Environmental Assessment of Coastal Sand Mining Using Proposed DPSIR Criteria: A Case of Hai Phong

Do Thi Thu Huong

Institute of Marine Environment and Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hai Phong, 180000,Vietnam

Do Gia Khanh

Hai Phong Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hai Phong, 180000, Vietnam;
Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam

Nguyen Van Thao

Institute of Marine Environment and Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hai Phong, 180000,Vietnam

Lan Dinh Tran

Institute of Marine Environment and Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hai Phong, 180000, Vietnam;
Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v5i1.812

Received: 8 February 2023; Received in revised form: 28 February 2023; Accepted: 15 March 2023; Published:18 March 2023

Copyright © 2023 Yogendra Acharya,Namdev Upadhyaya,Sudha Sapkota. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

The environmental impact of coastal sand mining activities in Hai Phong city was assessed using ten proposed sustainable criteria for socioeconomic development, and ecological and environmental protection. These ten criteria were developed by the analysis of the DynamicsPressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, including one driver and pressure criterion (D and P), seven status and impact criteria (S and I), and two response criteria (R). Each criterion is quantified according to five specific evaluation criteria corresponding to the evaluation score from 1 to 5. The results of the ten criterion application for environmental impact assessment of coastal mining Hai Phong by weighting show that the areas with economic activities, benthic biodiversity, and coastal ecosystems are most negatively impacted (score 4/5 and 3.5/5). Other subjects suffer low to moderate impacts (score 1/5 to 3/5). The environmental impact of sand mining (2015-2020) is generally moderate (score ranging from 2/5 to 3/5). The set of adjusted criteria can be applied to similar activities in coastal provinces and cities in Vietnam

Keywords: Coastal area; Marine ecosystems; Environmental impact; Vietnam


References

[1] Khanh, D.G., 2022. Study on environmental effects of sand mining and shipping channel dredging in Hai Phong coastal waters [PhD thesis]. Hanoi, Vietnam: Graduate University of Science and Technology.

[2] Pitchaiah, P.S., 2017. Impacts of sand mining on environment—A review. SSRG International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science. 4(1), 1-5.

[3] Mensah, J.V., 1997. Causes and effect of coastal sand mining in Ghana. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 18, 69-88.

[4] Bayram, A., Onsoy, H., 2015. Sand and gravel mining impact on the surface water quality: A case study from the city of Tirebolu (Giresun Province, NE Turkey). Environmental Earth Science. 73, 1997-2011.

[5] Hurme, A.K., Pullen, E.J., 1988. Biological effects of marine sand mining and fill placement for beach replenishment: Lessons for other uses. Marine Mining. 7(2), 123-136.

[6] Boyd, S.E., Limpenny, D.S., Rees, H.L., et al., 2005. The effects of marine sand and gravel extraction on the macrobenthos at a commercial dredging site (results 6 years post-dredging). ICES Journal of Marine Science. 62, 145-162.

[7] Desprez, M., Pearce, B., Le Bot, S., 2010. The biological impact of overflowing sands around a marine aggregate extraction site: Dieppe (eastern English Channel). ICES Journal of Marine Science. 67, 270- 277.

[8] Kowalska, A., Sobczyk, W., 2014. Negative and positive effects of the exploitation of gravelsand. Inzynieria Mineralna. 15(1), 105-109.

[9] Lan, T.D., Olsson, E.G.A., Alpokay, S., 2013. Environmental stresses and resource use in coastal urban and peri-urban regions DPSIR approach to SECOA’s 17 case studies. Sapienza Università Editrice Digilab: Rome, Italy.

[10] Kaikkonen, L., Venesjärvi, R., Nygård, H., et al., 2018. Assessing the impacts of seabed mineral extraction in the deep sea and coastal marine environments: Current methods and recommendations for environmental risk assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 135, 1183-1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.08.055

[11] Lan, T.D., 2007. Research in rational use of natural resources in the Northeastern coastal region of Vietnam based on environmental indicators [PhD thesis]. Hanoi: University of Natural Sciences, Hanoi National University.

[12] European Environment Agency (EEA), 1999. Environmental Indicator: Typology and Overview. Available from: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files/biodiversita/Smeets_Environmental_indicators_1999.pdf

[13] Merino-Saum, A., Halla, P., Superti, V., et al., 2020. Indicators for urban sustainability: Key lessons from a systematic analysis of 67 measurement initiatives. Ecological Indicators. 119, 106879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106879

[14] Khanh, D.G., Huong, D.T.T., Vinh, V.D., et al., 2019. Zoning marine disposal for dredged material management: A case study in Vietnam. Sustainable Marine Structures. 1(2), 19-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v1i2.141

[15] Huong, D.T.T., Ha, N.T.T., Khanh, D.G., et al., 2022. Sustainability assessment of coastal ecosystems: DPSIR analysis for beaches at the Northeast Coast of Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 24, 5032-5051.

[16] Lan, T.D., 2009. Assessment of some marine using sustainable utilization indicators in Hai Phong— Quang Ninh coastal area, Vietnam. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management. 12(3), 243-248.

[17] Lan, T.D., Chien, H.T., 2021. Proposition of economic valuation index for sustainable ecosystem management: An island case study in Vietnam. Modern Environmental Science and Engineering. 6(11), 1196- 1204.

[18] Wang, C., Qu, A., Wang, P., et al., 2013. Estuarine ecosystem health assessment based on the DPSIR framework: A case of the Yangtze Estuary, China. Journal of Coastal Research. 165, 1236-1241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2112/si65-209.1

[19] Harold, A., Limestone, M.T., (editors), 2002. The delphi method techniques and applications. Portland State University and New Jersey Institute of Technology: USA. pp. 618.

[20] Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL.

[21] Pielou, E.C., 1975. Ecological diversity. Wiley Interscience: New York.

[22] Mielck, F., Hass, H.C., Michaelis, R., et al., 2019. Morphological changes due to marine aggregate extraction for beach nourishment in the German Bight (SE North Sea). Geo-Marine Letters. 39, 47-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-018-0556-4