Evidence-based Analysis for ASEAN Agroeconomic Development: Implications for the US Tariff Policy
Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i1.2562
Received: 01 August 2025 | Revised: 25 August 2025 | Accepted: 12 September 2025 | Published Online: 3 February 2026
Copyright © 2025 Elisa Jean Jion Nor Pau, Chen Chen Yong. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
In response to rising US protectionist trade policies, this study is important to provide evidence-based analysis for the long-standing efforts of ASEAN in agroeconomic development. Agriculture continues to play a central role in ASEAN, not only as a source of food security but also as a key driver of employment and rural development. This study contributes to the literature on input-output analysis by linking structural multiplier effects with the implications of external trade policy, thereby offering a perspective on the vulnerabilities of ASAN agriculture to US protectionism. Using a multiregional input-output table, the study computes output and value-added multipliers by decomposing them into direct, indirect, and induced effects, and estimates bilateral linkages to trace cross-country production impacts and key enabling sectors in 2023. The findings show that most ASEAN countries experience strong indirect effects, which indicate dense intersectoral linkages and reliance on domestic supply networks. Highly induced effects in countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines further highlight the important role of agriculture in generating income and reducing poverty. The US tariff policy on Indonesia’s increased agricultural commodity imports and the removal of local content requirements for its long-protected agricultural industry may disrupt the domestic supply network. This disruption could affect both local and regional markets, with particular consequences for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs).
Keywords: Agriculture; Asean; Local Content; Tariffs; Input‑Output
References
[1] Sundram, P., 2023. Food security in ASEAN: progress, challenges and future. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7, 1260619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1260619
[2] TOI Business Desk, 2025. ‘Aggressive US pressure can force…’: GTRI warns India against one-sided trade deal; says don’t fall into same trap’ as Indonesia. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/aggressive-us-pressure-can-force-gtri-warns-india-against-one-sided-trade-deal-says-dont-fall-into-same-trap-as-indonesia/articleshow/122857837.cms (cited 15 July 2025).
[3] Sabala, E., Gale, F., United States. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service, 2024. U.S. agricultural exports in Southeast Asia. Economic Research Service, Report No. EIB-27, 6 August 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32747/2024.8583174.ers
[4] Smith, S.A., Khanal, A.R., 2024. Understanding ASEAN Agricultural Production, Consumption, and Trade Potential. Available from: https://www.choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/theme-articles/us-agricultural-trade-and-asean/understanding-asean-agricultural-production-consumption-and-trade-potential (cited 15 July 2025).
[5] World Bank Group. GDP per capital (current US$) —Malaysia 1991. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=MY (cited 15 July 2025).
[6] Bouët, A., Nguyen, D.B., Traoré, F., et al., 2022. Intra-regional agricultural trade in ASEAN—An assessment of the impact of non-tariff measures. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/daaa2928-589e-4399-8849-47a81901cea7/content (cited 15 July 2025).
[7] Menezes, T., 2024. Countryman A. U.S. Meat Export Potential in ASEAN. Available from: https://www.choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/theme-articles/us-agricultural-trade-and-asean/us-meat-export-potential-in-asean (cited 15 July 2025).
[8] Unit EP, 2017. Malaysia Success Story in Poverty Eradication. Available from: https://www.studocu.com/my/document/universiti-teknologi-mara/introduction-to-public-policy/malaysia-success-story-in-poverty-eradication/30555251 (cited 15 July 2025).
[9] The ASEAN Secretariat, 2025. ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Strategic Plan 2026-2030 of the ASEAN Community Vision 2045. Available from: https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AEC-Strategic-Plan-2026-2030.pdf (cited 15 July 2025).
[10] Greenville, J., Kawasaki, K., Jouanjean, M., 2019. Employment in Agriculture and Food Trade: Assessing the Role of GVCs. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers No. 124. 20 February 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5ed3b181-en
[11] Mukhlis, I., Hendrati, I.M., Gürçam, Ö.S., et al., 2021. Poverty and Food Security: a reality in ASEAN countries. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan. 13(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um002v13i12021p001
[12] Rattanasevee, P., 2014. Towards institutionalised regionalism: the role of institutions and prospects for institutionalisation in ASEAN. SpringerPlus. 3(1), 556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-556
[13] Norbu, N.P., Tateno, Y., Bolesta, A., 2021. Structural transformation and production linkages in Asia-Pacific least developed countries: An input-output analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 59, 510–524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.09.009
[14] Reardon, T., Liverpool-Tasie, L.S.O., Minten, B., 2021. Quiet Revolution by SMEs in the midstream of value chains in developing regions: wholesale markets, wholesalers, logistics, and processing. Food Security. 13(6), 1577–1594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01224-1
[15] Suyanto, S., Sugiarti, Y., Setyaningrum, I., 2021. Clustering and firm productivity spillovers in Indonesian manufacturing. Heliyon. 7(3), e06504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06504
[16] Yamano, N., Guilhoto, J., 2020. CO2 emissions embodied in international trade and domestic final demand: Methodology and results using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Database. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers No. 2020/11, 23 November 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/8f2963b8-en
[17] Ross, A.G., Raseta, M., Grajewski, M., et al., 2025. Resilience and recovery in networked economic systems: An ex-ante analysis of susceptibility to aspects of a potential China-Taiwan conflict. Papers in Regional Science. 104(3), 100094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pirs.2025.100094
[18] Heady, E.O., Schnittker, J.A., 1957. Application of Input-Output Models to Agriculture. Journal of Farm Economics. 39(3), 745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1234429
[19] Marlianti, N., Wahyunadi, W., Harsono, I., 2017. The Role of Agricultural Sector onthe Economy of West Nusa Tenggara (Input-Output Analysis Approach). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan. 9(2), 176–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um002v9i22017p176
[20] Bank, A.D., 2023. Multiregional Input-Output Database. Available from: https://kidb.adb.org/globalization (cited 15 July 2025).
[21] Miller, R.E., Blair, P.D., 2022. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 238–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676212
[22] Ibrahim, M.K., Shaibu, U.M., 2024. Analysis of Ghana—Nigeria Export Trade: Linkages, Impacts and Policy Implications. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 333–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i4.1172
[23] Kuroiwa, I., 2021. Method of value chain mapping with international input-output data: application to the agricultural value chain in three Greater Mekong Subregion countries. Journal of Economic Structures. 10(1), 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-021-00235-7
[24] Shubravska, O., Prokopenko, K., 2022. The Agricultural Sector of Ukraine in the Global Food Market: Pre-war State and Post-war Prospects. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 3(4), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v3i4.693
[25] Emonts-Holley, T., Ross, A., Swales, K., 2021. Estimating induced effects in IO impact analysis: variation in the methods for calculating the Type II Leontief multipliers. Economic Systems Research. 33(4), 429–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2020.1837741
[26] Lyu, Y., Xiang, Y., Wang, D., 2023. Evaluating Indirect Economic Losses from Flooding Using Input-Output Analysis: An Application to China’s Jiangxi Province. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(5), 4509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054509
[27] Mardones, C., Silva, D., 2021. Estimation of regional input coefficients and output multipliers for the regions of Chile. Papers in Regional Science. 100(4), 875–890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12603
[28] Oosterhaven, J., Hewings, G.J.D., 2021. Interregional Input-Output Models. In: Fischer, M.M., Nijkamp, P. (eds.). Handbook of Regional Science. Springer: Berlin, Germany. pp. 397–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60723-7_43
[29] Muhammad, A., Hossen, M.D., Countryman, A.M., 2024. Theme Overview: U.S. Agricultural Trade and ASEAN. Available from: https://www.choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/theme-articles/us-agricultural-trade-and-asean/theme-overview-us-agricultural-trade-and-asean (cited 15 July 2025).
[30] Chrisendo, D., Siregar, H., Qaim, M., 2021. Oil palm and structural transformation of agriculture in Indonesia. Agricultural Economics. 52(5), 849–862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12658
[31] Shams, S., Shafiuddin, K.H., Sultan, A.M.S.B.H.M., et al., 2015. Agriculture Adaptation to Climate Change in Brunei Darussalam: A Step towards Food Security. Environment and Urbanization ASIA. 6(1), 59–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425315585193
[32] USDA, 2025. Global Agricultural Trade System (GAT). Available from: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/gats/ExpressQuery1.aspx (cited 15 July 2025).
[33] Mikulić, D., Lovrinčević, Ž., Keček, D., 2023. Economic effects of food supply chain re-localization on the Croatian economy. Agricultural and Food Economics. 11(1), 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-023-00281-8
[34] Loizou, E., Karelakis, C., Galanopoulos, K., et al., 2019. The role of agriculture as a development tool for a regional economy. Agricultural Systems. 173, 482–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.04.002
[35] Yeritsyan, A., Tabares, E., Ishdorj, A., et al., 2024. Policies enhancing agricultural value chains in developing countries: An Evidence Gap Map. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 18, 101418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101418
[36] Singh, A.K., Pathak, M., Joshi, M.D., et al., 2024. The Role of Agriculture in Poverty Alleviation and Rural Development. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 30(8), 529–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i82276
[37] Amgai, S., Komarek, A.M., Adhikari, R.P., 2025. Understanding the role of policy in enhancing agrifood value chain competitiveness: A systematic literature review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 22, 102022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102022
[38] Li, S., Chen, X., Ren, Y., et al., 2024. The impact of demographic dynamics on food consumption and its environmental outcomes: Evidence from China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 23(2), 414–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.11.017
[39] Mujahid, I., Kornher, L., 2016. ASEAN Food Reserve and Trade: Review and Prospect. In: Kalkuhl, M., Von Braun, J., Torero, M. (eds.). Food Price Volatility and Its Implications for Food Security and Policy. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 413–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28201-5_17
[40] Devadason, E.S., 2024. Rethinking Agri-Food Trade in ASEAN: Issues and Prospects. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development. 45(1),165–192.