Technical Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Telangana, India: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

K. Nirmal Ravi Kumar

Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural College, Bapatla, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University(ANGRAU), Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v3i3.559

Received: 17 June 2022; Received in revised form: 11 July 2022; Accepted: 19 July 2022; Published: 5 August 2022

Copyright © 2022 K. Nirmal Ravi Kumar. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

It is known that the inability of the farmers to exploit the available production technologies results in lower efficiencies of production. So, the measurement of technical efficiency in agricultural crops in developing countries like India gained renewed attention in the late 1980s from an increasing number of researchers. Accordingly, the present study has employed Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index to ascertain the technical efficiency of rice productivity (2021-2022) and its changes over the study period (2019-2020 to 2021- 2022) respectively in Telangana, India. This study was based on secondary data pertaining to rice productivity (output variable), fertilizer doses (NPK), seed rate, water applied and organic manure (input variables). The findings of Data Envelopment Analysis revealed that the overall mean technical efficiency score across all the Decision-Making Units was 0.860 ranging between 0.592 and 1.000. So, the Decision-Making Units, on average, could reduce their input usage by 14 percent and still could produce the same level of rice output. Further, fertilizers (60.54 kg/ha); seed (5.63 kg/ha); water (234.48 mm) and organic manure (3.76 t/ha) use can be reduced without affecting the current level of rice productivity. Malmquist Total Factor Productivity indices (2019-2020 to 2021-2022) revealed that the mean scores of technical efficiency change, pure technical efficiency change and scale efficiency change are more than one (1.153, 1.042 and 1.009 respectively), unlike technological change (0.983). All the Decision-Making Units showed impressive progress with reference to technical efficiency change (1.112) and it is the sole contributor to Total Factor Productivity change in rice cultivation. The DEA results suggest that farmers should be informed about the use of inputs as per the scientific recommendations to boost the technical efficiency of rice productivity in Telangana. It also calls for policy initiatives for the distribution of quality inputs to the farmers to boost technical efficiency in rice production.

Keywords: Constant returns to scale; Malmquist total factor productivity index; Decision Making Units; Telangana


References

[1] FAO on the Occasion of the International Year of Rice 2004, (IYR) [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/J1706e/J1706e00.htm

[2] Rice Paddy Production in the Asia-Pacific Region in 2020, by country, 2022 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/681740/asia-pacific-rice-paddy-production-by-country/

[3] Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, 2020 [Internet]. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Available from: https://eands.dacnet.nic.in/PDF/Agricultural%20Statistics%20at%20a%20Glance%20-%202020%20(English%20version).pdf

[4] Abdulai, S., Nkegbe, P.K., Donkoh, S.A., 2018. Assessing the technical efficiency of maize production in northern Ghana: The data envelopment analysis approach. Cogent Food And Agriculture. 4(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1512390

[5] Mohapatra, T., Nayak, A.K., Raja, R., et al., 2013. Vision 2050 [Internet]. Central Rice Research Institute. Cuttack: ICAR-National Rice Research Institute.

[6] Socio-Economic Outlook [Internet]. Planning Department, Government of Telangana; 2022. Available from: https://www.telangana.gov.in

[7] Tipi, T., Yildiz, N., Nargeleçekenler, M., et al., 2009. Measuring the TE and determinants of efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa) farms in Marmara region, Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 37, 121-129.

[8] Fabio, A., 2015. Madau technical and scale efficiency in the Italian citrus farming: A comparison between SFA and DEA approaches. Agricultural Economics Review. 16, 15-27.

[9] Sivasankari, B., Vasanthi, R., Prema, P., 2017. Determination of technical efficiency in Paddy farms of canal irrigated systems in Tamil Nadu: A data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 5(5), 33-36.

[10] Li, B.J., Zhu, X.X., 2018. Analysis of maize production efficiency based on DEA-Malmquist Indexes: A case study of Henan Province. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment. 7, 176-187.

[11] Mbarga, J.S.E., Sotamenou, J., Jr.Tabe-Ojong, M.P., et al., 2018. Technical efficiency of maize production in the centre region of Cameroon: A data envelopment analysis (DEA). Developing Country Studies. 8(4).

[12] Khan, N.U., Rehman, A., 2022. Decomposition of total factor productivity of cash crops in Pakistan: A Malmquist data envelop analysis. Journal of Economic Impact. 4(1), 139-144.

[13] Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 30, 1078-1092.

[14] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operations Research. 2, 429-444.

[15] Coelli, T.J., 1996. A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program [Internet]. CEPA Working Paper 96/08, University of New England, Armidale. Available from: https://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~econ380/DEAP.PDF

[16] Benli, Y.K., Degirmen, S., 2013. The application of data envelopment analysis based Malmquist total factor productivity index: Empirical evidence in Turkish banking sector. Panoeconomicus. 2(Special Issue), 139-159.

[17] Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., 2007. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (Second Edition). Springer: New York.

[18] Malmquist, S., 1953. Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos De Estatistica. 4(2), 209-242.

[19] Kumar, K.N.R., Babu, S.C., 2021. Can a weather-based crop insurance scheme increase the technical efficiency of smallholders? A case study of groundnut farmers in India. Sustainability. 13, 9327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169327

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.