Research on World Agricultural Economy

Modeling Factors Influencing the Adoption of Low-Emission Practices in Rice Farming in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta

Vo Hong Tu

Department of Economics for Development, Can Tho University—Hau Giang Campus, Can Tho city 94000, Vietnam

Nguyen Thuy Trang

Department of Economics for Development, Can Tho University—Hau Giang Campus, Can Tho city 94000, Vietnam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i2.2684

Received: 30 August 2025 | Revised: 13 October 2025 | Accepted: 21 October 2025 | Published Online: 14 April 2026

---

Abstract

The Mekong Delta is a vital rice-producing region in Vietnam, but conventional rice farming continues to generate considerable greenhouse gas emissions, placing increasing pressure on the sector to transition toward more sustainable production models. This study investigates the socio-economic and perception-based factors shaping farmers’ adoption of low-emission rice farming practices. Using survey data collected from 748 farmers across six provinces, a generalized ordered logit model is employed to identify key determinants and adoption patterns. Results show that farmers with larger landholdings, higher education levels, and stronger perceptions of economic and environmental benefits are more likely to adopt low-emission practices. In contrast, household size, land fragmentation, and limited access to resources constrain participation. Financial uncertainties, market instability, higher input requirements, and concerns over pest and disease risks remain major barriers. While farmers adopting multiple low-emission practices often achieve greater profitability and improved resource efficiency, perceived risks related to yield variability and cost fluctuations continue to discourage widespread uptake. Reputational gains, environmental stewardship motivations, and policy-driven incentives also play an important role in supporting adoption. To accelerate the transition to sustainable rice production, the study recommends enhanced financial support mechanisms, targeted training and capacity-building programs, improved market linkages, and robust institutional frameworks to mitigate risks and strengthen farmer confidence.

Keywords: Adoption; Climate‑Smart Agriculture; Low‑Emission Rice; Ordered Logit; Sustainable Agriculture

---

References

[1] General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO), 2024. Statistical yearbook of Vietnam 2024. Statistical Publishing House: Ha Noi, Vietnam. Available from: https://www.nso.gov.vn/en/data-and-statistics/2025/09/statistical-yearbook-of-viet-nam-2024/ (in Vietnamese)

[2] Smajgl, A., Toan, T.Q., Nhan, D.K., et al., 2015. Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta. Nature Climate Change. 5(2), 167–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2469

[3] Wassmann, R., Hien, N.X., Hoanh, C.T., et al., 2004. Sea Level Rise Affecting the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: Water Elevation in the Flood Season and Implications for Rice Production. Climatic Change. 66(1–2), 89–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000043144.69736.b7

[4] Edenhofer, O., 2015. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 7.

[5] Nguyen, T.H. , 2017. An overview of agricultural pollution in Vietnam: the crops sector. World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/b9df63ff-1f27-5268-9814-5334ba622fd8

[6] Shrivastava, A., Tchale, H., Cao, B.T.,et al., 2022. Vietnam-Spearheading Vietnam's Green Agricultural Transformation: Moving to Low-Carbon Rice. World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/1ca1c746-dcdc-5032-91c1-545e43aa3574

[7] Khai, N.H., Tinh, T.K., Tin, H.Q., et al., 2018. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Rice Grown in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Environment Pollution and Climate Change. 02(03). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2573-458X.1000158

[8] Lasko, K., Vadrevu, K., 2018. Improved rice residue burning emissions estimates: Accounting for practice-specific emission factors in air pollution assessments of Vietnam. Environmental Pollution. 236, 795–806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.098

[9] Tho, L.C.B., Umetsu, C., 2022. Rice variety and sustainable farming: A case study in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Environmental Challenges. 8, 100532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100532

[10] Tho, L.C.B., Dung, L.C., Umetsu, C., 2021. "One must do, five reductions” technical practice and the economic performance of rice smallholders in the Vietnamese Mekong delta. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 28, 1040–1049. Available from: https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/items/361224ba-7e2d-4b99-825f-97756d81187c

[11] Trung, K., 2023. The Government approved of the One Million Hectares High-Quality Rice Project. Availablefrom: https://vietnamagriculture.nongnghiep.vn/the-government-approved-of-the-one-million-hectares-high-quality-rice-project-d369797.html (cited 5 March 2025). (in Vietnamese)

[12] Mekong Institute. Study on Inventory of Innovative Cultivation Technologies in the Rice Sector that Contribute to Reducing GHG Emissions in South and Southeast Asia. Available from: https://mekonginstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Study-on-Inventory-of-Innovative-Cultivation-Technologies-in-the-Rice-Sector.pdf

[13] Tu, V.H., Can, N.D., Takahashi, Y., et al., 2018. Modelling the factors affecting the adoption of eco-friendly rice production in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 4(1), 1432538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1432538

[14] Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3), 319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[15] Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Espinosa-Goded, M., Dupraz, P., 2010. Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 53(7), 891–905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.490058

[16] Adesina, A.A., Zinnah, M.M., 1993. Technology characteristics, farmers’ perceptions and adoption decisions: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agricultural Economics. 9(4), 297–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1993.tb00276.x

[17] Negatu, W., 1999. The impact of perception and other factors on the adoption of agricultural technology in the Moret and Jiru Woreda (district) of Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics. 21(2), 205–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(99)00020-1

[18] Wang, N., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., et al., 2016. Adoption of eco-friendly soil-management practices by smallholder farmers in Shandong Province of China. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 62(2), 185–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1149779

[19] Knowler, D., Bradshaw, B., 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy. 32(1), 25–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003

[20] Lee, D.R., 2005. Agricultural Sustainability and Technology Adoption: Issues and Policies for Developing Countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 87(5), 1325–1334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00826.x

[21] Meijer, S.S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O.C., et al., 2015. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 13(1), 40–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493

[22] Berg, H., Berg, C., Nguyen, T.T., 2012. Integrated Rice-Fish Farming: Safeguarding Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Food Production in the Mekong Delta. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 36(8), 859–872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.712090

[23] Bosma, R., Verreth, J., Visser, L., et al., 2005. Agriculture Diversification in the Mekong Delta: Farmers’ Motives and Contributions to Livelihoods. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development. 2(1–2), 49–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2005.2.1-2.5

[24] Watkins, M.W., 2018. Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology. 44(3), 219–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807

[25] Ul Hadia, N., Abdullah, N., Sentosa, I., 2016. An Easy Approach to Exploratory Factor Analysis: Marketing Perspective. Journal of Educational and Social Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n1p215

[26] Williams, R., 2006. Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. 6(1), 58–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0600600104