Research on World Agricultural Economy

Driving Agricultural Investment through Government Policies, Human Resources, Infrastructure, and Technology: An Empirical Analysis of Tay Ninh Province, Vietnam

Trinh Quynh Le

Finance and Banking Faculty, Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong, Vietnam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i3.1866

Received: 17 March 2025 | Revised: 8 May 2025 | Accepted: 26 May 2025 | Published Online: 17 July 2025

---

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of government policies, human resources, infrastructure, and investment promotion programs on technological adoption and investment mobilization in the agricultural sector of Tay Ninh Province, Vietnam. Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the research analyzes survey data from 269 agricultural investors to assess how these factors drive technology integration and capital inflows. The findings reveal that government policies, including subsidies and regulatory support, significantly enhance both technological adoption and investment attraction by creating a conducive environment for innovation and reducing investment risks. Human resources and expertise are critical, as a skilled workforce facilitates effective technology use and increases investor confidence. Infrastructure development, encompassing reliable transportation and communication networks, supports the implementation of advanced agricultural technologies and lowers operational costs, making the sector more appealing to investors. Investment promotion programs, through financial incentives and partnerships, play a pivotal role in fostering technology adoption and attracting capital. Notably, technological advancements mediate the relationship between these factors and investment mobilization, underscoring the role of technology in enhancing agricultural productivity and investment appeal. While the study offers actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to promote sustainable agricultural development in Tay Ninh, its regional focus may limit its generalizability. Recommendations include strengthening policy frameworks, investing in workforce training, improving infrastructure, and expanding promotion programs to drive technological innovation and capital mobilization, thereby supporting Tay Ninh’s agricultural growth and economic resilience.

Keywords: Technological Advancements and Adoption; Mobilization of Investment Capital; Agriculture Sector; Human Resources and Expertise; Infrastructure Development

---

References

[1] Tay Ninh Statistical Office, 2023. Statistical Yearbook of Tay Ninh Province 2023. Tay Ninh Statistical Office: Tay Ninh, Vietnam.

[2] Duc Truong, D., Tho Dat, T., Huy Huan, L., 2022. Factors affecting climate-smart agriculture practice adaptation of farming households in coastal central Vietnam: the case of Ninh Thuan Province. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 6, 790089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.790089

[3] Đào, V.C., 2022. Investment capital for economic development of Tay Ninh province [PhD thesis]. Banking University of Ho Chi Minh City: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

[4] Hair, J.F., 2020. Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based PLS-SEM. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 121(1), 5–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0505

[5] Quang, A., 2019. How the border economic zone in Vietnam was developed: the case of Tay Ninh city in the border with Cambodia [Master’s thesis]. University of Eastern Finland: Joensuu, Finland.

[6] Tien, N.H., 2019. Solutions to attract ODA investment into the southeastern economic region of Vietnam. International Journal of Foreign Trade and International Business. 2(1), 21–26.

[7] Bathla, S., 2017. Futuristic private and public capital requirements in agriculture for doubling farmers’ income across the states. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 30(conf), 101–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2017.00025.8

[8] Elizabeth, M., Olutumise, A., Akinrinola, O., et al., 2024. Impacts of capital formation and investment sources on total factor productivity: the example of Nigeria’s agriculture. Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal. 16(1), 106–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52951/dasj.24160109

[9] Bórawski, P., Guth, M., Bełdycka-Bórawska, A., et al., 2020. Investments in Polish agriculture: how production factors shape conditions for environmental protection? Sustainability. 12(19), 8160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198160

[10] Bathla, S., Kumar, A., Saroj, S., 2022. Nexus in income, saving and investment among agricultural households: a state and farm level analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 73(3), 348–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.345206

[11] Nkwetenang, C., Forgha, G., Oumar, S., 2024. Understanding the drivers of farm investment in Cameroon amidst climate variability. Journal of Climate Policy. 3(1), 62–75.

[12] Belokopitov, A.V., Matveeva, E.E., Moskaleva, N.V., 2020. Investment potential formation for the development of agricultural enterprises at the regional level. Proceedings of the International Conference on Policies and Economics Measures for Agricultural Development (AgroDevEco 2020); 25–26 May 2020; Voronezh State Agrarian University: Voronezh, Russia. pp. 449–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200729.084

[13] Mardhiyyah, Y.S., Rasyidi, M.A., Hidayah, L., 2020. Factors affecting crowdfunding investor number in agricultural projects: the dummy regression model. urnal Manajemen & Agribisnis. 17(1), 14–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.17.1.14

[14] Wang, Y., Zhao, Z., Xu, M., et al., 2023. Agriculture–tourism integration’s impact on agricultural green productivity in China. Agriculture. 13(10), 1941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101941

[15] Badu-Prah, C., Agyeiwaa-Afrane, A., Gidiglo, F., et al., 2023. Trade, foreign direct investment and agriculture in developing countries. Research in World Agricultural Economics. 4(3), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i3.861

[16] Nyiwul, L., Koirala, N.P.,, 2022. Role of foreign direct investments in agriculture, forestry and fishing in developing countries. Future Business Journal. 8(1), 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00164-2

[17] Kilic Topuz, B., 2020. Members’ willingness to invest capital in the agricultural producer unions: a case of Samsun province in Turkey. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi. 26(1), 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.425327

[18] Williamson, J., Stutzman, S., 2016. Tax policy and farm capital investment: section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation. Agricultural Finance Review. 76(2), 246–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-07-2015-0031

[19] Abdelgawwad, N.A., Kamal, A.L.M., 2023. Contributions of investment and employment to the agricultural GDP growth in Egypt: an ARDL approach. Economies. 11(8), 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11080215

[20] Butzer, R., Mundlak, Y., Larson, D.F., 2002. Determinants of agricultural growth in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2803

[21] Zeddies, H.H., Busch, G., Qaim, M.,, 2024. Positive public attitudes towards agricultural robots. Scientific Reports. 14(1), 15607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66198-4

[22] McDonald, N., Fogarty, E., Cosby, A., et al., 2022. Technology acceptance, adoption and workforce on Australian cotton farms. Agriculture. 12(8), 1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081180

[23] Lee, C., Strong, R., Briers, G., et al., 2023. A correlational study of two U.S. state extension professionals’ behavioral intentions to improve sustainable food chains through precision farming practices. Foods. 12(11), 2208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112208

[24] Duncan, E., Glaros, A., Ross, D.Z., et al., 2021. New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. 38(4), 1181–1199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10244-8

[25] Strong, R., Wynn, J., Lindner, J., et al., 2022. Evaluating Brazilian agriculturalists’ IoT smart agriculture adoption barriers: understanding stakeholder salience prior to launching an innovation. Sensors. 22(18), 6833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186833

[26] Liu, C., Hua-wei, Z., 2021. How social capital affects willingness of farmers to accept low-carbon agricultural technology (LAT)? A case study of Jiangsu, China. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 13(3), 286–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-09-2020-0100

[27] Purnomo, S., Kusnandar, K., 2018. Barriers to acceptance of information and communication technology in agricultural extension in Indonesia. Information Development. 35(4), 512–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918767484

[28] Gwara, S., Wale, E., Odindo, A., 2022. Behavioral intentions of rural farmers to recycle human excreta in agriculture. Scientific Reports. 12(1), 5890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09917-z

[29] Jiménez, I., Garcia, L., Violante, M., et al., 2020. Commonly used external TAM variables in virtual reality, e-learning and agriculture applications: a literature review using QFD as organizing framework. Preprints. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0023.v1

[30] Stephens, N., Silvio, L., Dunsford, I., et al., 2018. Bringing cultured meat to market: technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 78, 155–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010

[31] Pinto, D.M., Oliveira, P.D., Fachini Minitti, A., et al., 2021. Impact assessment of information and communication technologies in agriculture: application of the AMBITEC-TICS method. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 16(2), 91–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242021000200091

[32] Dongqing, W., Liu, F., 2015. Study on the influence of agricultural modernization on rural economic development. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Science, Education Management and Sports Education; 10–11 April 2015; Beijing, China. Atlantis Press: Paris, France. pp. 1335–1338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ssemse-15.2015.343

[33] Nkosi, M., Agholor, A.I., Olorunfemi, O.D., 2024. Agro-investments among small farm business entrepreneurs in the era of the fourth industrial revolution: a case in the Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Administrative Sciences. 14(5), 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14050085

[34] Thiyagarajan, S., Naresh, G., Mahalakshmi, S., 2015. Forecasting volatility in Indian agri-commodities market. Global Business and Finance Review. 20(1), 95–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2015.20.1.95

[35] Jehangir, M., Lee, S., Park, S.W., 2020. Effect of foreign direct investment on economic growth of Pakistan: the ARDL approach. Global Business and Finance Review. 25(2), 19–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2020.25.2.19

[36] Teklemariam, D., Azadi, H., Nyssen, J., et al., 2016. How sustainable is transnational farmland acquisition in Ethiopia? Lessons learned from the Benishangul-Gumuz region. Sustainability. 8(3), 213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030213

[37] Benin, S., 2019. Public expenditure on agriculture and its impact. In: Diao, X., Hazell, P., Kolavalli, S., et al. (eds.). Ghana's Economic and Agricultural Transformation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 170–209.

[38] Bukhtiarova, A., Hayriyan, A., Chentsov, V., et al., 2019. Modeling the impact assessment of agricultural sector on economic development as a basis for the country’s investment potential. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 16(3), 229–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(3).2019.21

[39] Chen, S., Wilson, W.W., Larsen, R., et al., 2014. Investing in agriculture as an asset class. Agribusiness. 31(3), 353–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21411

[40] Dang, T.K.P., Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., Arts, B., 2017. The institutional capacity for forest devolution: the case of forest land allocation in Vietnam. Development Policy Review. 35(6), 723–744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12251

[41] Amanullah, W.J., Khan, I., Channa, S.A., et al., 2019. Farm level impacts of credit constraints on agricultural investment and income. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 56(2), 511–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/19.7872

[42] Tran, T.P., 2024. Impact of investment decision and capital mobilization decision on beta coefficient of technology and telecommunications enterprises listed in Vietnam. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation (ICRMAT 2023); 25–26 August 2023; Hanoi, Vietnam. Springer Nature: Singapore. pp. 461–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8472-5_43

[43] Hien, P.H., 2023. The mediating effects of employee trust and job satisfaction in the relationship between empowerment leadership and employee loyalty. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment. 7(2), 130–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2023.134527

[44] Pham, H.H., Tran, T.T., 2023. Strengthening the link between organizational culture and employee loyalty: exploring the mediating effects of employee trust and job satisfaction. Global Business and Finance Review. 28(3), 68–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.68

[45] Hien, P.H., 2024. Unveiling the influence of empowerment leadership on employee loyalty: the mediating role of employee trust and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Research in Technology & Engineering. 5(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/jarte.2024.19546