Impact of Farmer Producer Organizations on Price and Poverty Alleviation of Smallholder Dry Chillies Farmers in India

K. Nirmal Ravi Kumar

Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural College, Bapatla, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), Andhra Pradesh, 522034, India

M. Jagan Mohan Reddy

Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030, India

Adinan Bahahudeen Shafiwu

Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box TL 1350, Ghana

A. Amarender Reddy

ICAR-Centre Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (ICAR-CRIDA), Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, 500059, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i3.880

Received: 25 June 2023; Received in revised form: 26 July 2023; Accepted: 7 August 2023; Published: 14 August 2023

Copyright © 2023 The author(s). Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

This study investigates the impact of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) on smallholder dry chilli farmers in Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, with a focus on price realization and poverty alleviation. Two specific FPOs, Red Chilli Farmer Producer Organisation and Spoorthi Chilli Producers Company Ltd., from the Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh were chosen for the study based on their substantial business turnover and comprehensive backward and forward linkages to their farmer-members. The smallholder farmers were stratified into two groups viz., treated (161) and untreated (n = 315) based on the FPO membership criterion. The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke model revealed that the poverty incidence among untreated farmers was recorded at 0.691, which was approximately 49 percent higher than the poverty incidence of treated farmers (0.352). The depth and severity of poverty were also greater among untreated farmers, with a poverty depth of 0.494 compared to the lower value of 0.126 observed among treated farmers. The results from Endogenous Switching Regression Model revealed a significant positive relationship between FPO membership and both price realization and poverty alleviation. Farmers with FPO membership experienced 2.11 percent higher prices and 39.14 percent higher annual agricultural income compared to untreated. Factors such as education, adherence to Good Agricultural Practices, farm experience, access to improved inputs, and credit significantly influenced FPO membership. The study concludes that FPO membership plays a crucial role in improving the standard of living for smallholder dry chilli farmers by increasing prices and income. So, this research sheds light on the significance of FPOs in enhancing the economic well-being of smallholder dry chilli farmers in Andhra Pradesh.

Keywords: Farmer producer organizations, Andhra Pradesh, Endogenous switching regression model, Impact assessment, Transitional heterogeneity


References

[1] Agricultural Statistics at a Glance [Internet]. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

[2] All India Report on Agriculture Census 2015-16 [Internet]. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare.

[3] Bhadwal, S., Thakur, R.K., Kumar, V., 2022. Farmer producer organization: A potent tool for paradigm shift in the farm sector. Journal of Agricultural Extension Management. 23(1), 11.

[4] Lade, A.H., Ahire, R.D., Lad, A.S., 2022. Farmer producer organization—boon for farming community. Journal of Agricultural Extension Management. 23(1), 25-40.

[5] Paty, B.K., Gummagolmath, K.C., 2018. Farmer producer companies—issues and challenges. Extension Digest. 1(3), 1-36.

[6] Trebbin, A., Hassler, M., 2012. Farmers’ producer companies in India: A new concept for collective action?. Environment and Planning A. 44(2), 411-427.

[7] Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2022. Season and crop report, 2020-21. Government of Puducherry, India.

[8] Gummagolmath, K.C., Valamannavar, S., Darekar, A., et al., 2022. Role of Farmer Producer Organizations in Empowering Farmers: Case Studies from India [Internet]. National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE). Available from: https://www.manage.gov.in/publications/eBooks/role%20of%20FPOs.pdf

[9] Kumar, R., Kumar, S., Pundir, R.S., et al., 2022. FPOs in India: Creating Enabling Ecosystem for their Sustainability [Internet]. ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, India. Available from: https://naarm.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/FPO-Policy-Paper.pdf

[10] Bikkina, N., Turaga, R.M.R., Bhamoriya, V., 2018. Farmer producer organizations as farmer collectives: A case study from India. Development Policy Review. 36(6), 669-687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12274

[11] Kumar, P., Manaswi, B.H., Prakash, P., et al., 2019. Impact of farmer producer organization on organic chilli production in Telangana, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge (IJTK). 19(1), 33-43.

[12] Pal, B.D., Saroj, S., 2019. Do improved agricultural practices boost farm productivity? The evidence from Karnataka, India. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 32, 55-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2019.00017.X

[13] Bidzakin, J.K., Fialor, S.C., Awunyo-Vitor, D., et al., 2019. Impact of contract farming on rice farm performance: Endogenous switching regression. Cogent Economics & Finance. 7, 1618229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1618229

[14] Kumar, A., Saroj, S., Joshi, P.K., et al., 2018. Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from a panel data analysis of smallholder dairy farmers in Bihar, India. Food Policy. 75, 24-36.

[15] Tesfaye, W., Tirivayi, N., 2016. The Effect of Improved Storage Innovations on Food Security and Welfare in Ethiopia [Internet]. Maastricht Economic and social Research institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU‐MERIT). Available from: https://www.manage.gov.in/publications/edigest/jun2018.pdf

[16] El-Shater, T., Yigezu, Y.A., Mugera, A., et al., 2016. Does zero tillage improve the livelihoods of smallholder cropping farmers?. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 67(1), 154-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12133

[17] Foster, J., Greer, J., Thorbecke, E., 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 52(3), 761-766.

[18] Angrist, J.D., Krueger, A.B., 2001. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 15(4), 69-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.69

[19] Tesfay, M.G., 2020. Does fertilizer adoption enhance smallholders’ commercialization? An endogenous switching regression model from northern Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security. 9(1), 1-18.

[20] Seng, K., 2015. The effects of nonfarm activities on farm households’ food consumption in rural Cambodia. Development Studies Research. 2(1), 77-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2015.1098554

[21] Di Falco, S., Veronesi, M., Yesuf, M., 2011. Does adaptation to climate change provide food security? A micro-perspective from Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 93(3), 829-846.

[22] Feleke, S., Manyong, V., Abdoulaye, T., et al., 2016. Assessing the impacts of cassava technology on poverty reduction in Africa. Studies in Agricultural Economics. 118(2), 101-111.

[23] Khanal, U., Wilson, C., Lee, B.L., et al., 2018. Climate change adaptation strategies and food productivity in Nepal: A counterfactual analysis. Climatic Change. 148, 575-590.

[24] Acheampong, P.P., Addison, M., Wongnaa, C.A., 2022. Assessment of impact of adoption of improved cassava varieties on yields in Ghana: An endogenous switching approach. Cogent Economics & Finance. 10(1), 2008587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2008587

[25] Chandio, A.A., Jiang, Y., 2018. Factors influencing the adoption of improved wheat varieties by rural households in Sindh, Pakistan. AIMS Agriculture & Food. 3(3), 216-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2018.3.216

[26] Tibamanya, F.Y., Henningsen, A., Milanzi, M.A., 2022. Drivers of and barriers to adoption of improved sunflower varieties amongst smallholder farmers in Singida, Tanzania: A double-hurdle approach. Q Open. 2(1), qoac008.

[27] Ayinde, I.A., 2003. Analysis of poverty level among farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Sciences, Environment and Technology. 3(3), 27-35.

[28] Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., Muricho, G., 2010. Adoption and impact of improved groundnut varieties on rural poverty: evidence from rural Uganda. Environment for Development Discussion Paper-Resources for the Future (RFF). (10-11).

[29] Akinrinola, O.O., Adeyemo, A.O., 2018. The impact of agricultural technology adoption on poverty: the case of yam minisetts technology in Ekiti state, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Research. 3(9), 000195.

[30] Gujarati, D.N., Porter, D.C., 2009. Basic econometrics, 5th edition. McGraw-Hill/Irwin: New York.

[31] Shiferaw, B.A., Kebede, T.A., You, L., 2008. Technology adoption under seed access constraints and the economic impacts of improved pigeonpea varieties in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics. 39(3), 309-323.

[32] Kondo, E., 2019. Market participation intensity effect on productivity of smallholder cowpea farmers: evidence from the northern region of Ghana. Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE). 22(1340-2019-777), 14-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15414/raae.2019.22.01.14-23

[33] Gyau, A., Mbugua, M., Oduol, J., 2016. Determinants of participation and intensity of participation in collective action: Evidence from smallholder avocado farmers in Kenya. Journal on Chain and Network Science. 16(2), 147-156.

[34] Ma, W., Abdulai, A., 2017. The economic impacts of agricultural cooperatives on smallholder farmers in rural China. Agribusiness. 33(4), 537-551.

[35] Hoken, H., Su, Q., 2018. Measuring the effect of agricultural cooperatives on household income: Case study of a rice‐producing cooperative in China. Agribusiness. 34(4), 831-846.

[36] Lokshin, M., Sajaia, Z., 2004. Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching regression models. The Stata Journal. 4(3), 282-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0400400306

[37] Fitawek, W., Hendriks, S.L., 2021. Evaluating the impact of large-scale agricultural investments on household food security using an endogenous switching regression model. Land. 10(3), 323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030323

[38] Amengor, N., Owusu-Asante, B., Adofo, K., et al., 2018. Adoption of improved sweetpotato varieties in Ghana. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. 23(3), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2018/39874

[39] Sarma, P., Rahman, M., 2020. Impact of government agricultural input subsidy card on rice productivity in rajbari district of Bangladesh: Application of endogenous switching regression model. Agricultural Research. 8(5), 131-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2020.080501

[40] Läpple, D., Hennessy, T., Newman, C., 2013. Quantifying the economic return to participatory extension programmes in Ireland: An endogenous switching regression analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 64(2), 467-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12000

[41] Kehinde, A.D., Ogundeji, A.A., 2022. The simultaneous impact of access to credit and cooperative services on cocoa productivity in South-western Nigeria. Agriculture & Food Security. 11(1), 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00351-4

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.