Impact of Manufacturing Subsidies on Global Trade Competitiveness under Smart Finance
aSSIST University, Seoul 03767, South Korea
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i2.2678
Received: 27 August 2025 | Revised: 6 December 2025 | Accepted: 12 December 2025 | Published Online: 23 June 2026
Copyright © 2026 Zixin Liu. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
This study examines how intelligent finance transforms the transmission mechanism of manufacturing and agricultural subsidy policies in shaping national trade competitiveness. The analysis employs a sector-matched panel of 30 countries from 2018 to 2023, integrating UN Comtrade and WTO trade data, OECD subsidy accounts, and a composite intelligent-finance index that combines AI penetration with financial-institution investment. An agricultural coverage scalar, reflecting digital crop insurance and AI-based rural credit, extends the cross-sector comparison. The results from two-way fixed effects and robustness checks using RCA indices reveal that subsidies enhance trade competitiveness, while intelligent finance magnifies this effect through targeted allocation, digital monitoring, and precision in capital flow. The impact operates through three channels: technological innovation, production efficiency, and risk management. Manufacturing gains arise from R&D investment, robotization, and supply-chain resilience; agriculture benefits from digital insurance participation, technology adoption, and logistics reliability. Effects are stronger in economies with advanced digital finance systems and weaker where infrastructure or connectivity remains limited. Policy relevance lies in aligning with the OECD Green Growth Report (2024) and the WTO trade-distortion framework, which emphasize transparent, innovation-driven subsidy governance. Embedding intelligent finance into subsidy systems strengthens efficiency, accountability, and sustainability, advancing global competitiveness in both industrial products and agricultural commodities.
Keywords: Intelligent Finance; Subsidy Policy; Trade Competitiveness; Manufacturing; Agriculture; Digital Crop Insurance; Two‑Way Fixed Effects
References
[1] Li, X., Mao, Y., 2025. The impact of subsidy policies for agricultural producer services on the wage inequality within rural areas. The Annals of Regional Science. 74(1), 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-025-01364-8
[2] Zhang, Z., 2024. The Impact of the WTO Agricultural Agreement on Developing Countries. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on International Law and Legal Policy, Preston, UK, 27 September 2024; pp. 7–11.
[3] Zhang, C., Qian, Z., 2024. A Price Mechanism Analyzing Willingness to Pay for Earthquake Insurance. In Proceedings of the 2024 China International Conference on Insurance and Risk Management, Ningbo, China, 18 July 2024; pp. 533–556.
[4] Ruan, P., Yin, S., Zhang, Y., 2024. The impact of agricultural insurance on consumer food safety: Empirical evidence from provincial-level data in China. Frontiers in Nutrition. 11, 1392711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1392711
[5] Pan, S., Di, C., Qu, Z., et al., 2024. How do agricultural subsidies affect farmers’ non-grain cultivated land production? Evidence from the fourth rural Chinese households panel data survey. Economia Politica. 41(1), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-024-00332-3
[6] Li, X., Han, Z., Dai, H., et al., 2023. An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Public Aviation Transport Service Subsidy Policies in China: A Multi-Period DID Approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis (ICFTBA 2023), Oxford, UK, 8 November 2023; pp. 409–422.
[7] Du, Z., Li, P., 2023. An empirical study on the influence of population structure on residents' housing demand—Taking the survey data of Chongqing as an example. In Proceedings of 2023 6th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2023), Xi’an, China, 13 October 2023; pp. 264–270.
[8] Wu, D., Pan, Z., 2023. A Review of Research on the Influence Relationship Between Technological Innovation, Industrial Structure Optimization, and Water-use Efficiency. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management, Economy and Law (ICMEL 2023), Online, 21 September 2023; pp. 49–60.
[9] Shadkam, E., Irannezhad, E., 2025. A comprehensive review of simulation optimization methods in agricultural supply chains and transition towards an agent-based intelligent digital framework for agriculture 4.0. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 143, 109930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109930
[10] Hajimirzajan, A., Vahdat, M., Sadegheih, A., et al., 2021. An integrated strategic framework for large-scale crop planning: Sustainable climate-smart crop planning and agri-food supply chain management. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 26, 709–732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.016
[11] Tao, X., Cai, W., 2025. The impact of digital finance on export competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Finance Research Letters. 73, 106629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106629
[12] Wang, M.L., 2023. Effects of the green finance policy on the green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry: A difference-in-difference model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 189, 122333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122333
[13] Zhao, X., Zhao, L., Sun, X., et al., 2024. The incentive effect of government subsidies on the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 19(11), 3892–3912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2022-0766
[14] Dam, M.M., Durmaz, A., Bekun, F.V., et al., 2024. The role of green growth and institutional quality on environmental sustainability: A comparison of CO2 emissions, ecological footprint and inverted load capacity factor for OECD countries. Journal of Environmental Management. 365, 121551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121551
[15] Tai, R., Ogura, I., Okazaki, T., et al., 2024. Algal growth inhibition test with TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. NanoImpact. 34, 100504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2024.100504
[16] Ochora, D.O., Murithi, C., Masai, R.J., et al., 2024. Ex vivo and in vitro antiplasmodial activity and toxicity of Caesalpinia decapetala (Roth) Alston (Fabaceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 318, 117007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117007
[17] Ban, G., Wang, Y., 2026. Fiscal subsidy policies and enterprise R&D investment: Sustainable exploration of China’s new energy vehicle industry. Finance Research Letters. 90, 109377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109377
[18] Wang, J., Wang, Z., Zhou, H., et al., 2025. Considering the impact and accumulative time-delay effects of the battery technology innovation and subsidy policy for predicting the new energy vehicle sales. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 212, 111674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.111674
[19] Naseem, M.H., Hui, S., Ziquan, X., et al., 2025. Carbon Emissions and Pricing Decisions in Green Supply Chains Under Carbon Tax and Subsidy Policies. Springer Nature: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-025-00629-1
[20] Yuan, S., Wang, Y., Li, L., et al., 2025. Achieving the synergy of health improvements and carbon emission reductions: Can food price subsidy policies work in China? Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 117, 108240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108240
[21] Hu, Q., Chen, C., Li, K., et al., 2025. Research on the impact of electricity price cross-subsidy policy on industrial electricity efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Strategy Reviews. 62, 101968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101968
[22] Liu, F., Wang, Z., 2025. Can Green Credit Interest Subsidy Policy Promote Corporate Green Innovation?—From the Perspective of Fiscal and Financial Policy Coordination. Sustainability. 17(21), 9750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219750
[23] Gao, J., Zhang, L., 2025. How to restrict informal recycling of photovoltaic modules: Research on closed-loop supply chain decision-making of photovoltaic modules under different recycling subsidy policies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 531, 146904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146904
[24] Xu, X., Cai, H., Huang, R., et al., 2025. The impacts on China’s economic growth and carbon reduction by renewable energy subsidy policy. Energy Strategy Reviews. 62, 101906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101906
[25] Wang, J., Ding, X., An, Y., et al., 2026. Forecasting new energy vehicle sales with grey model incorporating impact of policies. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 151, 116462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2025.116462