Sustainable Marine Structures

Development of an Environmental Impact Methodology for Arctic Shipping: Exploring FMEA and STPA applications considering a Dynamic (varying) Baseline.

Giacomo Stirpe

Department of Mechanical, Civil and Material Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger 4021, Norway

Ove Tobias Gudmestad

Department of Mechanical, Civil and Material Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger 4021, Norway; Department of Technology and Safety,University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø 9019, Norway

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v6i2.1110

Received: 21 May 2024 | Revised: 9 August 2024 | Accepted: 12 September 2024 | Published Online: 19 September 2024.

---

Abstract

Arctic shipping poses environmental risks due to the region's fragile ecosystems and rapid climate changes. Effective risk assessment tools are needed to ensure sustainable expansion and to carry out environmental impact assessments. This paper explores applications of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) coupled with the consequences of a “Dynamic baseline approach” for Arctic shipping environmental impact assessment.

Shipping entails complex interactions between environmental, technical, human, and organizational factors. FMEA identifies failure modes and their effects through component-level analysis. STPA examines how unsafe control actions can emerge from interactions between system components. Combining these techniques with a dynamic (variable) baseline, accounting for inherent ongoing changing Arctic conditions, offers a robust methodology.

A qualitative case study shows that prioritizing hazards by risk, yields highest concerns, as increased greenhouse gas emissions, black carbon deposition on ice and snow, and response delays to accidents represent some of the most important identified threats to the environment. The use of FMEA and STPA are complementary, and differences are highlighted.

The methodology applied, should be representative for the qualitative risk analysis methodology, and while the findings are impacted by the perspectives of the authors, the process followed is intended to identify and rank risks in a consistent manner.

Mitigations measures must be in place to target these issues. Constant monitoring of the changing ecological and socioeconomic Arctic baselines supports the responses.

This methodology offers a starting point for systematically addressing environmental impact risks in the data-limited Arctic. Integrating failure modes and effect analysis, system theories and dynamic baselines, account for identification of the complex interactions, influencing environmental risks in this rapidly evolving region.

Keywords: Arctic shipping; Environmental impact analysis; Arctic baseline; Dynamic baseline; Risk analysis; FMEA; STPA; Risk mitigation prioritization

---

References

[1] AMAP, CAFF and SDWG, 2013. Identification of Arctic marine areas of heightened ecological and cultural significance: Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA) IIc. [online] Available at: <https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/items/1d567c4b-723b-48fa-8510-828edede09a7> [Accessed 28 September 2023].

[2] Dawson, J., Carter, N.A., van Luijk, N., Cook, A., Weber, M., Orawiec, A., Stewart, E. and Holloway, J.S., 2021. Tourism vessels and low impact shipping corridors in Arctic Canada: Trends, risks, community perspectives and management strategies. https://doi.org/10.20381/d3dd-yk49.

[3] Panahi, R., Afenyo, M. and Adolf, K.Y.N., 2022. Developing a resilience index for safer and more resilient arctic shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2061059.

[4] Huntington, H.P., Olsen, J., Zdor, E., Zagorskiy, A., Shin, H.C., Romanenko, O., Kaltenborn, B., Dawson, J., Davies, J. and Abou-Abbsi, E., 2023. Effects of Arctic commercial shipping on environments and communities: context, governance, priorities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, [online] 118, p.103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103731.

[5] Biamah, E.K., Kiio, J. and Kogo, B., 2013. Environmental Impact Assessment in Kenya. Developments in Earth Surface Processes, 16, pp.237–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59559-1.00018-9.

[6] UNEP, 1988. Environmental impact assessment: basic procedures for developing countries. Nairobi.

[7] Sabeva, M., 2015. Environmental impact assessment - necessity, principles and specificities. Trakia Journal of Science, 13(Suppl.2), pp.339–345. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2015.s.02.072.

[8] Min, C., Yang, Q., Chen, D., Yang, Y., Zhou, X., Shu, Q. and Liu, J., 2022. The Emerging Arctic Shipping Corridors. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl099157.

[9] PAME, 2020. The increase in Arctic Shipping: 2013-2019. [online] Available at: <https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/items/f46b780b-55e5-49b0-9f6a-9afb55a700b4> [Accessed 28 September 2023].

[10] Bennett, M.M., Stephenson, S.R., Yang, K., Bravo, M.T. and De Jonghe, B., 2020. The opening of the Transpolar Sea Route: Logistical, geopolitical, environmental, and socioeconomic impacts. Marine Policy, 121, p.104178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104178.

[11] National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1966. Procedure for Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). [online] Available at: <https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19700076494/downloads/19700076494.pdf>.

[12] Stamatis, D.H., 2003. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Asq Quality Press.

[13] IEC 31010, 2019. Risk management: risk assessment techniques. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.

[14] Kim, H., Lundteigen, M.A., Hafver, A. and Pedersen, F.B., 2020. Utilization of risk priority number to systems-theoretic process analysis: A practical solution to manage a large number of unsafe control actions and loss scenarios. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 235(1), pp.92–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006x20939717.

[15] Abrecht, B., 2016. Systems Theoretic Process Analysis applied to an Offshore Supply Vessel Dynamic Positioning System. [online] Available at: <http://sunnyday.mit.edu/Abrecht_Thesis.pdf> [Accessed 6 October 2023].

[16] Leveson, N., 2012. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, [Piscataqay, New Jersey].

[17] Leveson, N.G. and Thomas, J.P., 2018. STPA Handbook. [online] MIT. Available at: <https://psas.scripts.mit.edu/home/get_file.php?name=STPA_handbook.pdf>.

[18] Vihma, T., 2014. Effects of Arctic Sea Ice Decline on Weather and Climate: A Review. Surveys in Geophysics, 35(5), pp.1175–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9284-0.

[19] Sun, X., Tingting L.V., Sun, Q., Ding, Z., Shen, H., Gao, Y., He, Y., Fu, M. and Li, C., 2023. Analysis of Spatiotemporal Variations and Influencing Factors of Sea Ice Extent in the Arctic and Antarctic. Remote Sensing, 15(23), pp.5563–5563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15235563.

[20] Screen, J.A. and Simmonds, I., 2011. Declining summer snowfall in the Arctic: causes, impacts and feedbacks. Climate Dynamics, 38(11-12), pp.2243–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1105-2.

[21] Bintanja, R. and Selten, F.M., 2014. Future increases in Arctic precipitation linked to local evaporation and sea-ice retreat. Nature, [online] 509(7501), pp.479–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13259.

[22] Kopec, B.G., Feng, X., Michel, F.A. and Posmentier, E.S., 2015. Influence of sea ice on Arctic precipitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(1), pp.46–51. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504633113.

[23] Cheng, M., Qiu, Y., Yang, M., Huang, L., Chen, J. and Li, Y., 2022. An analysis of the characteristics of precipitation in the Northeast passage and its relationship with sea ice. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.890787.

[24] PAME, 2019. Marine Litter including Microplastics in the Arctic. [online] Available at: <https://pame.is/images/03_Projects/Arctic_Marine_Pollution/Litter/Desktop_study/Desktop_Study_on_marine_litter.pdf> [Accessed 15 January 2024].

[25] AMAP, 2021a. Litter and Microplastics Monitoring Guidelines Arctic Monitoring & Assessment Programme version 1.0 AMAP Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). [online] Available at: <https://www.amap.no/documents/download/6761/inline> [Accessed 15 January 2024].

[26] Bergmann, M., Collard, F., Fabres, J., Gabrielsen, G.W., Provencher, J.F., Rochman, C.M., van Sebille, E. and Tekman, M.B., 2022. Plastic Pollution in the Arctic. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, [online] 3, pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00279-8.

[27] Figenschau, N. and Lu, J., 2022. Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Atmospheric Emissions from Shipping along the Northern Sea Route. Sustainability, 14(3), p.1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031359.

[28] Storaas, G., 2024. Black Carbon and Methane. [online] Arctic Council. Available at: <https://arctic-council.org/about/task-expert/egbcm/> [Accessed 18 January 2024].

[29] AMAP, 2021b. Arctic Climate Change Update 2021: Key Trends and Impacts Summary for Policy-Makers Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme. [online] Available at: <https://www.amap.no/documents/download/6759/inline>.

[30] Awong, A.D. and Gudmestad, O.T., 2023. Availability of fresh water in cold climate regions. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1294(1), pp.012034–012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1294/1/012034.

[31] Hu, F.S., Higuera, P.E., Duffy, P., Chipman, M.L., Rocha, A.V., Young, A.M., Kelly, R. and Dietze, M.C., 2015. Arctic tundra fires: natural variability and responses to climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(7), pp.369–377. https://doi.org/10.1890/150063.

[32] Eisted, R. and Christensen, T.H., 2011. Waste management in Greenland: current situation and challenges. Waste Management & Research, 29(10), pp.1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x10395421.

[33] Magnusson, K., Jörundsdóttir, H., Norén, F., Lloyd, H., Talvitie, J. and Setälä, O., 2016. Microlitter in sewage treatment systems A Nordic perspective on waste water treatment plants as pathways for microscopic anthropogenic particles to marine systems. [online] Available at: <https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:923936/FULLTEXT01.pdf> [Accessed 8 December 2022].

[34] Maksimenko, A., 2023. Climate Change and the Expansion of Arctic Shipping. [online] Available at: <https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/19593/Maksimenko_Arsenii.pdf?sequence=5>

[35] Pettit, H., 2020. Arctic declares state of emergency after thousands of tons of diesel leak into river. [online] New York Post. Available at: <https://nypost.com/2020/06/02/arctic-declares-state-of-emergency-after-thousands-of-tons-of-diesel-leak-into-river/> [Accessed 7 February 2024].

[36] Pogojeva, M.P., Chekmeneva, N.A., Dolgova, A.O., Matveeva, I.S., Babkin, E.M. and Sysolyatin, R.G., 2023. Heavy Metals in Soil and in Some Environmental Components of Alexandra Land Island (the Franz Josef Land Archipelago). Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 48(4), pp.376–381. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068373923040118.

[37] Cosandey-Godin, A., 2022. Making noise for quieter ships: Why we need to reduce underwater noise pollution. [online] WWF.CA. Available at: <https://wwf.ca/stories/ships-reduce-underwater-noise-pollution/>.

[38] WWF, 2024. Underwater noise. [online] WWF Arctic. Available at: <https://www.arcticwwf.org/threats/underwater-noise/> [Accessed 7 February 2024].

[39] Popper, A.N., Hawkins, A.D., Fay, R.R., Mann, D.A., Bartol, S., Carlson, T.J., Coombs, S., Ellison, W.T., Gentry, R.L., Halvorsen, M.B., Løkkeborg, S., Rogers, P.H., Southall, B.L., Zeddies, D.G. and Tavolga, W.N., 2014. Sound Exposure Guidelines. Springer Briefs in Oceanography, pp.33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06659-2_7.

[40] Halliday, W.D., Pine, M.K. and Insley, S.J., 2020. Underwater noise and Arctic marine mammals: review and policy recommendations. Environmental Reviews, pp.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2019-0033.

[41] Elias, S., 2021. Impacts of Global Shipping to Arctic Ocean Ecosystems. Elsevier eBooks, pp.153–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-821555-5.00008-5.

[42] Arctic Council and PAME, 2009. Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment. [online] Available at: <https://www.pame.is/projects/arctic-marine-shipping/amsa> [Accessed 28 September 2023].

[43] Hapag - Lloyd Insights, 2017. The Icebergs Are Coming: Shipping in the North Atlantic. [online] MarineLink. Available at: <https://www.marinelink.com/news/icebergs-shipping425015> [Accessed 25 January 2024].

[44] Gurlev, I.V., Makosko, A.A. and Malygin, I.G., 2022. Analysis of the state and development of the transport system of the Northern Sea Route. Arktika. Èkologiâ i èkonomika, 12(2), pp.258–270. https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-2022-2-258-270.

[45] Pavlova, E.A., Alekseeva, T.A., Mironov, E. and Smolyanitsky, V., 2020. Specific Features of Iceberg Distribution According to Shipborne Observations in the Kara Sea in 2004-2019. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-4255-2020-12103.

[46] Gudmestad, O.T., 2022. Polar Ship Design and Operations. Routledge eBooks, pp.232–247. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003246015-18.

[47] Comer, B., Osipova, L., Georgeff, E. and Mao, X., 2020. The International Maritime Organization’s Proposed Arctic Heavy Fuel Oil Ban: Likely Impacts and Opportunities for Improvement. [online] Available at: <https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/Arctic-HFO-ban-sept2020.pdf> [Accessed 24 January 2024].

[48] Hofmann, B., 2022. Oil pollution and black carbon in the Arctic. Routledge eBooks, pp.228–239. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315149745-24.

[49] Lenton, T.M., 2012. Arctic Climate Tipping Points. AMBIO, 41(1), pp.10–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0221-x.

[50] Zhang, X., Sorteberg, A., Zhang, J., Gerdes, R. and Comiso, J.C., 2008. Recent radical shifts of atmospheric circulations and rapid changes in Arctic climate system. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(22). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl035607.

[51] Overland, J.E. and Wang, M., 2010. Large-scale atmospheric circulation changes are associated with the recent loss of Arctic sea ice. Tellus A. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v62i1.15661.

[52] Boers, N. and Rypdal, M., 2021. Critical slowing down suggests that the western Greenland Ice Sheet is close to a tipping point. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(21). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024192118.

[53] Overland, J.E. and Wang, M., 2013. When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free? Geophysical Research Letters, [online] 40(10), pp.2097–2101. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50316.

[54] Archer, D., Buffett, B. and Brovkin, V., 2008. Ocean methane hydrates as a slow tipping point in the global carbon cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), pp.20596–20601. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800885105.

[55] Khvorostyanov, D.V., Krinner, G., Ciais, P., Heimann, M. and Zimov, S.A., 2008. Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to global warming. Part I: model description and role of heat generated by organic matter decomposition. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 60(2), pp.250–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00333.x.

[56] Abbott, B.W., Rocha, A.V., Shogren, A., Zarnetske, J.P., Iannucci, F., Bowden, W.B., Bratsman, S.P., Patch, L., Watts, R., Fulweber, R., Frei, R.J., Huebner, A.M., Ludwig, S.M., Carling, G.T. and O’Donnell, J.A., 2021. Tundra wildfire triggers sustained lateral nutrient loss in Alaskan Arctic. Global Change Biology, 27(7), pp.1408–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15507.

[57] Abbott, B.W., 2022. Permafrost Climate Feedback. Springer eBooks, pp.189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81253-9_10.

[58] Marques, A., Hradec, J. and Rosenbaum, E., 2017. Baseline Assumptions in EC Impact Assessments Significance, Analysis and Recommendations. https://doi.org/10.2760/982695.

[59] Kossiakoff, A., Sweet, W.N., Seymour, S.J. and Biemer, S.M., 2011. Systems Engineering Principles and Practice. Hoboken, Nj, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[60] Trantzas, K., Gudmestad, O.T. and Abrahamsen, E.B., 2018. Considerations related to insurance of cruise traffic in the arctic waters. CRC Press eBooks, pp.135–139. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351174664-17.

[61] Chaal, M., Valdez Banda, O.A., Glomsrud, J.A., Basnet, S., Hirdaris, S. and Kujala, P., 2020. A framework to model the STPA hierarchical control structure of an autonomous ship. Safety Science, 132, p.104939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104939.

[62] Heikkilä, E., Wahlström, M. and Granholm, G., 2020. Towards maritime traffic coordination in the era of intelligent ships: a systems theoretic study. Sciendo eBooks, pp.243–248. https://doi.org/10.2478/9788395669606-020.

[63] Stirpe, G., 2024. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Increased Arctic Shipping. Master’s Thesis, University of Stavanger, Spring 2024.

[64] IMO, 2017. International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code). [online] Available at: <https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Documents/POLAR%20CODE%20TEXT%20AS%20ADOPTED.pdf>.

[65] Fedi, L., 2019. Arctic shipping law: from atomised legislations to integrated regulatory framework. In: Arctic Shipping Climate Change, Commercial Traffic and Port Development. Routledge.

[66] Henriksen, T., 2014. The Polar Code Ships in Cold Water -Arctic Issues Examined CMI. [online] Available at: <https://comitemaritime.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Tore-Henriksen-The-Polar-Code-Ships-in-Cold-Water-%E2%80%93-Arctic-Issues-Examined-Presentation.pdf> [Accessed 20 March 2024].

[67] IMO, 2021. Amendments to MARPOL Annex I (Prohibition on the use and carriage for use as fuel of heavy fuel oil by ships in Arctic waters). [online] Available at: <https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.329(76).pdf>.

[68] Prior, S., 2022. Review of Perceived Gaps and Challenges in the Implementation of the Polar Code. [online] Available at: <https://apiwwfarcticse.cdn.triggerfish.cloud/uploads/2022/04/12144330/22-4372_polar_code_220408_links-3.pdf>.

[69] Bartenstein, K. and Lalonde, S., 2019. Shipping in the Canadian and Russian Arctic. Routledge eBooks, pp.137–156. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351037464-11.

[70] NSR General Administration, 2024. NSR General Administration Rosatom. [online] nsr.rosatom.ru. Available at: <https://nsr.rosatom.ru/en/>.

[71] Governor of Svalbard, 2022. Heavy fuel oil ban. [online] Governor of Svalbard. Available at: <https://www.sysselmesteren.no/en/the-governor-of-svalbard/environmental-protection/pollution-waste-and-chemicals/heavy-fuel-oil-ban/#:~:text=From%201%20January%202022%2C%20it> [Accessed 20 March 2024].

[72] Tikka, S., 2021. Mitigating Environmental Impacts by Insurances in Arctic Shipping. [online] Available at: <https://helda.helsinki.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/4bfbfd35-fe23-4ef4-8ee5-1e4477c70e36/content> [Accessed 21 March 2024].

[73] MIL-STD-1629A, 1980. Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. [online] US Department of Defence. Available at: <https://elsmar.com/pdf_files/Military%20Standards/mil-std-1629.pdf> [Accessed 9 October 2023].

[74] Sulaman, S.M., Beer, A., Felderer, M. and Höst, M., 2017. Comparison of the FMEA and STPA safety analysis methods–a case study. Software Quality Journal, [online] 27(1), pp.349–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-017-9396-0.

[75] Ishimatsu, T., Leveson, N., Thomas, J., Katahira, M., Miyamoto, Y. and Nakao, H., 2010. Modeling and Hazard Analysis Using Stpa. [online] (680). Available at: <https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/79639/Leveson_Modeling%20and%20hazard.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y> [Accessed 9 October 2023].

[76] Fleming, C.H., Spencer, M., Thomas, J., Leveson, N. and Wilkinson, C., 2013. Safety assurance in NextGen and complex transportation systems. Safety Science, 55, pp.173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.12.005.

[77] ICS, 2018. Arctic Shipping A position paper. [online] Available at: <https://www.ics-shipping.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ICS-Position-Paper-on-Arctic-Shipping.pdf> [Accessed 6 February 2024].