Characteristics of Multiplanetary Systems with One Host Star

Elza Buslaeva

1. Physical Department, Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia
2. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU), Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, 1(2) Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia

Elena Belenkaya

Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP MSU), Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, 1(2) Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/eps.v3i2.1025

Received: 23 January 2024; Received in revised form: 11 May 2024; Accepted: 23 May 2024; Published: 7 June 2024

Copyright © 2024 Author(s). Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

The characteristics of 100 multiplanetary systems with single central stars of different spectral classes were examined. The data for these systems were taken from the NASA Exoplanet Archive. Among the systems, those were selected for which the exoplanet mass and radius were simultaneously known. For 293 planets from these systems masses, radii, orbital radii, orbital periods, and types of exoplanets were analyzed. It occurred that the rarest type in such systems were terrestrial planets and after them the gas giants. Most of the exoplanets belonged to the type of super-earths. The distribution of the number of planets in a system showed that systems with many exoplanets are less common than those with a smaller number. The system with the largest number of exoplanets in this sample is TRAPPIST-1 (7 planets systems). The properties of exoplanets in multiplanetary systems with one host star in terms of characteristics, orbital sizes, and number of planets, are investigated and compared with the Solar system. It turned out that the Solar system is rather an exception to the considered extrasolar multiplanetary systems.

Keywords: Exoplanets; Planetary systems; Stars


References

[1] Otegi, J.F., Dorn, C., Helled, R., et al., 2020. Impact of the measured parameters of exoplanets on the inferred internal structure. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 640, A135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038006

[2] Martínez, R.R., Martin, D.V., Gaudi, B.S., et al., 2023. A comparison of the composition of planets in single-planet and multiplanet systems orbiting M dwarfs. The Astronomical Journal. 166(4), 137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aced9a

[3] Fatheddin, H., Sajadian, S., 2023. Detecting multiplanetary systems with gravitational microlensing and the roman space telescope. The Astronomical Journal. 166, 140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aced8b

[4] Udry, S., Santos, N.C., 2007. Statistical properties of exoplanets. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 45, 397–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110529

[5] On the Question of Gravitational Instability of the Protoplanetary Disk of the Sun. Part I. Statement of the Problem. Preprint, Inst. Appl. Math. [Internet] [cited 2024 Jan 20]. Available from: https://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.asp?id=2014-34 (in Russian).

[6] Some Models of Proto-Planet Disk of the Sun at an Initial Stage of it Evolution. Preprint, Inst. Appl. Math., The Russian Academy of Science [Internet] [cited 2024 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.keldysh.ru/papers/2006/prep70/prep2006_70.html (in Russian).

[7] Belenkaya, E., Khodachenko, M., 2012. Accreation and current disks controlled by strong magnetic field. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2, 81–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2012.22012

[8] Williams, J.P., Cieza, L.A., 2011. Protoplanetary disks and their evolution. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 49, 67–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102548

[9] Bartram, P., 2021. Pushing the envelope of exoplanet evolution modelling [Ph.D. thesis]. Southampton: University of Southampton. Available from: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/456719/1/PeterBartram_thesis_unsigned.pdf

[10] Cridland, A.J., Rosotti, G.P., Tabone, B., et al., 2022. Early planet formation in embedded protostellar disks-Setting the stage for the first generation of planetesimals. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 662, A90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142207

[11] Heller, R., 2019. Formation of hot Jupiters through disk migration and evolving stellar tides. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 628, A42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833486

[12] Dawson, R.I., Johnson, J.A., 2018. Origins of hot Jupiters. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 56, 175–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853

[13] Winn, J.N., Fabrycky, D.C., 2015. The occurrence and architecture of exoplanetary systems. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 53, 409–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122246

[14] Zhu, W., Dong, S., 2021. Exoplanet statistics and theoretical implications. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 59, 291–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-020055

[15] Wright, J., Upadhyay, S., Marcy, G., et al., 2009. Ten new and updated multiplanet systems and a survey of exoplanetary systems. The Astrophysical Journal. 693,1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1084

[16] Marov, M.Y., Ipatov, S.I., 2023. Migration processes in the Solar System and their role in the evolution of the Earth and planets. Physics Uspekhi. 66, 2–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.2021.08.039044

[17] Pichierri, G., Batygin, K., Morbidelli, A., 2019. The role of dissipative evolution for three-planet, near-resonant extrasolar systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 625, A7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935259

[18] Helled, R., 2023. The mass of gas giant planets: Is Saturn a failed gas giant? Astronomy and Astrophysics. 675, L8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346850

[19] Fulton, B.J., Erik, A.P., 2018. The California-Kepler survey. VII. Precise planet radii leveraging Gaia DR2 reveal the stellar mass dependence of the planet radius gap. The Astronomical Journal. 156, 264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aae828

[20] Nasralla, M., 2020. Fundamental properties and evolution of exoplanets and their host stars [Master’s thesis]. Manchester: The University of Manchester.