Research on World Agricultural Economy

How Does the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology Improve Farmer Welfare? A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Fara Shaliza

Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia; Department of Public Administration, STIA Lancang Kuning, Dumai 28813, Indonesia; Agency for Agricultural Extension and Human Resources Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta 12550, Indonesia

Sumardjo

Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

Dwi Sadono

Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

Zaim Uchrowi

Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i2.2794

Received: 29 September 2025 | Revised: 20 November 2025 | Accepted: 25 November 2025 | Published Online: 15 June 2026

---

Abstract

The adoption of Information and Communication Technology has become a crucial driver of agricultural transformation, helping farmers enhance their skills, decision-making, and access to information. This study examines whether and how the adoption of Information and Communication Technology improves farmer welfare. A systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 protocol analyzed 19 peer-reviewed articles and used bibliometric analysis in Biblioshiny (RStudio) to identify global publication trends and thematic clusters. Publications on this topic have increased significantly after 2020, reflecting rising academic, commercial, and policy interest in digital agriculture. The review demonstrates that Information and Communication Technology adoption enhances farmer welfare through five pathways: improved access to information, faster adoption of innovations, increased productivity and efficiency, expanded market and income opportunities, and strengthened social and gender inclusion. These findings support the hypothesis that digital technology adoption positively affects farmer welfare, particularly when accompanied by adequate infrastructure, institutional services, financing mechanisms, and local knowledge systems. The study contributes by: (1) integrating bibliometric and thematic evidence to provide a multidisciplinary understanding of welfare outcomes; (2) highlighting an overlooked link between digital adoption, social capital, and governance structures; and (3) developing an integrated framework that maps determinants, adoption processes, and welfare effects. These insights are valuable for global stakeholders, as strengthening rural digital infrastructure and literacy can unlock substantial economic gains by boosting productivity, reducing transaction costs, and improving market efficiency. Future research should quantify financial returns from Information and Communication Technology adoption, explore inclusive digital business models, and examine long-term environmental and socio-economic impacts.

 

Keywords: Information and Communication Technology; Digital Agriculture; Innovation Adoption; Farmer Wel‑ fare; Digital Literacy

---

References

[1] Pastiniasih, L., Sumantra, K., Pandawani, N.P., et al., 2023. Analysis of the potential of rice and corn in supporting food availability. Philippine Agricultural Scientist. 106(4), 380–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62550/BV017023

[2] Kartika, L., Frans, Widjanarko, M.V., et al., 2024. SWOT analysis and strategy formulation to increase the competitiveness of rice agriculture MSMEs, Pamijahan District, Bogor Regency. E3S Web of Conferences. 499, 01027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449901027

[3] United Nations, 2023. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/ (cited 3 September 2025).

[4] Wang, J., You, Z., Song, P., et al., 2024. Rainfall's impact on agricultural production and government poverty reduction efficiency in China. Scientific Reports. 14(1), 9320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59282-2

[5] Hidayah, K., Mahphoth, M.H., Bachri, S., et al., 2023. Welfare state-based agricultural policies in Malaysia. Cogent Social Sciences. 9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2241261

[6] Purnawan, E., Brunori, G., Prosperi, P., 2022. Small family farms, a review in Indonesian context. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 3(12), 2708–2725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.12.23

[7] Nur, M.M., Umar, R., Suprapta, et al., 2023. Sustainable strategy for rice crop management in Pinrang Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences. 400, 01001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340001001

[8] Fawzi, N.I., Qurani, I.Z., 2021. Lesson learned from the development of sustainable rice farming in peatland. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 752, 012037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/752/1/012037

[9] Sultana, R., Irfanullah, H.M., Selim, S.A., et al., 2023. Vulnerability and ecosystem-based adaptation in the farming communities of drought-prone Northwest Bangladesh. Environmental Challenges. 11, 100707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100707

[10] Jamil, A., Chairunnisya, R.A., 2023. Building resilience: addressing climate change impacts on rice production based on agricultural infrastructure in West Java Province, Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences. 425, 05001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342505001

[11] Riaman, Sukono, Supian, S., et al., 2021. Determining the premium of paddy insurance using the extreme value theory method and the operational value at risk approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1722(1), 010259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012059

[12] Kabir, J., Cramb, R., Alauddin, M., et al., 2020. Farmers' perceptions and management of risk in rice/shrimp farming systems in South-West Coastal Bangladesh. Land Use Policy. 95, 104577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104577

[13] Kyire, S.K.C., Kuwornu, J.K.M., Bannor, R.K., et al., 2023. Perceived risk and risk management strategies under irrigated rice farming: evidence from Tono and Vea irrigation schemes, Northern Ghana. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 12, 100593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100593

[14] Sumardjo, S., Firmansyah, A., Dharmawan, L., 2023. Social transformation in peri-urban communities toward food sustainability and achievement of SDGs in the era of disruption. Sustainability. 15(13), 10678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310678

[15] Soegoto, R., Umam, M.C., Nurwan, J.V., et al., 2024. Information communication and technology: An introduction. International Journal of Research and Applied Technology. 4(1), 152–158.

[16] Jabarkhil, Z., Israr, S.W., Safi, A.B., et al., 2024. The inclusion of information and communication technology in education. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences. 2(1), 139–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(1).10

[17] Ma, W., McKay, A., Rahut, D.B., et al., 2023. An introduction to rural and agricultural development in the digital age. Review of Development Economics. 27(3), 1273–1286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13025

[18] Aldosari, F., Al Shunaifi, M.S., Ullah, M.A., et al., 2019. Farmers' perceptions regarding the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Northern Pakistan. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 18(2), 211–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.05.004

[19] Chikaire, J.U., Anaeto, F.C., Emerhirhi, E., et al., 2017. Effects of use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) on farmers' agricultural practices and welfare in Orlu Agricultural Zone of Imo State, Nigeria. UDS International Journal of Development. 4(1), 92–104.

[20] Chapman, R.B., Slaymaker, T., 2002. ICTs and Rural Development: Review of the Literature, Current Interventions and Opportunities for Action. Overseas Development Institute: London, UK.

[21] Rogers, E.M., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. Free Press: New York, NY, USA.

[22] Al-Ammary, J.H., Ghanem, M.E., 2024. Information and communication technology in agriculture: awareness, readiness and adoption in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research. 42(1), 182–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-07-2022-0113

[23] Kabirigi, M., Sekabira, H., Sun, Z., et al., 2023. The use of mobile phones and the heterogeneity of banana farmers in Rwanda. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 25(6), 5315–5335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02268-9

[24] Okeke, M.N., Nwoye, I.I., Kadiri, A.O., 2020. Assessment of information and communication technology (ICT) utilization among rural women rice farmers in Ayamelum Local Government Area of Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research. 8(5), 2319–2473.

[25] Mwalupaso, G.E., Wang, S., Xu, Z., et al., 2019. Towards auspicious agricultural informatization: implication of farmers' behavioral intention apropos of mobile phone use in agriculture. Sustainability. 11(22), 6282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226282

[26] Cieslik, K., Cecchi, F., Damtew, E.A., et al., 2021. The role of ICT in collective management of public bads: the case of potato late blight in Ethiopia. World Development. 140, 105366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105366

[27] Pělucha, M., Nováková, J., Shemetev, A., et al., 2023. Contesting the role of digitisation and ICT in the business model of agricultural holdings and farmers: micro-study of the inner rural periphery region in the Czech Republic. European Countryside. 15(1), 99–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2023-0006

[28] Shaliza, F., Sumardjo, S., Sadono, D., et al., 2025. Strengthening group leadership and farmer independence through optimizing the role of information communication technology (ICT). Multidisciplinary Science Journal. 7(10), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025484

[29] Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., et al., 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 10(1), 89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

[30] Karubanga, G., Godfrey Agea, J., Tatenda Rugare, J., et al., 2024. Leveraging video integration for enhanced agricultural extension reforms in Uganda. Cogent Social Sciences. 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2399936

[31] Touri, M., 2024. Deconstructing the role of ICTs in agricultural development using the diverse economies framework. Information Technology for Development. 30(4), 696–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2332316

[32] Shaleh, M.I., Toiba, H., Muhaimin, A.W., et al., 2024. The impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on pesticides use of potato farmers in Indonesia. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics. 16(1), 83–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2024.160107

[33] Ma, W., Qiu, H., Rahut, D.B., 2023. Rural development in the digital age: Does information and communication technology adoption contribute to credit access and income growth in rural China? Review of Development Economics. 27(3), 1421–1444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12943

[34] Akter, A., Tan, K.H., 2023. Agro-based mobile apps adoption among Bangladeshi farmers at the ‘Hamlet' of Bangladesh– A case study of Chandpura Village of Barisal. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication. 39(4), 324–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-17

[35] Midamba, D.C., Kwesiga, M., Ouko, K.O., 2023. Determinants of adoption of sustainable agricultural practices among maize producers in Northern Uganda. Cogent Social Sciences. 10(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2286034

[36] Wu, S., Abramson, D.B., Zhong, B., 2022. Digital governance in rural Chengdu, China: Its potential for social-ecological resilience. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 4, 736965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.736965

[37] Adeniyi, R.T., Adetunji, T.A., Olumoyegun B.A., et al., 2022. Poultry farmers adaptation strategies to consequences of COVID-19 pandemic in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension. 26(2), 11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v26i1.3S

[38] Reissig, L., Stoinescu, A., Mack, G., 2022. Why farmers perceive the use of e-government services as an administrative burden: A conceptual framework on influencing factors. Journal of Rural Studies. 89, 387–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.01.002

[39] Kumar, U., Werners, S., Roy, S., et al., 2020. Role of information in farmers' response to weather and water related stresses in the lower Bengal Delta, Bangladesh. Sustainability. 12(16), 6589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166598

[40] Simelane, P.T., Lall, M., Kogeda, O.P., 2019. A mobile phone application for agricultural extension in marginalised rural areas of Pongola region, Zululand district, South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension. 47(1), 137–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2019/v47n1a495

[41] Borrero, J.D., 2019. Agri-food supply chain traceability for fruit and vegetable cooperatives using Blockchain technology. CIRIEC-Espana Revista de Economia Publica, Social y Cooperativa. 95, 71–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.95.13123 (in Spanish)

[42] Munthali, N., Leeuwis, C., van Paassen, A., et al., 2018. Innovation intermediation in a digital age: Comparing public and private new-ICT platforms for agricultural extension in Ghana. NJAS- Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 86–87, 64–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2018.05.001

[43] Maredia, M.K., Reyes, B., Ba, M.N., et al., 2018. Can mobile phone-based animated videos induce learning and technology adoption among low-literate farmers? A field experiment in Burkina Faso. Information Technology for Development. 24(3), 429–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1312245