Dynamic Modelling of the Impact of Fiscal and Exchange Rate Policy on Agriculture and Welfare Applied to South Africa

Ramos E. Mabugu

Accounting and Economics Department, Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley 8301, South Africa

Ismaël Fofana

Ministry of Economy and Finance, Government of Guinea, Conakry Bp579, Guinea

Margaret Chitiga‑Mabugu

Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i2.2535

Received: 25 July 2025 | Revised: 12 August 2025 | Accepted: 18 August 2025 | Published Online: 8 April 2026

Copyright © 2026 Ramos E. Mabugu, Ismaël Fofana, Margaret Chitiga‑Mabugu. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

This study examines the effects of macroeconomic policies on growth and equity in South Africa, focusing on agriculture's links to the broader economy. We extend existing work by employing a dynamic agriculture-centred computable general equilibrium model to quantify the impacts. The focus is on fiscal and exchange rate policies and assessing how these policies affect agriculture and the nation's welfare. Findings indicate that expansionary fiscal policies impede agricultural expansion, regardless of how the fiscal expansion is financed. Positive effects on rural consumption only arise if budget deficits are managed through taxes on household income, which minimises adverse effects on agriculture and rural growth more than on urban sectors. A depreciated exchange rate enhances sectors driven by exports, such as agriculture and mining, but slightly detracts from the economy by affecting private services industries that constitute a large share of the economy, less tradable, and sensitive to income changes. The overall impact on consumption income is neutral but is marginally challenging for urban dwellers. These findings have two main policy implication. To be suitable for the agricultural sector and the broader economy, the orientation and framework of the current macroeconomic policy need adjustment to sustain fiscal balance and prevent exchange rate overvaluation. In the policymaking, two key considerations are: first, quantifying how macroeconomic policies interact with the agricultural sector, structural factors, and broader equilibrium effects, as these can significantly alter policy outcomes. Second, recognising the distributive impacts of policies, especially on agriculture and rural markets, and integrating agriculture's role in income distribution and political economy consequences into policymaking.

Keywords: Agriculture; Applied Economics; Welfare; Fiscal Policy; Exchange Rate Policy; South Africa


References

[1] World Bank, 2022. The World Bank in South Africa. Country Overview. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/southafrica/overview (cited 25 March 2025).

[2] Vink, N., 2004. The influence of policy on the roles of agriculture in South Africa. Development Southern Africa. 21(1), 155–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835042000181462

[3] Kirsten, J.F., May, J., Hendricks, S., et al., 2007. The poverty alleviation and food security role of agriculture in South Africa. In: Bresciani F., Valdés, A. (Eds.). Beyond food production: the role of agriculture in poverty reduction. Food Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy. pp. 188–221.

[4] Alexander, M., 2025. Mapping poverty in South Africa. Available from: https://southafrica-info.com/people/mapping-poverty-in-south-africa/ (cited 25 July 2025).

[5] Statistics South Africa, 2017. Poverty Trends in South Africa: An Examination of Absolute Poverty between 2006 and 2015. Available from: https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-10-06/Report-03-10-062015.pdf (cited 25 March 2025).

[6] Timmer, P.C., 1988. The agricultural transformation. In: Chenery, H., Srinivasan, T.N. (Eds.). Handbook of Development Economics. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 275–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(88)01011-3

[7] World Bank, 2007. Assistance to agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: an IEG review (English). Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/643971468198877047 (cited 25 March 2025).

[8] Christiaensen, L., Demery, L., Kuhl, J., 2011. The (evolving) role of agriculture in poverty reduction—An empirical perspective. Journal of Development Economics. 96(2), 239–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.10.006

[9] African Development Bank (AfDB), 2018. African Economic Outlook 2018: Macroeconomic developments and structural change: Infrastructure and its financing. Available from: https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/African_Economic_Outlook_2018_-_EN.pdf (cited 25 March 2025).

[10] Cateia, J.V., Bittencourt, M.V.L., Carvalho, T.S., et al., 2023. Potential Economic Impacts of Agricultural Growth in Africa: Evidence from Guinea-Bissau. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 55(3), 492–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2023.26

[11] Mellor, J. W., 1995. Agriculture on the Road to Industrialization. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA.

[12] Republic of South Africa, 2011. National Development Plan 2030. Our future—Make it work. Available from: www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/ndp-2030-our-future-make-it-workr.pdf (cited 2 March 2025).

[13] Adelman, I., Taylor, J.E., 1990. Is structural adjustment with a human face possible? The case of Mexico. Journal of Development Studies. 26(3), 387–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389008422161

[14] Díaz-Bonilla, E., 2019. Macroeconomic Policies and Agricultural and Rural Development. 2030—Food, agriculture and rural development in Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9a0d4973-0a4f-45b7-a6a3-4afa87c3a07b/content (cited 2 March 2025).

[15] Bergman, L., 2005. CGE Modelling of Environmental Policy and Resource Management. In: Handbook of Environmental Economics Vol. 3: Economy wide and international environmental issues. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 1273–1306.

[16] De Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E., 2020. Using agriculture for development: Supply- and demand-side approaches. World Development. 133, 105003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105003

[17] Decaluwé, B., Lemelin, A., Robichaud, V., et al., 2013. PEP-1-t (Single-Country Dynamic Version). Available from: https://www.pep-net.org/research-resources/cge-models (cited 2 March 2025).

[18] Mabugu, R.E., Fofana, I., Chitiga-Mabugu, M.R., 2015. Pro-Poor Tax Policy Changes in South Africa: Potential and Limitations. Journal of African Economies. 24(suppl 2), ii73–ii105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/eju038

[19] Tiberti, L., Maisonnave, H., Chitiga, M., et al., 2018. Reforming grants to tackle child poverty: An integrated macro-micro approach. World Development. 112, 272–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.023

[20] Fofana, I., Mabugu, R.E., Camara, A., et al., 2024. Ending poverty and accelerating growth in South Africa, through the expansion of its social grant system. Journal of Policy Modeling. 46(6), 1090–1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2024.07.003

[21] Chitiga-Mabugu, M., Henseler, M., Maisonnave, H., et al., 2025. Financing the Basic income support in South Africa under fiscal constraints. World Development Perspectives. 37, 100657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100657

[22] Mabugu, R.E., Fofana, I., Chitiga-Mabugu, M., 2025. Market Imperfection and Rural-Urban Effects of Agriculture and Non-Agriculture Productivity Shocks: A Dynamic CGE Model Analysis for South Africa. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 6(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i3.1917

[23] Mabugu, R.E., Fofana, I., Chitiga-Mabugu, M., 2025. Evaluating impacts of agriculture-led investments on sub-Saharan African countries’ growth and poverty. International Review of Applied Economics. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2025.2456226

[24] Goodfriend, M., McDermott, J., 1995. Early Development. American Economic Review. 85(1), 116–133. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2123617

[25] Hansen, G.D., Prescott, E.C., 2002. Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review. 92(4), 1205–1217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344731

[26] Gollin, D., Parente, S., Rogerson, R., Structural Transformation and Cross-Country Income Differences.Available from: http://www.dklevine.com/archive/refs4506439000000000259.pdf (cited 25 March 2025).

[27] Atkeson, A., Kehoe, P.J., 2007. Modeling the Transition to a New Economy: Lessons from Two Technological Revolutions. American Economic Review. 97(1), 64–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.1.64

[28] Wang, P., Xie, D., 2004. Activation of a modern industry. Journal of Development Economics. 74(2), 393–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.06.005

[29] Laitner, J., 2000. Structural Change and Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies. 67(3), 545–561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00143

[30] Ngai, L.R., Pissarides, C.A., 2007. Structural Change in a Multisector Model of Growth. American Economic Review. 97(1), 429–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.1.429

[31] Kongsamut, P., Rebelo, S., Xie, D., 2001. Beyond Balanced Growth. The Review of Economic Studies. 68(4), 869–882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00193

[32] Caselli, F., Coleman Ii, W.J., 2001. The U.S. Structural Transformation and Regional Convergence: A Reinterpretation. Journal of Political Economy. 109(3), 584–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/321015

[33] Duarte, M., Restuccia, D., 2010. The Role of the Structural Transformation in Aggregate Productivity*. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 125(1), 129–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.129

[34] Buera, F.J., Kaboski, J.P., 2012. The Rise of the Service Economy. American Economic Review. 102(6), 2540–2569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2540

[35] Herrendorf, B., Rogerson, R., Valentinyi, A., 2014. Growth and Structural Transformation. In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, S.N. (Eds.). Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 855–941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00006-9

[36] Lewis, W.A., 1954. Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester School. 22(2), 139–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x

[37] Ranis, G., Fei, J.C.H., 1961. A Theory of Economic Development. American Economic Review. 51, 533–565.

[38] Fei, J.C.H., Ranis, G., 1964. Development of the Labour Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy. Yale University: New Haven, CT, USA.

[39] Sen, A.K., 1966. Peasants and Dualism with or without Surplus Labor. Journal of Political Economy. 74(5), 425–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/259198

[40] Todaro, M.P., 1969. A Model of Labour Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries. American Economic Review. 39, 138–148.

[41] Harris, J.R., Todaro, M.P., 1970. Migration, Unemployment, and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis. American Economic Review. 60, 126–142. Available from: https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/top20/60.1.126-142.pdf

[42] Khan, M.A., 1980. The Harris-Todaro hypothesis and the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson trade model. Journal of International Economics. 10(4), 527–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(80)90004-5

[43] Batra, R.N., Naqvi, N., 1987. Urban Unemployment and the Gains from Trade. Economica. 54(215), 381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2554451

[44] Beladi, H., Marjit, S., 1996. An Analysis of Rural-Urban Migration and Protection. The Canadian Journal of Economics. 29(4), 930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/136221

[45] Chang, R., Kaltani, L., Loayza, N.V., 2009. Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. Journal of Development Economics. 90(1), 33–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.06.011

[46] Drazen, A., Eckstein, Z., 1988. On the Organisation of Rural Markets and the Process of Economic Development. American Economic Review. 78, 431–443.

[47] Glomm, G., 1992. A Model of Growth and Migration. The Canadian Journal of Economics. 25(4), 901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/135771

[48] Bencivenga, V.R., Smith, B.D., 1997. Unemployment, Migration, and Growth. Journal of Political Economy. 105(3), 582–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/262083

[49] Banerjee, A.V., Newman, A.F., 1998. Information, the Dual Economy, and Development. The Review of Economic Studies. 65(4), 631–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00062

[50] Lucas, Jr., R.E., 2004. Life Earnings and Rural‐Urban Migration. Journal of Political Economy. 112(S1), S29–S59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/379942

[51] Krueger, A., Schiff, M., Valdés, A., 1988. Agricultural Incentives in Developing Countries: Measuring the Effects of Sectorial and Economywide Policies. World Bank Economic Review. 2(3), 255–271. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/481751468764718845/pdf/Agricultural-incentives-in-developing-countries-measuring-the-effect-of-sectoral-and-economywide-policies.pdf

[52] Schiff, M., Valdés, A., 1992. The Political Economy of Agricultural Pricing Policy. In: A Synthesis of the Economics in Developing Countries, vol. 4. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA.

[53] Díaz-Bonilla, E., 2015. Macroeconomics, agriculture, and food security: A guide to policy analysis in developing countries. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896298590

[54] Paarlberg, P., Chambers, R., 1988. Macroeconomics, Agriculture and Exchange Rates. Westview Press: Boulder, CO.

[55] Orden, D., 1986. Agriculture, trade, and macroeconomics: The U.S. case. Journal of Policy Modeling. 8(1), 27–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(86)90003-7

[56] Johnson, O., 1987. The Agricultural Sector and Adjustment Programs Supported by IMF Stand-By Arrangements. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.884860

[57] Pauw, K., Thurlow, J., 2011. The Role of Agriculture Growth in Reducing Poverty and Hunger: The Case of Tanzania. Available from: http://cdm15738.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/127101/filename/127 (cited 15 March 2025).

[58] Maisonnave, H., Mamboundou, P.N., 2022. Agricultural economic reforms, gender inequality and poverty in Senegal. Journal of Policy Modeling. 44(2), 361–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.03.006

[59] Hartley, F., Merven, B., Hughes, A., et al., 2025. Estimating the economy-wide and redistributive impacts of mitigation in South Africa. Climate and Development. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2025.2491539

[60] Zidouemba, P.R., Traoré, F., Odjo, S.P., 2025. Imperfect competition and asymmetric welfare effects of global price and productivity shocks: a CGE model analysis for Senegal. Cogent Economics & Finance. 13(1), 2475160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2475160

[61] Dervis, K., de Melo, J., Robinson, S., 1982. General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[62] Devarajan, S., Robinson, S., 2013. Contribution of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling to Policy Formulation in Developing Countries. In: Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 277–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00005-5

[63] Baldacci, E., Clements, B., Gupta, S., et al., 2008. Social Spending, Human Capital, and Growth in Developing Countries. World Development. 36(8), 1317–1341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.08.003

[64] Pereira, A.M., Shoven, J.B., 1988. Survey of dynamic computational general equilibrium models for tax policy evaluation. Journal of Policy Modeling. 10(3), 401–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(88)90029-4

[65] Bacchetta, M., Beverelli, C., Cadot, O., et al., 2012. A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. World Trade Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. p. 236. Available from: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wto_unctad12_e.pdf

[66] Carri, B., 2008. CGE Approaches to Policy Analysis in Developing Countries: Issues and Perspectives. South Pacific Environmental Radioactivity Association (SPERA): Melbourne, Australia.

[67] Dixon, P., 2006. Evidence-Based Trade Policy Decision Making in Australia and the Development of Computable General Equilibrium Modelling. Centre of Policy Studies: Melbourne, Australia. Available from: https://vuir.vu.edu.au/38945/1/g-163.pdf

[68] Kingdon, G.G., Knight, J., 2004. Unemployment in South Africa: The Nature of the Beast. World Development. 32(3), 391–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.005

[69] Kingdon, G.G., Knight, J., 2006. How Flexible are Wages in Response to Local Unemployment in South Africa? ILR Review. 59(3), 471–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390605900308

[70] Blanchflower, D.G., Oswald, A.J., 1995. An Introduction to the Wage Curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9(3), 153–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.3.153

[71] Jung, H.-S., Thorbecke, E., 2001. The Impact of Public Education Expenditure on Human Capital, Growth, and Poverty in Tanzania and Zambia: A General Equilibrium Approach. IMF Working Papers. 01(106), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451852899.001

[72] Van Seventer, D., Bold, S., Gabriel, S., et al., 2019. A 2015 Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for South Africa. The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research: New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://sa-tied.wider.unu.edu/article/2015-social-accounting-matrix-south-africa

[73] Van Seventer, D., Davies, R., 2019. A 2016 social accounting matrix for South Africa with an occupationally disaggregated labour market representation, 56th ed. UNU-WIDER: Helsinki, Finland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2019/690-6

[74] Ntombela, S.M., Kalaba, M., Bohlmann, H., 2018. Estimating trade elasticities for South Africa’s agricultural commodities for use in policy modelling. Agrekon. 57(3–4), 221–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2018.1518724

[75] Statistics South Africa, 2024. Improving lives through data ecosystems. Available from: https://www.statssa.gov.za/?page_id=idmfuleniunicipality (cited 15 March 2025).

[76] Schultz, T.W, 1978. On economics and politics of agriculture. In Distortions of agricultural incentive. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, USA.

[77] International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2025. South Africa: 2024 Article IV Consultation. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2025/01/30/South-Africa-2024-Article-IV-Consultation-Press-Release-Staff-Report-and-Statement-by-the-561414 (cited 15 March 2025).

[78] André, F.J., Cardenete, M.A., Romero, C., 2010. Designing Public Policies: An Approach Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis and Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer: Berlin, Germany. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12183-8

[79] Adams, P.D., Parmenter, B.R., 2013. Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Environmental Issues in Australia. In: Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling. Elsevier: London, UK. pp. 553–657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00009-2

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.