Consumer Decision-Making in Livestream Agricultural Retail: Evidence from Northern Vietnam
Faculty of Political Economy, VNU University of Economics and Business, Hanoi 11300, Vietnam
Faculty of Political Economy, VNU University of Economics and Business, Hanoi 11300, Vietnam
Nga Nguyen‑Thi‑Minh
Faculty of Political Economy, VNU University of Economics and Business, Hanoi 11300, Vietnam
Faculty of Economics & Management, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 12400, Vietnam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i2.2486
Received: 17 July 2025 | Revised: 13 October 2025 | Accepted: 21 October 2025 | Published Online: 3 April 2026
Copyright © 2026 Linh Nguyen‑Thi Thuy; Quynh Pham‑Ngoc‑Huong, Nga Nguyen‑Thi‑Minh; Mai Dong‑Thanh. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
This study explores the determinants shaping consumers’ decisions to purchase agricultural products through livestreaming in Vietnam’s northern mountainous provinces-regions constrained by underdeveloped e-commerce infrastructure. The research seeks to uncover key behavioral and contextual drivers influencing online agricultural purchasing behavior. Based on 1323 valid survey responses, the study applies Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test seven hypothesized relationships. Results indicate that livestream timing (β = 0.415), viewer interaction (β = 0.226), livestream environment (β = 0.124), and product information (β = 0.122) exert significant positive effects on purchase decisions. In contrast, seller reputation, customer understanding, and interface intuitiveness are found to have no statistically significant impact. This research advances the theoretical understanding of consumer decision-making in the context of agricultural livestream commerce by extending existing frameworks to digital markets in low-connectivity areas. It also provides empirical insights specific to Vietnam’s highland regions, where technological access and digital literacy remain limited. Practically, the findings suggest that optimizing the timing of livestream sessions, enhancing audience interactivity, and ensuring transparency and accuracy in product information can significantly improve consumer engagement and sales performance. Overall, this study contributes both to academic discourse on digital consumer behavior and to the sustainable development of agricultural e-commerce ecosystems in emerging rural economies.
Keywords: Digital Transformation; Livestream; Purchase Decisions; Agricultural Products; Northern Vietnam
References
[1] Ministry of Industry and Trade, 2025. Vietnam import and export report 2024. Industrial and Commercial Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam. (in Vietnamese)
[2] Nguyen, V. C., 2024. E-commerce application in agricultural production: A case study in Thuy Bieu Commune, Hue City. Can Tho University Science Journal. 60(3B), 162–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22144/ctujos.2024.316 (in Vietnamese)
[3] Nguyen, T.N.L., 2022. Digital Agriculture in Viet Nam: Conditions and Prospect of Development. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics. 14(3), 43–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2022.140304
[4] Pham, T.H., Tran, T.P., 2025. E-commerce: Opportunities and challenges for Vietnamese businesses. Available from: https://kinhtevadubao.vn/thuong-mai-dien-tu-co-hoi-va-thach-thuc-doi-voi-doanh-nghiep-viet-31558.html (cited 28 May 2025). (in Vietnamese)
[5] Vu, T.H.L., 2025. Livestream sales—Current situation and recommendations. Available from: https://www.quanlynhanuoc.vn/2025/04/29/livestream-ban-hang-thuc-trang-va-khuyen-nghi/ (cited 24 May 2025). (in Vietnamese)
[6] An, T., 2024. There are 2.5 million livestream sales sessions in Vietnam every month. Available from: https://baodautu.vn/moi-thang-co-25-trieu-phien-ban-hang-livestream-tai-viet-nam-d213850.html (cited 20 May 2025). (in Vietnamese)
[7] Zheng, S., Lyu, X., Wang, J., et al., 2023. Enhancing Sales of Green Agricultural Products through Live Streaming in China: What Affects Purchase Intention? Sustainability. 15(7), 5858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075858
[8] Chen, X., Zhang, X., Chen, J., 2024. TAM-Based Study of Farmers’ Live Streaming E-Commerce Adoption Intentions. Agriculture. 14(4), 518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040518
[9] Zhu, Y., He, L., Hu, E., et al., 2024. Research on the Development Status, Problems and Strategies of Agricultural Products E-commerce Live Streaming Platform——Taking “EAST BUY” as an Example. Academic Journal of Business & Management. 6(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.060919
[10] Zhang, H., Lian, Z., 2025. Exploring Agricultural Livestreaming and Agricultural Supply Chain Management Empowered by the Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Information Science and Engineering. 41(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.6688/JISE.202507_41(4).0002
[11] Loiacono, E.T., Watson, R.T., Goodhue, D.L., 2007. WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 11(3), 51–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302
[12] Bilgihan, A., Okumus, F., Nusair, K., et al., 2014. Online experiences: flow theory, measuring online customer experience in e-commerce and managerial implications for the lodging industry. Information Technology & Tourism. 14(1), 49–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-013-0003-3
[13] Sharabati, A.-A.A., Ali, A.A.A., Allahham, M.I., et al., 2024. The Impact of Digital Marketing on the Performance of SMEs: An Analytical Study in Light of Modern Digital Transformations. Sustainability. 16(19), 8667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198667
[14] Zeithaml, V.A., 1988. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing. 52(3), 2–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
[15] Pavlou, P.A., 2003. Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 7(3), 101–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
[16] Nguyen, T., Nguyen, T.T., Grote, U., 2023. Internet use and agricultural productivity in rural Vietnam. Review of Development Economics. 27(3), 1309–1326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12990
[17] Linh, V.H., Hieu, P.D., Chau, N.N.M., et al., 2022. Determinants of Vietnamese Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Ecommerce Platforms for Fresh Produce Retail: An Integrated TOE-TAM Framework. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research. 05(03). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i3-16
[18] Wongkitrungrueng, A., Assarut, N., 2020. The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research. 117, 543–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032
[19] Hwang, J., Youn, S., 2023. From brick-and-mortar to livestream shopping: product information acquisition from the uncertainty reduction perspective. Fashion and Textiles. 10(1), 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-022-00327-3
[20] Dong, X., Zhao, H., Li, T., 2022. The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products. Sustainability. 14(7), 4374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074374
[21] Wang, Y., Fang, L., Pan, J., 2024. The antecedents of customer satisfaction in the live-streaming commerce of green agricultural products. PLOS ONE. 19(7), e0305527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305527
[22] Xiong, X., Yang, F., Su, L., 2023. Popularity, face and voice: Predicting and interpreting livestreamers’ retail performance using machine learning techniques. arXiv preprint. arXiv: 2310.19200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.19200
[23] Zhou, R., Tong, L., 2022. A Study on the Influencing Factors of Consumers’ Purchase Intention During Livestreaming e-Commerce: The Mediating Effect of Emotion. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 903023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903023
[24] Tian, B., Chen, J., Zhang, J., et al., 2023. Antecedents and Consequences of Streamer Trust in Livestreaming Commerce. Behavioral Sciences. 13(4), 308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040308
[25] Zhao, G., 2025. Agricultural products live streaming E-commerce ecosystem dynamics research. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 9, 1685996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1685996
[26] Cong, Z., Liu, J., Manchanda, P., 2022. The Role of “Live” in Livestreaming Markets: Evidence Using Orthogonal Random Forest. arXiv preprint. arXiv: 2107.01629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.01629
[27] Kotler, P., 2001. Marketing Management, 10th ed. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
[28] Huafeng, Z., Aibdiwy, F., 2024. Building A Research Model for the Relationship between Live-Streaming E-commerce Service Quality and Agricultural Product Purchase Intention: With Perceived Value as a Mediator. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 14(12), Pages 3804-3815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i12/24336
[29] Gu, C., Sun, X., Wei, W., et al., 2025. How to improve users’ purchase intention of agricultural products through live streaming systems? Acta Psychologica. 254, 104883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104883
[30] Bilgihan, A., Kandampully, J., Zhang, T., 2016. Towards a unified customer experience in online shopping environments: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. 8(1), 102–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-07-2015-0054
[31] Kim, H.-W., Xu, Y., Gupta, S., 2012. Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 11(3), 241–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.06.003
[32] Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Ariffin, S.K., 2024. Consumers purchase intention in live-streaming e-commerce: A consumption value perspective and the role of streamer popularity. PLOS ONE. 19(2), e0296339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296339
[33] Corbitt, B.J., Thanasankit, T., Yi, H., 2003. Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2(3), 203–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00024-3
[34] Falahat, M., Lee, Y.-Y., Foo, Y.-C., et al., 2019. A Model for Consumer Trust in E-Commerce. Asian Academy of Management Journal. 24(Supp. 2), 93–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.s2.7
[35] Nguyen, B.V., Hong, H.Q., Truong, L.N.T., et al., 2024. Impulse buying behavior in livestream on Tiktok platform: Role of streamer attractiveness, social presence and sales promotion. Science & Technology Development Journal - Economics - Law and Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjelm.v8i2.1363
[36] Kim, J., He, N., Miles, I., 2023. Live Commerce Platforms: A New Paradigm for E-Commerce Platform Economy. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 18(2), 959–975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18020049
[37] Chen, Y., Lu, F., Zheng, S., 2020. A Study on the Influence of E-Commerce Live Streaming on Consumer Repurchase Intentions. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 12(4), 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v12n4p48
[38] Xiaoping, X., Xinru, C., Jinyan, H., T.C.E. C., Yugang, Y., Li, Z., 2025. Should live streaming be adopted for agricultural supply chain considering platform’s quality improvement and blockchain support?, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Trans, 195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103950.
[39] Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., et al., 2014. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
[40] Yang, G., Chaiyasoonthorn, W., Chaveesuk, S., 2024. Exploring the influence of live streaming on consumer purchase intention: A structural equation modeling approach in the Chinese E-commerce sector. Acta Psychologica. 249, 104415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104415
[41] Ali, H., 2019. Measurement of e-services quality: an empirical study of University of Bahrain. Education and Information Technologies. 24(3), 1907–1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9775-6
[42] Chin, W. W., 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulids, G.A. (Ed.). Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: New York, NY, USA. pp. 295–336.
[43] Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., et al., 2019. Predictive Model Assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing. 53(11), 2322–2347. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3471205
[44] Chen, L.-R., Chen, F.-S., Chen, D.-F., 2023. Effect of Social Presence toward Livestream E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchase Intention. Sustainability. 15(4), 3571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043571
[45] Zhang, L., Chen, M., Zamil, A.M.A., 2023. Live stream marketing and consumers’ purchase intention: An IT affordance perspective using the S-O-R paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 1069050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069050
[46] Ashraf, M., Ahmad, J., Chani, M.I., et al., 2022. Determinants of Livestream Shopping Reuse Intention in Social Commerce: Role of Trusting Belief and IT Affordance. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences. 49(4), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.4.1
[47] Ramadhoni, M.F., Prassida, G.F., 2025. The Impact of Perceived Value on Engagement, Purchase Intention, and Continuance Usage Intention: A PLS-SEM Study on Social Commerce Live Streaming Context. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis. 15(3), 310–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/vol15iss3pp310-320
[48] Cheah, J.-H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., et al., 2018. Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 30(11), 3192–3210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649
[49] Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., Yung, Y.-F., 2000. Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach. Marketing Science. 19(1), 22–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184