Assessing the Role of Kisan Rail on Agri-Supply Chain in India: Insights from Mixed-Method Research

Abhishikt Chauhan

Political Science, Gujarat National Law University (GNLU), Gandhinagar 382426, India

William Nunes

Political Science, Gujarat National Law University (GNLU), Gandhinagar 382426, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i2.1726

Received:11 February 2025 | Revised: 27 March 2025 | Accepted: 28 March 2025 | Published Online: 26 May 2025

Copyright © 2025 Abhishikt Chauhan, William Nunes. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

Agriculture plays a significant role in the country’s economy still there are inefficiencies in logistics of sector which hinder farmers' profitability. The Government of India (GoI) has launched the Kisan Rail (KR) scheme in 2020 which aims to address these challenges by providing an affordable and accessible rail transport system for agricultural produce. This study evaluates the effectiveness of KR scheme in Madhya Pradesh. The evaluation uses  four variables namely accessibility, affordability, awareness, market access, and income enhancement to assess the effectiveness of KR scheme. The convergent parallel mixed-methods approach was used and qualitative data was analysed using techniques such as word cloud & triangulation. The quantitative analysis was done using Pearson correlation and fractional logistics regression.  The findings revealing that KR significantly improves affordability, market reach, and income stability, especially for small and medium farmers. However, infrastructure gaps, first-mile connectivity issues, scheduling inefficiencies, and inconsistent policy implementation hinder full adoption. Additionally, limited awareness and outreach, particularly among marginal and female farmers, restrict utilization. The study highlights KR’s potential in reducing post-harvest losses and bypassing intermediaries but calls for stronger government intervention, infrastructure upgrades, dynamic pricing models, and digital integration to maximize impact. Future research should explore KR’s long-term sustainability using longitudinal studies and advanced econometric models to enhance India’s agricultural supply chain.

Keywords: Agriculture Policy; Agricultural Logistics; Supply Chain; Market Access; Mixed-Methods Approach; Logitic Regression; Farmer Income; Pearson Correlation


References

[1] Bureau of Research on Industry and Economic Fundamentals (BRIEF), 2018. Improving Rail Efficiency and Share in India’s Freight Transport. Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Efficiency%20and%20competitiveness%20of%20Indian%20Railways.pdf (cited 19 December 2024).

[2] Ministry of Finance, 2024. India’s Services Landscape Witnesses Rapid Technology Driven Transformation in Domestic Services Delivery and Diversification of Exports. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2034919 (cited 19 December 2024).

[3] Ministry of Railways, 2023. Indian Railways Year Book (2022–23). Available from: https://www.thehinducentre.com/resources/68976376-Resources_Year-Book.pdf (cited 19 December 2024).

[4] Union Finance, 2024. Agriculture Sector has Registered an Average Annual Growth Rate of 4.18 Per Cent Over the Last Five Years: Economic Survey. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2034943 (cited 16 December 2024).

[5] Ornaghi, A., Budani, M., 2024. Effect of agricultural exports on India's economic development. International Journal of Financial Management and Economics. 7(1), 43–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/26179210.2024.v7.i1.258

[6] Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2024. Department at Glance Available from: https://agriwelfare.gov.in/en/Dept#:~:text=Agriculture%20and%20Allied%20sector%20accounts,development%20in%20a%20sustainable%20manner (cited 20 December 2024).

[7] NABCONS, 2022. Study to determine post-harvest losses of agri produces in India. Available from: https://www.mofpi.gov.in/sites/default/files/study_report_of_post_harvest_losses.pdf (cited 21 December 2024).

[8] Parwez, S., 2016. A Conceptual Model for Integration of Indian Food Supply Chains. Global Business Review. 17(4), 834–850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916645681

[9] Bureau of Research on Industry and Economic Fundamentals (BRIEF), 2023. Improving Rail Efficiency and Share in India’s Freight Transport. Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Efficiency%20and%20competitiveness%20of%20Indian%20Railways.pdf (cited 13 September 2024).

[10] Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmer’s Welfare, 2018. Report on Doubling Farmers Income (Report No. 14). Available from: https://agriwelfare.gov.in/Documents/DFI_Volume_14.pdf (cited 21 December 2024).

[11] Statista, 2025. Commodities carried by Indian Railways as a share of production plus imports FY 2023. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1029255/india-commodities-carried-by-trains-share/ (cited 22 December 2024).

[12] Ministry of Railways, 2023. Indian Railways Year Book (2022–23). Available from: https://www.thehinducentre.com/resources/68976376-Resources_Year-Book.pdf (cited 19 December 2024).

[13] Ministry of Railways, 2020. National Rail Plan 2030. Available from: https://www.indembassy-tokyo.gov.in/public_files/assets/pdf/NRP.pdf (cited 16 December 2024).

[14] Press Indian Bureau (PIB), 2021. To boost farmers’ income, additional commodities (Mandarin & Turmeric) included for the subsidy through Kisan Rail transportation. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1697118 (cited 20 December 2024).

[15] Kohli, P., 2017. Railways mode of Transport for Cross-regional Trade of Perishable Agri-produce. Available from: https://www.nccd.gov.in/PDF/Railways%20and%20Cold-chain.pdf (cited 16 December 2024).

[16] Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, 2024. Provision of storage facilities to farmers. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2037655 (cited 20 December 2024).

[17] Ali, M.S., Singh, R., 2018. Passenger Transportation in Indian Railways: Facilities & Challenges. Journal of Commerce and Trade. 13, 83–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26703/JCT.V13I1-12

[18] Kapoor, A., Anand, M., Joshi, K., 2024. Infrastructure deficit in land transport infrastructure in India (EAC-PM Working Paper Series). Available from: https://eacpm.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Infrastructure_Deficit_In_Land_Transport.pdf (cited 22 December 2024).

[19] Lokesha, M.N., Mahesha, M., 2016. Impact of Road Infrastructure on Agricultural Development and Rural Road Infrastructure development programmes in India. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. 5(11), 1–7.

[20] Adam, S.A., Anthony, S.A., 2023. Economic Development and Agriculture in India. Available from: https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2011/jun/3.html (cited 21 December 2024).

[21] Negi, S., Anand, N., 2015. Cold chain: A weak link in the fruits and vegetables supply chain in India. The IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management. 12(1), 48–62.

[22] Chand, R., 2019. Transforming agriculture for challenges of 21st century. Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2020-01/Presidential_Address.pdf (28 December 2024).

[23] Gulati, A., Das, R., Winter-Nelson, A., 2024. Reducing Post-Harvest losses in India. Available from: https://icrier.org/pdf/Reducing_Post-Harvest_Losses_in_India.pdf (cited 22 December 2024).

[24] Aggarwal, S., 2018. Do rural roads create pathways out of poverty? Evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics. 133, 375–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.01.004

[25] World Bank, 2023. India: Issues and priorities for agriculture. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/05/17/india-agriculture-issues-priorities (cited 24 December 2024).

[26] NITI Aayog, 2017. India: Three Year Action Agenda (2017–18 to 2019–20). Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Three-Year-Action-Agenda-2017-19.pdf (cited 22 December 2024).

[27] NITI Aayog, 2023. Gearing up to Solve Food Security Challenges: Building agritech ecosystem for the Global South. Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-04/Report-UNCDF.pdf (cited 23 December 2024).

[28] The World Bank Group, 2015. Enabling The Business Of Agriculture (2015). Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/674471468125681789/pdf/940330WP0P145200of0Agriculture02015.pdf (cited 28 December 2024).

[29] Raut, R., Gardas, B., Narkhede, B., et al., 2019. Analysing the challenges in sustainable agricultural supply chain system in India. International Journal of Business Excellence. 18(3), 336–359.

[30] Kumar, G.C., Murugaiyan, P., Madanmohan, G., 2017. Agri-food supply chain management: Literature review. Intelligent Information Management. 9(2), 68–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/iim.2017.92004

[31] Minten, B., Kyle, S., 1999. The effect of distance and road quality on food collection, marketing margins, and traders’ wages: evidence from the former Zaire. Journal of Development Economics. 60(2), 467–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3878(99)00049-8

[32] Muto, M., Yamano, T., 2009. The Impact of Mobile Phone Coverage Expansion on Market Participation: Panel Data Evidence from Uganda. World Development. 37(12), 1887–1896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.004

[33] Shamdasani, Y., 2021. Rural road infrastructure & agricultural production: Evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics. 152, 102686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102686

[34] Negi, D.S., Birthal, P.S., Roy, D., et al., 2018. Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: Role of transportation and communication networks. Food Policy. 81, 106–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.008

[35] Saini, A., 2022. Kisan Rail: Contributing towards doubling farmers’ income in India. Available from: https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/article/135294/kisan-rail-a-social-endeavour-of-indian-railways-to-contribute-towards-doubling-farmers-income/ (cited 28 December 2024).

[36] Ministry of Food Processing Industries (MoFPI), 2022. Study to Determine the Post Harvest Losses of Agri-Products in India. Available from: https://www.mofpi.gov.in/sites/default/files/study_report_of_post_harvest_losses.pdf (cited 21 November 2024).

[37] Singh, V., Borisagar, D., Singh, O.P., et al., 2024. Enhancing agricultural competitiveness: Harnessing Value Chains and Agro-Processing for Sustainable Growth. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4330-2.ch002 (cited 26 December 2024).

[38] Patel, D.K., Dwivedi, S., Lal, S.P., 2024. A 3600 status analysis of Doubling Farmers’ Income Post stipulated deadline in India. International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences. 16(1), 7–14.

[39] Dror, Y., 1972. Social Science Meta-policy. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315014210-15/social-science-meta-policy-yehezkel-dror (cited 21 December 2024).

[40] Dror, Y., 1975. Some Features Of A Meta‐Model For Policy Studies. Policy Studies Journal. 3(3), 247–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1975.tb01314.x

[41] Dror, Y., 1970. Social science metapolicy: Some concepts and applications. Available from: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4372.html (cited 21 December 2024).

[42] Vekshin, A.S., Vekshina, O.I., 2021. Methodological Aspects Of Assessing The Effectiveness Of Program-Target Planning In Public Administration. Economics and Entrepreneurship. 1(38), 48240002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2022.138.1.054

[43] Barnow, B.S., Pandey, S.K., Luo, Q., 2024. How Mixed-Methods Research can Improve the policy relevance of impact evaluations. Evaluation Review. 48(3), 495–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x241227480

[44] Thompson, K., Cramer, R., LaPollo, A.B., et al., 2020. Using mixed methods and multidisciplinary research to strengthen policy assessments focusing on populations at high risk for sexually transmitted diseases. Public Health Reports. 135(1_suppl), 32S–37S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920931832

[45] Bohatá, M., Bédiová, M., Cebáková, A., et al., 2017. Measuring Social Effectiveness of Public Institutions: A contribution to Methodology. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68285-3_2 (cited 30 December 2024).

[46] Bryman, A., 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research. 6(1), 97–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877

[47] Flick, U., 2018. Triangulation in data collection. In: Flick, U. (eds.). Triangulation in Data Collection. SAGE Publications Ltd.: Los Angeles, CA, USA. pp. 527–544.

[48] DePaolo, C.A., Wilkinson, K., 2014. Get Your Head into the Clouds: Using Word Clouds for Analyzing Qualitative Assessment Data. TechTrends. 58(3), 38–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0750-9

[49] Nowell, S., White, J., Patton, M., 2017. Word Clouds: A Tool for Qualitative Policy Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 16(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917719359

[50] Mullahy, J., 2015. Multivariate fractional regression estimation of econometric share models. Journal of Econometric Methods. 4(1), 71–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jem-2012-0006

[51] Habib, N., Rankin, P., Alauddin, M., et al., 2023. Determinants of livelihood diversification in rural rain-fed region of Pakistan: Evidence from fractional multinomial logit (FMLOGIT) estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30, 32791–32808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23040-6

[52] Papke, L.E., Wooldridge, J.M., 1996. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 11(6), 619–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1

[53] von Wyl, V., Bonhoeffer, S., Bugnion, E., et al., 2020. A research agenda for digital proximity tracing apps. Swiss Med Wkly. 150, w20324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20324

[54] Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., 2007. Analysis and Interpreting Data in Mix Method Research (Chapter 7). In Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA. pp. 209-258.

[55] Press India Bureau, 2023. Railways have operated around 2,359 Kisan Rail services till January, 2023. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1897375 (cited 11 November 2024).

[56] Cyr, J., 2015. The pitfalls and promise of focus groups as a data collection method. Sociological Methods & Research. 45(2), 231–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115570065

[57] Rahman, M.M., 2023. Sample Size Determination for Survey Research and Non-Probability Sampling Techniques: A Review and Set of Recommendations. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics. 11(1), 42–62.

[58] Castleberry, A.N., Nolen, A., 2018. Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning. 10(6), 807–815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

[59] Hendrickson, C., Matthews, H.S., Cicas, G., 2006. Analysis of Regional Supply Chain Economic and Environmental Effects of Expansion of the U.S. Freight Rail System. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 12(3), 123–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/40799(213)123

[60] Liu, R., Stefanovich, A., Kaewunruen, S., 2021. Sensitivity of a High-Speed Rail Development on Supply Chain and Logistics via Air-Rail-Road Freight Transportation. Frontiers in Built Environment. 7, 685884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.685884

[61] Pallant, J., 2020. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education: Columbus, OH, USA. pp. 126–139.

[62] Field, A., 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA. pp.271–274.

[63] Dancey, C.P., Reidy, J., 2017. Statistics without maths for psychology (7th ed.). Pearson Education: London, UK. pp. 384–403.

[64] Carlucci, F., Corcione, C., Mazzocchi, P., et al., 2021. The role of logistics in promoting Italian agribusiness: The Belt and Road Initiative case study. Land Use Policy. 108, 105660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105560

[65] Baffoe, G., Zhou, X., Moinuddin, M., et al., 2021. Urban–rural linkages: Effective solutions for sustainable development in Ghana. Sustainability Science. 16, 1133–1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00929-8

[66] Sinha, B., Ghosh, M., 2019. Institutional imperatives for promoting trees outside forests (TOFs) to enhance timber production in India. Small-scale Forestry. 18, 333–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9407-4

[67] Ricciolini, E., Tiralti, A., Paolotti, L., et al., 2024. Sustainable development according to 2030 Agenda in EU countries. Sustainable Development. 32(3), 1894–1912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2758

[68] Semenza, J.C., Hall, D.E., Wilson, D.J., et al., 2008. Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 35(5), 479–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020

[69] Chamberlin, J., Jayne, T.S., 2013. Unpacking the meaning of ‘market access’: Evidence from rural Kenya. World Development. 41, 245–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.004

[70] Doss, C., Kovarik, C., Peterman, A., et al. 2015. Gender inequalities in ownership and control of land in Africa: Myths versus reality. Agricultural Economics. 46(3), 403–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12171

[71] Aker, J.C., 2011. Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agricultural Economics. 42(6), 631–647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x

[72] Barrett, C.B., 2008. Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy. 33(4), 299–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005

[73] Asfaw, S., Shiferaw, B., Simtowe, F., et al., 2012. Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Food Policy. 37(3), 283–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.013

[74] World Bank, 2007. World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/587251468175472382/pdf/41455optmzd0PA18082136807701PUBLIC1.pdf (cited 28 December 2024.

[75] Higgins, A., McFallan, S., Marinoni, O., et al., 2018. Informing transport infrastructure investments using TraNSIT: A case study for Australian agriculture and forestry. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 154, 187–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.008

[76] Schroeder, Μ., Braun, I., Schnieder, E., 2000. Modern revenue management strategies for railway slots. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 33(9), 141–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)38137-5

[77] Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., et al., 2011. Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 48(3), 369–383. DOi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005

[78] Vaishnav, H., Divi, S., Reddy Minampati, V.R., et al., 2024. Increasing Role of Women in Agriculture: Unveiling Perceived Impact of the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) Scheme using Multivariate Regression Approach. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 5(4), 620–636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i4.1278

[79] Akber, N., Paltasingh, K.R., Mishra, A.K., 2022. How can public policy encourage private investments in Indian agriculture? Input subsidies vs. public investment. Food Policy. 107, 102210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102210

[80] Janarthanan, B.S., 2024. Saving farm subsidies with smart climate interventions: the case of transition to a millet-based agriculture. China Agricultural Economic Review. 16(2), 249–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-05-2023-0129

[81] Kumar, P., Kumbhare, N.V., Nain, M.S., et al., 2023. Factors for Value Realization of Tomato, Onion, and Potato (TOP) under Operation Greens Using DEMATEL Method. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 59(4), 72–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48165/ijee.2023.59415

[82] Singh, S., Manoharan, S., n.d. PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan: India's Move Towards 5 Trillion Dollar Economy. Google Scholar. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dhanabalan-Thangam/publication/378076254_On_INDIA'S_5_TRILLION_ECONOMY_THE_VISION_CHALLENGES_AND_ROADMAP_5TE-2024/links/65c5b8fc1bed776ae337b8cf/On-INDIAS-5-TRILLION-ECONOMY-THE-VISION-CHALLENGES-AND-ROADMAP-5TE-2024.pdf#page=265 (cited 22 December 2024).

[83] Kaur, P., Dhillon, S.S., 2017. Disparities in Agriculture Income Across the Indian States. In: Bathla, S., Dubey, A. (eds.). Changing Contours of Indian Agriculture. Springer: Singapore. pp. 133–148.

[84] Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., et al., 2017. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 16(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

[85] Agresti, A., 2013. Statistical Inference for a Proportion. In Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 5–10.

[86] Schober, P., Boer, C., Schwarte, L.A., 2018. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 126(5), 1763–1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

[87] Papke, L.E., Wooldridge, J.M., 1996. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 11(6), 619–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1

[88] Long, J.S., Freese, J., 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata (3rd ed.). Stata Press: College Station, TX, USA. pp. 344–405.

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.