Understanding Factors of Households' Circular Economy Adoption to Facilitate Sustainable Development in an Emerging Country

Quang Phu Tran

Department of Training Management, Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam

The Kien Nguyen

VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam

Manh Cuong Dong

School of Business, British University Vietnam, Hung Yen, 160000, Vietnam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i4.911

Received: 26 July 2023; Received in revised form: 17 November 2023; Accepted: 20 November 2023; Published: 30 November 2023

Copyright © 2023 Quang Phu Tran, The Kien Nguyen, Manh Cuong Dong. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

A shift from a linear economy to a circular economy can help participants (i.e., enterprises and households) to cut expenses, stabilize supply chains for the long term, and lower manufacturing and operating costs. Although the circular economy can benefit both the economy and the environment, this topic has still been under-studied in developing countries. More specifically, there has been little known about conditions and/or barriers for stakeholders in adopting a circular economy. In this regard, the authors conducted a study among Vietnamese households to improve the understanding of the factors (both drivers and impediments) of a circular economy adoption. Specifically, the authors employed a questionnaire-based survey approach to collect data from 473 households operating in the agricultural sector in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. The PLS-SEM method was performed to unravel the complicated relationship between circular economy adoption, organizational innovation, and income of agricultural households. The results showed that the adoption of circular economy is widely influenced by many factors in Vietnam. For example, technology has a negative impact on the level of circular economy adoption while policy and regulation, management, customer, and society have the opposite effect. Furthermore, organizational innovation played a fully mediating role between circular economy adoption and households’ income. The results of the study offer many policy implications for supporting and increasing the households’ circular economy adoption for further sustainable development in Vietnam and beyond.

Keywords: Circular economy; Agricultural households; Households’ income; Vietnam; Red River Delta; PLS-SEM


References

[1] Lewandowski, M., 2016. Designing the business models for circular economy—Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability. 8(1), 43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043

[2] Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S.N., de Carvalho, M.M., et al., 2018. Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 190, 712-721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159

[3] Manninen, K., Koskela, S., Antikainen, R., et al., 2018. Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions? Journal of Cleaner Production. 171, 413-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.003

[4] Barros, M.V., Salvador, R., do Prado, G.F., et al., 2021. Circular economy as a driver to sustainable businesses. Cleaner Environmental Systems. 2, 100006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2020.100006

[5] Bocken, N.M., Schuit, C.S., Kraaijenhagen, C., 2018. Experimenting with a circular business model: Lessons from eight cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 28, 79-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001

[6] Sarja, M., Onkila, T., Mäkelä, M., 2021. A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: Obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. Journal of Cleaner Production. 286, 125492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125492

[7] Tri, D.N.M., 2021. Circular economic development ensures sustainable development in Vietnam: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Aquatic Science. 12(3), 2419-2430.

[8] Galvão, G.D.A., de Nadae, J., Clemente, D.H., et al., 2018. Circular economy: Overview of barriers. Procedia Cirp. 73, 79-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.011

[9] Suchek, N., Fernandes, C.I., Kraus, S., et al., 2021. Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment. 30(8), 3686-3702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2834

[10] Phan, T.T.A., 2019. Does organizational innovation always lead to better performance? A study of firms in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development. 21(1), 71-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-06-2019-0003

[11] Moric, I., Jovanović, J.Š., Đoković, R., et al., 2020. The effect of phases of the adoption of the circular economy on firm performance: Evidence from 28 EU countries. Sustainability. 12(6), 2557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062557

[12] Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., 2017. Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Journal of Cleaner Production. 168, 487-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047

[13] Maitre-Ekern, E., 2021. Re-thinking producer responsibility for a sustainable circular economy from extended producer responsibility to pre-market producer responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production. 286, 125454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125454

[14] Houston, J., Casazza, E., Briguglio, M., et al., 2018. Stakeholder Views Report: Enablers and Barriers to a Circular Economy [Internet]. Available from: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/48298

[15] Xia, X., Ruan, J., 2020. Analyzing barriers for developing a sustainable circular economy in agriculture in China Using Grey-DEMATEL approach. Sustainability. 12(16), 6358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166358

[16] Parmar, B.L., Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., et al., 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals. 4(1), 403-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581

[17] Werning, J.P., Spinler, S., 2020. Transition to circular economy on firm level: Barrier identification and prioritization along the value chain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 245, 118609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118609

[18] Govindan, K., Hasanagic, M., 2018. A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: A supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research. 56(1-2), 278-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141

[19] Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., et al., 2013. A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 42, 215-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020

[20] Pan, S.Y., Du, M.A., Huang, I.T., et al., 2015. Strategies on implementation of waste-to-energy (WTE) supply chain for circular economy system: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 108, 409-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.124

[21] Geng, Y., Doberstein, B., 2008. Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving ‘leapfrog development’. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 15(3), 231-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6

[22] Lieder, M., Rashid, A., 2016. Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 115, 36-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042

[23] Bey, N., Hauschild, M.Z., McAloone, T.C., 2013. Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies. Cirp Annals. 62(1), 43-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.001

[24] Ilić, M., Nikolić, M., 2016. Drivers for development of circular economy—A case study of Serbia. Habitat International. 56, 191-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.003

[25] Yuan, Z., Bi, J., Moriguichi, Y., 2006. The circular economy: A new development strategy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 10(1‐2), 4-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321

[26] Pieroni, M.P., McAloone, T.C., Pigosso, D.C., 2019. Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production. 215, 198-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036

[27] Stankevičienė, J., Nikanorova, M., Çera, G., 2020. Analysis of green economy dimension in the context of circular economy: The case of Baltic sea region. E & M Ekonomie a Management. 23(1), 4-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2020-1-001

[28] OECD, 2009. Innovation in firms: A microeconomic perspective. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056213-en

[29] Zaied, R.M.B., Affes, H., 2016. The relationship between the sources of knowledge management, organisational innovation and organisational performance. International Journal of Information, Business and Management. 8(3), 185.

[30] Malhotra, N.K., Schaller, T.K., Patil, A., 2017. Common method variance in advertising research: When to be concerned and how to control for it. Journal of Advertising. 46(1), 193-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1252287

[31] Doty, D.H., Astakhova, M., 2020. Common method variance in international business research: A commentary. Research methods in international business. Springer: Berlin. pp. 399-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_21

[32] Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., et al., 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31(1), 2-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

[33] Kirchherr, J., Hekkert, M., Bour, R., et al., 2017. Breaking the Barriers to the Circular Economy [Internet]. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/risk/deloitte-nl-strategic-risk-breaking-the-barriers-to-the-circular-economy-white-paper.pdf

[34] Kandasamy, J., Kinare, Y.P., Pawar, M.T., et al., 2022. Circular economy adoption challenges in medical waste management for sustainable development: An empirical study. Sustainable Development. 30(5), 958-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2293

[35] Cao, J., Gao, F., Sun, Z., 2014. Nong ye duo gong neng xing shi yu xia fa zhan sheng tai he xun huan nong ye wen ti yan jiu ?—yi huang he san jiao zhou wei li (Chinese) [Research on developing the ecological and circular agriculture under the background of multi-functional agriculture: Example of the Yellow River Delta]. Ecological Economy. 30, 27.

[36] Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J.G., Chen, Q., 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research. 37(2), 197-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.