Border-rows Effect of Rape (Brassica napus L.) Intercropping with Milk Vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.)
Zeqin Liu
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Quan Zhou
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Fengzai Ouyang
Ji'an Institute of Agricultural Science, Ji'an, Jiangxi, 343119, China
Yiqiang Liu
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Gaojie Su
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Xuehao Wang
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Zhijie Hou
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Tengqi Wang
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Yajun Wang
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v3i1.484
Received: 12 January 2022; Received in revised form: 22 March 2022; Accepted: 28 March 2022; Published: 31 March 2022
Copyright © 2022 Zeqin Liu, Quan Zhou, Fengzai Ouyang, Yiqiang Liu, Gaojie Su, Xuehao Wang, Zhijie Hou, Tengqi Wang, Yajun Wang, Guoqin Huang. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
Border-rows effect is an important research content of the intercropping system. Milk vetch-rape intercropping is one of the typical intercropping patterns in southern China. However, research on the border-rows effect is very little, which has affected the application and popularization of the milk vetch-rape intercropping system. In this study, two field experiments were conducted from 2018 to 2020. The effects of monoculture, intercropping and different border rows on agronomic traits and the yield of rape were studied. The results showed that milk vetch had a significant effect on the first border row of rape. The first border-row of rape diameter of root and secondary effective branch number is significantly higher than the second and third border-row, and the rape yield per plant in the first border-row of intercropping milk vetch was 135%, 328%, 257% and 147% higher than that in the second, third, fourth and fifth border rows respectively. The intercropping with milk vetch enhanced the number of pods per plant in the first border-row by increasing the agronomic traits of rape, such as plant height, stem diameter, primary effective branch number and secondary effective branch number. In conclusion, intercropping milk vetch significantly improved the agronomic traits of the first and second border-rows rape and increased the yield of rape. So it is recommended that milk vetch intercropping with two rows rape, which has important guiding significance for the application and promotion of milk vetch-rape intercropping in the future.
Keywords: Border-rows effect; Intercropping; Milk vetch; Rape
References
[1] Francis, C.A., 1990. Potential of multiple cropping systems. Altieri MA, Hecht SB (eds) Agroecology and small farm development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 137-150.
[2] Meng, F.F., Wang, B., Liu, B.Q., et al., 2014. Analysis of Yield and Main Agronomic Traits of Maize in Maize and Soybean Strip Intercropping System. Crops. pp. 101-105.
[3] Qi, W.H., Cai, Q., Yu, A.Z., 2010. Relationship between edge effects and root spatial distribution of intercropping wheat. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University. 45(1), 72-76.
[4] Ai, P.G., Ma, Y.J., Hai, Y., 2020. Influence of marginal effect on physiological characters and yields of intercropping cotton. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering. 31(4), 138-144.
[5] Zhang, S.Z., Zhen, Z.G., Wu, F., 2004. Application of the Marginal Effect in Interplant Peanut. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences. 32(4), 616-621.
[6] Jiangxi Institute of Agricultural Science, 1957. Preliminary report on mixed seeding experiment of rape and Chinese milk vetch. Central China Agriculture Science. (5), 310-312.
[7] Jiang, S.H., 1955. A good way to develop oil source——green manure intercropping rape. Agricultural Science Bulletin. (10), 567-568.
[8] Li, Z.D., 1957. Experience of Rape mixed intercropping with Chinese milk vetch in Jiangxi Province. Agricultural Science Bulletin. (7), 382-384.
[9] Lou, Y.S., Yang, Y.A., Xu, J.M., 2001. Effect of boron fertilization on B uptake and utilization by oilseed rape under different soil moisture regimes. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. 12(3), 478-480.
[10] Song, L., Han, S., Xi, Y.Y., et al., 2014. Effects of intercropping on growth and yield of rape and Chinese milk vetch. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences. 36(2), 231-237.
[11] Zhou, K.J., Xing, J., Bo, Y.H., et al., 2005. Physiological and ecological effects of inter-and mixed cropping rape with milk vetch. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. 16(8), 1477-1481.
[12] Zhou, Q., Wang, L.C., Ma, S.M., et al., 2018. Influences of rape intercropping with Chinese milk vetch and straw mulching on productive benefits in dryland region in Southwest China. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 44(3), 431-441.
[13] Zhou, Q., Chen, J., Xing, Y., et al., 2019. Influence of intercropping Chinese milk vetch on the soil microbial community in rhizosphere of rape. Plant and Soil. 440, 85-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04040-x
[14] Zhou, Q., Wang, L.C., Xiong, Y., et al., 2016. Effects of green manure intercropping and straw mulching on winter rape rhizosphere soil organic carbon and soil respiration. Environmental Science. 37(3), 1114- 1120.
[15] Xiang, Y.C., Guan, C.Y., Huang, H., et al., 2010. Effects of Intercropping on Accumulation of Cd and Pb in Oilseed Rape. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 24(3), 50-55.
[16] He, S.W., Guo, S.L., 1988. Study on edge-row advantages of maize intercropping flax. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology. (10), 8.
[17] Zhang, X.Q., Huang, G.Q., Bian, X.M., et al., 2012. Marginal effect of soybean and peanut intercropped with maize in upland red soils. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture. 20(08), 1010-1017.
[18] Li, P., Zhang, Y.C., Tian, F., 2012. Study on effect of marginal effect on quality of potato tuber in potato and faba bean intercropping system. Crop Research. 26(05), 471-473.
[19] Ma, Z.L., 2014. Marginal effects and mechanism of increasing yield of fava beans and potatoes intercropping system. Hubei Agricultural Sciences. 53(10), 2254-2256+2272.
[20] Gao, J.Y., Ma, Z.W., Li, X., et al., 2015. Effects of fertilization methods on border effect of cereal-vegetable strip intercropping system. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture. 23(12), 1491-1501.
[21] Cao, W.D., Huang, H.X., 2009. Ideas on restoration and development of green manures in China. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China. (4), 1-3.
[22] Zhao, B.Q., Zhang, F.S., Li, Z.J., et al., 2001. Vertical Distribution and Its Change of Root Quantity & Activity of Crops in the “Winter Wheat‖Early Spring Maize/Summer Maize” Cropping System II. The Vertical Distribution and Its Changes of Root Quantity & Activity of the Early Spring Inter-Planted Maize. Acta agronomica sinica. 27(6), 974-979.
[23] Zhou, Q., Chen, J., Shi, C., et al., 2019. Effects of Chinese milk vetch intercropping with rapeseed under straw mulching on soil microenvironment. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas. 37(04), 193-199.
[24] Chen, Y.H., Yu, S.L., Yu, Z.W., 1999. Study on the edge effect in wheat. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University. 30(4), 431-435.
[25] Xiu, H.X., Dong, Y.M., Mao, Z.S., et al., 2012. Ecological effects of interspecific interaction I. Effects of intercropping on nodulation in faba beans. Journal of southern agriculture. 43(6), 749-752.
[26] Zhao, M.L., Zhao, J., Yuan, J., et al., 2021. Root exudates drive soil-microbe-nutrient feedbacks in response to plant growth. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 613- 628.