Tsunami Preparedness in the Coastal Tourism Area of Palabuhanratu Bay, West Java
Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53122, Indonesia
Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53122, Indonesia
Muhammad Azmy Ikhsani
Department of Architecture, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53122, Indonesia
Alena Najwa Lulu Birki Zain
Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53122, Indonesia
Amru Muyassar Raharjo
Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53122, Indonesia
Hidayat
Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53122, Indonesia
Muhammad Wisnu Zulva Al Azmi
Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53122, Indonesia
Haidar Fadhila Rahman
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu City 64002, Taiwan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v8i1.2868
Received: 27 October 2025 | Revised: 30 December 2025 | Accepted: 28 January 2026 | Published Online: 12 February 2026
Copyright © 2026 Wahyu Widiyanto, Sanidhya Nika Purnomo, Muhammad Azmy Ikhsani, Alena Najwa Lulu Birki Zain, Amru Muyassar Raharjo, Hidayat, Muhammad Wisnu Zulva Al Azmi, Haidar Fadhila Rahman. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
The Sunda Strait segment constitutes a subduction zone near the periphery of the Indonesian Ring of Fire that has not released its energy through a significant earthquake for an extended period, hence referred to as a seismic gap. The anticipated magnitude of this earthquake is projected to be MW 8.7. If this possibility occurs, it will lead to a significant earthquake and tsunami. Consequently, community preparedness is imperative. This article examines inexpensive and easily executable preparations. Palabuhanratu Bay, a heavily populated and geographically distinctive tourism destination in West Java, was chosen. A tsunami simulation will be executed to ascertain the height, arrival timing, and potential inundation area of the tsunami. An efficient evacuation path will be devised. A community-based mitigation strategy is presented, involving the installation of lifebuoys that serve as lifesaving devices during a tsunami, aimed at decreasing drowning fatalities caused by runup. Simulation results in the research region show a tsunami height exceeding the major tsunami category (>3 m), with the observation site recording a height of 7–10 m. The tsunami arrival time varies between 17 and 23 min. The projected area of probable inundation is 6.24 km2. Dijkstra's algorithm was employed to identify 20 alternate evacuation routes at each observation location. Evacuation durations ranged from 16 to 18 min, with distances varying from 390 m to 1040 m. Based on insights from prior tsunamis, many survivors survived by grasping floating debris; this study suggests the strategic placement of denser coastal buoys along designated evacuation pathways.
Keywords: Tsunami; Mitigation; Preparedness; Evacuation; Lifebuoy; Megathrust; Sunda Strait
References
[1] Widiyantoro, S., Gunawan, E., Muhari, A., et al., 2020. Implications for megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis from seismic gaps south of Java Indonesia. Scientific Reports. 10, 15274.
[2] National Center for Earthquake Studies (PuSGeN), 2025. Indonesia’s Earthquake Source and Hazard Map for 2024. Ministry of Public Work: Jakarta, Indonesia. (in Indonesian)
[3] Aziza, B., Muntasib, E.K.S.H., Hermawan, R., 2023. Impact of Tourism Activity in Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu Geopark (CPG), Sukabumi, West Java. Media Konservasi. 28, 43–50.
[4] Supendi, P., Widiyantoro, S., Rawlinson, N., et al., 2023. On the potential for megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis off the southern coast of West Java and southeast Sumatra, Indonesia. Natural Hazards. 116, 1315–1328.
[5] Gulo, E.R., Koestoer, R.H.S., 2024. Comparison of coastal tourism destination management against natural disasters of New Zealand and Indonesia. ASEAN Natural Disaster Mitigation and Education Journal. 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.61511/andmej.v1i2.2024.377
[6] National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), 2025. National Disaster Management Agency Regulation Number 1 of 2025 concerning the National Disaster Management Plan for 2025–2029. BNPB: East Jakarta, Indonesia. (in Indonesian)
[7] Lavrentiev, M., Lysakov, K., Marchuk, A., et al., 2021. Algorithmic Design of an FPGA-Based Calculator for Fast Evaluation of Tsunami Wave Danger. Algorithms. 14(12), 343.
[8] Wang, X., 2009. User Manual for COMCOT Version 1.7 (First Draft). GNS Science (Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences): Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
[9] Mohamed, E.S., Regina, M.Y., 2025. Implementation and validation of the TIMPULSE-SIM model for predicting tsunami wave behavior in the 2024 Kyushu, Hyuganada sea and 2011 Tohoku, Honshu tsunamis in Japan region. Natural Hazards. 121, 6921–6953.
[10] Le Quéré, P.A., Nistor, I., Mohammadian, A., 2020. Numerical Modeling of Tsunami-Induced Scouring around a Square Column: Performance Assessment of FLOW-3D and Delft3D. Journal of Coastal Research. 36(6), 1278–1291.
[11] Borzì, L., Scala, P., Distefano, S., et al., 2024. Tsunami propagation and flooding maps: An application for the Island of Lampedusa, Sicily Channel, Italy. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 49, 4842–4861.
[12] Deltares System, 2012. Delft3D-FLOW User Manual: Simulation of Multi-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Flows and Transport Phenomena, Including Sediments. Deltares: Delft, The Netherlands
[13] Scala, A., Lorito, S., Escalante Sánchez, C., et al., 2024. Assessing the Optimal Tsunami Inundation Modeling Strategy for Large Earthquakes in Subduction Zones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 129(9), e2024JC020941.
[14] Sedeño-Noda, A., Colebrook, M., 2019. A biobjective Dijkstra algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research. 276(1), 106–118.
[15] Zhu, Y., Li, H., Wang, Z., et al., 2022. Optimal Evacuation Route Planning of Urban Personnel at Different Risk Levels of Flood Disasters Based on the Improved 3D Dijkstra’s Algorithm. Sustainability. 14(16), 10250.
[16] Mirahadi, F., McCabe, B.Y., 2021. EvacuSafe: A real-time model for building evacuation based on Dijkstra’s algorithm. Journal of Building Engineering. 34, 101687.
[17] Li, B., Hou, J., Wang, X., et al., 2023. High-Resolution Flood Numerical Model and Dijkstra Algorithm Based Risk Avoidance Routes Planning. Water Resources Management. 37(8), 3243–3258.
[18] Bhat, R., Rao, P.K., Kamath, C.R., et al., 2024. Comparative analysis of Bellman-Ford and Dijkstra’s algorithms for optimal evacuation route planning in multi-floor buildings. Cogent Engineering. 11(1), 2319394.
[19] Pierro, R., Ember, C.R., Pitek, E., et al., 2022. Local knowledge and practice in disaster relief: A worldwide cross-cultural comparison of coping mechanisms. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 76, 102988.
[20] Widiyanto, W., Santoso, P.B., Hsiao, S.-C., et al., 2019. Post-event field survey of 28 September 2018 Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 19(12), 2781–2794.
[21] Widiyanto, W., Hsiao, S.-C., Chen, W.-B., et al., 2020. Run-up, inundation, and sediment characteristics of the 22 December 2018 Sunda Strait tsunami, Indonesia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 20(4), 933–946.
[22] Shaw, R., Izumi, T., Djalante, R., et al. (Eds.), 2025. Two Decades from the Indian Ocean Tsunami: Key Challenges and Advancements. Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore.
[23] Isya, H.R.M., Arrasyid, R., Ihsan, H.M., et al., 2024. Tsunami Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy in Ciletuh–Palabuhanratu UNESCO Global Geopark. E3S Web Conference. 600, 01001.
[24] Environment and Road Safety Sector Directorate General of Highways, 2023. Tsunami Natural Disaster Evacuation Route Planning. Environment and Road Safety Sector Directorate General of Highways: Jakarta, Indonesia. (in Indonesian)
[25] Wells, D.L., Coppersmith, K.J., 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 84(4), 974–1002.
[26] Blaser, L., Kruger, F., Ohrnberger, M., et al., 2010. Scaling Relations of Earthquake Source Parameter Estimates with Special Focus on Subduction Environment. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 100(6), 2914–26.
[27] Shibayama, T., Esteban, M., Nistor, I., et al., 2013. Classification of Tsunami and Evacuation Areas. Natural Hazards. 67, 365–386.
[28] Fathianpour, A., Evans, B., Babaeian Jelodar, M., et al., 2024. Environmental factors in tsunami evacuation simulation: Topography, traffic jam, human behaviour. Natural Hazards. 120, 12797–12815.
[29] Chen, C., Mostafizi, A., Wang, H., et al., 2022. Evacuation behaviors in tsunami drills. Natural Hazards. 112(1), 845–871.
[30] Nakaya, N., Nemoto, H., Yi, C., et al., 2018. Effect of tsunami drill experience on evacuation behavior after the onset of the Great East Japan Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 28, 206–213.
[31] Gowan, M.E., Sloan, J.A., Kirk, R.C., 2015. Prepared for what? addressing the disaster readiness gap beyond preparedness for survival. BMC Public Health. 15, 1139.
[32] Sofyan, H., Rahmatina, G., Hidayati, A., et al., 2025. Are we prepared for the next one? Evaluating community evacuation preparedness 20 years after the Indian Ocean tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 121, 105430.
[33] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR: Geneva, Switzerland.
[34] Ronkay, F., Molnar, B., Gere, D., et al., 2021. Plastic waste from marine environment: Demonstration of possible routes for recycling by different manufacturing technologies. Waste Management. 119, 101–110.
[35] Dong, L., Dong, C., Zhi, W., et al., 2024. A comprehensive approach to physical recycling of hazardous waste HDPE industrial drums: Overcoming challenges in safety and foam interference. Chemical Engineering Journal. 497, 154502.
[36] Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., Dias, N. (Eds.), 2021. Multi Hazard Early Warning and Disaster Risks. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland.
[37] Nallapaneni, M.K., Hait, S., Priya, A., et al., 2023. From Trash to Treasure: Unlocking the Power of Resource Conservation, Recycling, and Waste Management Practices. Sustainability. 15(18), 13863.
[38] Rahmafitria, F., Sukmayadi, V., Suryadi, K., et al., 2021. Disaster management in Indonesian tourist destinations: how institutional roles and community resilience are mediated. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes. 13(3), 324–339.
[39] Setyonegoro, W., Gusman, A.R., Hanif, M., et al., 2024. Typical of Tsunami Hazard Potential from Earthquake and Landslide Sources in Palabuhanratu Bay, Indonesia. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 181, 1381–1412.
[40] Bernard, E.N., 2023. Tsunami Preparedness: Is Zero Casualties Possible? Pure and Applied Geophysics. 180, 1573–1586.