Research on World Agricultural Economy

Agricultural Green Innovation and Food Security in Indonesia: Exploring Green Economy Transformation

Bunga Aditi

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Harapan, Medan 20151, Indonesia

Suginam

Department of Management, Universitas Harapan, Medan 20151, Indonesia

Cia Cai Cen

Department of Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bina Karya, Tebing Tinggi 20611, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2412

Received: 2 July 2025 | Revised: 30 July 2025 | Accepted: 8 August 2025 | Published Online: 23 September 2025

---

Abstract

Sustainable development in developing countries requires integrated approaches addressing environmental sustainability, economic growth, and food security simultaneously. This study advances agricultural innovation research by employing structural equation modeling to examine the mediating role of green economy transformation in the relationship between individual farmer innovations and sustainable food security outcomes, providing novel empirical evidence on systemic mechanisms that translate micro-level innovations into macro–level food security benefits in developing country contexts. A cross–sectional survey of 398 Indonesian smallholder farmers employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to test complex mediation relationships within an integrated theoretical framework. Green entrepreneurial innovation was measured through product, process, organizational, and marketing dimensions, while green economy transformation encompassed resource efficiency, technology access, policy support, and environmental contribution. Results explained 61.2% of food security variance with all relationships statistically significant (p < 0.001). Green entrepreneurial innovation influenced food security directly (β = 0.394) and through green economy transformation (β = 0.668 → 0.421). Mediation analysis revealed partial mediation, with green economy transformation accounting for 41.6% of the total effect (β = 0.281). Findings demonstrate that sustainable food security requires integrated approaches targeting both individual farmer capacity and broader green economy development. Policy interventions addressing innovations alone achieve suboptimal results without complementary systemic changes in markets, institutions, and infrastructure, providing valuable guidance for evidence–based sustainable agricultural development policy across developing countries.

Keywords: Green Entrepreneurship; Sustainable Food Security; Green Economy Transformation; Smallholder Farm‑ ers; Agricultural Innovation; Indonesia

---

References

[1] Ashurov, S., Musse, O.S.H., Abdelhak, T., 2024. Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility in Achieving Sustainable Development and Social Welfare. BRICS Journal of Economics. 5(2), 77–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.5.e121429

[2] Barra, C., Falcone, P.M., 2024. Cross country comparisons of environmental efficiency under institutional quality. Evidence from European economies. Journal of Economic Studies. 51(9), 75–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-05-2023-0264

[3] Barra, C., Falcone, P.M., 2024. Environmental performance of countries. Examining the effect of diverse institutional factors in a metafrontier approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 95, 101972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101972

[4] Barra, C., Falcone, P.M., 2024. Unraveling the impact of economic policy uncertainty on environmental efficiency: How do institutional quality and political orientation matter? Economics & Politics. 36(3), 1450–1490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12297

[5] Ghufran, M., Aldieri, L., Pyka, A., et al., 2024. Food security assessment in the light of sustainable development goals: a post-Paris Agreement era. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 27(2), 4541–4569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04089-w

[6] Ansah, I.G.K., Gardebroek, C., Ihle, R., 2019. Resilience and household food security: a review of concepts, methodological approaches and empirical evidence. Food Security. 11(6), 1187–1203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00968-1

[7] Kudama, G., Dangia, M., Wana, H., et al., 2021. Will digital solution transform Sub-Sahara African agriculture? Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. 5, 292–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2021.12.001.

[8] Mushi, G.E., Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Burgi, P.-Y., 2022. Digital Technology and Services for Sustainable Agriculture in Tanzania: A Literature Review. Sustainability. 14(4), 2415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042415

[9] Zhang, D., Dong, F., Li, Z., et al., 2025. How Can Farmers’ Green Production Behavior Be Promoted? A Literature Review of Drivers and Incentives for Behavioral Change. Agriculture. 15(7), 744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15070744

[10] Liu, X., Huo, X., 2024. Green Finance, Land Transfer and China’s Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity. Land. 13(12), 2213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122213

[11] Falcone, P.M., Fiorentino, R., 2025. Nudging towards sustainability: Exploring the role of behavioral interventions in circular bio‐economy development for the fashion industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 32(1), 661–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2983

[12] He, J., Osabohien, R., Yin, W., et al., 2024. Green economic growth, renewable energy and food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Strategy Reviews. 55, 101503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101503

[13] Lema, Z., Lobry De Bruyn, L.A., Marshall, G.R., et al., 2021. Multilevel innovation platforms for development of smallholder livestock systems: How effective are they? Agricultural Systems. 189, 103047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103047

[14] Su, Y., Huang, Q., Shu, Q., et al., 2025. Mechanism of land trusteeship promoting farmers’ collective action: A study based on social–ecological systems framework. Journal of Rural Studies. 116, 103622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103622

[15] Errichiello, G., Falcone, P.M., Popoyan, L., 2025. Navigating climate policy: The influence of lobbying trends and narratives in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy. 163, 103974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103974

[16] Falcone, P.M., Tutore, I., 2025. Mapping the Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis and Social Network Analysis of Transformative Innovation Policies and Sustainable Development Goals. Business Strategy and the Environment. 34(2), 2423–2435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4104

[17] Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Tacconi, L., Sloan, S., et al., 2019. Indonesia’s land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change. Forest Policy and Economics. 108, 101903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.007

[18] Adamu Demelash, S., Abate Alemu, E., 2024. Measuring food system sustainability in Ethiopia: Towards a Multi-Dimensional perspective. Ecological Indicators. 161, 111991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111991

[19] Charamba, V., Kazembe, L.N., Nickanor, N., 2023. Application of item response theory modelling to measure an aggregate food security access score. Food Security. 15(5), 1383–1398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01388-y

[20] Calloway, E.E., Carpenter, L.R., Gargano, T., et al., 2023. New measures to assess the “Other” three pillars of food security–availability, utilization, and stability. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 20(1), 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01451-z

[21] Shon, J., Miles, A., 2025. Ranking food security indicators and metrics in Hawaiʻi: a Delphi approach. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8, 1427270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1427270

[22] Pham, H.-G., Chuah, S.-H., Feeny, S., 2021. Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: Findings from panel data for Vietnam. Ecological Economics. 184, 107000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107000

[23] Crudeli, L., Mancinelli, S., Mazzanti, M., et al., 2022. Beyond individualistic behaviour: Social norms and innovation adoption in rural Mozambique. World Development. 157, 105928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105928

[24] Bahn, R.A., Yehya, A.A.K., Zurayk, R., 2021. Digitalization for Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Potential, Status, and Risks for the MENA Region. Sustainability. 13(6), 3223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063223

[25] Sidibé, A., Olabisi, L.S., Doumbia, H., et al., 2021. Barriers and enablers of the use of digital technologies for sustainable agricultural development and food security. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 9(1), 00106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00106

[26] Aliabadi, V., Ataei, P., Gholamrezai, S., 2022. Identification of the relationships among the indicators of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems in agricultural startups. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 7(4), 100245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100245

[27] Anghel, G.A., Anghel, M.A., 2022. Green Entrepreneurship among Students—Social and Behavioral Motivation. Sustainability. 14(14), 8730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148730

[28] Aboagye-Darko, D., Mkhize, P., 2025. Unearthing the determinants of digital innovation adoption in the agricultural sector: The role of food security awareness and agricultural experience. Heliyon. 11(1), e41695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41695

[29] Ismail, I.J., 2025. The influence of green absorptive capacity on agripreneurs’ adoption of precision agriculture technologies: Mediating effects of green innovations. Innovation and Green Development. 4(3), 100248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100248

[30] Leite-Moraes, A.E., Rossato, F.G., Susaeta, A., et al., 2023. Environmental impacts in integrated production systems: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production. 420, 138400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138400

[31] Khurshid, S., Awan, A., Ahmad, S., 2025. Econometric insights into inclusive green growth, technological innovation and financial development dynamics in Asia: aggregated and disaggregated data analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06179-3

[32] Prigoreanu, I., Ungureanu, B.A., Ungureanu, G., et al., 2024. Analysis of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Policies in Agriculture in the EU Regarding the European Green Deal. Energies. 17(24), 6428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246428

[33] Yu, X., Wang, Q., Tian, M., et al., 2024. Exploring the Impact of Cultivated Land Utilization Green Transformation on Agricultural Economic Growth: Evidence from Jiangsu Province in China. Sustainability. 16(16), 7032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167032

[34] Phan, T.C., 2024. Impact of green investments, green economic growth and renewable energy consumption on environmental, social, and governance practices to achieve the sustainable development goals: A sectoral analysis in the ASEAN economies. International Journal of Engineering Business Management. 16, 18479790241231725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790241231725

[35] Hermans, F., Sartas, M., Van Schagen, B., et al., 2017. Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PLOS ONE. 12(2), e0169634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169634

[36] Li, J., Leeuwis, C., Heerink, N., et al., 2022. THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BACKYARD AS A LOCAL LEVEL INNOVATION INTERMEDIARY IN RURAL CHINA. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering. 9(4), 558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022465

[37] Davies, J., Maru, Y., Hall, A., et al., 2018. Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa. Agricultural Systems. 165, 321–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.014

[38] Nandi, S., Gonela, V., Awudu, I., 2023. A resource-based and institutional theory-driven model of large-scale biomass-based bioethanol supply chains: An emerging economy policy perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy. 174, 106813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106813

[39] Dyck, B., Silvestre, B.S., 2018. Enhancing socio-ecological value creation through sustainable innovation 2.0: Moving away from maximizing financial value capture. Journal of Cleaner Production. 171, 1593–1604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.209

[40] McGuire, E., Al-Zu’bi, M., Boa-Alvarado, M., et al., 2024. Equity principles: Using social theory for more effective social transformation in agricultural research for development. Agricultural Systems. 218, 103999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103999

[41] Kapgen, D., Roudart, L., 2023. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Assess Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption of New Technologies in Development Interventions. The European Journal of Development Research. 35(4), 974–995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00548-8

[42] Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., et al., 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31(1), 2–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

[43] Hair Jr, J.F., 2020. Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based PLS-SEM. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 121(1), 5–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0505

[44] Sternad Zabukovšek, S., Bobek, S., Zabukovšek, U., et al., 2022. Enhancing PLS-SEM-Enabled Research with ANN and IPMA: Research Study of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems’ Acceptance Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Mathematics. 10(9), 1379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091379

[45] Khan, P.A., Johl, S.K., Kumar, A., et al., 2023. Hope-hype of green innovation, corporate governance index, and impact on firm financial performance: a comparative study of Southeast Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30(19), 55237–55254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26262-4

[46] Appelt, J.L., Garcia Rojas, D.C., Verburg, P.H., et al., 2022. Socioeconomic outcomes of agricultural land use change in Southeast Asia. Ambio. 51(5), 1094–1109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01712-4