Research on World Agricultural Economy

Gendered Land Use Decision-Making and Income Control in Avocado Farming: A Case Study of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania

Sospeter Jibunge Charles

Department of Geography and Economics, Mkwawa University College of Education, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 2513, Iringa, Tanzania

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i3.2094

Received: 30 April 2025 | Revised: 4 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published Online: 15 July 2025

---

Abstract

The growing demand for avocados in Tanzania has led to land reallocation and changes in agricultural practices, particularly in the Southern Highlands, where land is being increasingly dedicated to avocado farming. This study addresses the gap in the existing literature by investigating intra-household decision-making regarding land sales and allocations for avocado farming, as well as income management, with a focus on gender dynamics and their implications for gender equality. The study used an explanatory sequential design to collect quantitative data through structured interviews with 151 respondents and qualitative data through focus group discussions. The study’s findings showed that more than half of the respondents (69.5%) reported that men within households made decisions regarding land sales and allocation for avocado farming exclusively. Additionally, approximately 70.2% of the respondents stated that men predominantly made decisions about how to use the income earned from avocado sales. Furthermore, most households (99.3%) reported no conflicts over decisions, with women often choosing silence to maintain family harmony. The study recommends that the Tanzanian government implement well-organized and integrated awareness campaigns and interventions to mitigate the negative influence of the social and cultural factors that deter women from participating in decision-making on land and money use.

Keywords: Avocado Farming; Land Use Decision-Making; Income; Gender; Household

---

References

[1] Sseruwagi, P., Lehmann, E., Sigombe, P., et al., 2025. Characterizing avocado production systems for Ugandan exports: the need for consolidation and support for sustainable development. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 9, 1500012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1500012

[2] Juma, I., Fors, H., Hovmalm, H.P., et al., 2019. Avocado production and local trade in the southern highlands of Tanzania: a case of an emerging trade commodity from horticulture. Agronomy. 9, 749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110749

[3] Tumaini, S., Ghahula, R., Macha, S., 2024. The impact of transportation on the avocado market in Tanzania. ESI Preprints. 31, 430–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n22p1

[4] Mabele, M.B., Kiwango, W.A., 2023. From timber rush to avocado rush? Insights and areas for research on restoration and development initiatives in Southern Highlands, Tanzania. Geoforum. 141, 103733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103733

[5] Gütte, A.M., Zscheischler, J., Sieber, S., et al., 2025. A typology of rural femininity and identity among women coffee producers: a qualitative case study from Costa Rica. Journal of Rural Studies. 114, 103560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103560

[6] Shisler, R.C., Sbicca, J., 2019. Agriculture as carework: the contradictions of performing femininity in a male-dominated occupation. Society & Natural Resources. 32, 875–892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1597234

[7] Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., et al., 2018. Women in agriculture: four myths. Global Food Security. 16, 69–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.10.001

[8] Deere, C.D., 2017. Women's land rights, rural social movements, and the state in the 21st‐century Latin American agrarian reforms. Journal of Agrarian Change. 17, 258–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12208

[9] Kaaria, S., Osorio, M., Wagner, S., et al., 2016. Rural women’s participation in producer organizations: an analysis of the barriers that women face and strategies to foster equitable and effective participation. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender). 1, 148–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.246035

[10] Maereka, E.K., Nchanji, E.B., Nyamolo, V., et al., 2023. Women’s visibility and bargaining power in the common bean value chain in Mozambique. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience. 4, 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-023-00197-9

[11] Boniphace, J., Kadigi, R.M.J., Kangile, J.R., 2023. The role of avocado production and trade in major producing districts, Tanzania: income inequality decomposition approach. Modern Economy. 14, 1620–1636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2023.1411085

[12] Malekela, A.A., 2022. Value chain challenges: experiences from avocado farmers and traders in Njombe Town, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences (EAJESS). 3, 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2022v03i02.0155

[13] Thomas, H., Makundi, H., 2021. Global value chains as a stimulant for innovation among producers: Evidence from avocado farmers in Siha District, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Development Studies. 18, 94–111

[14] Research on Poverty Alleviation (REPOA), 2018. Improving Tanzania's competitiveness of avocado ("green gold") value chain and exports: a case for targeted regulatory, policy and institutional reforms. Available from: https://www.repoa.or.tz/wpcontent/uploads/2020/07/AVOCADO_value_chain.pdf (cited 14 December 2024).

[15] Shahbandeh, M., 2018. Consumers' main drivers for buying avocados in the United States in 2018. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/317753/us-consumers--main-drivers-for-buying-avocados/ (cited 20 November 2024).

[16] Swai, L., Ubaldus, T., 2023. Avocado households farmers' decision-making in Southern Highlands of Tanzania: a case of Njombe Urban. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences. 1, 1363–1371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(5).117

[17] Canton, H., 2021. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women—UN Women. In: Publications, E. (ed.). The Europa Directory of International Organizations. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 185–188.

[18] Bavelas, J.B., Segal, L. 1982. Family systems theory: background and implications. Journal of Communication. 32(3), 99–107.

[19] Priest, J., 2021. The Science of Family Systems Theory. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. Pp. 1–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367854591

[20] Walsh, F., 2011. Family Therapy: Systemic Approaches to Practice. In: Brandell, J. R. (ed.). Theory and Practice in Clinical Social Work, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 153–178.

[21] Mahmud, K.T., Kabir, F., Hossain, J., et al., 2023. Can land ownership really improve the economic status and decision-making capacity of the rural women? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Poverty. 27, 166–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2021.2011532

[22] Kieran, C., Sproule, K., Quisumbing, A.R., et al., 2017. Gender gaps in landownership across and within households in four Asian countries. Land Economics. 93, 342–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.2.342

[23] Quisumbing, A.R., Kumar, N., Behrman, J.A., 2018. Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda. Development Policy Review. 36, 3–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12235

[24] Badstue, L., Farnworth, C.R., Umantseva, A., et al., 2021. Continuity and change: performing gender in rural Tanzania. The Journal of Development Studies. 57, 310–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1790534

[25] Sutz, P., Seigneret, A., Richard, M., et al., 2019. A Stronger Voice for Women in Local Land Governance: Effective Approaches in Tanzania, Ghana, and Senegal. International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK. pp. 1–56.

[26] United Republic of Tanzania, President’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government, 2015. Wanging’ombe District Council Strategic Plan for the Year 2015/16 – 2019/20. Wanging’ombe District Council: Njombe, Tanzania. pp. 1–126.

[27] Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 1–492.

[28] Morgan, D.L., 2013. Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 1–271.

[29] Yardley, L., Bishop, F.L., 2017. Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. In: Wendy, S.R., Willig, C. (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 398–413.

[30] Tashakkori, A., 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 1–207.

[31] United Republic of Tanzania, 2023a. A bridged multisectoral country gender profile Tanzania Mainland. Available from: https://africa.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2024-01/abridged_multisectoral_tanzania_country_gender_profile-web.pdf (cited 27 November 2024).

[32] United Republic of Tanzania, 2023b. Gender profile Tanzania Mainland. Available from: https://africa.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2024-01/mainland_gender_profile_final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com (cited 27 November 2024).

[33] Japan Development Service Co., Ltd. (JICA), 2016. Country gender profile: Tanzania final report. Available from: https://www.jica.go.jp/Resource/english/our_work/thematic_issues/gender/background/c8h0vm0000anjqj6-att/tanzania_2016.pdf (cited 27 November 2024).

[34] Joireman, S.F., 2008. The mystery of capital formation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Women, property rights, and customary law. World Development. 36, 1233–1246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.017

[35] Burrone, S., Giannelli, G.C., 2023. Do households where women own land fare better for food security? Evidence for Tanzania. IZA Discussion Papers. No. 16382, August 2023

[36] Aduma, E.A., Onyango, G.M., Dida, M., 2024. Gendered property rights in farmer-led irrigation development in Nyando Sub-County, Kenya: Myth or reality? The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies. 12, 113–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2024/v12/i5/HS2405-024

[37] Gallagher, E.J., Monterroso, I., Sanjaya, M., 2021. Mapping gendered impact pathways of Fairtrade coffee: Case studies from Guatemala, Indonesia and Kenya. In: Agroecological Transformation for Sustainable Food Systems: Insight on FranceCGIAR research. Agropolis International: Montpellier, France. pp. 107–109.

[38] Ngigi, M., Mueller, U., Birner, R., 2016. Gender Differences in Climate Change Perceptions and Adaptation Strategies: An Intra-Household Analysis from Rural Kenya. Zentrum für Entwicklungsforschung (ZEF): Bonn, Germany. pp. 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2747856

[39] Shubhangini, S., 2016. Woman's role in agriculture: in India. Remarking. 2(10), 45–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12818818

[40] Pandey, P., Vinay, D., Kwatra, S., et al., 2024. A study on gender disparity in agricultural resource management in the state of Uttarakhand, India. Archives of Current Research International. 24, 486–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i11987

[41] Putten, M.V.D., Nur-E-Jannat, A., 2020. Coping with domestic violence: women’s voices in Bangladesh. Journal of Health Research. 34, 283–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-02-2020-0026

[42] Shibata, R., Cardey, S., Dorward, P., 2020. Gendered intra-household decision-making dynamics in agricultural innovation processes: assets, norms, and bargaining power. Journal of International Development. 32, 1101–1125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3497

[43] Murugani, V.G., 2016. Women Empowerment in Agriculture: Agency and Institutions for Improved Market Access and Household Food Security in Limpopo Province [PhD dissertation]. Durban, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal. pp. 1–152.

[44] International Labor Organization (ILO), 2020. Gender equality in the world of work: Tanzania country profile. International Labor Organization. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40dgreports/%40gender/documents/publication/wcms_751914.pdf (cited 26 January 2025).

[45] Balana, B., Mekonnen, D.K., Haile, B., et al., 2020. Are smallholder farmers credit constrained? Evidence on demand and supply constraints of credit in Ethiopia and Tanzania. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., USA. Discussion Paper. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134152 (cited 20 May 2025).

[46] Tanzania Gender Networking Programme, 2004. Research report on civil society participation in the implementation Beijing Platform of Action (BPFA). Available from: www.tgnp.co.tz (cited 10 February 2025).

[47] Osanya, J., Adam, R.I., Otieno, D.J., et al., 2020. An analysis of intra-household spousal decision-making intensities on agricultural income use in Kenya: a multinomial logit approach [Working paper]. Australian Center for International Research.

[48] Akhtar, S., Ahmad, S., Yousaf, H., et al., 2018. Role of women in social and agricultural decision-making in the rural areas of the Southern Punjab (Pakistan). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 5, 34–38.

[49] Gates, M.F., 2014. Putting women and girls at the center of development. Science. 345, 1273–1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.125888

[50] Kopweh, C.P., 2016. The story of a post-feminist in post-patriarchy: The consequences of customary laws and practices on rural women’s land rights and livelihoods in Tanzania [Master Thesis]. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies. pp. 1–57.

[51] Sugden, F., 2016. Tenant farmer collectives for sustainable intensification of agriculture: Reflection from Mithilanchal. Proceedings of The Water-Livelihoods-Gender Nexus to Advance Koshi Basin Management; March 24–25, 2016; Kathmandu, Nepal. pp. 1–6.

[52] Akter, S., Rutsaert, P., Luis, J., et al., 2017. Women’s empowerment and gender equity in agriculture: a different perspective from Southeast Asia. Food Policy. 69, 270–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.003

[53] Lusasi, J., Mwaseba, D., 2020. Gender inequality and symbolic violence in women’s access to family land in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Land. 9(11), 468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110468

[54] Thapar-Björkert, S., Samelius, L., Sanghera, G.S., 2016. Exploring symbolic violence in the everyday: misrecognition, condescension, consent, and complicity. Feminist Review. 112(1), 144–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.53