Research on World Agricultural Economy

Blockchain Traceability and Consumer Willingness-to-Pay (WTP): Behind the Construction of Transparency Index (TRPI)

Caterina  Sciortino

Department of Economics, Business and Statistics, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy

Filippo  Sgroi

Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy

Federico  Modica

Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i3.2969

Received: 4 December 2025 | Revised: 29 December 2025 | Accepted: 6 January 2026 | Published Online: 10 July 2026

---

Abstract

This paper examines how consumers perceive and value blockchain-based traceability when food products are associated with health, quality, and sustainability claims. In markets where added value is increasingly communicated through transparency, safety, and authenticity cues, blockchain can act as a supporting tool rather than as a standalone innovation. Survey evidence shows that consumers clearly distinguish between search, experience, and credence attributes, and that willingness to pay for digitally certified products is mainly driven by credence-related concerns such as food safety, fraud prevention, transparency, and sustainability. To capture these attitudes, a Transparency Index (TRPI) is developed by combining perceptions of authenticity, ethical and environmental motivations, and trust in digital certification systems. Consumers who place greater importance on these aspects display a higher acceptance of blockchain-verified products, while standard socio-demographic characteristics explain only a limited share of variation in willingness to pay. The results indicate that blockchain mainly reinforces existing consumer expectations regarding product credibility rather than creating new demand. This is particularly relevant for value-added food markets such as functional, clean-label, allergen-free, and sustainability-oriented products, where trust in production processes and information reliability is essential. The findings suggest that blockchain-based traceability is most effective when combined with established certification schemes, as it strengthens transparency and credibility along the supply chain. By improving access to information on production practices and environmental performance, blockchain can also support consumer valuation of carbon-related attributes, making CO₂ reduction efforts more credible and economically relevant in agri-food markets.

Keywords: Blockchain Traceability; Transparency; Consumer Behavior; Willingness-to-Pay; Functional Foods; Sustainable Food Markets; Digital Trust; Credence Attributes

---

References

[1] Wang, S., Yuan, C., Liu, Y., et al., 2024. The impact of blockchain food traceability system on consumers’ affective brand commitment and premium price motivation. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 36(6), 1520–1537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2023-0631

[2] Li, W., Song, R., Yu, K., 2025. Consumer adoption of food blockchain traceability: insights from integrating TAM and TR models. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 9, 1515188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1515188

[3] Testi, N., 2023. Blockchain technology for supply chain traceability: the case of SMEs of the Made in Italy. Piccola Impresa / Small Business. (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14596/pisb.3501

[4] Zhang, Y., 2023. Consumer attitudes towards blockchain food traceability technology in Sweden [Master’s Thesis]. Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden.

[5] Vriezen, R., Plishka, M., Cranfield, J., 2023. Consumer willingness to pay for traceable food products: a scoping review. British Food Journal. 125(5), 1631–1665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2022-0085

[6] Glogovețan, A.-I., Pocol, C.B., 2024. The Role of Promoting Agricultural and Food Products Certified with European Union Quality Schemes. Foods. 13(6), 970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060970

[7] Maltese, F., Giachino, C., Bonadonna, A., 2016. The safeguarding of Italian eno-gastronomic tradition and culture around the world: A strategic tool to enhance the restaurant services. Calitatea. 17(154), 91.

[8] Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3), 319–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[9] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 46(2), 186–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

[10] Nasekos, J., Collart, A.J., Canales, E., et al., 2025. Got Traceability? A Geographical-Price-Informed Choice Experiment Assessing Consumer Preferences for Blockchain-Verified Traceability in Cow's Milk. Journal of Food Distribution Research. 56(2), 1.

[11] Balzarova, M.A., 2021. Blockchain technology—A new era of ecolabelling schemes? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 21(1), 159–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2020-0328

[12] Melendez, E.V., 2023. Food Transparency, Authenticity and Safety with Blockchain Technology [PhD Thesis]. The University of Western Australia: Crawley, Australia.

[13] Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Vecchio, P.D., et al., 2022. Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & Management. 59(7), 103508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103508

[14] Ellahi, R.M., Wood, L.C., Bekhit, A.E.-D.A., 2023. Blockchain-Based Frameworks for Food Traceability: A Systematic Review. Foods. 12(16), 3026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163026

[15] Nurgazina, J., Pakdeetrakulwong, U., Moser, T., et al., 2021. Distributed Ledger Technology Applications in Food Supply Chains: A Review of Challenges and Future Research Directions. Sustainability. 13(8), 4206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084206

[16] Ellahi, R.M., Wood, L.C., Bekhit, A.E.-D.A., 2024. Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Review for Unexplored Opportunities. Applied Sciences. 14(19), 8944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198944

[17] Lateb, N.A., Jaswir, I., Kartika, B., 2024. Bibliometric Analysis Of Opportunities In The Halal Supply Chain: Mapping Trends, Innovations And Industry Prospects. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development. 9(66), 76–96.

[18] Alves Batista, D., 2024. Enhancing transparency and accountability in public procurement: exploring blockchain technology to mitigate records fraud. Records Management Journal. 34(2/3), 151–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-10-2023-0054

[19] Stranieri, S., Riccardi, F., Meuwissen, M.P.M., et al., 2021. Exploring the impact of blockchain on the performance of agri-food supply chains. Food Control. 119, 107495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107495

[20] Tan, T.M., Saraniemi, S., 2023. Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 51(4), 914–939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00889-0

[21] Duong, C.D., Dao, T.T., Vu, T.N., et al., 2024. Blockchain-enabled food traceability system and consumers’ organic food consumption: A moderated mediation model of blockchain knowledge and trust in the organic food chain. Sustainable Futures. 8, 100316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100316

[22] Wu, W., Zhang, A., Van Klinken, R.D., et al., 2021. Consumer Trust in Food and the Food System: A Critical Review. Foods. 10(10), 2490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102490

[23] Nguyen, T.H., Nguyen, K.M., 2025. Fostering consumer sustainability trust by integrating blockchain-enabled reviews and QR code traceability systems in supply chain: a three-dimensional measurement scale development. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2025.2574470

[24] Reitano, M., Pappalardo, G., Selvaggi, R., et al., 2024. Factors influencing consumer perceptions of food tracked with blockchain technology. A systematic literature review. Applied Food Research. 4(2), 100455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2024.100455

[25] Vasileiou, M., Kyrgiakos, L.S., Kleisiari, C., et al., 2024. Is Blockchain a Panacea for Guarding PDO Supply Chains? Exploring Vulnerabilities, Critical Control Points, and Blockchain Feasibility in Greece. Advanced Sustainable Systems. 8(10), 2400257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202400257

[26] Zhai, Q., Sher, A., Li, Q., 2022. The Impact of Health Risk Perception on Blockchain Traceable Fresh Fruits Purchase Intention in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(13), 7917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137917

[27] Shao, P., Ismail, N.A., Xu, H., 2025. Green Attributes, Blockchain-Enabled Traceability Systems, and Purchase Intention towards Organic Rice in China: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management. 31(2), 256–283. Available from: https://submissions.ijoqm.org/index.php/ijoqm/article/view/486

[28] Collart, A.J., Interis, M.G., Canales, E., et al., 2025. Consumer willingness-to-pay for blockchain-based QR code traceability of leafy greens. PLOS One. 20(10), e0331614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331614

[29] Ershadrad, S., 2024. Blockchain-based Traceability in the Food Supply Chain: Assessing Consumer Willingness to Pay for Transparency and Safety [Master’s Thesis]. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden. Available from: https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/20253/

[30] Kabir, A.N.M.F., Alam, M.J., Begum, I.A., et al., 2023. Consumers’ interest and willingness to pay for traceable vegetables- An empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Future Foods. 7, 100214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100214

[31] Maesano, G., Sadrmousavigargari, S., Castellini, A., 2025. Consumer Intentions to Purchase Pasta with Blockchain-based Traceability. Bio-based and Applied Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-17195

[32] Chen, X., Shang, J., Zada, M., et al., 2021. Health Is Wealth: Study on Consumer Preferences and the Willingness to Pay for Ecological Agricultural Product Traceability Technology: Evidence from Jiangxi Province China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(22), 11761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211761

[33] Brusset, X., Kinra, A., Naseraldin, H., et al., 2024. Increasing willingness to pay in the food supply chain: a blockchain-oriented trust approach. International Journal of Production Research. 62(24), 8858–8879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2352763

[34] Cooper, P., Poe, G.L., Bateman, I.J., 2004. The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement. Ecological Economics. 50(1–2), 69–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.009

[35] Tran, D., De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., et al., 2024. Consumers’ valuation of blockchain-based food traceability: role of consumer ethnocentrism and communication via QR codes. British Food Journal. 126(13), 72–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2023-0812

[36] Petrontino, A., Frem, M., Fucilli, V., et al., 2024. Consumers’ purchase propensity for pasta tracked with blockchain technology and labelled with sustainable credence attributes. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8, 1367362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1367362

[37] Jo, J., Lusk, J.L., 2023. The Intrinsic and Instrumental Values of Blockchain to Provide Beef Traceability in Hong Kong, South Korea, and the United States. Foods. 12(23), 4209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12234209

[38] Castellini, G., Lucini, L., Rocchetti, G., et al., 2022. Determinants of consumer acceptance of new technologies used to trace and certify sustainable food products: A mini-review on blockchain technology. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health. 30, 100403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100403

[39] Uddin, A., Gallardo, R.K., 2021. Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic, clean label, and processed with a new food technology: an application to ready meals. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 24(3), 563–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2020.0127

[40] Hsu, J.L., Sung, C.-C., Tseng, J.-T., 2023. Willingness-to-pay for ready-to-eat clean label food products at convenient stores. Future Foods. 7, 100237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100237

[41] Sá, A.G.A., Carmo, L.M., Valencia, G.A., 2023. The influence of clean food labels on consumers’ perception. Packaging Technology and Science. 36(9), 757–766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2757

[42] Varghese, C., Arcia, P., Curutchet, A., 2024. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Food Products Enriched with Brewers’ Spent Grain: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Foods. 13(22), 3590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223590

[43] Sgroi, F., Sciortino, C., Baviera-Puig, A., et al., 2024. Analyzing consumer trends in functional foods: A cluster analysis approach. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 15, 101041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101041

[44] Li, C., Khaliq, N., Chinove, L., et al., 2023. Cryptocurrency Acceptance Model to Analyze Consumers’ Usage Intention: Evidence From Pakistan. Sage Open. 13(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231156360

[45] Wang, S., Sun, Z., 2025. Roles of artificial intelligence experience, information redundancy, and familiarity in shaping active learning: Insights from intelligent personal assistants. Education and Information Technologies. 30(2), 2525–2546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12895-6

[46] Wang, S., Gao, M., Zhang, H., 2025. Enhancing Creativity and Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through Data-Driven Decision-Making and Digital Leadership. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 72, 1361–1375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2025.3551331

[47] Wang, S., Zhang, H., 2025. Generative AI in international hotel marketing: impacts on employee creativity and performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 37(8), 2601–2626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2024-1595