Enhancing Sustainability in Super-Intensive Shrimp Farming by Implementing a Closed Ecological System
Institute for Environment and Resources, National University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 740500, Vietnam
Faculty of Technology–Engineering–Environment, An Giang University—Vietnam National University of Ho Chi Minh City, Long Xuyen 900000, Vietnam
Institute for Environment and Resources, National University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 740500, Vietnam
Institute for Environment and Resources, National University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 740500, Vietnam
Institute for Environment and Resources, National University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 740500, Vietnam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i3.2960
Received: 29 November 2025| Revised: 7 January 2026 | Accepted: 13 January 2026| Published Online: 29 July 2026
Copyright © 2026 Duong Mai Linh, Tran Trung Kien, Nguyen Thi Phuong Thao, Nguyen Viet Thang. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
This study aims to assess the sustainability of super-intensive shrimp farming using a sustainability indicators analysis that considers various factors. The indicators were selected based on the current state of super-intensive shrimp farming activities and observations of specific natural conditions in the study area. The study identified 18 indicators across three dimensions for assessing the sustainability of shrimp farming, including economic, environmental, and social. Furthermore, the study proposed and successfully implemented a closed ecological system to improve sustainability in super-intensive shrimp farming. The waste from the shiphong water exchange process includes shrimp shells, shrimp feces, and residual pond waste. Shrimp shells or carcasses are collected for composting. The final organic fertilizer is used for orchard cultivation and as a replacement for chemical fertilizers. The treated water is recirculated to a primary settling pond for further treatment before being returned to the super-intensive shrimp farming ponds. The results show that the implementation of the closed super-intensive farming system, which emphasizes material and energy recycling along with increased farming density, resulted in a total gross outcome index (GO) of $925,717.23. This figure is 11.2 times higher than that of the traditional super-intensive farming system. However, intermediate costs (IC) increased by $723,113.68. The closed system operates on an area of 0.09 ha/kg of shrimp, uses 0.15 m3 of water, and needs 1.01 MJ of energy. Additionally, the Nitrogen to Phosphorus (N:P) ratio is 0.27:0.05, and the use efficiency of N and P reach 87% and 81%, respectively.
Keywords: Sustainability; Environmental Indicators; Closed Ecological System; Super-Intensive Shrimp Farming; Environmental Impacts
References
[1] Le, N.T.T., Hestvik, E.B., Armstrong, C.W., et al., 2022. Determinants of inefficiency in shrimp aquaculture under environmental impacts: Comparing shrimp production systems in the Mekong, Vietnam. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 53(5), 963–983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12874
[2] Trang, N.T., Tu, V.H., Kopp, S.W., 2023. Trade-offs between economic and environmental efficiencies in shrimp farming: Implications for sustainable agricultural restructuring in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26(3), 6677–6701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02982-y
[3] Trang, N.T., Tu, V.H., Son, L.T., et al., 2023. Is super-intensive shrimp farming more environmentally friendly? An application of material balance principle in the Mekong Delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 25(3), 2670–2687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02156-2
[4] Iber, B.T., Kasan, N.A., 2021. Recent advances in Shrimp aquaculture wastewater management. Heliyon. 7(11), e08283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08283
[5] Iber, B.T., Okomoda, V.T., Rozaimah, S.A., et al., 2021. Eco-friendly approaches to aquaculture wastewater treatment: Assessment of natural coagulants vis-a-vis chitosan. Bioresource Technology Reports. 15, 100702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100702
[6] Tampangallo, B.R., Idra Jaya Asaad, A., Undu, M.C., et al., 2020. Bacterial diversity in superintensive vanname shrimp aquaculture wastewater treatment plants in Barru and Takalar Regencies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 564(1), 012007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/564/1/012007
[7] Satanwat, P., Tapaneeyaworawong, P., Boonprasertsakul, T., et al., 2023. Sustainable practice for a zero-discharge outdoor earthen shrimp pond based on biological nitrogen waste carrying capacity. Aquaculture. 574, 739734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739734
[8] Prachumwat, A., Wechprasit, P., Srisala, J., et al., 2020. Shewanella khirikhana sp. nov. —A shrimp pathogen isolated from a cultivation pond exhibiting early mortality syndrome. Microbial Biotechnology. 13(3), 781–795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13538
[9] Badraeni, Azis, H.Y., Tresnati, J., et al., 2020. Seaweed Gracilaria changii as a bioremediator agent for ammonia, nitrite and nitrate in controlled tanks of Whiteleg Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 564(1), 012059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/564/1/012059
[10] Ni, M., Yuan, J., Zhang, L., et al., 2021. In- situ and ex- situ purification effect of ecological ponds of Euryale ferox Salisb on shrimp aquaculture. Aquaculture. 540, 736678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736678
[11] Bridson, P.B., Stoner, J.M.S., Fransen, M.H., et al., 2020. The aquaculture sustainability continuum: Defining an environmental performance framework. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 8, 100050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100050
[12] Taiyebi, K.A., Welden, N.A.C., Hossain, M.S., 2025. Social-ecological indicators and framework for assessing the sustainability of shrimp farming in coastal Bangladesh. Regional Sustainability. 6(5), 100260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2025.100260
[13] Dat, N.T., 2022. Sustainable Livelihood Strategy for Shrimp Farmers in Mekong Delta under the Climate Change Context. A Case Study in Tra Vinh Province, Vietnam [PhD Thesis]. Philipps-Universität Marburg: Marburg, Germany. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17192/Z2020.0651
[14] Swapan, M.S.H., Gavin, M., 2011. A desert in the delta: Participatory assessment of changing livelihoods induced by commercial shrimp farming in Southwest Bangladesh. Ocean & Coastal Management. 54(1), 45–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.011
[15] Poelma, T., Bayrak, M.M., Van Nha, D., et al., 2021. Climate change and livelihood resilience capacities in the Mekong Delta: a case study on the transition to rice–shrimp farming in Vietnam’s Kien Giang Province. Climatic Change. 164(1–2), 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02973-w
[16] Van Der Lee, J., Kangogo, D., Gülzari, Ş.Ö., et al., 2022. Theoretical positions and approaches to resilience assessment in farming systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 42(2), 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00755-x
[17] Emerenciano, M.G.C., Khanjani, M.H., Sharifinia, M., et al., 2025. Could Biofloc Technology (BFT) Pave the Way Toward a More Sustainable Aquaculture in Line With the Circular Economy? Aquaculture Research. 2025(1), 1020045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/are/1020045
[18] Cooney, R., De Sousa, D.B., Fernández-Ríos, A., et al., 2023. A circular economy framework for seafood waste valorisation to meet challenges and opportunities for intensive production and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 392, 136283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136283
[19] Viera-Romero, A.M., Selfa, T.L., Luzadis, V.A., et al., 2026. Ecological modernization in practice: A multiple case study in Ecuador. Environmental Sociology. 12(1), 107–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2025.2479052
[20] Kais, S.M., Islam, M.S., 2023. Climate Change, Ecological Modernization, and Disaster Management: The Coastal Embankment Project in Southwestern Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(12), 6086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126086
[21] Chowdhury, M.A., Khairun, Y., Shivakoti, G.P., 2015. Indicator-based sustainability assessment of shrimp farming: A case for extensive culture methods in South-western coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Sustainable Development. 18(4), 261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2015.072646
[22] Shafi, J., Waheed, K.N., Mirza, Z.S., et al., 2020. Assessment Of Soil Quality For Aquaculture Activities From Four Divisions Of Punjab, Pakistan. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 31(2), 556–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2021.2.0244
[23] Shafi, J., Waheed, K.N., Mirza, Z.S., et al., 2021. Variation in Bottom Soil Quality with Increasing Pond Age in Freshwater Aquaculture. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 22(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4194/TRJFAS18305
[24] Tan, L.V., Tran, T., Loc, H.H., 2020. Soil and Water Quality Indicators of Diversified Farming Systems in a Saline Region of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Agriculture. 10(2), 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10020038
[25] Ahmed, N., Thompson, S., Glaser, M., 2019. Global Aquaculture Productivity, Environmental Sustainability, and Climate Change Adaptability. Environmental Management. 63(2), 159–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1117-3
[26] Murray, F., Bostock, J., Fletcher, D., 2014. Review of Recirculation Aquaculture System Technologies and Their Commercial Application. University of Stirling Aquaculture: Stirling, UK.
[27] Tien, N.N., Matsuhashi, R., Bich Chau, V.T.T., 2019. A Sustainable Energy Model for Shrimp Farms in the Mekong Delta. Energy Procedia. 157, 926–938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.259
[28] Suantika, G., Situmorang, M.L., Kurniawan, J.B., et al., 2018. Development of a zero water discharge (ZWD)—Recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) hybrid system for super intensive white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) culture under low salinity conditions and its industrial trial in commercial shrimp urban farming in Gresik, East Java, Indonesia. Aquacultural Engineering. 82, 12–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.04.002
[29] Kien, T.T., Thao, N.T.P., Van Thanh, T., et al., 2022. Nitrogen conversion efficiency in the integrated catfish farming system toward closed ecosystem in Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 168, 180–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.09.057
[30] Van Tung, T., Phuong Thao, N.T., Vi, L.Q., et al., 2021. Waste treatment and soil cultivation in a zero emission integrated system for catfish farming in Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal of Cleaner Production. 288, 125553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125553
[31] Van Tung, T., Tran, Q.B., Phuong Thao, N.T., et al., 2021. Recycling of aquaculture wastewater and sediment for sustainable corn and water spinach production. Chemosphere. 268, 129329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129329
[32] Valenti, W.C., Kimpara, J.M., Preto, B.D.L., et al., 2018. Indicators of sustainability to assess aquaculture systems. Ecological Indicators. 88, 402–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.068
[33] Scoones, I., 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 36(1), 171–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503
[34] Dhar, A.R., Uddin, M.T., Roy, M.K., 2020. Assessment of organic shrimp farming sustainability from economic and environmental viewpoints in Bangladesh. Environmental Research. 180, 108879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108879
[35] Treviño, M., Murillo-Sandoval, P.J., 2021. Uneven consequences: Gendered impacts of shrimp aquaculture development on mangrove dependent communities. Ocean & Coastal Management. 210, 105688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105688
[36] Kumaran, M., Anand, P., Kumar, J.A., et al., 2021. Assessment of perceived farming risks, communication of risk management practices, and evaluation of their efficiency in Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) farming—A survey-based cross-sectional study. Aquaculture International. 29(6), 2713–2730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00775-6
[37] Ngoc, P.T.A., Le, V., Pham, T.T., et al., 2023. Technical and scale efficiency of intensive white-leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) farming in Vietnam: A data envelopment analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management. 27(1), 50–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2021.2003483
[38] Rajaram, V., Jannathulla, R., Ambasankar, K., et al., 2022. Oxygen consumption in relation to nitrogen metabolism in Black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon (Fabricius, 1798), fed fresh food and formulated feed. Aquaculture Research. 53(6), 2237–2248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15742