Evaluating China's Agricultural Investment in ASEAN: Location, Trends, and Economic Impact

Ye Xue

School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah 06010, Malaysian

Mohd Sobri Don

School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah 06010, Malaysian

A. S. A. Ferdous Alam

School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah 06010, Malaysia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i3.1970

Received: 9 April 2025 | Revised: 4 June 2025 | Accepted: 6 June 2025 | Published Online: 15 August 2025

Copyright © 2025 Ye Xue, Mohd Sobri Don, A. S. A. Ferdous Alam. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

This study investigates the spatial distribution, temporal trends, and economic effects of China’s agricultural investments in ASEAN countries using a combined approach of panel-data regression and case-study analysis. Drawing on investment and output data from 2010 to 2020 across six major recipient countries, we first estimate a fixed-effects model to quantify the impact of Chinese capital flows on local agricultural output while controlling for GDP, labor inputs, and technology spending. The regression results indicate that each additional $1 million in Chinese investment is associated with an average increase of $2.35 million in recipient-country agricultural output (p < 0.01). However, investment remains heavily concentrated in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, whereas larger markets such as Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia receive comparatively little funding despite offering high marginal returns. To illustrate practical mechanisms, we present two case studies: the China–Cambodia Modern Agriculture Industrial Park, which integrates production, processing, and technology transfer, and a China–Philippines rice-farming project focused on resource extraction. The former yields substantially greater income gains for local farmers and accelerates technology diffusion. Based on these findings, we recommend a strategic pivot toward geographically diversified investments, emphasizing under-invested but high-potential markets; enhanced value-chain integration to raise product value; increased spending on agricultural technology—whose coefficient of 4.20 suggests strong productivity gains from each $1 million invested—and strengthened infrastructure and green-agriculture initiatives. These targeted policies aim to balance economic efficiency with long-term sustainability across the ASEAN region.

Keywords: China-ASEAN; Agricultural Investment; Location Choice; Investment Trends; Economic Impact


References

[1] Nie, F., Li,J., Bi, X., et al., 2022. Agricultural trade liberalization and domestic fertilizer use: Evidence from ChinaASEAN free trade agreement. Ecological Economics. 195(C), 107341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107341

[2] Zhou, L., Tong, G., 2022. Research on the competitiveness and influencing factors of agricultural products trade between China and the countries along the “Belt and Road”. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 61(11), 8919–8931.

[3] Fahim, K.E., De Silva, L.C., Hussain, F., et al., 2023. An evaluation of ASEAN renewable energy path to carbon neutrality. Sustainability. 15(8), 6961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086961

[4] Gregorioa, G.B., Ancog, R.C., 2020. Assessing the impact of the COVID19 pandemic on agricultural production in Southeast Asia: toward transformative change in agricultural food systems. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development. 17(1), 1–13.

[5] Hossain, S.S., Huang, D., 2022. Measuring economic impact in Korea, Japan, India, China, and ASEAN considering agricultural sectors: a dynamic CGE approach based on GAMS. Review of World Economics. 158(2), 571–613.

[6] Chandio, A.A., Shah, M.I., Sethi, N., et al., 2022. Assessing the effect of climate change and financial development on agricultural production in ASEAN4: the role of renewable energy, institutional quality, and human capital as moderators. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(11), 1–15. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11356-021-16670-9 (cited Day Month Year)

[7] Tian, Y., Yin, M., 2022. Re-evaluation of China’s agricultural carbon emissions: basic status, dynamic evolution and spatial spillover effects. 20220209317.

[8] Han, M.S., Yuan, Q., Fahad, S., et al., 2022. Dynamic evaluation of green development level of ASEAN region and its spatio-temporal patterns. Journal of Cleaner Production. 362, 132402. Available from: https://www.x-mol.com/paperRedirect/1530383458085384192 (cited 22 March 2025)

[9] Liu, W., Zhou, W., Lu, L., 2022. An innovative digitization evaluation scheme for spatiotemporal coordination relationship between multiple knowledge driven rural economic development and agricultural ecological environment—coupling coordination model analysis based on Guangxi. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 7(3), 100208.

[10] Tolliver, C., Fujii, H., Keeley, A.R., et al., 2021. Green innovation and finance in Asia. Asian Economic Policy Review. 16(1), 67–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12320

[11] Liu, H., Zhou, R., Yao, P., et al., 2022. Assessing Chinese governance lowcarbon economic peer effects in local government and under sustainable environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 61304–61323 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17901-9

[12] Raihan, A., 2023. An econometric evaluation of the effects of economic growth, energy use, and agricultural value added on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. AsiaPacific Journal of Regional Science. 7(3), 665–696.

[13] Mishra, A., Ketelaar, J.W., Uphoff, N., et al., 2021. Food security and climatesmart agriculture in the lower Mekong basin of Southeast Asia: evaluating impacts of system of rice intensification with special reference to rainfed agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 19(2), 152–174. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2021IJAgS..19..152M/doi:10.1080/14735903.2020.1866852 (cited 22 March 2025)

[14] Randive, K., Raut, T., Jawadand, S., 2021. An overview of the global fertilizer trends and India’s position in 2020. Mineral Economics. , 1–14.

[15] Abula, K., Abula, B., Wang, X., et al., 2022. Performance evaluations and influencing factors of the agricultural product trade supply chain between China and central Asian countries. Sustainability. 14(23), 15622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315622

[16] Khan, D., Nouman, M., Ullah, A., 2023. Assessing the impact of technological innovation on technically derived energy efficiency: A multivariate cointegration analysis of the agricultural sector in South Asia. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 25(4), 3723–3745.

[17] Wang, T., Yu, Z., Ahmad, R., et al., 2022. Transition of bioeconomy as a key concept for the agriculture and agribusiness development: An extensive review on ASEAN countries. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 6, 998594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.998594

[18] Ali, S.A.S., Rahman, A.S.A., Mohamad, M.F.N., et al., 2023. Assessing the energy efficiency of fossil fuel in ASEAN. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development. 12(6), 1008–1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.57601

[19] Shen, Z., Wang, S., Boussemart, J.-P., et al., 2022. Digital transition and green growth in Chinese agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 181, 121742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121742

[20] Han, J., Qu, J., Maraseni, T.N., et al., 2021. A critical assessment of provincial-level variation in agricultural GHG emissions in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 296, 113190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113190

[21] Jiang, Q., Khattak, S.I., Rahman, Z.U., 2021. Measuring the simultaneous effects of electricity consumption and production on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2e) in China: New evidence from an EKCbased assessment. Energy. 229, 120616.

[22] Cao, Y., Jiang, A.Y., Cao, Z.J., et al., 2022. Impact of the belt and road initiative on economicsocialnatural ecological niches and their coupling coordination: evidence from 11 countries along the route. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 10, 913928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.913928

[23] Erokhin, V., Diao, L., Du, P., 2020. Sustainability-related implications of competitive advantages in agricultural value chains: Evidence from Central Asia–China trade and investment. Sustainability. 12(3), 1117.

[24] Khan, Y., Taimoor, H., Kirikkaleli, D., et al., 2022. The impact of economic policy uncertainty on carbon emissions: evaluating the role of foreign capital investment and renewable energy in East Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. , 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17000-9

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.