Agricultural Market Seasonality Dynamics Inducing Farmers’ Commercialisation Intensity Efforts within Cash Crop Farming

Takalani Isaac Khorombi

Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Faculty of Science, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa

Dakalo Phaswana

Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Faculty of Science, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa

Mpho Tshikororo

Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Faculty of Science, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.1893

Received: 24 March 2025 | Revised: 11 April 2025 | Accepted: 16 June 2025 | Published Online: 21 November 2025

Copyright © 2025 Takalani Isaac Khorombi, Dakalo Phaswana, Mpho Tshikororo. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

The importance of agricultural commercialization cannot be overemphasized, particularly with the need to achieve zero hunger and improve the provision of nutritious food for the gradually increasing population. Agricultural commercialization is essential for economic development, improved food security, and enhanced livelihoods for societies dependent on agriculture. The current study investigated agricultural market seasonality dynamics influencing farmers’ transition from emerging to commercial farming at Thulamela municipality of Limpopo province, South Africa. A simple random sampling technique was used to select 207 vegetable farmers. Data was collected through in-person interviews and analyzed using descriptive analysis and a multinomial regression model. The study revealed that the vegetables most produced within the study sample were spinach, tomatoes, and cabbage, primarily due to their low production costs, affordability, and cultural preference. Furthermore, the study findings indicated that market dynamics such as commodity seasonality, product variation, perishability rate, commodity supplied volumes, and market selling price enhanced farmers’ commercialization intensity. Meanwhile, market dynamics such as commodity shelf lifespan, market competition, and selling season had a regressive influence in intensifying commercialization at various levels.  The study recommends integrating short-shelf lifespan commodities with more durable ones to improve sales volumes, intensifying commercialization efforts. Moreover, the study also recommends acclimatizing farmers to the market dynamics in which they intend to supply their produce

Keywords: Commercialization; Intensify; Transitioning; Emerging Farmers; Market Dynamics


References

[1] Owusu, O., İşcan, T.B., 2021. Drivers of farm commercialization in Nigeria and Tanzania. Agricultural Economics. 52(2), 265–299.

[2] Leakey, R.R., Tientcheu Avana, M.L., Awazi, N.P., et al., 2022. The future of food: Domestication and commercialization of indigenous food crops in Africa over the third decade (2012–2021). Sustainability. 14(4), 2355.

[3] Hemathilake, D.M.K.S., Gunathilake, D.M.C.C., 2022. Agricultural productivity and food supply are needed to meet increased demands. In: Future Foods. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 539–553.

[4] Kissoly, L., Fasse, A., Grote, U., 2020. Intensity of commercialization and the dimensions of food security: the case of smallholder farmers in rural Tanzania. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. 10(5), 731–750.

[5] Ogutu, S.O., Gödecke, T., Qaim, M., 2020. Agricultural commercialisation and nutrition in smallholder farm households. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 71(2), 534–555.

[6] Gc, R.K., Hall, R.P., 2020. The commercialization of smallholder farming—a case study from the rural western middle hills of Nepal. Agriculture. 10(5), 143.

[7] Ntshangase, Z.M., Sanelise, T., Moyo, B., et al., 2021. Factors Affecting Household Goat Farmers’ Market Participation and the Extent of Commercialization. In: Goat Science-Environment, health and Economy. IntechOpen: London, UK.

[8] Büchner, J., Knerr, B., Becerril, J., 2020. Market participation and poverty reduction in smallholder households of Yucatán. Traditional Smallholder Farmers in a Growing Economy and a Globalized World: Evidence from the State of Yucatan. Kassel University Press GmbH: Kassel, Germany. p. 59.

[9] Mariyono, J., 2019. Stepping up to market participation of smallholder agriculture in rural areas of Indonesia. Agricultural Finance Review. 79(2), 255–270.

[10] Dancey, M., 2024. Strategies of Informality: A Case Study of Informal Urban Farmers in Johannesburg, South Africa [Master's Thesis]. Porto, Portugal: Universidade do Porto.

[11] Soliman, A.M., 2021. Urbanization and urban informality in the era of globalization. In: Urban Informality: Experiences and Urban Sustainability Transitions in Middle East Cities. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 85–120.

[12] Barrett, C.B., Reardon, T., Swinnen, J., et al., 2022. Agri-food value chain revolutions in low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Economic Literature. 60(4), 1316–1377.

[13] Banerjee, P.S., 2022. Economic Development In Agro-Finance Sector: A Complete Guided Study. Notion Press: Chennai, India.

[14] Kephe, P.N., Siewe, L.C., Lekalakala, R.G., et al., 2022. Optimizing smallholder farmers' productivity through crop selection, targeting and prioritization framework in the Limpopo and Free State provinces, South Africa. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 6, 738267.

[15] Khutlapye, S., 2022. Urban Resilience and Sustainability through Regenerative Urban Agriculture. University of Johannesburg: Johannesburg, South Africa.

[16] Muflikh, Y.N., Smith, C., Brown, C., et al., 2021. Analysing price volatility in agricultural value chains using systems thinking: a case study of the Indonesian chilli value chain. Agricultural Systems. 192, 103179.

[17] Sunday, F.X., Uwineza, Y., Ndahayo, E., et al., 2024. Exploring crop choices: benefits, challenges, and rationale among Rwandan farmers. Journal of Agricultural Science. 16(5), 16–31.

[18] Hlatshwayo, S.I., Modi, A.T., Hlahla, S., et al., 2021. Usefulness of seed systems for reviving smallholder agriculture: A South African perspective. African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition and development. 21(2), 17581–17603.

[19] Hareendran, A., Albaaji, G.F., 2024. Precision farming for sustainability: An agricultural intelligence model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 226, 109386.

[20] Amaglobeli, D., Benson, T., Mogues, T., 2024. Agricultural producer subsidies: Navigating challenges and policy considerations. International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA.

[21] Ndlovu, P.N., Thamaga-Chitja, J.M., Ojo, T.O., 2021. Factors influencing the level of vegetable value chain participation and implications on smallholder farmers in Swayimane KwaZulu-Natal. Land Use Policy. 109, 105611.

[22] Kennedy, G., Kanter, R., Chotiboriboon, S., et al., 2021. Traditional and indigenous fruits and vegetables for food system transformation. Current Developments in Nutrition. 5(8), nzab092.

[23] Solankey, S.S., Kumari, M., Akhtar, S., et al., 2021. Challenges and opportunities in vegetable production in changing climate: Mitigation and adaptation strategies. Advances in Research on Vegetable Production under a Changing Climate. 1, 13–59.

[24] Quick, V., Errickson, L., Bastian, G., et al., 2022. Preserving farm freshness: Consumer preferences for local value-added products at urban farmers markets. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development. 11(2), 113–134.

[25] Touch, V., Tan, D.K., Cook, B.R., et al., 2024. Smallholder farmers’ challenges and opportunities: Implications for agricultural production, environment and food security. Journal of Environmental Management. 370, 122536.

[26] Statistics South Africa, 2024. Local municipality statistics South Africa, First quarter publication. Available from: www.statssa.gov.za (cited 17 November 2024).

[27] Khan, N., 2020. Critical review of sampling techniques in the research process in the world. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572336

[28] Nesamvuni, A.E., Tshikolomo, K.A., Mpandeli, N.S., et al., 2022. Demography of smallholder agricultural women and youth enterprises and their association with the cultivation of the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) vegetable crop. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 29, 700.

[29] Mdoda, L., Obi, A., Christian, M., et al., 2022. Profitability of cabbage production by smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension. 50(2), 1–25.

[30] Mukaila, R., 2024. Agricultural commercialisation among women smallholder farmers in Nigeria: Implication for food security. GeoJournal. 89(2), 42.

[31] Sujoya, G., 2023. Supply Chain Management of Perishable Goods at ACI Logistics Ltd. (Shwapno). Available from: http://dspace.uiu.ac.bd/handle/52243/2883(cited 17 November 2024).

[32] Mahaputra, M.R., Saputra, F., 2022. Determination of public purchasing power and brand image of cooking oil scarcity and price increases of essential commodities. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary. 1(1), 36–46.

[33] Kambali, U., Panakaje, N., 2022. A review on access to agriculture finance by farmers and its impact on their income. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4104741 (cited 20 February 2025).

[34] Niyonsaba, H.H., Höhler, J., Kooistra, J., et al., 2021. Profitability of insect farms. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 7(5), 923–934.

[35] Giri, A., 2023. Market dynamics and seasonal pricing of major vegetables in Kathmandu Valley. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology. 8(4), 105–117.

[36] Roy, P., Bhattacharyya, S., 2020. Doubling farmers’ income: its necessity and possibilities in Indian context. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 90(9), 1639–1645.

[37] Mondal, P., DeFries, R., Clark, J., et al., 2021. Multiple cropping alone does not improve year-round food security among smallholders in rural India. Environmental Research Letters. 16(6), 065017.

[38] Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE). Why Diversify? Available from: https://www.sare.org (cited 11 February 2025).

[39] Sulaiman, M.A.B.A., Asad, M., Awain, A.M.S.B., et al., 2024. Entrepreneurial marketing and performance: contingent role of market turbulence. Discover Sustainability. 5(1), 492.

[40] Zhong, D., Um, K.H., 2025. How customer integration drives green innovation: exploring the influence of regulatory pressures and market changes. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 36(3), 731–754.

[41] Rubiyanto, C.W., Hirota, I., 2021. A review on livelihood diversification: dynamics, measurements and case studies in Montane mainland Southeast Asia. Reviews in Agricultural Science. 9, 128–142.

[42] Lesala, M.E., Mujuru, N., Mdoda, L., et al., 2025. Evaluating the Economic Impact of Market Participation on the Well-Being of Smallholder Irrigators: Evidence from the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Sustainability. 17(8), 3390.

[43] Cele, L., Wale, E., 2020. Determinants of smallholders’ entrepreneurial drive, willingness and ability to expand farming operations in KwaZulu-Natal. Development in Practice. 30(8), 1028–1042.

[44] Khorombi, T.I., Tshikororo, M., 2024. Gender dimensions on adoption of modern agricultural marketing initiatives among emerging farmers in rural economies. Revista de Educación. 404(5), 182–195.

[45] Donnelly, R., Li, Z., 2022. Dynamic inventory management with mean-field competition. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2210.17208.

[46] Binge, B., Jalango, D., Tesfaye, L., 2023. Technical Report: Post-Harvest Loss Management through Climate-Smart Innovations: A Collaborative Approach Among Value-Chain Actors. Nairobi. Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA): Nairobi, Kenya. p. 53.

[47] Tietjen, M., 2022. Opportunities to Improve Efficiency in the Fresh Produce Supply Chain. Available from: https://ruralleaders.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Marcus-Tietjen_Opportunities-to-improve-efficiency-in-the-fresh-produce-supply-chain_Kellogg-report.pdf (cited 20 February 2025).

[48] Tripathi, P.K., Singh, C.K., Singh, R., et al., 2023. A farmer-centric agricultural decision support system for market dynamics in a volatile agricultural supply chain. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 30(10), 3925–3952.

[49] Getahun, A., 2020. Smallholder farmers agricultural commercialization in Ethiopia: a review. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 9(3), 67.

[50] Ruben, R., 2024. From market-based development to value chain transformation: What markets can (not) do for rural poverty alleviation?. Journal of Rural Studies. 109, 103328.

[51] Ma, W., Sonobe, T., Gong, B., 2024. Linking farmers to markets: Barriers, solutions, and policy options. Economic Analysis and Policy. 82, 1102–1112.

[52] Diphoko, I.V., 2023. Agricultural Commercialization Through Market Participation by Smallholder Tomato Farmers in Bojanala District, North West Province [Ph.D. Thesis]. Potchefstroom, South Africa: North-West University.

[53] Aharoni, 2024. "How Small Firms Can Achieve Competitive Advantage in an Interdependent World," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Arie Y Lewin & Ravi Ramamurti & Elizabeth L Rose (ed.), Standing on the Shoulders of International Business Giants. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd: Singapore. pp. 263–274.

[54] Zondi, N.T.B., Ngidi, M.S.C., Ojo, T.O., et al., 2022. Factors influencing the extent of the commercialization of indigenous crops among smallholder farmers in the Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa. Frontiers in sustainable food systems. 5, 777790.

[55] Eichsteller, M., Njagi, T., Nyukuri, E., 2022. The role of agriculture in poverty escapes in Kenya-developing a capabilities approach in the context of climate change. World Development. 149, 105705.

[56] Zang, L., Wang, Y., Ke, J., et al., 2022. What drives smallholders to utilize socialized agricultural services for farmland scale management? Insights from the perspective of collective action. Land. 11(6), 930.

[57] Boretti, A., Pollet, B.G., 2024. Hydrogen economy: Paving the path to a sustainable, low-carbon future. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 93, 307–319.

[58] Nugroho, A.D., 2021. Agricultural market information in developing countries: a literature review. Agricultural Economics/Zemedelska Ekonomika. 67(11), 468–477.

[59] Peng, P., Xu, Z., 2022. Price expectations, risk aversion, and choice of sales methods for large‐scale farmers under incomplete market conditions. Agribusiness. 38(4), 1012–1031.

[60] Albuquerque, R., De Araujo, B., Brandao-Marques, L., et al., 2024. Market timing, farmer expectations, and liquidity constraints. Journal of Development Economics. 168, 103268.

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.