Research on World Agricultural Economy

The Role of Sustainability Performance to Improve Green Competitive Advantage in the Agriculture Sector Manufacturing Industry in Indonesia

MF. Arrozi Adhikara

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta 11510, Indonesia

Abdurrahman

Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta 11510, Indonesia

Nur Diana

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia

Maslichah

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia

M. Basjir

Department of Machine, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Islam Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia

Dewi Diah Fakhriyyah

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i1.2620

Received: 11 August 2025 | Revised: 10 September 2025 | Accepted: 30 Septembert 2025 | Published Online: 10 February 2026

---

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze how Sustainability Performance enhanced Green Competitive Advantage through Environmental Consciousness and Green Intellectual Capital in Indonesia's agricultural manufacturing sector. The Natural Resource-Based View (NRBV), Stakeholder, and Knowledge-Based theories were integrated to address a literature gap on this mediation mechanism in developing countries. A quantitative, explanatory causality method was adopted to collect data through surveys of 183 senior and middle managers from relevant companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The study used a cross-sectional time horizon and individual unit of analysis, then, data were processed using Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS software. The results showed that both Environmental Consciousness and Green Intellectual Capital significantly positive influence on Sustainability Performance, thereby enhancing Green Competitive Advantage. Furthermore, Sustainability Performance fully mediated the relationships between Environmental Consciousness and Green Competitive Advantage, as well as between Green Intellectual Capital and Green Competitive Advantage. These results showed that Sustainability Performance was important for converting environmental awareness and intellectual resources into competitive advantage by improving resource efficiency, stimulating green innovation, and enhancing corporate image. This study contributes theoretically by expanding NRBV and Stakeholder theories through incorporating Sustainability Performance as a mediator. It was practically recommended that companies should internalize Environmental Consciousness through training, develop Green Intellectual Capital, and implement sustainability management systems like ISO 14001. For regulators, the results supported policies promoting ESG transparency and green practice incentives. This study also addressed global challenges, such as the EU's CBAM, showing the need to adapt to sustainability standards for the maintenance of market competitiveness.

Keywords: Green Intellectual Capital; Sustainability Performance; Environmental Consciousness; Green Competi‑ tive Advantage

---

References

[1] Nandy, 2024. Environmental Pollution: Definition, Examples, Impacts and How to Overcome. Available from: https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/pencemaran-lingkungan/ (cited 3 April 2024). (in Indonesian)

[2] Abdullah, M., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., et al., 2016. Barriers to Green Innovation Initiatives Among Manufacturers: The Malaysian Case. Review of Management Science. 10, 683–709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0173-9

[3] Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G., et al., 2012. Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A Survey. International Journal of Production Economics. 140(1), 330–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008

[4] World Bank Group, 2023. Unleashing Indonesia’s business potential. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/716f9787-fd91-47b5-9bfb-682e7531e076/content (cited 1 August 2025).

[5] The World Bank, 2024. Green economic growth in Indonesia. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099022524232013007/pdf/P177245-f9792680-9e7c-4dec-bf95-5add9e14539a.pdf (cited 1 August 2025).

[6] Mallak, S.K., Ishak, M.B., Mohamed, A.F., et al., 2018. Toward Sustainable Solid Waste Minimization by Manufacturing Firms in Malaysia: Strengths and Weaknesses. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 190, 575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6935-5

[7] Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., et al., 2015. Green Innovation Adoption in Automotive Supply Chain: The Malaysian Case. Journal of Cleaner Production. 108, 1115–1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.039

[8] Lyon, T.P., Montgomery, A.W., 2015. The Means and End of Greenwash. Organization and Environment. 28(2), 223–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332

[9] Linnenluecke, M.K., Griffiths, A., 2013. Firms and Sustainability: Mapping the Intellectual Origins and Structure of the Corporate Sustainability Field. Global Environmental Change. 23(1), 382–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.007

[10] Yusliza, M.Y., Yong, J.Y., Tanveer, M.I., et al., 2020. A Structural Model of the Impact of Green Intellectual Capital on Sustainable Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 249, 119334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119334

[11] Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., Hyun, S.S., et al., 2019. Applying the Theory of Consumption Values to Explain Drivers’ Willingness to Pay for Biofuels. Sustainability. 11(3), 668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030668

[12] Wong, W.P., Wong, K.Y., 2014. Synergizing an Ecosphere of Lean for Sustainable Operations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 85, 51–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.093

[13] Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G., 2014. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science. 60(11), 2835–2857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

[14] Chang, C.H., Chen, Y.S., 2013. Green Organizational Identity and Green Innovation. Management Decision. 51(5), 1056–1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2011-0314

[15] Lee, H., Wu, X., 2023. Green Supplier Selection and Environmental Performance of Firms in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry: The Roles of Behavior and Outcome Controls. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 34(7), 1141–1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2022-0425

[16] Hart, S.L., Dowell, G., 2010. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After. Journal of Management. 37(5), 1464–1479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219

[17] Jiao, X., Zhang, P., He, L., et al., 2023. Business Sustainability for Competitive Advantage: Identifying the Role of Green Intellectual Capital, Environmental Management Accounting and Energy Efficiency. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 36(2), 2125035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2125035

[18] Obeng, B.A., Robson, P., Haugh, H., 2014. Strategic Entrepreneurship and Small Firm Growth in Ghana. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. 32(5), 501–524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612463946

[19] Agostini, L., Nosella, A., Filippini, R., 2017. Does Intellectual Capital Allow Improving Innovation Performance? A Quantitative Analysis in the SME Context. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 18(2), 400–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2016-0056

[20] Chen, Y.S., 2008. The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms. Journal of Business Ethics. 77, 271–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9349-1

[21] Qureshi, M.I., Awan, U., Arshad, Z., et al., 2016. Dynamic Linkages Among Energy Consumption, Air Pollution, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agricultural Production in Pakistan: Sustainable Agriculture Key to Policy Success. Natural Hazards. 84, 367–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2423-9

[22] Jabbour, C.J.C., Santos, F.C.A., 2008. Relationships Between Human Resource Dimensions and Environmental Management in Companies: Proposal of a Model. Journal of Cleaner Production. 16(1), 51–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.025

[23] Banerjee, S.B., 2002. Corporate Environmentalism: The Construct and Its Measurement. Journal of Business Research. 55(3), 177–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1

[24] Boiral, O., 2009. Greening the Corporation Through Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics. 87, 221–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9881-2

[25] Huang, S.Y.B., Ting, C.W., Li, M.W., 2021. The Effects of Green Transformational Leadership on Adoption of Environmentally Proactive Strategies: The Mediating Role of Green Engagement. Sustainability. 13(6), 3366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063366

[26] Naffziger, D.W., Ahmed, N.U., Montagno, R.V., 2003. Perceptions of Environmental Consciousness in US Small Business: An Empirical Study. SAM Advanced Management Journal. 68(2), 23–32.

[27] Lee, K.H., 2009. Why and How to Adopt Green Management into Business Organizations? The Case Study of Korean SMEs in Manufacturing Industry. Management Decision. 47(7), 1101–1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978322

[28] Latan, H., Jabbour, C.J.C., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., et al., 2018. Effects of Environmental Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Top Management's Commitment on Corporate Environmental Performance: The Role of Environmental Management Accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production. 180, 297–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106

[29] Wijethilake, C., 2017. Proactive Sustainability Strategy and Corporate Sustainability Performance: The Mediating Effect of Sustainability Control Systems. Journal of Business Ethics. 144, 185–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2796-9

[30] Djajadikerta, H.G., Trireksani, T., 2012. Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure by Indonesian Listed Companies on Their Corporate Web Sites. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 13(1), 21–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09675421211231899

[31] Institute for Essential Services Reform, 2024. Industry decarbonization roadmaps for Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges to Net-Zero Emissions. Available from: https://iesr.or.id/download/industry-decarbonization-roadmaps-for-indonesia/ (cited 1 August 2025).

[32] Zhong, S., Geng, Y., Liu, W., et al., 2016. A Bibliometric Review on Natural Resource Accounting During 1995–2014. Journal of Cleaner Production. 139, 122–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.039

[33] Kementerian Perindustrian Republik Indonesia, 2023. Performance report secretariat of the inspectorate general. Available from: https://itjen.kemenperin.go.id/assets/laporan_doc/2024_Laporan%20Akuntabilitas%20Kinerja%20Instansi%20Pemerintahan_LAKIP%20Sekretariat%20Inspektorat%20Jenderal%20Tahun%202023.pdf (cited 13 April 2024). (in Indonesian)

[34] UNEP, 2023. Keeping the promise: annual report 2023. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/44777/UNEP_Annual_Report_2023.pdf?sequence=19 (cited 13 April 2024).

[35] Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), 2023. Indonesia’s environmental statistics 2023. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/11/30/d3456ff24f1d2f2cfd0ccbb0/statistik-lingkungan-hidup-indonesia-2023.html (cited 14 April 2024). (in Indonesian)

[36] Hart, S.L., 1995. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review. 20(4), 986–1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033

[37] Freeman, R.E., Dmytriyev, S., Phillips, R.A., 2021. Stakeholder Theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management. 47(7), 1757–1770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576

[38] Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., Khare, N., 2018. The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential. Sustainability. 10(2), 494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020494

[39] Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., Kaiser, S., 2022. ESG Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Disclosure. Global Finance Journal. 38, 45–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

[40] Yusoff, Y.M., Omar, M.K., Zaman, M.D.K., et al., 2019. Do All Elements of Green Intellectual Capital Contribute Toward Business Sustainability? Evidence from the Malaysian Context Using the Partial Least Squares Method. Journal of Cleaner Production. 234, 626–637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.153

[41] Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston, MA, USA.

[42] Laplume, A.O., Sonpar, K., Litz, R.A., 2022. Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us. Journal of Management. 34(6), 1152–1189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324322

[43] Rahmayanti, R., Sutisna, D., Salsabil, I., 2024. The Role of Stakeholder Pressure in Enhancing Green Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Green Culture. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 19(9), 3623–3632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190930

[44] Harrison, J.S., Bosse, D.A., Phillips, R.A., 2010. Managing for Stakeholders, Stakeholder Utility Functions, and Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal. 31, 58–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.801

[45] Grant, R.M., 1996. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal. 17(S2), 109–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

[46] Jeurissen, R., 2000. John Elkington, Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Journal of Business Ethics. 23, 229–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006129603978

[47] Huang, H., Mbanyele, W., Wang, F., et al., 2023. Nudging Corporate Environmental Responsibility Through Green Finance? Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research. 167, 114147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114147

[48] Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., Appuhami, R., 2018. Environmental Innovation Strategy and Organizational Performance: Enabling and Controlling Uses of Management Control Systems. Journal of Business Ethics. 151, 1139–1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3259-7

[49] Yong, J.Y., Klemeš, J.J., Varbanov, P.S., et al., 2019. Cleaner Energy for Cleaner Production: Modelling, Simulation, Optimisation and Waste Management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 111, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.062

[50] Liu, S., Yu, Q., Zhang, L., et al., 2021. Does Intellectual Capital Investment Improve Financial Competitiveness and Green Innovation Performance? Evidence from Renewable Energy Companies in China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2021(1), 9929202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9929202

[51] Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R., 2011. Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review. 89(1–2), 62–77.

[52] Hu, Q., Yuan, C., Li, X., 2024. The Impact of Environmental Strategy on Environmental Performance: Mediating Role of Green Human Resource Management and Moderating Role of Green Consciousness of Top Managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 35(17), 2891–2915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2024.2382480

[53] García-Sánchez, I.M., Hussain, N., Khan, S.A., et al., 2021. Do Markets Punish or Reward Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling? Business and Society. 60(6), 1431–1467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319898839

[54] Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., Hoppe, H., 2014. Making Sense of Conflicting Empirical Findings: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship Between Corporate Environmental and Financial Performance. European Management Journal. 32, 735–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.004

[55] Sánchez, G.I.M., Hussain, N., Ferrero, M.J., 2022. An Empirical Analysis of the Complementarities and Substitutions Between Effects of CEO Ability and Corporate Governance on Socially Responsible Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 215, 1288–1300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.130

[56] Huang, C.L., Kung, F.H., Cheng, C.L., 2022. The Effect of Environmental Consciousness on Environmental Management. Sustainability. 14(21), 14587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114587

[57] Joshi, A., Kataria, A., Rastogi, M., et al., 2023. Green Human Resource Management in the Context of Organizational Sustainability: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production. 430, 139713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139713

[58] Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., et al., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Prentice Hall: London, UK.

[59] Diana, N., Soetjipto, B.E., Handayati, P., et al., 2025. Barriers, Self-Efficacy and Performance of Creative Industry SMEs: The Role of Accounting Information System. The Economics and Finance Letters. 12(2), 374–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/29.v12i2.4253

[60] Mostafa, M.M., 2007. A Hierarchical Analysis of the Green Consciousness of the Egyptian Consumer. Psychology and Marketing. 24(5), 445–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20168

[61] Kim, Y., Choi, S.M., 2005. Antecedents of Green Purchase Behavior: An Examination of Collectivism, Environmental Concern, and Perceived Consumer Effectiveness. Advances in Consumer Research. 32, 592–599.

[62] Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 2021. The global leader for sustainability reporting. Available from: https://www.globalreporting.org (cited 1 August 2025).

[63] Li, T.T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., et al., 2021. ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects. Sustainability. 13(21), 11663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663