Impact of Participation in Young Smart Farmer Program on Smallholder Farmers' Income: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Supaporn Poungchompu

Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, KhonKaen University, KhonKaen, 40002, Thailand

Porntip Phuttachat

KhonKaen Provincial Office of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Extension, KhonKaen, 40000, Thailand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i4.916

Received: 31 July 2023; Received in revised form: 17 November 2023; Accepted: 20 November 2023; Published: 11 December 2023

Copyright © 2023 Supaporn Poungchompu, Porntip Phuttachat. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

The increase of elderly workers in the agricultural sector will decrease productivity using traditional agriculture production which causes the reduction of income. The Young Smart Farmer program is one of the solutions to solve the problem by developing new generation farmers' agricultural abilities replacing elderly farmers and creating incentives for the new generation to turn to agricultural occupation. Thus, this paper principally assessed the impact of the participation of young farmers in the YSF program on farm income and the determinants of the YSF program factor of young farmer's participation in the YSF program. The total number of samplings is 340 comprising 210 participants and 130 non-participants in the YSF program of the northeast area of Thailand. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the propensity score matching approach to estimate the treatment effect of YSF participation on farm income among smallholder farmers. The results presented that the participants were younger with higher education, more experience and technology support, and had higher farm income compared to non-participants. The propensity scores matching results revealed a significant effect between farmer participation and farm income. The increase in farmers’ income from the participation of young smart farmers was estimated to be approximately 6758.59 $/year compared to non-participants of 3066.63 $/year. To encourage young people to participate more in the YSM program the government should provide more support that can stimulate the young farmers' farming economic activities to improve their quality of living and be fully satisfied with their livelihood. Also, the government should encourage a strong network within the group which consequently increases knowledge sharing, technology, and agricultural activities from the production process to marketing.

Keywords: Young smart farmer; Participation; Farm income; New generation; Aging farmer


References

[1] United Nations Population Fund Country Office in Thailand, 2011. Impact of demographic change in Thailand. [Internet]. Available from: https://thailand.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/demographic%20eng.pdf

[2] John, B., Rossarin, G., 2005. Rural population ageing and farm structure in Thailand. Population and Development Service Sustainable Development Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [Internet]. Available from: http://globalag.igc.org/ruralaging/world/2005/fao.thailande.pdf

[3] John, K., Bussarawan, T., Vipan, P., et al., 2015. The Situation of Thailand’s Older population. HelpAge International East Asia/Pacific Regional Office [Internet]. Available from https://www.partners-popdev.org/ageing/docs/The_Situation_of_Thailands_Older_Population.pdf

[4] Sylvia, S., Chidchanok, A., Malay, P., et al., 2021. Agricultural productivity, aging farming workforce, sustainable agriculture, and well-being: Household survey data from central Thailand. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 5(728120), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.728120

[5] Ozimek, P., Bierhoff, H.W., Hanke, S., 2018. Do vulnerable narcissists profit more from Facebook use than grandiose narcissists? An examination of narcissistic Facebook use in the light of self-regulation and social comparison theory. Personality and Individual Differences. 124, 168-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.016

[6] National Economic and Social Development Board, 2012. The Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012-2016) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nesdc.go.th/nesdb_en/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=3786

[7] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2023. Summary of the Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012-2016) [Internet]. Available from: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/tha160976.pdf

[8] Faysse, N., Phiboon, K., Filloux, T., 2019. Public policy to support young farmers in Thailand. Outlook on Agriculture. 48(4), 292-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019880187

[9] Cochetel, C., Phiboon, K., Faysse, N., et al., 2017. The Diversity of Young Farmers in Chiang Mai and Prachinburi Provinces: Orientations, Problems Faced and Engagement with Support Programs [Internet]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321795782_The_diversity_of_young_farmers_in_Chiang_Mai_and_Prachinburi_Provinces_orientations_problems_faced_and_engagement_with_support_programs

[10] Nnadi, F.N., Akwiwu, C.D., 2008. Determinants of youths participation in rural agriculture in Imo State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences. 8(2), 328-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.328.333

[11] Lee, S.H., Choi, W., 2019. Policies on Returning to Farming and Rural Villages in Korea [Internet]. Available from: https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/1655

[12] Yusoff, N.H., Hussain, M.R.M., Tukiman, I., 2017. Roles of community towards urban farming activities. Planning Malaysia Journal. 15(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.243

[13] Bekabil, U.T., Bedemo, A., 2015. Dynamics of farmers’ participation in conservation agriculture: Binary logistic regression analysis. Dynamics. 13, 74-83.

[14] Issahaku, G., Abdul-Rahaman, A., 2019. Sustainable land management practices, off-farm work participation and vulnerability among farmers in Ghana: Is there a nexus? International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 7(1), 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.10.002

[15] Sithole, N.L., Lagat, J.K., Masuku, M.B., 2014. Factors influencing farmer’s participation in smallholder irrigation schemes: The case of Ntfonjeni rural development area. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 5(22), 157-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091524

[16] Morris, C., Potter, C., 1995. Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers’ adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies. 11(1), 51-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(94)00037-A

[17] Northeastern Thailand—Isaan [Internet]. Available from: http://thailandforvisitors.com/isan/

[18] Katchova, A.L., 2010. Agricultural contracts and alternative marketing options: A matching analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 42(2), 261-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800003448

[19] Kermel-Torrès, D., 2004. Atlas of Thailand: Spatial Structures and Development. IRD Editions: Paris. Chapter 4. Available from: https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers17-02/010037584.pdf

[20] Baker, J.L., 2000. Evaluating the impact of development projects on poverty: A handbook for practitioner. The World Bank: Washington DC.

[21] Jansuwan, P., Zander, K.K., 2021. Getting young people to farm: How effective is Thailand’s young smart farmer programme? Sustainability. 13(21), 11611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111611

[22] Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B., 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 70(1), 41-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41

[23] Attavanich, W., 2016. Did the Thai rice-pledging programme improve the economic performance and viability of rice farming? Applied Economics. 48(24), 2253-2265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1117049

[24] Lechner, M., 1999. Earnings and employment effects of continuous off-the-job training in east Germany after unification. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 17(1), 74-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1999.10524798

[25] Caliendo, M., Kopeinig, S., 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys. 22(1), 31-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x

[26] Maximilian, K., 2015. Does professional tax preparation matter? Empirical evidence from Germany Journal of Business Economic. 85, 231-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0733-5

[27] Morgan, S.L., Todd, J.J., 2008. A diagnostic routine for the detection of consequential heterogeneity of causal effects. Sociological Methodology. 38(1), 231-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2008.00204.x

[28] Nguyen, K.K., Nguyen, T.T.T., Yoon, H., 2018. Impact of conversion to organic tea cultivation on household income in the mountainous areas of Northern Vietnam Sustainability. 10(12), 4475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124475

[29] Smith, J., 2000. A Critical Survey of Empirical Methods for Evaluating Active Labor Market Policies [Internet]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70423

[30] Ramahaimandimby, Z., Sakurai, T., 2021. Vegetable production and its impact on smallholder farmers’ livelihoods: The case of the central highlands of Madagasca. Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics. 23, 125-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18480/jjae.23.0_125

[31] Olounlade, O.A., Li, G.C., Kokoye, S.E.H., et al., 2020. Impact of participation in contract farming on smallholder farmers’ income and food security in rural Benin: PSM and LATE parameter combined. Sustainability. 12(3), 901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030901

[32] Morescalchi, A., 2021. A new career in a new town. Job search methods and regional mobility of unemployed workers. Portuguese Economic Journal. 20(2), 223-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10258-020-00175-3

[33] Rubin, D.B., 2001. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology. 2, 169-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020363010465

[34] Phiboon, K., Cochetel, C., Faysse, N., 2019. Support programmes and the diversity of young farmers in Thailand: A good match? Outlook on Agriculture. 48(4), 300-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019880559

[35] Ahmed, H., Anang, B.T., 2019. Impact of improved variety adoption on farm income in Tolon district of Ghana. Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal. 19(2), 105-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.2.5

[36] STATA Statistical Software, STATA Corporation, Version 18.0 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.stata.com/

[37] Edison, E., 2021. Determinants of technical efficiency in smallholder corn crop farming: Application of stochastic frontier production function. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management. 2(6), 1900-1906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v2i5.335

[38] Amara, N., Traoré, N., Landry, R., et al., 1999. Technical efficiency and farmers’ attitudes toward technological innovation: The case of the potato farmers in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie. 47(1), 31-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.1999.tb00214.x

[39] Hieu, L.Q., Hong Van, V., Doanh, N.K., 2023. Impacts of switching from business households to enterprises on the financial performance. Portuguese Economic Journal. 22(3), 417-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-022-00219-w

[40] Kalirajan, K.P., Shand, R.T., 1989. A generalized measure of technical efficiency. Applied Economics. 21(1), 25-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/772284229

[41] Seyoum, E.T., Battese, G.E., Fleming, E.M., 1998. Technical efficiency and productivity of maize producers in eastern Ethiopia: A study of farmers within and outside the Sasakawa‐Global 2000 project. Agricultural Economics. 19(3), 341-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1998.tb00536.x

[42] Angba, A.O., 2003. Effect of rural-urban migration of youths on agricultural labour supply in Umuahia north local government area of Abia state, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Social Research (JASR). 3(2), 77-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jasr.v3i2.2796

[43] Muhammad-Lawal, A.O., Omotosho, O.A., Falola, A., 2009. Technical efficiency of youth participation in agriculture: A case study of the youth-in-agriculture programme in Ondo State, South Western Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment. 5, 20-26.

[44] Adesina, T.K., Favour, E., 2016. Determinants of participation in youth-in-agriculture programme in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension. 20(2), 104-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v20i2.8

[45] Lobley, M., Baker, J.R., Whitehead, I., 2010. Farm succession and retirement: Some international comparisons. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development. 1(1), 49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009

[46] Lapple, D., Van Rensburg, T., 2011. Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption? Ecological Economics. 70(7), 1406-1414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.002

[47] Sutherland, L.A., Zagata, L., Wilson, G.A., 2015. Transition Pathways towards Sustainability in European Agriculture [Internet]. Available from: https://www.perlego.com/book/969604/transition-pathways-towards-sustainability-in-agriculture-case-studies-from-europe-pdf

[48] Heley, J., 2010. The new squirearchy and emergent cultures of the new middle classes in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies. 26(4), 321-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.002

[49] McDonald, R., Macken-Walsh, A., Pierce, K., et al., 2014. Farmers in a deregulated dairy regime: Insights from Ireland’s New Entrants Scheme. Land Use Policy. 41, 21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.018

[50] Simonyan, J.B., Omolehin, R.A., 2012. Analysis of impact of Fadama II project on beneficiary farmers income in Kaduna state: A double difference method approach. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences. 1(11), 1-8.

[51] Leuven, E., Sianesi, B., 2018. PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing [Internet]. Available from: https://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/S432001.htm

[52] Angrist, J.D., Pischke, J.S., 2008. Mostly harmless econometrics: An Empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.

[53] Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., 2004. Applied logistic regression second edition. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken.

[54] Farid, K.S., Mozumdar, L., Kabir, M.S., et al., 2009. Nature and extent of rural women’s participation in agricultural and non-agricultural activities. Agricultural Science Digest. 29(4), 254-259.

[55] Nxumalo, K.K.S., Oladele, O.I., 2013. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in agricultural programme in Zululand district, Kwazulu Natal Province, South Africa. Journal of Social Sciences. 34(1), 83-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2013.11893120

[56] Oyedele, O.O., Yahaya, M.K., 2007. Technical information needs in improves citrus production techniques of farmers in southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension. 10, 168-175.

[57] Hu, W.Y., 2013. Effect of contract farming on the US crop farmers’ average return. Agricultural Economics. 59(5), 195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/100/2012-AGRICECON

[58] Maertens, M., Velde, K.V., 2017. Contract-farming in staple food chains: The case of rice in Benin. World Development. 95, 73-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.011

[59] Mwambi, M.M., Oduol, J., Mshenga, P., et al., 2016. Does contract farming improve smallholder income? The case of avocado farmers in Kenya. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. 6(1), 2-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-05-2013-0019

[60] Okunmadewa, F., 2002. Poverty reduction and the Nigeria agricultural sector. Elshaddai Global Ventures Limited: Mokola Ibadan Nigeria.

[61] Ebojei, C.O., Ayinde, T.B., Akogwu, G.O., 2012. Socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of hybrid maize in Giwa Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 17(1), 23-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v7i1.4064

[62] Miranowski, J., Monson, M., Shortle, J., et al., 1983. Effect of agricultural land use practices on stream water quality: economic analysis (No. 11149). Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

[63] Ng’ombe, J.N, Kalinda, T., Tembo, G., et al., 2014. Econometric analysis of the factors that affect adoption of conservation farming practices by smallholder farmers in Zambia. Journal of Sustainable Development. 7(4), 124-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n4p124

[64] Scrimgeour, F., McDermott, A., Saunders, C., et al. (editors), 2006. New Zealand agribusiness success: An approach to exploring the role of strategy, structure and conduct on firm performance. Proceedings of the New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (Inc.) Conference; 2006 Aug 24-25; Nelson, New Zealand. p. 25-27.

[65] Barrett, C.B., 2008. Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy. 33(4), 299-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005

[66] Besley, T., Case, A., 1994. Diffusion as a Learning Process: Evidence from HYV Cotton [Internet]. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/priwds/174.html

[67] Botlhoko, G.J., Oladele, O.I., 2013. Factors affecting farmer’s participation in agricultural projects in Ngaka Modiri Molema district North West province, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology. 41(3), 201-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2013.11906568

[68] Ndungu, S.K., Macharia, I., Ruth, K.G., et al., 2013. Impact of organic vegetable production system in Kiambu and Kajiado Countries of Kenya. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering. A 2 (2013), 256-266. Available from: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/86774

[69] Kiy, F., Zick, T., 2020. Effects of declining bank health on borrowers’ earnings quality: Evidence from the European sovereign debt crisis. Journal of Business Economics. 90, 615-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00968-0

[70] Bellemare, M.F., 2012. As you sow, so shall you reap: The welfare impacts of contract farming. World Development. 40(7), 1418-1434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.008

[71] McBride, W.D., Greene, C.R. (editors)., 2007. A comparison of conventional and organic milk production systems in the U.S. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Conferences; 2007 Jul 29-Aug 1; Oregon, Portland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.9680

[72] Miyata, S., Minot, N., Hu, D., 2009. Impact of contract farming on income: Linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China. World Development. 37(11), 1781-1790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.025

[73] Tran, D., Goto, D., 2019. Impacts of sustainability certification on farm income: Evidence from small-scale specialty green tea farmers in Vietnam. Food Policy. 83, 70-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.11.006

[74] Tufa, A.H., Alene, A.D., Manda, J., et al, 2019. The productivity and income effects of adoption of improved soybean varieties and agronomic practices in Malawi. World Development. 124, 104631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104631

[75] Pufahl, A., Weiss, C.R., 2009. Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: Results from propensity score matching. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 36(1), 79-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbp001

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.