Research on World Agricultural Economy

Characteristics and Attitudes Towards Food Safety Among Small-Scale Farmers in Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile

Sofia Boza

Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile

Giannina Lagomarsino

Faculty of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 8380544, Chile

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2016

Received: 18 April 2025 | Revised: 27 June 2025 | Accepted: 15 July 2025 | Published Online: 5 September 2025

---

Abstract

This study surveyed 80 small-scale vegetable farmers in Chile's Santiago Metropolitan Region to investigate their characteristics, attitudes, and knowledge concerning food safety. The findings indicate that the surveyed farmers largely rely on informal sales channels, where buyers typically do not mandate food safety compliance. Although 65% of farmers reported following Good Agricultural Practices (GAP), only a small fraction held formal certifications, revealing a notable disparity between perceived and actual adherence. A prevalent misconception was identified, with 60% of farmers incorrectly believing GAP and food safety to be synonymous. This divergence can be partially explained by the farmers' heavy reliance on informal sales channels. Farmers generally expressed confidence in their production systems to deliver safe products and were satisfied with their pest, disease, weed control, and irrigation techniques. However, they displayed less assurance regarding agrochemical residue management, record-keeping, and product preservation. While acknowledging the need to evolve beyond traditional farming methods, farmers viewed GAP implementation as requiring substantial investment. A multivariate analysis revealed the existence of two distinct farmer groups, delineated by their attitudes towards food safety, market orientation, and perceived benefits of integration into the formal economy. Commercially oriented farmers using conventional agriculture showed a heightened awareness of the challenges in implementing GAP. Conversely, those focused on self-consumption and organic farming tended to underestimate these difficulties. The study underscores the urgent need for targeted public policies to bridge the gap between farmers’ current practices and formal food safety standards, addressing technical resource gaps, clarifying conceptual ambiguities, and fostering market opportunities.

Keywords: Food safety; Small-Scale Farming; Attitudes; Santiago Metropolitan Region; Chile

---

References

[1] Lowder, S.K., Sánchez, M.V., Bertini, R., 2021. Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated? World Development. 142, 105455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105455

[2] FAO, 2018. FAO’s work on family farming. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/CA1465EN/ca1465en.pdf (cited 15 March 2025).

[3] Schreinemachers, P., Simmons, E.B., Wopereis, M.C.S., 2018. Tapping the economic and nutritional power of vegetables. Global Food Security. 16, 36–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.09.005

[4] Gibson, M. J., Wang, Q., 2018. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures in Chinese agricultural exports: the role of trade intermediaries. Applied Economics. 50(27), 3007–3015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1414932

[5] Kareem, O. I., 2016. European Union’s sanitary and phytosanitary measures and food exports. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets. 9(4), 287–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2016.081141

[6] Wood, J., Wu, J., Li, Y., et al., 2019. The impact of TBT and SPS measures on Japanese and Korean exports to China. Sustainability. 11(21), 6141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216141

[7] FAO, 2021. Th state of Food and Agriculture 2021. FAO: Rome, Italy.

[8] Pingali, P., 2015. Agricultural policy and nutrition outcomes – getting beyond the preoccupation with staple grains. Food Security. 7, 583–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0461-x

[9] FAO, 2015. Promotion of Fruit and Vegetables for Health. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4935e.pdf (cited 12 April 2025).

[10] Verplanken, B., Orbell, S., 2022. Attitudes, habits, and behavior change. Annual Review of Psychology. 73, 327–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744

[11] Haddock, G., Maio, G., 2019. Inter-individual differences in attitude content: Cognition, affect and attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 59, 53–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.10.002

[12] Landini, F., 2016. How to be a good rural extensionist. Reflections and contributions of Argentine practitioners. Journal of Rural Studies. 43, 193–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.014

[13] Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction, 1st ed. Routledge: Abingdon, UK.

[14] Naziri, D., Aubert, M., Codron, J.M., et al., 2014. Estimating the impact of small-scale farmer collective action on food safety: The case of vegetables in Vietnam. The Journal of Development Studies. 50(5). DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2013.874555

[15] Andrei, J.V., Ion, R.A., Chivu, L., et al., 2019. Investigations on farmers willingness to associate and join in environmental responsible short supply chain in Romania. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 17(2), 1617–1639. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_16171639

[16] Mwambi, M., Bijman, J., Mshenga, P., et al., 2020. Adoption of food safety measures: The role of bargaining and processing producer organizations. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 92, 100337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100337

[17] Library of the National Congress of Chile, 2023. Santiago Metropolitan Region. Regional Report 2023 (in Spanish). Available from: https://www.bcn.cl/siit/reportesregionales/reporte_final.html?anno=2023&cod_region=13 (cited 14 March 2025).

[18] National Statistics Institute (Chile), 2023. Agriculture, agroindustry and fisheries statistics : vegetables (in Spanish). Available from: https://www.ine.gob.cl/estadisticas/economia/agricultura-agroindustria-y-pesca/hortalizas (cited 12 March 2025).

[19] Boza, S., Mora, M., Nuñez, A., et al., 2022. Exploring the attitudes and strategies of peri-urban vegetable growers in the Santiago Metropolitan Region of Chile. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales-Agricultural and Resource Economics. 22(1), 53–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2022.01.03

[20] Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., Alkassim, R.S., 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 5(1), 1–4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

[21] Shamsudin, M.F., Hassim, A.A., Manaf, S.A., 2024. Mastering probability and non-probability methods for accurate research insights. Journal of Postgraduate Current Business Research. 9(1), 38–53.

[22] Jager, J., Putnick, D.L., Bornstein, M.H., 2017. More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogeneous convenience samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 82(2), 3–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12296

[23] Kohler, U., 2019. Possible uses of nonprobability sampling for the social sciences. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2019-00014

[24] Grübler, J., Reiter, O., 2021. Characterising non-tariff trade policy. Economic Analysis and Policy. 71, 138–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.007

[25] Tiu, C., 2021. Pesticide Residues in Food: A Never-Ending Challenge. In: Scott, P., Strange, R., Korsten, L., Gullino, M. L. (eds.). Plant Diseases and Food Security in the 21st century. Springer: Switzerland. pp. 251–258.

[26] Boza, S., Jara-Rojas, R., 2018. Peri-urban family farming and agricultural earnings: The effect of long-term participation in an extension program in a metropolitan area. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. 45(3), 200–209. DOI: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6791734

[27] National Statistics Institute (Chile), 2018. Synthesis of results. Census 2017 (in Spanish). Available from: http://www.censo2017.cl/descargas/home/sintesis-de-resultados-censo2017.pdf (cited 21 September 2024).

[28] National Statistics Institute (Chile), 2019. Estimates and projections of the Chilean population 2002–2035 regional totals, urban and rural population. National Statistics Institute – Synthesis of results (in Spanish). INE: Santiago, Chile.

[29] Ministry of Social Development, 2024. Series of results CASEN: Educational status of the population. CASEN Survey 2006–2022 (in Spanish). Available from: https://observatorio.ministeriodesarrollosocial.gob.cl/storage/docs/casen/2022/Resultados_Educacion_Casen2022.pdf (cited 8 April 2025).

[30] Ayisi, D.N., Kozári, J., Krisztina, T., 2022. Do smallholder farmers belong to the same adopter category? An assessment of smallholder farmers innovation adopter categories in Ghana. Heliyon. 8(8), e10421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10421

[31] Mercado, G., Hjortsø, C.N., Honig, B., 2018. Decoupling from international food safety standards: how small-scale indigenous farmers cope with conflicting institutions to ensure market participation. Agriculture and Human Values. 35(3), 651–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9860-x

[32] National Statistics Institute (Chile), 2022. VIII National Agricultural and Forestry Census (in Spanish). Available from: https://www.ine.gob.cl/censoagropecuario/resultados-finales/graficas-nacionales (cited 8 April 2025).

[33] Cid, P., 2022. Rural Women in Chile: Systematization of some elements (in Spanish). Available from: https://minmujeryeg.gob.cl/doc/estudios/MMEG-2017-Mujeres-rurales-en-Chile-1.pdf (cited 21 March 2025).

[34] Cortés, M., Montenegro, I., Boza, S., et al., 2017. The collection of non-timber forest products by rural women in southern Chile: reshaping the tension between local and global. RIVAR-Revista Iberoamericana De Viticultura Agroindustria y Ruralidad. 4(12), 22–45.

[35] Rengifo, A., Boza, S., Pérez, M.C., 2022. Assessment for the Insertion of Agroecological Female Farmers in the Provision of Restaurants (in Spanish). RIVAR. 9(26), 191–210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35588/rivar.v9i26.5579

[36] Korale-Gedara, P., Weerahewa, J., Roy, D., 2023. Food safety in milk: Adoption of food safety practices by small-scale dairy farmers in Sri Lanka and their determinants. Food Control. 143, 109274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109274

[37] Yu, H., Wang, H.H., Li, B., 2018. Production system innovation to ensure raw milk safety in small holder economies: the case of dairy complex in China. Agricultural Economics. 49(6), 787–797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12460

[38] Grashuis, J., Su, Y., 2019. A review of the empirical literature on farmer cooperatives: Performance, ownership and governance, finance, and member attitude. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 90(1), 77–102, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12205

[39] Arias, M.C., Fernández, M., Fellenberg, M.A., 2022. Improvement of skills in food safety and development of social capital in small farmers. Agriculture, Society and Development. 19(3), 279–289. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v19i3.1315

[40] Jara-Rojas, R., Bravo-Ureta, B.E., Solís, D., et al., 2018. Technical efficiency and marketing channels among small-scale farmers: evidence for raspberry production in Chile. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 21(3), 351–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2016.0168

[41] Parker, J.S., DeNiro, J., Ivey, M.L., et al., 2016. Are small and medium scale produce farms inherent food safety risks? Journal of Rural Studies. 44, 250–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.005

[42] Chen, H., Ellet, J.K., Phillips, R., et al., 2021. Small-scale produce growers’ barriers and motivators to value-added business: Food safety and beyond. Food Control. 130, 108192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108192

[43] Chen, H., Benjamin, T., Guan, W., et al., 2022. Food Safety Education Needs Assessment for Small-Scale Produce Growers Interested in Value-Added Food Production. Journal of Food Protection. 85(2), 220–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-21-193

[44] Handschuch, C., Wollni, M., Villalobos, P., 2013. Adoption of food safety and quality standards among Chilean raspberry producers – Do smallholders benefit? Food Policy. 40, 64–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.02.002

[45] Starobin, S.M., 2021. Credibility beyond compliance: Uncertified smallholders in sustainable food systems. Ecological Economics. 180, 106767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106767

[46] Ramírez-Hernández, A., Galagarza, O.A., Álvarez Rodríguez, M.V., et al., 2020. Food safety in Peru: A review of fresh produce production and challenges in the public health system. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 19(6), 3323–3342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12647

[47] De María, F., Lubello, P., Drogué, S., 2018. Measuring the complexity of complying with phytosanitary standard: the case of French and Chilean fresh apples. Bio-Based and Applied Economics. 7(1), 39–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13128/BAE-24047

[48] Arita, S., Beckman, J., Mitchell, L., 2017. Reducing transatlantic barriers on U.S.-EU agri-food trade: What are the possible gains? Food Policy. 68, 233–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.006

[49] Kinzius, L., Sandkamp, A., Yalcin, E., 2019. Trade protection and the role of non-tariff barriers. Review of World Economics. 155, 603–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-019-00341-6

[50] Murina, M., Nicita, A., 2017. Trading with Conditions: The Effect of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on the Agricultural Exports from Low-income Countries. The World Economy. 40(1), 168–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12368