Research on World Agricultural Economy

Drivers and Barriers Shaping Consumer Adoption of Organic Agri-Food Products: A Case Study in Can Tho City, Vietnam

Quang Nguyen Phuong

Faculty of Marketing & Sales, FPT University, Can Tho 94000, Vietnam; Faculty of Business & Management, Asia Paciϔic University of Technology & Innovation (APU), Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia

Nennie Trianna Rosli

Faculty of Business & Management, Asia Paciϔic University of Technology & Innovation (APU), Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia

Aravindan Logeiswaran

Faculty of Management, Multimedia University (MMU), Melaka 75450, Malaysia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i3.2995

Received: 13 December 2025 | Revised: 9 January 2026 | Accepted: 19 January 2026 | Published Online: 10 August 2026

---

Abstract

The main factor driving the fast expansion of the international organic agri-food products markets is raising concerns related to food safety and hygiene, public health, and environmental protection. Nonetheless, in developing countries such as Vietnam, consumer acceptance of organic agri-food products remains relatively low due to the coexistence of driving and structural factors. The purpose of this research is to seek and measure factors influencing consumers’ acceptance of organic agri-food products in Can Tho City, using a theory combination: Intentional Behavior Theory (TPB), Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT), and Dual Factor Theory (DFT). A mixed research method was used, which consisted of expert interviews, mock surveys, and formal surveys with 398 consumers. The data is analyzed using a partial linear structure model (PLS-SEM) to simultaneously evaluate the measurement model and the structural model. The results showed that three driving factors, health awareness, quality safety, and quality labels, had a positive and statistically significant impact on acceptance intent, while three functional barriers, value barriers, use barriers, and risk barriers, had the opposite effect. The study model explained about 94.4% of the variation in acceptance intent, reflecting a very strong explanatory capacity for consumer behavior in the context of the study. Theoretically, the study contributes by simultaneously examining the dynamic structure and barriers in an integrated model, overcoming the limitations of previous studies that mainly looked at individual groups of factors. In practical terms, the results are the basis for businesses and regulators to develop market development strategies, emphasizing the health and welfare benefits of ecosystems, while minimizing perceived risks, inconveniences of use, and improving the perception of value for organic agri-food products in Vietnam.

Keywords: Agricultural Products; Organic Food; Organic Agri‑Food Products; Intention to Accept; Motivations and Barriers

---

References

[1] Ministry of Industry and Trade, 2021. Exports of Vietnam's Key Agricultural Products: Opportunities and Challenges in the Coming Time. Ministry of Industry and Trade Institute for Strategic Policy Studies Institute of Industry and Trade Policy: Hanoi, Vietnam. Available from: https://vioit.org.vn/vn/chien-luoc-chinh-sach/xuat-khau-san-pham-nong-san-chu-luc-cua-viet-nam--co-hoi--thach-thuc-trong-thoi-gian-toi-4378.4050.html (in Vietnamese)

[2] Hương, V.T.T., Giang, P.Q., Hiếu, D.T., et al., 2022. Impacts of Climate on Agricultural Production in Ha Nam Island, Quang Ninh Province. Scientific Journal of Ha Long University. 3(2022), 95–103. Available from: https://vjol.info.vn/index.php/halong/article/download/77217/65740/?utm_source (in Vietnamese)

[3] Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, 2025. Agriculture and Environment: Joining forces for a green future. Ministry of Agriculture and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam. Available from: https://mae.gov.vn/nong-nghiep-moi-truong-hop-luc-vi-tuong-lai-xanh-19964.htm

[4] CafeF, 2025. Global agriculture suffers heavy losses due to natural disasters. Available from: https://cafef.vn/nong-nghiep-toan-cau-thiet-hai-nang-vi-thien-tai-188251117063304305.chn (cited 10 December 2025). (in Vietnamese)

[5] Kushwah, S., Dhir, A., Sagar, M., et al., 2019. Determinants of organic food consumption: A systematic literature review on motives and barriers. Appetite. 143, 104402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104402

[6] Molinillo, S., Vidal-Branco, M., Japutra, A., 2020. Understanding the drivers of organic foods purchasing of millennials: Evidence from Brazil and Spain. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 52, 101926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101926

[7] Viswanadham, N., 2021. Ecosystem Model for Healthcare Platform. Sadhana. 46, 188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01708-y

[8] Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam, 2024. Consumers Tend to Increase the Use of Green Products and Green Consumption. Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam: Hanoi, Vietnam. Available from: https://moit.gov.vn/phat-trien-ben-vung/nguoi-tieu-dung-co-xu-huong-gia-tang-su-dung-san-pham-xanh-va-tieu-dung-xanh.html (in Vietnamese)

[9] Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., et al., 2020. Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concern and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 57, 102247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102247

[10] Thuy, P.T.L., 2023. The Green Consumption in Vietnam: Current Situation and Solutions. Cong Thuong Journal. Available from: https://tapchicongthuong.vn/tieu-dung-xanh-tai-viet-nam-hien-nay--thuc-trang-va-phai-phap-106815.htm (in Vietnamese)

[11] Huyen, N., 2024. Statistics on the Current Situation of Organic Agriculture in the World. ATP Vietnam: Hanoi, Vietnam. Available from: https://agrihitechvietnam.com/thong-ke-thuc-trang-nong-nghiep-huu-co-tren-the-gioi-phan-1 (in Vietnamese)

[12] Rana, J., Paul, J., 2017. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 38, 157–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004

[13] Sica, P.M.D.S., Franco, D.H., 2024. Drivers and Barriers of Organic food Consumption: A Comparative Analysis in Brazil, the U.S., and Europe. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety. 19(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-023-01469-2

[14] Loi, P.T., Hao, N.T.N., Loc, N.T., 2023. Consumer Awareness and Attitudes Leading to Decision-Making Intentions for Organic Food Purchases. Cong Thuong Journal. Available from: https://ojs.tapchicongthuong.vn/vi/ojs-post/nhan-thuc-va-thai-do-cua-nguoi-tieu-dung-dan-den-y-dinh-ra-quyet-dinh-mua-thuc-pham-huu-co-108302.htm (in Vietnamese)

[15] Nagy, L.B., Unger-Plasek, B., Lakner, Z., et al., 2023. Confidence in Organic Food: A Cross-Country Choice Based Conjoint Analysis of Credibility Factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 10(1), 762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02293-7

[16] Murphy, B., Martini, M., Fedi, A., et al., 2021. Consumer trust in organic food and organic certifications in four European countries. Food Control. 133(Part B), 108484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108484

[17] Nagy, L.B., Lakner, Z., Temesi, Á., 2022. Is it really organic? Credibility factors of organic food—A systematic literature review. PLOS ONE. 17(4), e0266855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266855

[18] Mai, N.T., Phuong, T.T.L., Dat, T.T., et al., 2023. Determinants of organic food purchasing intention: An empirical study of local consumers in Da Nang city, Central Vietnam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7, 1180612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1180612

[19] Nordhagen, S., Hagos, S., Gebremedhin, G., et al., 2024. Understanding Consumer Beliefs and Choices Related to Food Safety: A Quanlitative Study in Urban Ethiopia. Public Health Nutrition. 27(1), e239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980024002131

[20] Sharma, K., Aswal, C., Paul, J., 2022. Factor Affecting Green Purchase Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review. Business Strategy and the Environment. 32(4), 2078–2092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3237

[21] Uyanik, M., Ilgaz, Z., Önen, V., 2025. The Role of Health Consciousness in the Impact of Environmental Concerns on Organic Food Purchase Intention in Turkiye. Journal of Business Research-Tusk. 17(1), 153–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2025.1963

[22] Ramakrishna, S.S., Pinakapani, P., 2025. Understanding Partial Adoption of Organic Food: A Psychological Analysis of Motivations, Barriers, and Behavioral Intentions. TPM—Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 32(2), 653–659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17285635

[23] Leoinidou, L.C., Eteokleous, P.P., Christofi, A.-M., et al., 2022. Drivers, Outcomes, and Moderators of Consumer Intention to buy Organic goods: Meta-analysis, Implications, and Future agenda. Journal of Business Research. 151, 339–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.027

[24] Nguyen, D.T., Truong, D.C., 2021. The impact of psychological and environmental factors on consumers’ purchase intention toward organic food: Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 8(1), 915–925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.915

[25] Truong, D.D., Huong, T.T.L., 2025. Mediator effects of customers’ attitude on factors influencing intention to purchase organic beverages in Vietnam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1467497

[26] Nguyen, H.V., Nguyen, N., Nguyen, B.K., et al., 2019. Organic food purchases in an emerging market: The influence of consumers’ personal factors and green marketing practices of food stores. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(6), 1037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061037

[27] Pham, T.H., Nguyen, T.N., Phan, T.T.H., et al., 2018. Evaluating the purchase behaviour of organic food by young consumers in an emerging market economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 27(6), 540–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2018.1447984

[28] Ghali, Z., Hamdi, R., 2015. The Purchase and Consumption Motivations of an Organic Product by the Tunisian Consumer: An application on the Prickly Pear Seed Oil (PPS). Journal of North African Research in Business. 2015(2015), 220428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2015.220428

[29] Hà, T., 2025. Explaining the nature of high-tech agriculture. Vietnam Organic Agriculture e-Magazine. Available from: https://nongnghiephuuco.vn/ly-giai-ban-chat-cua-nong-nghiep-cong-nghe-cao-8074.html (in Vietnamese)

[30] DT 3-TCVN 11041-1:2017. 2017. Organic Agricultural—Part 1: General Requirement for Production, Processing, Labelling of Products from Organic Agriculture. (in Vietnamese)

[31] CanThoOnline, 2020. Improvement and restoration of land resources for the Mekong Delta. Available from: https://baocantho.com.vn/cai-tao-phuc-hoi-tai-nguyen-dat-cho-vung-dbscl-a128436.html (cited 10 December 2025). (in Vietnamese)

[32] Chekima, B., Chekima, K., Chekima, K., 2019. Understanding factors underlying actual consumption of organic food: The moderating effect of future orientation. Food Quality and Preference. 74, 49–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.12.010

[33] Ditlevsen, K., Sandøe, P., Lassen, J., 2019. Healthy food is nutritious, but organic food is healthy because it is pure: The negotiation of healthy food choices by Danish consumers of organic food. Food Quality and Preference. 71, 46–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.001

[34] Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 50(2), 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

[35] Geng, R., Chen, J., 2021. The Influencing Mechanism of Interaction Quality of UGC on Consumers’ Purchase Intention—An Empirical Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 697382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697382

[36] Lin, L.-Y., Lu, C.-Y., 2010. The Influence of Corporate Image, Relationship Marketing, and Trust on Purchase intention: The Moderating Effects of Word-of-Mouth. Tourism Review. 65(3), 16–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/16605371011083503

[37] Bagozzi, R.P., 1982. A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intention. Journal of Marketing Research. 19(4), 562–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900415

[38] Haines, G.H., 1970. The Theory of Buyer Behavior, by John A. Howard, Jagdish N. Sheth. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 65(331), 1406–1407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2284311

[39] Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA. Available from: https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html

[40] Mullett, G.M., Karson, M.J., 1985. Analysis of Purchase Intent Scales Weighted by Probability of Actual Purchase. Journal of Marketing Research. 22(1), 93–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378502200110

[41] Höck, M., Ringle, C.M., 2010. Local strategic networks in the software industry: An empirical analysis of the value continum. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 4(1–2), 132–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2010.030789

[42] Ramayah, T., Lee, J., Mohamad, O., 2010. Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 54(12), 1419–1427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.007

[43] Ram, S., Sheth, J.N., 1989. Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 6(2), 5–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542

[44] Herzberg, F., 1966. Work and the Nature of Man. The World Publishing Company: Cleveland, OH, USA.

[45] Rey-Moreno, M., Medina-Molina, C., 2020. Dual models and technological platforms for efficient management of water consumption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 150, 119761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119761

[46] Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., et al., 2020. Behavioral reasoning perspectives on organic food purchase. Appetite. 104786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104786

[47] Hansen, T., Sørensen, M.I., Eriksen, M.-L.R., 2018. How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior. Food Policy. 74, 39–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.003

[48] Kareklas, I., Carlson, J.R., Muehling, D.D., 2014. “I eat organic for my benefit and yours”: Egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists. Journal of Advertising. 43(1), 18–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.799450

[49] Nuttavuthisit, K., Thøgersen, J., 2017. The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food. Journal of Business Ethics. 140(2), 323–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5

[50] Shamsi, H.R., Najafabadi, M.O., Hosseini, S.J.F., 2019. Designing a three-phase pattern of organic product consumption behaviour. Food Quality and Preference. 79, 103743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103743

[51] Doorn, J.V., Verhoef, P.C., 2015. Drivers of and Barriers to Organic Purchase Behavior. Journal of Retailing. 91(3), 436–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.02.003

[52] Lee, H.-J., Yun, Z.-S., 2015. Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Quality and Preference. 39, 259–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.002

[53] Fleșeriu, C., Cosma, S.A., Bocăneț, V., 2020. Values and Planned Behaviour of the Romanian Organic Food Consumer. Sustainability. 12(5), 1721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051722

[54] Laukkanen, T., 2016. Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking. Journal of Business Research. 69(7), 2432–2439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.013

[55] Basha, M.B., Lal, D., 2019. Indian consumers’ attitudes towards purchasing organically produced foods: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 215, 99–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.098

[56] Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., 2013. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning. 46(1–2), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001

[57] Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., 2013. Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th ed. Pearson: Boston, MA, USA.

[58] Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., et al., 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31(1), 2–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

[59] Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research. 18(3), 382–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980

[60] Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M., 1998. Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification Psychological Methods. Psychological Methods. 3(4), 424–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424