Research on World Agricultural Economy

Entrepreneurship Skill for Empowering Women in Cocoyam Production in Abia and Imo States, Nigeria

C. I. Ugboaja

Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria

S. E. Onu

Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v2i2.383

Received: 22 April 2021; Accepted: 28 May 2021; Published Online: 31 May 2021

---

Abstract

The study adopted survey design to determine the entrepreneurial skills for empowering women in cocoyam production in Abia and Imo States of Nigeria. Objectives of the study were to determine the entrepreneurship skills available that are utilized for empowering women in cocoyam production and determine the extension strategies for empowering women in cocoyam production. The hypothesis of the study states that there is no significant mean difference between the available entrepreneurship skills and strategies utilized for empowering women in cocoyam production. Questionnaire was the instrument for data collection constructed on a 4-point measuring scale which has (X=2.50) as the cut of point. Instrument was validated by peer review of two experts in agricultural extension and statistics. The reliability was achieved by subjecting the data collected from pre-survey to Cronbach’s Alpha which yield a reliability co-efficient rα = 0.83 which affirmed high reliability index. Multi-stage simple probability and disproportionate sampling technique was used to select sample size of 250. In Abia, 100 women cocoyam farmers were sampled while 150 were sampled from Imo State. The instrument was administered and retrieved by the help of research assistants such as extension agents and executives of women development union in the sampled areas. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics of frequency, mean and inferential statistics as t-test at 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed that entrepreneurship skills were available in empowering women with the pooled mean scores of (2.78)  for Abia and (3.13)  for Imo State. The Imo women were better than Abia cocoyam farmers. It was also indicated that strategies for empowering women cocoyam farmers were used more in Imo State with X₂  than Abia State X₁ . The hypothesis of no significant mean difference was not rejected because t = -0.003 at P ≥ 0.05 indicated no mean difference between the strategies utilized in Abia and Imo State for empowering women on entrepreneurship skills in cocoyam production. It was concluded that women cocoyam farmers were less empowered and had less access to land, fund and extension services in both Imo and Abia State. But the Imo cocoyam farmers were marginally better than their Abia women cocoyam farmers counterpart on the strategies used on empowering women on entrepreneurship skills in cocoyam production. It was concluded that cocoyam farmers were less empowered on entrepreneurship skills, hence, they had less access to land, fund and extension services. The study recommended that more women should be employed into the WIA arm of the ADP to enable them sufficiently empower women to get access to entrepreneurship skills such as agronomic and business skills to enhance cocoyam production.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship; Empowerment; Women; Cocoyam; Production

---

References

[1] Acha, C. K. (2014). Trend and Levels of Women Empowerment in Nigeria. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Vol. 2, No. 6 Pp 402-408

[2] Agbarevo, M. N. B & Obinne, C. P. O. (2010) Element of Rural Sociology and Agricultural Extension. Teo Publishers. Pp 87 – 100.

[3] Asiabaka, C. C. (2002). Agricultural Extension. A Hand Book For Development Practitioners, Omoku, Rivers State: 167 Ahoada Road, Molsyfem United Services

[4] Burk,R. J. & Major, D. A. (2014). Gender in Organization. Are men allies or adversaries to women career advancement. Northampton: Edward Elga Publishers.

[5] Chukwu, G. O. & Eteng, (2014)a. Enhancing Soil Health and Control of Cocoyam Root Through Integrated plant Nutrition, Basic Reasearch Journal of Soil and Environmental Science. No. 6, 2(4) Pp 40 – 45

[6] Chukwu, G, Okoye, B. C., Onwubiko, O., Okonkwo, E. I. & Amadi, C. O. (2014)b. Gocken Technology: Ehancing Health of Haplic Acrisols and Multiplication of Taro in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Science and Technology

[7] Dike, F. C. (2016). Evaluation of Gender Participation in Cocoyam Production for Food Security in Abia State, Nigeria. Unplished Thesis of Post Graduate School. Umudike: Michael Okpara University of Agriculture.

[8] Ekong, E. E & Olowu (2002). Women Access to Agricultural Production Resources in Akwa-Ibom State Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology Vol. 4, No. 1 Pp 58 – 59

[9] Food & Agricultural Organization (2011). The State of Food and Agriculture: Women in Agriculture. Retrieved 12/02/2017.

[10] Iheonunekwu, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Second Edition. 73 Mbaise Road, Owerri: Crown Publishers Limited.

[11] Kimenju, S. C., De Groote, H., Kanugia, J., Mbogoh, S., & Poland, D. (2015). Consumer Awareness attitudes towards Genetically Modified Food in Kenya. African Journal Biotechnology Vol. 4 (10) 1066-1075.

[12] Ogbimi, G. E. & Williams, S. E. (2014). Assessment of the availability of productive assets to women in Agricultural Development. Agricultural Extension and Poverty Alleviation in Nigeria. Olowu T.A (ed) Proceedings of the 16th Annual National Conference of the Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria, April 10th – 12th Pp 56-64

[13] Ogbonna , P. E., & Orji, K. O., (2013). Evaluation of the Growth and Yield Potential of Cultivars of Cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) in Locations in South Eastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Crop Science Vol. I. No 1. Pp 105-115

[14] Schumpter, J. (1976). Capitalism, “Socialism and Democracy. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-10767-4

[15] Yemisi, I. O. & Muktar, A. A. (2009). Gender Issues in Agricultural and Rural Development in Nigeria: The Role of Women. Humanity and Social Sciences Journal, IDOSI Publications Pp 19 – 30 4 (1)