Trend Analysis of Marine Construction Disaster Prevention Based on Text Mining: Evidence from China

Yin Junjia

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

Aidi Hizami Alias

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

Nuzul Azam Haron

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

Nabilah Abu Bakar

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia


Received: 23 January 2024; Revised: 15 March 2024; Accepted: 20 March 2024; Published Online: 31 March 2024

Copyright © 2024 Yin Junjia, Aidi Hizami Alias, Nuzul Azam Haron, Nabilah Abu Bakar. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Global climate change has led to frequent natural disasters such as tsunamis and earthquakes, making offshore construction risky. In this paper, high-level papers from the Web of Science (WoS) were searched, and critical terms were identified and categorized using text-mining techniques. To ensure the resilience and safety of marine structures, we discuss the challenges of marine clays, marine eco-civilization construction, and disaster prevention databases. The recommendations presented provide valuable insights for engineers, researchers, and other stakeholders involved in marine construction projects.

Keywords: Text mining, Web of Science, Marine construction, Disaster prevention, Literature review


[1] Li, H., Liu, Y., Liang, B., et al., 2022. Demands and challenges for construction of marine infrastructures in China. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 16(5), 551–563. DOI:

[2] Sui Pheng, L., Raphael, B., Kwan Kit, W. 2006. Tsunamis: Some pre‐emptive disaster planning and management issues for consideration by the construction industry. Structural Survey. 24(5), 378–396. DOI:

[3] Imamura, F., Boret, S.P., Suppasri, A., et al., 2019. Recent occurrences of serious tsunami damage and the future challenges of tsunami disaster risk reduction. Progress in Disaster Science. 1, 100009. DOI:

[4] Suppasri, A., Goto, K., Muhari, A., et al., 2015. A decade after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: The progress in disaster preparedness and future challenges in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand and the Maldives. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 172, 3313–3341. DOI:

[5] Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., 2016. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 106, 213–228. DOI:

[6] Whelchel, A.W., Reguero, B.G., Van Wesenbeeck, B., et al., 2015. Advancing disaster risk reduction through the integration of science, design, and policy into eco-engineering and several global resource management processes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 32, 29–41. DOI:

[7] Jorge, V.A., Granada, R., Maidana, R.G., et al., 2019. A survey on unmanned surface vehicles for disaster robotics: Main challenges and directions. Sensors. 19(3), 702. DOI:

[8] Desai, N., 2015. Dynamic positioning: Method for disaster prevention and risk management. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science. 11, 216–223. DOI:

[9] Defu, L., Guilin, L., Fengqing, W., et al., 2017. Typhoon/hurricane disaster prediction and prevention for coastal, offshore, and nuclear power plant infrastructure. Hurricanes and Climate Change. 3, 135–165. DOI:

[10] Cunyi, L., Zhicheng, Z., Zhanheng, G., et al., 2021. Assessment and application of geological disaster risk in offshore wind farms. China Safety Science Journal. 31(S1), 181–186. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.S1.032

[11] Citexs., 2024. Literature Research Analyzer [Internet] [Accessed on 2024 Jan 22]. Available from:

[12] StudyRecon Keyword Graph., 2024 [Internet] [Accessed 2024 Jan 22].

[13] A Study on the Construction of the Tsunami Hazard Database for Mooring Vessels in the Ports [Internet]. Available from:

[14] Cho, J., 2024. Construction of a spatial information data catalogue for coastal red tide disaster management in Korea. Journal of Coastal Research. 116(SI), 230–234. DOI:

[15] Cheng, J.C., Tan, Y., Song, Y., et al., 2018. Developing an evacuation evaluation model for offshore oil and gas platforms using BIM and agent-based model. Automation in Construction. 89, 214–224. DOI:

[16] Pedram, S., Ogie, R., Palmisano, S., et al., 2021. Cost-benefit analysis of virtual reality-based training for emergency rescue workers: a socio-technical systems approach. Virtual Reality. 25(4), 1071–1086. DOI:

[17] Towards mitigation of environmental risks. Preventive Methods for Coastal Protection. Springer, Heidelberg: Heidelberg. pp. 1–27.

[18] Offshore Operation Facilities: Equipment and Procedures [Internet]. Available from:

[19] Jiang, Q., Feng, C., Ding, J., et al., 2020. The decade long achievements of China’s marine ecological civilization construction (2006–2016). Journal of Environmental Management. 272, 111077. DOI:

[20] Lin, Y., Yang, Y., Li, P., et al., 2022. Spatial-temporal evaluation of marine ecological civilization of Zhejiang Province, China. Marine Policy. 135, 104835. DOI:

[21] Fernandez, R., Pardo, M., 2013. Offshore concrete structures. Ocean Engineering. 58, 304–316. DOI:

[22] Shirlaw, J., Tan, T., Wong, K., 2005. Deep excavations in Singapore marine clay. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium TC28. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 15-17 June 2005. CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 13–28.

[23] Kim, Y., Jeong, S., Won, J., 2009. Effect of lateral rigidity of offshore piles using proposed PY curves in marine clay. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 27(1), 53–77. DOI:

[24] Yang, Q., Ren, Y., Niu, J., et al., 2018. Characteristics of soft marine clay under cyclic loading: A review. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 77, 1027–1046. DOI:

[25] Zainuddin, N., Yunus, N., Al-Bared, M., et al., 2019. Measuring the engineering properties of marine clay treated with disposed granite waste. Measurement. 131, 50–60. DOI:

[26] Al-Bared, M, Marto, A., 2017. A review on the geotechnical and engineering characteristics of marine clay and the modern methods of improvements. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 13(4), 825–831. DOI:

[27] Li-ping, G., Xiang-peng, F., Jian-dong, W., et al., 2024. High ductility cementitious composites incorporating seawater and coral sand (SCS-HDCC) for offshore engineering: Microstructure, mechanical performance and sustainability. Cement and Concrete Composites. 147, 105414. DOI:

[28] Xing, H., Xiaoyin, Z., Qingqing, L., et al., 2023. Evaluation of synergy ability and reconstruction of synergy organization for marine disaster monitoring and early warning in coastal cities, China. Soft Computing. 27(23), 18245–18262. DOI:

[29] Døskeland, Ø., Gudmestad, O.T., Moen, P., 2023. Use of response forecasting in decision making for weather sensitive offshore construction work. Ocean Engineering. 287, 115896. DOI:

[30] Paiva, M. da S., Silveira, L. da S., Isoldi, L.A., et al., 2021. Bibliometric study applied to the overtopping wave energy converter device. Sustainable Marine Structures. 2(1), 35–45.DOI:

[31] Amaechi, C.V., Ja’e, I.A., Reda, A., et al., 2022. Scientometric review and thematic areas for the research trends on marine hoses. Energies. 15(20), 7723. DOI:

[32] Benhemma-Le Gall, A., Graham, I.M., Merchant, N.D., et al., 2021. Broad-scale responses of harbor porpoises to pile-driving and vessel activities during offshore windfarm construction. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 664724. DOI:

[33] Xu, J., Ye, M., Lu, W., et al., 2021. A four-quadrant conceptual framework for analyzing extended producer responsibility in offshore prefabrication construction. Journal of Cleaner Production. 282, 124540. DOI:

[34] Ismail, Z., Kong, K.K., Othman, S.Z., et al., 2014. Evaluating accidents in the offshore drilling of petroleum: Regional picture and reducing impact. Measurement. 51, 18–33. DOI:

[35] Zhu, G., Chen, G., Zhu, J., et al., 2022. Modeling the evolution of major storm-disaster-induced accidents in the offshore oil and gas industry. International journal of environmental research and public health. 19(12), 7216. DOI:

[36] Woolfson, C., 2013. Preventable disasters in the offshore oil industry: from Piper Alpha to Deepwater Horizon. New solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy. 22(4), 497–524. DOI:

[37] Sato, S., Nagatomi, K., 2023. Proposal for a floating offshore base for disaster prevention and multipurpose use. Geomate Journal. 24(101), 134–142. DOI:

[38] Gaogeng, Z, Guoming, C., Yufei, Z, et al., 2021. Research on evolution hierarchy of major accidents in offshore oil and gas industry in storm disasters. China Safety Science Journal. 31(7), 172. DOI: 1003-3033.2021.07.024

[39] Ryu, G.H., Kim, H., Kim, Y.G., et al., 2021. GIS-based site analysis of an optimal offshore wind farm for minimizing coastal disasters. Journal of Coastal Research. 114(SI), 246–250.DOI:

[40] Offshore Safety in the Wake of the Macondo Disaster: the Role of the Regulator [Internet]. Available from:

[41] Sui Pheng, L., Raphael, B., Kwan Kit, W., 2006. Tsunamis: some pre‐emptive disaster planning and management issues for consideration by the construction industry. Structural Survey. 24(5), 378–396. DOI:

[42] Chou, J.S., Liao, P.C., Yeh, C.D., 2021. Risk analysis and management of construction and operations in offshore wind power project. Sustainability, 13(13), 7473. DOI:

[43] Junjia, Y., Alias, A.H., Haron, N.A., et al., 2023. A Bibliometric review on safety risk assessment of construction based on CiteSpace software and WoS database. Sustainability. 15(15), 11803. DOI:

[44] Junjia, Y., Alias, A.H., Haron, N.A., et al., 2023. A Bibliometrics-Based systematic review of safety risk assessment for IBS hoisting construction. Buildings. 13(7), 1853. DOI:

[45] Junjia, Y., Alias, A.H., Haron, N. A., et al., 2024. Identification and analysis of hoisting safety risk factors for IBS construction based on the AcciMap and cases study. Heliyon. 10(1). E23587.DOI:

[46] Dong, J., Asif, Z., Shi, Y., et al., 2022. Climate change impacts on coastal and offshore petroleum infrastructure and the associated oil spill risk: A review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 10(7), 849. DOI:

[47] Ngo, D.V., Kim, Y.J., Kim, D.H., 2023. Risk assessment of offshore wind turbines suction bucket foundation subject to multi-hazard events. Energies. 16(5), 2184. DOI:

[48] Brkić, D., Praks, P., 2021. Probability analysis and prevention of offshore oil and gas accidents: Fire as a cause and a consequence. Fire. 4(4), 71. DOI:

[49] Yan, K., Wang, Y., Wang, W., et al., 2023. A system-theory and complex network-fused approach to analyze vessel-wind turbine allisions in offshore wind farm waters. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 11(7), 1306. DOI:

[50] Ercilla, G., Casas, D., Alonso, B., et al., 2021. Offshore geological hazards: charting the course of progress and future directions. Oceans. 2(2), 393–428. DOI:

[51] Olukolajo, M.A., Oyetunji, A.K., Amaechi, C.V., 2023. A scientometric review of environmental valuation research with an altmetric pathway for the future. Environments. 10(4), 58. DOI:

[52] Zhu, H., Li, J., Yuan, Z., et al., 2023. Bibliometric analysis of spatial accessibility from 1999–2022. Sustainability. 15(18), 13399. DOI:

[53] Ibrion, M., Paltrinieri, N., Nejad, A.R., 2020. Learning from failures: Accidents of marine structures on Norwegian continental shelf over 40 years time period. Engineering Failure Analysis. 111, 104487. DOI:

[54] Krausmann, E., Renni, E., Campedel, M., et al., 2011. Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Natural Hazards. 59, 285–300. DOI:

[55] Liu, K., Cai, B., Wu, Q., et al., 2023. Risk identification and assessment methods of offshore platform equipment and operations. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 177, 1415–1430. DOI:

[56] Shan, Y., Wang, X., Cui, J., et al., 2021. Effects of clay mineral composition on the dynamic properties and fabric of artificial marine clay. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 9(11), 1216. DOI:

[57] Bo, Q., Liu, J., Shang, W., et al., 2024. application of ann in construction: comprehensive study on identifying optimal modifier and dosage for stabilizing marine clay of Qingdao coastal region of China. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 12(3), 465. DOI:

[58] Guan, Y., Chen, Y., Sun, X., et al., 2023. The clay mineralogy and geochemistry of sediments in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea: a record of the Holocene sedimentary environmental change. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(7), 1463. DOI:

[59] Sun, X., Yi, Y., 2022. Utilization of incineration bottom ash, waste marine clay, and ground granulated blast-furnace slag as a construction material. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 182, 106292. DOI:

[60] Subsea Pipeline Temporary Decommissioning & Recommissioning for an Emergency Repair [Internet]. Available from:

[61] Yang, W., Tian, W., Hvalbye, O., et al., 2019. Experimental research for stabilizing offshore floating wind turbines. Energies. 12(10), 1947. DOI:

[62] Jin, Y., Jang, B.S., 2015. Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module. Ocean Engineering. 104, 725–737. DOI:

[63] Liu, L., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., et al., 2022. Energy dissipation by external damping in marine vibratory pile sinking. Ocean Engineering. 259, 111896. DOI:

[64] Luo, Z., Wang, X., Wen, H., Pei, A., 2022. Hydrogen production from offshore wind power in South China. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47(58), 24558–24568. DOI:

[65] Chuang, Z., Chang, X., Li, C., et al., 2020. Performance change of a semi-submersible production platform system with broken mooring line or riser. Engineering Failure Analysis. 118, 104819. DOI: