Climate Change and Agricultural Sustainability: Lessons from China
Centre for Policy Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia; School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400065, China
Centre for Policy Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
Liping Lan
Centre for Policy Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i2.1874
Received: 19 March 2025 | Revised: 15 April 2025 | Accepted: 23 April 2025 | Published Online: 12 June 2025
Copyright © 2025 Ying Fu, Dayang Haszelinna Abang Ali, Liping Lan. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
Climate change poses a growing threat to global agricultural systems, with developing economies like China facing unique challenges in balancing food security, environmental protection, and economic growth. This study examines the interplay between climate risk, fiscal environmental protection expenditures, and agricultural sustainability across 31 Chinese provinces from 2012 to 2022. Utilizing panel data analysis and a moderating effect regression model, the research quantifies the heterogeneous impacts of climate risk on agricultural sustainability, revealing a significant negative correlation in provinces with lower baseline levels of sustainable development. Conversely, the effect diminishes in regions with higher sustainability performance. A critical counterintuitive finding is that fiscal environmental protection expenditures, intended to mitigate environmental degradation, inadvertently exacerbate the adverse effects of climate risk on agricultural sustainability, suggesting potential misalignment in policy implementation. These results underscore the necessity for regionally differentiated strategies that integrate both climate adaptation and mitigation measures with sustainable agricultural practices. The study contributes to the discourse on climate-agriculture policy by highlighting China’s empirical lessons, which offer scalable insights for developing nations and analogous economies grappling with similar trade-offs between environmental governance and agricultural resilience. Ultimately, this research advocates for re-evaluating regional and fiscal policy to ensure synergistic outcomes under escalating climate challenges.
Keywords: Climate Change; Fiscal Environmental Protection Expenditures; Agricultural Sustainability; Quantile Regression; Moderating Effect
References
[1] World Health Organization (WHO), 2023. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023: Urbanization, Agrifood Systems Transformation and Healthy Diets Across the Rural–Urban Continuum. Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/445c9d27-b396-4126-96c9-50b335364d01
[2] Zhou, Y., Li, Y., Xu, C., 2020. Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths. Land Use Policy. 91, 104379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101227
[3] Ji, J.S., 2024. China's health national adaptation plan for climate change: Action framework 2024–2030. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific. 52, 101227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101227
[4] Zang, D., Hu, Z., Yang, Y., et al., 2022. Research on the relationship between agricultural carbon emission intensity, agricultural economic development and agricultural trade in China. Sustainability. 14(18), 11694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811694
[5] Xing, S., Zhang, G., Chen, S., et al., 2024. Response of soil erosion resistance to straw incorporation amount in the black soil region of Northeast China. Journal of Environmental Management. 357, 120801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120801
[6] Ullah, I., Dagar, V., Tanin, T.I., et al., 2024. Agricultural productivity and rural poverty in China: The impact of land reforms. Journal of Cleaner Production. 475, 143723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143723
[7] Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Qian, W., 2024. Digital economy and China's agricultural exports: Based on trade cost and market competition effect. China Agricultural Economic Review. 16(3), 489–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-08-2023-0213
[8] Fan, W., Yan, L., Chen, B., et al., 2022. Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China. Resources Policy. 77, 102760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102760
[9] Shi, M., Yuan, Z., Shi, X., et al., 2022. Drought assessment of terrestrial ecosystems in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 362, 132234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132234
[10] Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W.D., Shaw, D., 1994. The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis. The American Economic Review. 84(4), 753–771. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118029
[11] Uitto, J.I., 1998. The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities: A theoretical framework. Applied Geography. 18(1), 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-6228(97)00041-6
[12] Hsiang, S., 2016. Climate econometrics. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 8(1), 43–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095343
[13] Lesk, C., Rowhani, P., Ramankutty, N., 2016. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature. 529(7584), 84–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16467
[14] Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J., Rozenberg, J., 2020. Adaptation Principles: A Guide for Designing Strategies for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience. World Bank Group Report number 154414, 17 November, 2020. Available from: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/546611605298449211/the-adaptation-principles-a-guide-for-designing-strategies-for-climate-change-adaptation-and-resilience
[15] Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, S., 2025. The impact of climate change on agricultural economic resilience: Moderating effect of fiscal support for agriculture. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture. 33(1), 166−177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12357/cjea.20240361
[16] Drakes, O., Tate, E., 2022. Social vulnerability in a multi-hazard context: A systematic review. Environmental Research Letters. 17(3), 033001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5140
[17] Feng, X., Zeng, F., Loo, B.P.Y., et al., 2024. The evolution of urban ecological resilience: An evaluation framework based on vulnerability, sensitivity and self-organization. Sustainable Cities and Society. 116, 105933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105933
[18] Porter, M., Van der Linde, C., 1995. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the Eco-efficient Economy: Environmental Regulation and Competitive Advantage. 33, 120–134. Available from: https://hbr.org/1995/09/green-and-competitive-ending-the-stalemate
[19] Zhang, Z., Cui, Y., Wang, L., et al., 2023. Determining the ecological compensation standards based on willingness to accept (WTA) for intensive agricultural production areas: A case in China. Applied Geography. 158, 103051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103051
[20] Van der Ploeg, F., 2016. Second-best carbon taxation in the global economy: The green paradox and carbon leakage revisited. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 78, 85–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.02.006
[21] Lesnikowski, A., Biesbroek, R., Ford, J.D., et al., 2021. Policy implementation styles and local governments: The case of climate change adaptation. Environmental Politics. 30(5), 753–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1814045
[22] López, R., 2005. Under‐investing in public goods: Evidence, causes, and consequences for agricultural development, equity, and the environment. Agricultural Economics. 32, 211–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0169-5150.2004.00025.x
[23] Wang, X., Zhou, W., Zhou, F., 2023. The effect of agricultural industrial agglomeration on the efficiency of agricultural green development: Empirical evidence from China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 32(6), 5825–5836. Available from: https://www.pjoes.com/pdf-169998-96215?filename=96215.pdf
[24] Rui, S., 2024. The regulatory role of environmental policies on agricultural market prices and their economic impacts. Academic Journal of Business & Management. 6(10), 47–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.061008
[25] Du, L., Zhou, Q., 2022. Study on the emission reduction effect of environmental protection tax—An empirical study based on the change of pollution charge standard in China. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 10(1), 207–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2022.101014
[26] Jia, H., Chen, F., Pan, D., et al., 2022. Flood risk management in the Yangtze River basin—Comparison of 1998 and 2020 events. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 68, 102724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102724
[27] Bailey, N., Hochman, Z., Mao, Y., et al., 2024. Impact of climate change on agriculture in Australia: An interactive fixed effects model approach. Applied Economics. 56, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2387361
[28] Blanc, E., Schlenker, W., 2017. The use of panel models in assessments of climate impacts on agriculture. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 11, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex016
[29] Yang, Z., Solangi, Y.A., 2024. Analyzing the relationship between natural resource management, environmental protection, and agricultural economics for sustainable development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 450, 141862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141862
[30] Guo, K., Ji, Q., Zhang, D., 2024. A dataset to measure global climate physical risk. Data in Brief. 54, 110502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110502
[31] Ministry of Finance, 2018. Government Revenue and Expenditure Ledger in 2019. Available from: https://yss.mof.gov.cn/xiazaizhongxin/201809/t20180903_3005117.htm (cited 13 March 2025).
[32] Park, P., Zhang, Y., 2021. Digital economy, declining demographic dividend and the rights of low- and middle-skilled laborers. Economic Research. 56(5), 91–108. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rero20/34/1?nav=tocList
[33] Kikstra, J.S., Nicholls, Z.R.J., Smith, C.J., et al., 2022. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: From emissions to global temperatures. Geoscientific Model Development. 15(24), 9075–9109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022
[34] Lobell, D.B., Schlenker, W., Costa-Roberts, J., 2011. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science. 333(6042), 616–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531
[35] Cole, S., Giné, X., Vickery, J., 2013. How does risk management influence production decisions: Evidence from a field experiment. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6546, 1 July 2013. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/285431468330274651/pdf/WPS6546.pdf
[36] Hallegatte, S. and Rozenberg, J., 2017. Climate change through a poverty lens. Nature Climate Change. 7(4), 250–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3253
[37] Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G., 2015. External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective. In: Organizational Behavior 2. Routledge: New York, NY, USA, pp. 355–370. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315702001-24/external-control-organizations%E2%80%94resource-dependence-perspective-jeffrey-pfeffer-gerald-salancik
[38] Ren, X., Li, Y., et al., 2022. Climate risk and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from China. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 30, 467–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.023
[39] Adger, W.N., Arnell, N.W., Tompkins, E.L., 2005. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change. 15(2), 77–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
[40] Smit, B., Wandel, J., 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change. 16(3), 282–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
[41] Tsur, Y., Zemel, A., 2005. Scarcity, growth and R&D. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 49(3), 484–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.07.001
[42] Wang, F., Wang, M., Yin, H., 2022. Can campaign‐style enforcement work: When and how? Evidence from straw burning control in China. Governance. 35(2), 545–564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12571
[43] Gollier, C., Treich, N., 2003. Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: The economics of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 27, 77–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025576823096
[44] Niskanen, J., 2017. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315081878