 1978. Fluid flow and heat transfer through hydraulically induced fractures in hot, dry rock masses. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. 100(3), 277–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3454467

[11] Zhang, Q., Dahi, T.A., 2023. Autonomous fracture flow tuning to enhance efficiency of fractured geothermal systems. Energy. 281, 128163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128163

[12] Wang, Y., HosseiniMehr, M., Marelis, A., et al., 2023. A generic framework for multiscale simulation of high and low enthalpy fractured geothermal reservoirs under varying thermodynamic conditions. Energies. 16(2), 928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020928

[13] Liu, S., Dahi, T.A., 2023. Factors affecting the efficiency of closed-loop geothermal wells. Applied Thermal Engineering. 222, 119947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119947

[14] Liu, S., AlBalushi, F., Dahi, T.A., 2023. Conductive proppants to improve heat extraction. Proceedings of the 48th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering; 6–8 February 2023; Stanford, CA, USA. pp. 1–7.

[15] Santos, L., Dahi Taleghani, A., 2023. Impact of microannulus on the efficiency of heat transfer in the bottomhole. Frontiers in Energy Research. 11, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1142662

[16] Yan, X., Xue, K., Liu, X., et al., 2023. A novel numerical method for geothermal reservoirs embedded with fracture networks and parameter optimization for power generation. Sustainability. 15(12), 9744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129744

[17] Abdelhafiz, M.M., Oppelt, J.F., Brenner, G., et al., 2023. Application of a thermal transient subsurface model to a coaxial borehole heat exchanger system. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 227, 211815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211815

[18] Mahmoodpour, S., Singh, M., Turan, A., et al., 2022. Simulations and global sensitivity analysis of the thermo-hydraulic-mechanical processes in a fractured geothermal reservoir. Energy. 247, 123511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123511

[19] Wang, D., Dong, Y., Li, Y., et al., 2022. Numerical simulation of heat recovery potential of hot dry rock under alternate temperature loading. Unconventional Resources. 2, 170–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uncres.2022.09.006

[20] Vinsome, P.K.W., Shook, G.M., 1993. Multi-purpose simulation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 9(1), 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(93)90026-B

[21] Sanyal, S.K., Butler, S.J., Swenson, D., et al., 2000. Review of the state-of-the-art of numerical simulation of enhanced geothermal systems. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress 2000; May 28–June 10 2000; Kyushu-Tohoku, Japan. pp. 3853–3858.

[22] Swenson, D., 1997. User’s manual GEOCRACK: a coupled fluid flow/heat transfer/rock deformation program for analysis of fluid flow in jointed rock. Mechanical Engineering Department, Kansas State University: Manhattan, KS, USA. pp. 1–18.

[23] Yamamoto, T., Kitano, K., Fujimitsu, Y., et al., 1997. Application of simulation code, GEOTH3D, on the Ogachi HDR site. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering; 27–29 January 1997; Stanford, CA, USA. pp. 203–212.

[24] Walters, D.A., Settari, A., Kry, P.R., 2002. Coupled geomechanical and reservoir modeling investigation poroelastic effects of cyclic steam stimulation in the cold lake reservoir. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 5(6), 507–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/80997-PA

[25] Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C., Moridis, G., 1999. TOUGH2 user’s guide, version 2. U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 210.

[26] Jing, Z., Willis-Richards, J., Watanabe, K., et al., 2000. A three-dimensional stochastic rock mechanics model for engineered geothermal systems in fractured crystalline rock. Journal of Geophysical Research. 105(B10), 23663–23679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900202

[27] Wang, P., Yotov, I., Wheeler, M., et al., 1997. A new generation EOS compositional reservoir simulator: part I – formulation and discretization. Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium; 8–11 June 1997; Dallas, Texas, USA. pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/37979-MS

[28] Minkoff, S.E., Stone, C.M., Bryant, S., et al., 2003. Coupled fluid flow and geomechanical deformation modeling. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 38(1–2), 37–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00021-4

[29] Chan, T., Guvanasen, V., Stanchell, F.W., 2004. Verification and validation of a three-dimensional finite-element code for coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical and salinity (T-H-M-C) modelling in fractured rock masses. Elsevier Geo-Engineering Book Series. 2, 452–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-9960(04)80082-X

[30] Zyvoloski, G., 2007. FEHM: a control volume finite element code for simulating subsurface multi-phase multi-fluid heat and mass transfer. LA-UR-07-3359. Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, USA. pp. 1–47.

[31] Zyvoloski, G.A., Robinson, B.A., Dash, Z.V., et al., 1997. User manual for the FEHMN application. LA-UR-94-3788, Rev. 1. Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, USA. pp. 129. Available from: https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/DE00014902.xhtml (cited 17 October 2024).

[32] Kipp, K.L., Hsieh, P.A., Charlton, S.R., 2008. Guide to the revised ground-water flow and heat transport simulator: HYDROTHERM – version 3. U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA. pp. 178. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/06A25/pdf/TM6-A25.pdf (cited 19 March 2025).

[33] Podgorney, R., Huang, H., Gaston, D., 2010. Massively parallel fully coupled implicit modeling of coupled thermal-hydrological-mechanical processes for enhanced geothermal system reservoirs. Proceedings of the 35th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering; 1–3 February 2010; Stanford, CA, USA. pp. 1–14.

[34] COMSOL Multiphysics, 2023. COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual, v6.2. COMSOL: Stockholm, Sweden. pp. 2202. Available from: https://doc.comsol.com/6.2/doc/com.comsol.help.comsol/COMSOL_ReferenceManual.pdf (cited 22 November 2024).

[35] Holzbecher, E., 2013. Coupled hydro-mechanical modelling of deep geothermal heat production. Proceedings of the Fifth Biot Conference on Poromechanics; 10–12 July 2013; Vienna, Austria. pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412992.226

[36] CMG STARS, 2016. STARS User guide, Advanced Processes & Thermal Reservoir Simulator. Computer Modelling Group Ltd: Calgary, Canada. pp. 1531. Available from: https://studylib.net/doc/27634726/stars-user-guide--2- (cited 3 November 2024).

[37] Encalada, J.R., Quichimbo, E.A., Vázquez, R.F., 2019. Assessing the impact of fracture properties and wellbore configuration on the energy extraction from hot dry rock. Proceedings of the XVII ECSMGE-2019 Geotechnical Engineering Foundation of the Future; 1–6 September 2019; Reykjavik, Iceland. pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32075/17ECSMGE-2019-1013

[38] Böttcher, N., Watanabe, N., Görke, U.-J., et al., 2016. Geoenergy modeling I Geothermal processes in fractured porous media. Springer: Leipzig, Germany. Available from: https://vip.s3.ufz.de/ogs/public/web/Books/Geoenergy-Model-I/Geoenergy%2BModeling%2BI.pdf (cited 22 February 2025).

[39] Pogacnik, J., O’Sullivan, M., O’Sullivan, J., 2015. Linking TOUGH2 and ABAQUS to model permeability enhancement using a damage mechanics approach. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress 2015; 19–25 April 2015; Melbourne, Australia. pp. 1–9.

[40] O’Sullivan, M.J., O’Sullivan, J.P., 2016. Reservoir modeling and simulation for geothermal resource characterization and evaluation. In: DiPippo, R. (ed.). Geothermal Power Generation Developments and Innovation. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK. pp. 165–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100337-4.00007-3

[41] Li, K.-Q., Yin, Z.-Y., 2025. State of the art of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical modelling for frozen soils. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 32, 1039–1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10164-w

[42] Pritchett, J.W., Garg, S.K., 1995. A modeling study of the Oguni geothermal field, Kyushu, Japan. Proceedings of the International Geothermal Association 1995; 18–31 May 1995; Florence, Italy. pp. 1727–1733.

[43] Environment Agency, 2019. Review of software used by the oil and gas industry to model hydraulic fracturing. Environment Agency: Bristol, UK. pp. 1–29.

[44] Duplyakin, D., Beckers, K., Siler, D.L., et al., 2022. Modeling subsurface performance of a geothermal reservoir using machine learning. Energies. 15(3), 967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030967

[45] Lei, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., et al., 2020. Electricity generation from a three-horizontal-well enhanced geothermal system in the Qiabuqia geothermal field, China: slickwater fracturing treatments for different reservoir scenarios. Renewable Energy. 145, 65–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.024

[46] Held, S., Genter, A., Kohl, T., et al., 2014. Economic evaluation of geothermal reservoir performance through modeling the complexity of the operating EGS in Soultz-sous-Forêts. Geothermics. 51, 270–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.016

[47] Sircar, A., Solanki, K., Bist, N., et al., 2022. Enhanced geothermal systems – promises and challenges. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development. 11(2), 333–346.

[48] Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Liu, F., 2024. Thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) coupled simulation of the land subsidence due to aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) system in soft soil. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 16(6), 1952–1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.019

[49] Keller, J., Rath, V., Bruckmann, J., et al., 2020. SHEMAT-Suite: an open-source code for simulating flow, heat and species transport in porous media. SoftwareX. 12, 100533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100533

[50] Lu, X., Jordan, K.E., Wheeler, M.F., et al., 2022. Bayesian optimization for field-scale geological carbon storage [in Chinese]. Engineering. 18(11), 96–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.06.011

[51] Pandey, S.N., Singh, M., 2020. Artificial neural network to predict the thermal drawdown of enhanced geothermal system. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 143(1), 010901-1–010901-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048067

[52] García, N.C., Albert, B.J.F., 2023. The HYDROTHERM code as a tool for integrating geophysics in geothermal prospecting [in Spanish]. Boletín Geológico Minero. 134(3), 27–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin/134.3/002

[53] Podgorney, R., Finnila, A., Simmons, S., et al., 2021. A reference thermal-hydrologic-mechanical native state model of the Utah FORGE enhanced geothermal site. Energies. 14(16), 4758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164758

[54] Zhang, Q., Li, H., Liu, Y., et al., 2025. Effect of fracture parameters on the thermal recovery performance of enhanced geothermal system. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 47(1), 44–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2024.2440604

[55] Xue, Z., Zhang, K., Zhang, C., et al., 2023. Comparative data-driven enhanced geothermal systems forecasting models: a case study of Qiabuqia field in China. Energy. 280, 128255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128255

[56] Cui, X., Ngai, Y.W.L., 2021. A 3D thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling model for enhanced geothermal systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 143, 104744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104744