Globalization, Agriculture and Entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia: Implications for Economic growth and Sustainable Development

Mohamed Neffati

College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia

Fahad Abdullah Aldubayan

College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia

Mounir Ben Mbarek

Higher Institute of Management of Gabes, University of Gabes, Gabès 6002, Tunisia

Badr Abdulaziz Binzaid

College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i2.2644

Received: 14 August 2025 | Revised: 15 October 2025 | Accepted: 21 October 2025 | Published Online: 17 April 2026

Copyright © 2026 Mohamed Neffati, Fahad Abdullah Aldubayan, Mounir Ben Mbarek, Badr Abdulaziz Binzaid. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

The evolving discourse on globalization has increased academic and heightened scholarly interest in its effects on economic growth, agricultural transformation, and sustainable development in both developed and developing nations. This study examines the causal relationships between entrepreneurship development, agricultural performance, economic growth, and sustainability in Saudi Arabia over the period 2000–2020. Recognizing the agriculture’s strategic role played in food security, rural employment creation, and environmental balance, the study situates it within the globalization–entrepreneurship nexus to assess development pathways aligned with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030. Applying Granger causality within a VAR framework, augmented by impulse response analysis and variance decomposition, the study reveals that entrepreneurship development is a significant driver of economic growth and exerts a positive influence on agricultural value-added and sustainability outcomes. Globalization is shown to boost agricultural efficiency through technological transfer, border market access, and increased investment, thereby supporting long-term sustainable growth. Based on these findings, policymakers should pursue targeted strategies that cultivate sustainable entrepreneurship and promote innovation driven practices in agriculture. The study underscores the interconnected roles of globalization, education, agriculture, and entrepreneurship as key drivers of economic diversification and sustainable development within the Saudi context. By fostering an entrepreneurial ecosystem and promoting knowledge spillovers, the findings point to a path where economic resilience and environmental stewardship reinforce one another, aligning prosperity with sustainable agricultural transformation and broader societal well-being.

Keywords: Globalization; Agriculture; Entrepreneurship Development; Economic Growth; Sustainability; Saudi Arabia


References

[1] Nnyanzi, J.B., Yawe, B.L., Ddumba-Ssentamu, J., 2018. Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance in Africa: A Sectoral Analysis with Focus on the Role of Finance, Institutions and Globalization. International Journal of Economics and Finance. 11(1), 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v11n1p37.

[2] Abid, I., Gafsi, N., 2025. Economic Complexity, Environmental Sustainability, and Technological Integration in Saudi Arabia: Analyzing Long-Term Trends. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 15(3), 669–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.18806

[3] Brundtland, G.H., 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development:" Our Common Future". United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

[4] Cimpeanu, F., Ruse, M.A., 2022. Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development. Ovidius University Annals. Economic Sciences Series. 21(2), 653–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61801/OUAESS.2021.2.91

[5] Hamdouch, A., Moulaert, F., 2006. Knowledge Infrastructure, Innovation Dynamics, And Knowledge Creation/Diffusion/Accumulation Processes: A Comparative Institutional Perspective. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 19(1), 25–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610600607676

[6] Mallinson, W., 2021. Geohistory. In: Guicciardini, Geopolitics and Geohistory. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 85–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76537-8_6

[7] Awad, A., Saadaoui Mallek, R., 2023. Globalisation’s Impact on the Environment’s Quality: Does the Proliferation of Information and Communication Technologies Services Matter? An Empirical Exploration. Environmental Development. 45, 100806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100806

[8] Nieto, M., Quevedo, P., 2005. Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge Spillovers, and Innovative Effort. Technovation. 25(10), 1141–1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001

[9] Sultana, T., Hossain, Md.S., Voumik, L.C., et al., 2023. Does Globalization Escalate the Carbon Emissions? Empirical Evidence from Selected Next-11 Countries. Energy Reports. 10, 86–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.020

[10] You, W., Lv, Z., 2018. Spillover Effects of Economic Globalization on CO2 Emissions: A Spatial Panel Approach. Energy Economics. 73, 248–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016

[11] Gurbuz, I.B., Nesirov, E., Ozkan, G., 2021. Does Agricultural Value-Added Induce Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Azerbaijan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(18), 23099–23112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12228-3

[12] Scharfy, D., Boccali, N., Stucki, M., 2017. Clean Technologies in Agriculture—How to Prioritise Measures? Sustainability. 9(8), 1303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081303

[13] Ajam, N., Moghaddasi, R., Mohammadinejad, A., 2023. Impact of Globalization on CO2 Emission in the Agricultural Sector: Case Study of Selected Developed Countries. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 195(10), 1138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11753-1

[14] Recepoğlu, M., Hayaloğlu, P., Cakir, S.C., et al., 2025. Ecological Footprint Components and Agricultural Productivity: Insights from MENA Countries. Science of The Total Environment. 992, 179852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179852

[15] Schumpeter, J.A., 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[16] Acs, Z.J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., et al., 2016. Institutions, Entrepreneurship and Growth: The Role of National Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 26(3), 505–540. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2912453

[17] Audretsch, D.B., Thurik, A.R., 2001. What’s New about the New Economy? Sources of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial Economies. Industrial and Corporate Change. 10(1), 267–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.1.267

[18] Naudé, W., 2013. Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: Theory, Evidence and Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2314802

[19] Carree, M.A., Thurik, A.R., 2007. The Lag Structure of the Impact of Business Ownership on Economic Performance in OECD Countries. Small Business Economics. 30(1), 101–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9007-0

[20] Bosma, N., Content, J., Sanders, M., et al., 2018. Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth in Europe. Small Business Economics. 51(2), 483–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0012-x.

[21] Ugboaja, C.I., Onu, S.E., 2021. Entrepreneurship Skill for Empowering Women in Cocoyam Production in Abia and Imo States, Nigeria. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 2(2), 20–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v2i2.383

[22] Stoica, O., Roman, A., Rusu, V.D., 2020. The Nexus Between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis on Groups of Countries. Sustainability. 12(3), 1186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031186

[23] Peprah, A.A., Adekoya, A.F., 2020. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from Africa. Business Strategy & Development. 3(3), 388–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.104

[24] Coulibaly, S.K., Erbao, C., Metuge Mekongcho, T., 2018. Economic Globalization, Entrepreneurship, and Development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 127, 271–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.028

[25] Ajide, F.M., Osinubi, T.T., Dada, J.T., 2021. Economic Globalization, Entrepreneurship, and Inclusive Growth in Africa. Journal of Economic Integration. 36(4), 689–717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2021.36.4.689

[26] Prieger, J.E., Bampoky, C., Blanco, L.R., et al., 2016. Economic Growth and the Optimal Level of Entrepreneurship. World Development. 82, 95–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.013

[27] Amoa-Gyarteng, K., Dhliwayo, S., 2024. Cultivating Success: Organizational Culture’s Influence on Innovation and Performance in SMEs. Cogent Business & Management. 11(1), 2397070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2397070

[28] Arshed, N., Hameed, K., Saher, A., 2024. Role of Globalization and Education Defining the Incidence of Entrepreneurship. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 15(1), 364–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01065-z

[29] Liñán, F., Paul, J., Fayolle, A., 2020. SMEs and Entrepreneurship in the Era of Globalization: Advances and Theoretical Approaches. Small Business Economics. 55(3), 695–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00180-7

[30] Pan, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, M., 2024. The Impact of Entrepreneurship of Farmers on Agriculture and Rural Economic Growth: Innovation-Driven Perspective. Innovation and Green Development. 3(1), 100093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100093

[31] Suman, J.V., Prasad, K.P., Murthy, A.S.D., et al., 2025. AI and Sustainable Agriculture Through Cost–Benefit Analysis of Smart Irrigation Systems. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 6(4), 266–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2503

[32] Aditi, B., Suginam, Cen, C.C., 2025. Agricultural Green Innovation and Food Security in Indonesia: Exploring Green Economy Transformation. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 6(4), 310–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2412

[33] Thann, O.H., Yuhuan, Z., Uddin, M., et al., 2025. Technological Innovation and Agricultural Performance in the ASEAN Region: The Role of Digitalization. Food Policy. 135, 102939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102939

[34] He, S., 2025. Digital Economy Transformation and Sustainable Development of Agricultural Enterprises: A Study on Supply Chain Finance Innovation and Environmental Governance in Rural Areas. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 6(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i3.1684

[35] Ahmed, A.E., Al-Khayri, J.M., Elbushra, A.A. (Eds.), 2024. Food and Nutrition Security in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Vol. 2: Macroeconomic Policy and Its Implication on Food and Nutrition Security. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46704-2

[36] Public Investment Found (PIF), 2025. How PIF is Pioneering New Solutions for Sustainable Agriculture PIF News Network. Available from: https://www.pif.gov.sa/en/news-and-insights/news-network/2025/how-pif-is-pioneering-new-solutions-for-sustainable-agriculture/ (cited 13 August 2025).

[37] Neffati, M., Jbir, R., 2024. The Impact of Digitalization and Economic Diversification on Economic Growth: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 30(5), 1510–1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.22105

[38] Neffati, M., 2025. Economic Growth in the Digital Era: Limits and Benefits of Globalization and Digital Transformation in KSA. Sustainability. 17(9), 3893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093893

[39] Alfehaid, F., Omri, A., Altwaijri, A., 2024. Impact of ICT Diffusion and Opportunity Entrepreneurship on Environmental Sustainability in Saudi Arabia. Heliyon. 10(19), e39009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39009

[40] Hamilton, K., Clemens, M., 1999. Genuine Savings Rates in Developing Countries. The World Bank Economic Review. 13(2), 333–356. Available from: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/637171468340206712/genuine-savings-rates-in-developing-countries

[41] Pezzey, J.C.V., 2004. Sustainability Policy and Environmental Policy. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 106(2), 339–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2004.00355.x

[42] Arrow, K.J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L.H., et al., 2012. Sustainability and the Measurement of Wealth. Environment and development economics. 17(3), 317–353. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26265518

[43] Asheim, G.B., 1994. Net National Product as an Indicator of Sustainability. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 96(2), 257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3440603

[44] Sims, C.A., 1980. Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica. 48(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017

[45] Somoye, R.O.C., 2013. The Impact Of Finance On Entrepreneurship Growth In Nigeria: A Cointegration Framework. ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives. 2(2), 21–45. Available from: http://www.acrn.eu/resources/Journals/201310b.pdf

[46] Ben Mbarek, M., Ben Ali, N., Feki, R., 2014. Causality Relationship Between CO2 Emissions, GDP and Energy Intensity in Tunisia. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 16(6), 1253–1262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9525-x

[47] Boca Saravia, A., Rodríguez, G., 2022. Presidential Approval in Peru: An Empirical Analysis Using a Fractionally Cointegrated Var. Economic Change and Restructuring. 55(3), 1973–2010.

[48] Dutta, K.D., Saha, M., 2023. Does Financial Development Cause Sustainable Development? A PVAR Approach. Economic Change and Restructuring. 56(2), 879–917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09451-y

[49] Diebold, F.X., Yilmaz, K., 2012. Better to Give Than to Receive: Predictive Directional Measurement of Volatility Spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting. 28(1), 57–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006

[50] Pesaran, H.H., Shin, Y., 1998. Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models. Economics Letters. 58(1), 17–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0

[51] Maddala, G.S., Wu, S., 1999. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 61(S1), 631–652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631

[52] Breitung, J., 2000. The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. In: Advances in Econometrics. Emerald: Bingley, UK. pp. 161–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6

[53] Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics. 115(1), 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

[54] Hlouskova, J., Wagner, M., 2006. The Performance of Panel Unit Root and Stationarity Tests: Results from a Large Scale Simulation Study. Econometric Reviews. 25(1), 85–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500545504

[55] Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., James Chu, C.-S., 2002. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics. 108(1), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7

[56] Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74(366a), 427–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531

[57] Phillips, P.C.B., Perron, P., 1988. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika. 75(2), 335–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335

[58] Geweke, J., 1984. Chapter 19 Inference and Causality in Economic Time Series Models. In: Handbook of Econometrics. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 1101–1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4412(84)02011-0

[59] Bressler, S.L., Seth, A.K., 2011. Wiener–Granger Causality: A Well Established Methodology. NeuroImage. 58(2), 323–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.059

[60] Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica. 55(2), 251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236

[61] Dalvi, A., Dhanawade, S., Shingate, K., 2025. Cultivating Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Agriculture: Fulfilling the Promise of Sustainable Development Goals. In: Prasad, L., Goncharuk, A., Fauzi, T. (Eds.). Sustainable Smart Technology Businesses in Global Economies, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003616306

[62] Galindo-Martín, M.-Á., Castaño-Martínez, M.-S., Méndez-Picazo, M.-T., 2021. The Role of Entrepreneurship in Different Economic Phases. Journal of Business Research. 122, 171–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.050

[63] Koop, G., Pesaran, M.H., Potter, S.M., 1996. Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models. Journal of Econometrics. 74(1), 119–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(95)01753-4

[64] Belloumi, M., Alshehry, A., 2015. Sustainable Energy Development in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability. 7(5), 5153–5170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055153

[65] Leigh, D., & Rossi, M. (2002). Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Turkey. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2002/wp02204.pdf (cited 13 August 2025).

[66] Ningrum, D.A.D., Ramadhani, A., Hamid, A., et al., (2025). Implementation of Green Entrepreneurship at PT Greenfields Indonesia. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 4(5), 1977–1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i5.161

[67] Soytas, U., Sari, R., Ewing, B.T., 2007. Energy Consumption, Income, and Carbon Emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics. 62(3–4), 482–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.009

[68] Sallam, M.A.M., 2023. The Effects of Compound Macroeconomic Variables on Economic Growth, Evidence From North African Countries, Using Pardl and the Pvar Approaches. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 19(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2023.19-3.13

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.