Ecological Agricultural Agglomeration: Spatial Spillover Effects on Economic Growth and Resource Efficiency

Ning Pang

School of Economics and Business, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 17024, Mongolia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i2.2821

Received: 10 October 2025 | Revised: 1 December 2025 | Accepted: 12 December 2025 | Published Online: 9 June 2026

Copyright © 2026 Ning Pang. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China spanning 2010–2023, this study constructs a Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) to systematically examine the influence mechanisms of ecology-oriented agricultural industrial agglomeration on regional agricultural economic growth and natural resource utilization efficiency. The findings reveal: First, the level of ecology-oriented industrial agglomeration has continuously improved, with the national average index rising from 0.342 to 0.587, exhibiting a spatial pattern of "higher in the east and lower in the west," and spatial autocorrelation has significantly intensified. Second, industrial agglomeration generates a direct effect of 0.342 on agricultural economic growth, an indirect effect of 0.187, and a total effect of 0.529, with spatial spillovers demonstrating significant distance-decay characteristics; technology diffusion serves as the primary pathway, contributing 41.2%. Third, industrial agglomeration significantly enhances resource utilization efficiency, producing a direct effect of 0.278 and an indirect effect of 0.143 on agricultural green total factor productivity, primarily achieved through four pathways: technological substitution, scale optimization, circular utilization, and management improvement. Fourth, the impact effects exhibit significant regional heterogeneity and nonlinear characteristics, with the eastern region demonstrating the strongest effects; both the impacts on economic growth and resource efficiency present inverted U-shaped relationships, with optimal agglomeration intervals of 0.524–0.758, respectively. This research provides theoretical foundations and policy references for promoting agricultural green transformation, optimizing industrial spatial layout, and facilitating coordinated regional development.

Keywords: Ecology‑Oriented; Agricultural Industrial Agglomeration; Agricultural Economic Growth; Resource Utilization Efficiency; Spatial Durbin Model


References

[1] Qi, D., Si, Z., Scott, S., 2021. Can We Be More Collaborative? Top-Down Policies and Urban–Rural Divides in the Ecological Agriculture Sector in Nanjing, China. Society & Natural Resources. 34(2), 208–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1774951

[2] Tourn, S.N., Videla, C.C., Studdert, G.A., 2019. Ecological agriculture intensification through crop-pasture rotations does improve aggregation of Southeastern-Pampas Mollisols. Soil and Tillage Research. 195, 104411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104411

[3] Liu, X., 2024. Analysis of Development Pathways of Ecological Agricultural Economy from the Perspective of Sustainable Development. New Farmers. 31, 32–34. (in Chinese)

[4] Vargas-Hernández, J.G., Domené-Painenao, O.E., 2021. Contributions of Urban Agro Ecological Agriculture to Ecosystem Services. International Journal of Urban Planning and Smart Cities. 2(1), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJUPSC.2021010101

[5] Rodríguez-Sousa, A.A., Parra-López, C., Sayadi-Gmada, S., et al., 2020. A multifunctional assessment of integrated and ecological farming in olive agroecosystems in southwestern Spain using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Ecological Economics. 173, 106658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106658

[6] Demissie, W.A., Sebastiani, L., Rossetto, R., 2026. Integration of artificial intelligence and remote sensing for crop yield prediction and crop growth parameter estimation in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Methodologies, emerging technologies, research gaps, and future directions. European Journal of Agronomy. 173, 127894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127894

[7] Sun, K., Chi, X., Wang, T., et al., 2021. No-tillage: core strategies for sustainable development of ecological agriculture of Chinese materia medica. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 46(8), 1869–1875. (in Chinese)

[8] Gunaratne, L.H.P., Hemachandra, K.S., Kumudumali, Y.M.K., et al., 2021. Comparative Assessment of Vegetable Crop Performances and Ecological Indicators during Transition from Conventional to Ecological Agriculture. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture. 14(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2021/v14i130113

[9] Wang, X., 2021. Influencing Factors and Sustainable Development Pathways of Agricultural Economic Growth. China’s Collective Economy. 22, 11–12. (in Chinese)

[10] Phamova, M., Banout, J., Verner, V., et al., 2022. Can Ecological Farming Systems Positively Affect Household Income from Agriculture? A Case Study of the Suburban Area of Hanoi, Vietnam. Sustainability. 14(3), 1466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031466

[11] Guo, L., Jiang, J., Zhang, X., et al., 2022. Contributions and strategies of eco-agriculture of Chinese medicine services for carbon dioxide peaking and carbon neutrality. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 47(1), 1–6. (in Chinese)

[12] Dale, B., 2021. Food sovereignty and the integral state: Institutionalizing ecological farming. Geoforum. 127, 137–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.10.010

[13] Chen, X., Jia, L., Jia, T., et al., 2022. An carbon neutrality industrial chain of “desert-photovoltaic power generation-ecological agriculture”: Practice from the Ulan Buh Desert, Dengkou, Inner Mongolia. China Geology. 5(3), 549–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2022053

[14] Zhang, J., Chen, M., Huang, C., et al., 2022. Labor Endowment, Cultivated Land Fragmentation, and Ecological Farming Adoption Strategies among Farmers in Jiangxi Province, China. Land. 11(5), 679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050679

[15] Huang, Y., Ye, Y., Zhou, M., 2022. Empirical Analysis on the Development of Ecological Agriculture under the Initiative of “Sustainable Development.” Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. 40(8), 130–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2022/v40i830946

[16] Zhang, J., 2025. Research on Sustainable Development Strategies of Ecological Agricultural Economy. Henan Agriculture. 10, 88–90. (in Chinese)

[17] Yang, Y., Ge, S., Cao, X., et al., 2022. Evolutionary Mechanisms of Ecological Agriculture Innovation Systems: Evidence from Chongming Eco-Island, China. Land. 11(11), 1909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111909

[18] Jităreanu, A.F., Mihăilă, M., Robu, A.-D., et al., 2022. Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan. Sustainability. 14(17), 11105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711105

[19] Chen, L., Zhang, W., Tan, J., et al., 2022. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollutants Removal from Rice Field Drainage with Ecological Agriculture Ditch: A Field Case. Phyton. 91(12), 2827–2841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2022.024105

[20] Xie, K., Zhu, Y., Ma, Y., et al., 2022. Willingness of Tea Farmers to Adopt Ecological Agriculture Techniques Based on the UTAUT Extended Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(22), 15351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215351

[21] Trenčiansky, M., Štěrbová, M., Výbošťok, J., 2022. The Influence of the Transition to Ecological Farming on the Quality of Runoff Water. Sustainability. 14(22), 15412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215412

[22] Ursu, A., Petre, I.L., 2022. Forecasting the Optimal Sustainable Development of the Romanian Ecological Agriculture. Sustainability. 14(21), 14192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114192

[23] Li, X., Wang, M., Wen, B., et al., 2023. Reed-mushroom-fertilizer ecological agriculture in wetlands: Harvesting reed to cultivate mushroom and returning waste substrates to restore saline-alkaline marshes. Science of The Total Environment. 878, 162987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162987

[24] Fuentes-Fernández, R., Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., et al., 2022. Does Ecological Agriculture Moderate the Relationship between Wine Tourism and Economic Performance? A Structural Equation Analysis Applied to the Ribera del Duero Wine Context. Agriculture. 12(12), 2143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122143

[25] Rega, C., Thompson, B., Niedermayr, A., et al., 2022. Uptake of Ecological Farming Practices by EU Farms: A Pan‐European Typology. EuroChoices. 21(3), 64–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12368

[26] Davidova, S., Hostiou, N., Alebaki, M., et al., 2022. What Does Ecological Farming Mean for Farm Labour? EuroChoices. 21(3), 21–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12366

[27] Obono, M.F., Naoutissa, L., Ntamack, S., et al., 2024. Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Aloe barbadensis Based Biological Insecticide against Pests of Abelmochus esculentus for Promoting Ecological Agriculture (Far-North, Cameroon). Agricultural Sciences. 15(5), 590–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2024.155033

[28] Xue, Y., Zhou, J., Ran, L., et al., 2024. Conservation tillage as an economic and ecological farming option for Summer Maize in the oasis region of Northwest China. Plant and Soil. 501(1–2), 361–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06527-8

[29] Sandu, M., Strateanu, A.G., Udrea, L., 2023. Analysis of Ecological Agriculture from the Perspective of Maintaining the Biodiversity of Agricultural Lands. Annals of “Valahia” University of Târgovişte. Agriculture. 15(1), 22–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/agr-2023-0006

[30] Tran, D.D., Park, E., Thu Van, C., et al., 2024. Advancing sustainable rice production in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta insights from ecological farming systems in An Giang Province. Heliyon. 10(17), e37142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37142

[31] Kamau, E.W., Gitau, R., Bett, H.K., 2024. Effects of adoption of ecological farming practices on farm income in rural households: Evidence from Central Kenya. Heliyon. 10(14), e34610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34610

[32] Shao, Y., Chen, Z., Xiao, H., et al., 2019. Integrating environmental parameters and economic benefits to analyze the ecological agriculture (EA) application in the mountain rice paddy system of Chongqing, China. Environmental Sciences Europe. 31(1), 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-019-0204-2

[33] Nikitina, O., Vasylenko, O., Balabak, A., et al., 2024. Ecological and Agrochemical Evaluation of Continuous Mineral Fertilizer Usage in Field Сrop Rotation. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 25(11), 124–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/192675

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.