Exploring the Determinants of Willingness and Behavioral Actions on Occupation Transition Among Fishermen on the Liaodong Peninsula Coast, China
United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 1838509, Japan
Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 1838509, Japan
United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 1838509, Japan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2224
Received: 27 May 2025 | Revised: 20 June 2025 | Accepted: 27 June 2025 | Published Online: 3 September 2025
Copyright © 2025 Muzi Li, Masaaki Yamada, Shuang Gao. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
As marine ecosystems have deteriorated and protective measures have been implemented, marine fishery yields have decreased. The reduced economic returns from fishing activities prompt individuals from coastal communities to seek alternative employment. However, constraints such as limited educational qualifications led many to remain reluctant to leave the marine fishing sector. This research analyzed the influencing factors from four perspectives: household characteristics, working conditions, government and community support, and the natural environment, by a field survey in three coastal cities of Liaoning Province—Dalian, Zhuanghe, and Dandong. Through bivariate probit regression model analysis, the findings showed that 70% of fishermen expressed a willingness to pursue occupational transfers, while only 30% have completed this transition. We found that educational background and working experience have a negative influence on the willingness of fishermen to transition to a new occupation. The fishery community influences both fishermen’s willingness and behavior regarding their occupation transition. The use of the internet in marketing has a positive effect on fishermen’s willingness to transition. Additionally, mitigation measures are essential in shaping both the willingness and behavior of fishermen during occupational transitions. Based on these findings, we propose several recommendations to promote the sustainable development of fishery communities. First, career development training should be provided to fishermen to enhance their adaptability and skill sets, facilitating smoother occupational transitions. Second, it is important to strengthen support systems and foster mutual understanding. Finally, the effectiveness of mitigation measures should be improved to assist fishermen better as they navigate occupational changes.
Keywords: Fishermen Livelihood; Occupation Transition; Willingness and Behavior; Bivariate Probit Model
References
[1] Zheng, S., Wang, S., Xu, W., et al., 2021. Research on the job transfer pathway of Chinese marine fishermen and its driving factors. Marine Policy. 129, 104572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104572
[2] Muallil, R.N., Geronimo, R.C., Cleland, D., et al., 2011. Willingness to exit the artisanal fishery as a response to scenarios of declining catch or increasing monetary incentives. Fisheries Research. 111(1–2), 74–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.06.013
[3] China Academy of Fishery Sciences, 2023. China Fishery Statistical Yearbook 2023. China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China.
[4] Administrator, 2016. Bohai Sea fishery "overdraft" serious water quality deterioration almost "lost to the sea" [in Chinese]. Available from: https://www.fmiri.ac.cn/info/1016/13719.htm (cited 26 June 2025).
[5] Bureau of Fisheries and Fisheries Administration, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2024. National statistical bulletin on fishery economy 2023. Available from: http://www.yyj.moa.gov.cn/gzdt/202407/t20240705_6458486.htm (cited 26 June 2025).
[6] Liang, C., Pauly, D., 2020. Masking and unmasking fishing down effects: the Bohai Sea (China) as a case study. Ocean & Coastal Management. 184, 105033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105033
[7] Cinner, J.E., Daw, T., McClanahan, T.R., 2009. Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conservation Biology. 23(1), 124–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01041.x
[8] Islam, M.M., Sallu, S., Hubacek, K., et al., 2014. Vulnerability of fishery-based livelihoods to the impacts of climate variability and change: insights from coastal Bangladesh. Regional Environmental Change. 14(1), 281–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0487-6
[9] Huynh, P.T.A., Le, N.D., Le, S.T.H., et al., 2021. Adaptive livelihood strategies among small-scale fishing households to climate change-related stressors in Central Coast Vietnam. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 13(4/5), 492–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2020-0034
[10] Bodin, Ö., Crona, B.I., 2008. Management of natural resources at the community level: exploring the role of social capital and leadership in a rural fishing community. World Development. 36(12), 2763–2779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.002
[11] Zheng, S., Wang, S., Xu, W., et al., 2021. Research on the job transfer pathway of Chinese marine fishermen and its driving factors. Marine Policy. 129, 104572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104572
[12] Fabinyi, M., Belton, B., Dressler, W.H., et al., 2022. Coastal transitions: small-scale fisheries, livelihoods, and maritime zone developments in Southeast Asia. Journal of Rural Studies. 91, 184–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.02.006
[13] Praptiwi, R.A., Maharja, C., Fortnam, M., et al., 2021. Tourism-based alternative livelihoods for small island communities transitioning towards a blue economy. Sustainability. 13(12), 6655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126655
[14] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, 2024. National statistical bulletin on fishery economy 2023 [in Chinese]. Available from: http://www.moa.gov.cn/ (cited 19 June 2025).
[15] Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, 2014. National statistical bulletin of fishery economy 2013. Available from: https://www.fmiri.ac.cn/info/1016/14342.htm (cited 25 June 2025).
[16] Li, F., Li, G., 2024. An empirical study on factors influencing on-site transfer of labor force for Yangtze River retired fishermen [in Chinese]. Chinese Fisheries Economics. 42(2), 12–19.
[17] Li, J., Shen, L., Lu, J., et al., 2003. An empirical analysis of Zhoushan fishermen’s perspective on sustainable development of fishery resources [in Chinese]. Market and Demographic Analysis. 9(5), 39–46.
[18] YICODE, 2022. Sense of gain for fishermen after the fishing ban [Internet]. Available from: https://www.yicode.org.cn/en/sense-of-gain-for-fishermen-after-the-fishing-ban/ (cited 19 June 2025).
[19] OASIS P&I, 2024. Chinese authorities issued revised fishing ban periods in China [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oasispandi.com/index.php?id=98 (cited 19 June 2025).
[20] General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2021. Notice on implementing fishery development support policies to promote high-quality development of fisheries [in Chinese]. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-07/05/content_5622531.htm (cited 19 June 2025).
[21] Liaoning Provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 2024. 2023 Liaoning Province aquatic products production and fishery economy statistical bulletin [in Chinese]. Available from: https://tjj.ln.gov.cn/tjj/attachDir/2024/03/2024032815431143514.pdf (cited 19 June 2025).
[22] Wu, Z., Tian, G., Li, Y., et al., 2023. Compensation mechanisms for fishermen quit fishing: a case of Jiangsu province, China. Heliyon. 9(7), e17648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17648
[23] Donggang Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2020. Donggang statistical yearbook 2020 Available from: https://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=E0102 (cited 19 June 2025).
[24] Mugisha, B., Agole, D., Ewing, J.C., et al., 2025. Determinants of adoption of climate-smart agriculture practices among farmers in Sheema District, Western Uganda. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education. 32(2), 204–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/2831-5960.1164
[25] Ebi, K.L., Vanos, J., Baldwin, J.W., et al., 2021. Extreme weather and climate change: population health and health system implications. Annual Review of Public Health. 42(1), 293–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105026
[26] Kim, D.W., Kwon, C., Kim, J., et al., 2020. Characteristics of heat waves from a disaster perspective. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 53(1), 26–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.19.315
[27] Begho, T., Begho, M.O., 2023. The occupation of last resort? Determinants of farming choices of small farmers in Nigeria. International Journal of Rural Management. 19(2), 298–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09730052221091343
[28] Crona, B.I., Pomeroy, R.S., Purcell, S.W., 2020. Editorial: small-scale and artisanal fisheries: insights and approaches for improved governance and management in a globalized context. Frontiers in Marine Science. 7, 455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00455
[29] Allison, E.H., Ellis, F., 2001. The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy. 25(5), 377–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00023-9
[30] Bellquist, L., Semmens, B., Stohs, S., et al., 2017. Impacts of recently implemented recreational fisheries regulations on the commercial passenger fishing vessel fishery for Paralabrax sp. in California. Marine Policy. 86, 134–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.017
[31] Power, N.G., Norman, M.E., Dupré, K., 2014. "The fishery went away": the impacts of long-term fishery closures on young people's experience and perception of fisheries employment in Newfoundland coastal communities. Ecology and Society. 19(3), 6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06693-190306
[32] Leite, M., Ross, H., Berkes, F., 2019. Interactions between individual, household, and fishing community resilience in southeast Brazil. Ecology and Society. 24(3), 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10910-240302
[33] Lloret, J., Cowx, I.G., Cabral, H., Castro, M., Font, T., Gonçalves, J.M.S., et al., 2018. Small-scale coastal fisheries in European seas are not what they were: ecological, social and economic changes. Marine Policy. 98, 176–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.11.007
[34] Pollnac, R.B., Pomeroy, R.S., Harkes, I.H.T., 2001. Fishery policy and job satisfaction in three Southeast Asian fisheries. Ocean & Coastal Management. 44(7–8), 531–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00064-3
[35] Wang, W., Gong, J., Wang, Y., et al., 2021. Exploring the effects of rural site conditions and household livelihood capitals on agricultural land transfers in China. Land Use Policy. 108, 105523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105523
[36] Mai, X., Qiao, J., 2006. Economic analysis of occupational transition among marine capture fishermen in China [in Chinese]. Chinese Fisheries Economics. 4, 8–10.
[37] Shih, C.H., Wang, X.R., Lu, Y.M., et al., 2024. Assessing the role of policy in the evolution of recreational fisheries in Chinese fishing villages: an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and Delphi method analysis. Fishes. 9(9), 353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090353
[38] Yu, W., Yu, M., Ding, L., 2023. Characteristics and evolution of hierarchical fishery policies in China – a textual analysis based on 5311 policies from 2003 to 2022. Marine Policy. 155, 105699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105699
[39] Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., 2024. Escaping poverty: changing characteristics of China’s rural poverty reduction policy and future trends. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1), 694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03204-0
[40] Smith, H., Basurto, X., 2019. Defining small-scale fisheries and examining the role of science in shaping perceptions of who and what counts: a systematic review. Frontiers in Marine Science. 6, 236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00236
[41] Salgueiro-Otero, D., Barnes, M.L., Ojea, E., 2022. Transformation in times of climate change: what makes a fisher diversify livelihoods? Frontiers in Marine Science. 9, 888288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.888288
[42] Schadeberg, A., Kraan, M., Hamon, K.G., 2021. Beyond métiers: social factors influence fisher behaviour. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 78(4), 1530–1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab050
[43] Andrews, E.J., Wolfe, S., Nayak, P.K., et al., 2021. Coastal fishers livelihood behaviors and their psychosocial explanations: implications for fisheries governance in a changing world. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 634484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.634484
[44] Anna, Z., Yusuf, A.A., Alisjahbana, A.S., et al., 2019. Are fishermen happier? Evidence from a large-scale subjective well-being survey in a lower-middle-income country. Marine Policy. 106, 103559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103559
[45] Chen, M., Zhou, Y., Huang, X., et al., 2021. The integration of new-type urbanization and rural revitalization strategies in China: origin, reality and future trends. Land. 10(2), 207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020207
[46] Gong, X., Zhu, W.C., Liu, S., 2020. The strategy of eco-agriculture economic development along the coast based on improving the rural eco-tourism environment. Journal of Coastal Research. 104(sp1), 652–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI104-112.1
[47] Alieva, D., Usmonova, G., Shadmanov, S., et al., 2023. Fishery culture, sustainable resources usage and transformations needed for local community development: the case of Aral Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10, 1285618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1285618
[48] Farquhar, S., Nirindrainy, A.F., Heck, N., et al., 2022. The impacts of long-term changes in weather on small-scale fishers’ available fishing hours in Nosy Barren, Madagascar. Frontiers in Marine Science. 9, 841048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.841048
[49] Irnad, Cahyadinata, I., Widiono, S., 2021. Enhanced fisher job satisfaction and loyalty for sustainable fisheries development in Bengkulu, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 744(1), 012033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/744/1/012033
[50] Hsiao, Y.J., Chen, J.L., 2021. Different perspectives of stakeholders on the sustainable development of fishery-based communities in Northeast Taiwan. Marine Policy. 130, 104576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104576
[51] Pookaiyaudom, G., 2015. Relationship between community pride and participation needs in sustainable tourism development of fishing village: a case study of Samut Sakhon Province, Thailand. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 192, 343–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO150311
[52] Jiang, Y., Qu, Z., Hao, H., et al., 2024. Rethink of individual transferable quota fishery management system in China: a case study in Zhejiang Province, China. International Journal of the Commons. 18(1), 635–648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1338
[53] Seara, T., Clay, P.M., Colburn, L.L., 2016. Perceived adaptive capacity and natural disasters: a fisheries case study. Global Environmental Change. 38, 49–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.006