Terrestrial Education and Marine Structural Design: A Post-Sustainability Framework for Ocean Engineering Innovation

Antonio Del Mastro

Mars Planet Technologies, Curno Bg, 24035 Via Dalmine, 10a Italy

Giovanni Garofalo

Mars Planet Technologies / ISAE-SUPAERO, Toulouse, 54032 10 Av. Edouard Belin BP, France.

Pietro Veragouth

Mars Planet Technologies / Swiss Institute for Disruptive Innovation, Bedano, 6930 Via industria 24, Switzerland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v7i3.2084

Received: 29 April 2025 | Revised: 27 May 2025 | Accepted: 19 June 2025 | Published Online: 23 July 2025

Copyright © 2025 Antonio Del Mastro, Giovanni Garofalo, Pietro Veragouth. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

This paper argues that in an era of accelerating climate change and rising sea levels, what truly matters is not merely the marine structure itself, but the foresight and adaptability embedded in its conception. As global urbanization intensifies along coastlines, and as storms grow stronger and ecosystems degrade, there is an urgent need for transformative approaches to ocean engineering and design. We introduce Terrestrial Education, an interdisciplinary framework that moves beyond conventional sustainability models by integrating ecological intelligence, regenerative systems thinking, and advanced technologies. Unlike traditional approaches that focus on minimizing harm, Terrestrial Education emphasizes active ecological restoration, socio-technical evolution, and planetary stewardship. Drawing on lessons from space exploration, such as closed-loop life support systems, autonomous environmental management, and modular habitat design, we demonstrate how these principles can inspire resilient marine infrastructures, including floating platforms, submerged laboratories, and bio-integrated offshore structures. These designs are envisioned not only for their physical durability but also for their capacity to regenerate ecosystems and foster meaningful human interaction with marine environments. The paper highlights key priorities such as adaptability to climate extremes, energy efficiency through marine renewables, and environmental integration using biomimetic materials. By aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals of the blue economy, Terrestrial Education offers a future-oriented model that harmonizes environmental, technological, and economic objectives. Ultimately, this framework provides a conceptual and operational foundation for reimagining marine structures as catalysts for innovation, educational transformation, and resilient planetary futures in the climate era.

Keywords: Terrestrial Education; Marine Structures; Floating Platforms; Blue Economy; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Marine Engineering Innovation; Submerged Facilities; Underwater Habitats


References

[1] IPCC, 2023. Special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/ (cited 30 June 2025).

[2] Del Mastro, A., 2025. Terrestrial education: A conceptual shift beyond sustainability. Mars Planet Technologies. Available from: https://zenodo.org/records/15512505 (cited 30 June 2025).

[3] UNESCO-IOC, 2021. Ocean literacy for all: A toolkit. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260721 (cited 30 June 2025).

[4] ECOncrete Tech, n.d. Eco-engineered marine concrete. Available from: https://econcretetech.com (cited 30 June 2025).

[5] Reef Design Lab, 2022. 3D Printing Living Seawalls: Innovation for Biodiversity. Reef Design Lab: Melbourne, Australia.

[6] NASA, n.d. Regenerative life support systems. NSS course materials. Available from: Website URL (cited 30 June 2025).

[7] Sholikhah, M., Putra, I.B., Nugroho, A.S., et al., 2023. Strength assessment of stiffened-panel structures against buckling loads: FE benchmarking and analysis. Marine Structures. 89, 103456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103456

[8] World Economic Forum, 2024. AI in conservation and monitoring ecosystems. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/ai-in-marine-conservation (cited 30 June 2025).

[9] Offshore, 2024. Global wave and tidal energy market set for 'significant growth' by 2034 Available from: https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/news/55274959/global-wave-and-tidal-energy-market-set-for-significant-growth-by-2034 (cited 15 March 2025).

[10] NASA, n.d. NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations (NEEMO). Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/NEEMO/main/index.html (cited 30 June 2025).

[11] Nekrasov, A., Popov, D., Lebedev, M., 2023. Using semicircular sampling to increase sea water/ice discrimination altitude. Remote Sensing of Environment. 298, 113885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113885

[12] Rusvan, R., Alavi, M., Chen, X., 2023. Evaluation of tidal energy potential using two-way tidal energy model. Renewable Energy. 213, 1501–1514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.07.017

[13] MATE Inspiration for Innovation, 2025. MATE ROV Competition: Marine Advanced Technology Education. Available from: https://materovcompetition.org (cited 30 June 2025).

[14] Oceanix., UN-Habitat., 2021. OCEANIX Busan: The world’s first prototype sustainable floating city. Oceanix/UN-Habitat: New York, Ny, USA.

[15] Rizzo, A., Cordaro, A., 2021. Biomimetic approaches to sustainable offshore design: integrating form, function, and ecosystem performance. Marine Technology Journal. 55(2), 45–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.55.2.6

[16] United Nations, 2023. Marine Spatial Planning: A Step-by-Step Approach toward Ecosystem-Based Management. UNESCO-IOC and UN Environment: Paris, France.

[17] Global Partnership on AI (GPAI)., 2023. Responsible AI in the Blue Economy: Guidelines and Case Studies. https://gpai.ai/projects/blue-ai.pdf (accessed 30 June 2025)

[18] Cousteau, F., 2022. PROTEUS: a modular underwater habitat for science, research, and innovation. Marine Technology Reports. 12(1), 10–18.

[19] DEEP., 2023. DEEP’s Sentinel Habitat Platform Overview. Available from: https://deep.io/sentinel (accessed 30 June 2025).

[20] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2021. Innovation Outlook: Ocean Energy Technologies. Abu Dhabi: IRENA. Available from: https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Dec/Innovation-Outlook-Ocean-Energy-Technologies (accessed 30 June 2025).

[21] World Economic Forum, 2021. What Ocean Sustainability Means and Why It Matters. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/06/what-ocean-sustainability-means-and-why-it-matters/ (accessed 30 June 2025).

[22] BIG, Arup, MIT Center for Ocean Engineering, and SAMOO, n.d. Contributors to the OCEANIX Busan Floating City Project. Project partner pages and architectural briefs, 2021–2025. Available from: https://oceanixcity.com (accessed 12 July 2025).

[23] ISO 14001, 2015. Environmental Management Systems. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html (accessed 12 July 2025).

[24] ISO 21401, 2018. Sustainability Management System for Accommodation Establishments. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/71532.html (accessed 12 July 2025).

[25] International EPD System, 2024. What Is an Environmental Product Declaration? Available from: https://www.environdec.com (accessed 12 July 2025).

[26] Baca Architects, 2020. Aquatecture: Building for a Changing Climate. RIBA Publishing: London, UK. pp. 1–220.

[27] Duarte, C.M., Agusti, S., Barbier, E., et al., 2020. Rebuilding marine life. Nature. 580, 39–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2146-7