Rationale of Government Policies on Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability: A European Perspective
Fotios Chatzitheodoridis
Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51100 Grevena, Greece
Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51100 Grevena, Greece
Efstathios Gortsilas
Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i2.1712
Received:2 February 2025 | Revised: 10 March 2025 | Accepted: 14 March 2025 | Published Online: 23 May 2025
Copyright © 2025 Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, Konstantinos Spinthiropoulos, Efstratios Loizou, Dimitrios Kalfas, Stavros Kalogiannidis, Efstathios Gortsilas. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
In recent years, the European Union has placed a strong emphasis on the development of government policies that promote agricultural productivity and sustainability. As global challenges such as climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental degradation have continued to pose significant hurdles to EU countries, governments have formulated guidelines in a bid to address food security, economic growth, and the environment. The present study relied on a cross-sectional research design and collected data from 278 stakeholders in the Greek agricultural sector in 2023. These were government subsidies for farming, environmental policies, and public spending on research and development in the agricultural sector. This research confirms that government subsidies positively influence agricultural productivity and provides reliable data on how subsidies facilitate the spread of advanced technology and environmentally friendly farming techniques. In addition, the environment generally benefits agriculture where it is most influential in affecting crop productivity through the improvement of soil health, water quality, and the protection and enhancement of the biological resource base. The government funding for agricultural research is vital for reinforcing innovation, particularly focusing on climate-wise farming and use of digital solutions. The implication for policy is that current EU agricultural policies are multilayered and geared towards meeting both environmental objectives and food production competitiveness. This research fills the gap in knowledge on the EU agriculture and can serve as a guideline for further reforms in Europe and in the rest of the world.
Keywords: Government Policies; Government Subsidies; Government Funding; Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability; Europe
References
[1] Hurduzeu, G., Pânzaru, R.L., Medelete, D.M., et al., 2022. The Development of Sustainable Agriculture in EU Countries and the Potential Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals Specific Targets (SDG 2). Sustainability. 14(23), 15798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315798
[2] Schnepf, R., 2021. EU Agricultural Domestic Support: Overview and Comparison with the United States. Congressional Research Service: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 42.
[3] Alawa, D. A., Ajigo, I., Unimna, F., et al., 2020. Policy initiatives for improving the contributions of university agricultural education and extension institutions to environmental and sustainable development in agriculture. Educational Research and Reviews. 15(6), 273–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.3990
[4] Kim, C., 2012. The Impact of Climate Change on the Agricultural Sector: Implications of the Agro-Industry for Low Carbon, Green Growth Strategy and Roadmap for the East Asian Region. Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific. pp. 1–51.
[5] OECD, 2015. Innovation, Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability in Brazil. In: OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
[6] Buckwell, A., Uhre, A.N., Annabelle, W., et al., 2014. Sustainable Intensification of European Agriculture: A review sponsored by the RISE Foundation. RISE Foundation: Brussels, Belgium. pp. 98.
[7] Ramaswami, B., 2019. Agricultural subsidies: Study prepared for XV finance commission. Economic and Political Weekly. 172(22), 1754.
[8] Alizamir, S., Iravani, F., Mamani, H., 2019. An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: Government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Management Science. 65(1), 32–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2927
[9] Baylis, K., Peplow, S., Rausser, G., et al., 2008. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison. Ecological Economics. 65(4), 753–764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.034
[10] Kyriakopoulos, G.L., Sebos, I., Triantafyllou, E., et al., 2023. Benefits and Synergies in Addressing Climate Change via the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy in Greece. Applied Sciences. 13(4), 2216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042216
[11] Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2018. Agriculture Bill: Analysis and Economic Rationales for Government Intervention. Defra Evidence and Analysis Paper No. 7, September 2018. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b9a8a0e40f0b6788dda2bc4/agri-bill-evidence-paper.pdf
[12] Van Zyl, J., Pearson, S.R., 1990. Review: The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Development Southern Africa. 7(1), 133–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03768359008439507
[13] OECD, 2019. Innovation, Productivity and Sustainability in Food and Agriculture. OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews. 3 October 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c9c4ec1d-en
[14] Timpanaro, G., Scuderi, A., Guarnaccia, P., et al., 2022. Will Recent World Events Shift the Focus of Policy-Makers from Sustainable Agriculture to Intensive and Competitive Agriculture? SSRN Electronic Journal. 9(7), e17991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4246492
[15] Hatfield-Dodds, S., Greenville, J., Burns, K., et al., 2020. Pathways to sustainable and productive agriculture: an Australian perspective. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences: Canberra, Australia.
[16] Scown, M.W., Nicholas, K.A., 2020. European agricultural policy requires a stronger performance framework to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Global Sustainability. 3, e11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.5
[17] Matthews, A., 2021. The contribution of research to agricultural policy in Europe. Bio-Based and Applied Economics. 10(3), 185–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-12322
[18] Czyżewski, B., Matuszczak, A., Grzelak, A., et al., 2021. Environmental sustainable value in agriculture revisited: How does Common Agricultural Policy contribute to eco-efficiency? Sustainability Science. 16(1), 137–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00834-6
[19] Verheugen, G., 2005. European commission. In: Bail, C., Falkner, R., Marquard, H. (eds.). The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776110-28
[20] Moreddu, C., 2017. Improving innovation for a more productive and sustainable food and agriculture system: policy insights from country reviews. Proceedings of the SCAR Conference 2017; 4–5 December 2017; Tallinn, Estonia.
[21] Beckman, J., Ivanic, M., Jelliffe, J., et al., 2020. Economic and food security impacts of agricultural input reduction under the European Union Green Deal's farm to fork and biodiversity strategies. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.307277
[22] Pe'er, G., Bonn, A., Bruelheide, H., et al., 2020. Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges. People and Nature. 2(2), 305–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10080
[23] Kalfas, D., Kalogiannidis, S., Papadopoulou, C.-I., et al., 2024. The value of periurban forests and their multifunctional role: A scoping review of the context of and relevant recurring problems. In: Sahana, M. (ed.). Remote sensing and GIS for peri-urban research. Academic Press: London, UK. 11, pp. 329–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15832-2.00014-9
[24] Viegas, M., Wolf, J., Cordovil, F., 2023. Assessment of inequality in the Common Agricultural Policy in Portugal. Agricultural and Food Economics. 11(1), 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-023-00255-w
[25] Zahrnt, V., 2011. FOOD SECURITY AND THE EU'S COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY: Facts Against Fears. ECIPE Working Paper. 1, 1–23.
[26] Zimmermann, R., Kolavalli, S., Flaherty, K., et al., 2009. Agricultural policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: Understanding CAADP and APRM policy processes. Studies No. 48. German Development Institute: Bonn, Germany.
[27] European Parliament, 2016. Resolution of 7 June 2016 on technological solutions for sustainable agriculture in the EU (2015/2225(INI)). Official Journal of the European Union. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0251_EN.html
[28] Doukas, Y.E.; Salvati, L.; Vardopoulos, I., 2023. Unraveling the European Agricultural Policy Sustainable Development Trajectory. Land. 12, 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091749
[29] SWAN, 2021. Towards a New Agricultural and Food Policy for Ireland Recommendations for Government. Sustainable Water Network: Dublin, Ireland.
[30] Koemtzopoulos, D., Zournatzidou, G., Ragazou, K., et al., 2025. Cryptocurrencies Transit to a Carbon Neutral Environment: From Fintech to Greentech Through Clean Energy and Eco-Efficiency Policies. Energies. 18(2), 291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020291
[31] Grethe, H., Arens-Azevedo, U., Balmann, A., et al., 2018. For an EU Common Agricultural Policy serving the public good after 2020: Fundamental questions and recommendations. Berichte Über Landwirtschaft. 225, 1–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12767/buel.v0i225.220
[32] Gava, O., Bartolini, F., Venturi, F., et al., 2020. Improving policy evidence base for agricultural sustainability and food security: A content analysis of life cycle assessment research. Sustainability. 12(3), 1033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031033
[33] El Benni, N., Grovermann, C., Finger, R., 2023. Towards more evidence-based agricultural and food policies. Q Open. 3(1), qoad003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoad003
[34] Tellioglu, I., Konandreas, P., 2017. Agricultural Policies, Trade and Sustainable Development in Egypt. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Geneva, Switzerland.
[35] Chatzitheodoridis, F., Melfou, K., Kontogeorgos, A., et al., 2023. Exploring Key Aspects of an Integrated Sustainable Urban Development Strategy in Greece: The Case of Thessaloniki City. Smart Cities. 6(1), 19–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6010002
[36] Vorley, B., 2002. Sustaining Agriculture: Policy, Governance, and the Future of Family-based Farming: a Synthesis Report of the Collaborative Research Project. IIED: London, UK. pp. 196.
[37] IPES, 2019. Towards a Common Food Policy for the European Union the Policy Reform and Realignment That Is Required. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems: Brussels, Belgium. pp. 1–112.
[38] Reytar, K., Hanson, C., Henninger, N., 2014. Indicators of sustainable agriculture: a scoping analysis. World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1–20.
[39] Scrieciu, S., 2007. Economic Impacts of Adopting the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union: A CGE Approach to the Case of Romania. Journal of Economic Integration. 22(2), 407–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2007.22.2.407
[40] Tangermann, S., Cramon-Taubadel, S.V., 2013. Agricultural policy in the European Union: An overview (Diskussionsbeitrag No. 1302). Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung (DARE), Georg-August-Universität Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany. pp. 1–75.
[41] Smedzik-Ambrozy, K., Guth, M., Stepień, S., et al., 2019. The influence of the European union's common agricultural policy on the socio-economic sustainability of farms (the case of Poland). Sustainability. 11(24), 7173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11247173
[42] Kalogiannidis, S., Kalfas, D., Giannarakis, G., et al., 2023. Integration of Water Resources Management Strategies in Land Use Planning towards Environmental Conservation. Sustainability. 15(21), 15242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115242
[43] Zournatzidou, G., 2024. Evaluating Executives and Non-Executives' Impact toward ESG Performance in Banking Sector: An Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method. Administrative Sciences. 14(10), 255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100255
[44] Dorward, A., Morrison, J., 2015. Heroes, villains and victims: Agricultural subsidies and their impacts on food security and poverty reduction. In: Blandford, D., Hill, B. (eds.). Handbook on the Globalisation of Agriculture. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 194–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939838.00016
[45] Kalogiannidis, S., Karafolas, S., Chatzitheodoridis, F., 2024. The Key Role of Cooperatives in Sustainable Agriculture and Agrifood Security: Evidence from Greece. Sustainability. 16(16), 7202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167202
[46] Kalogiannidis, S., Syndoukas, D., 2024. The impact of agricultural extension services on farm output: A worldwide viewpoint. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 5(1), 96–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i1.999
[47] FOEEurope, 2013. A New Food and Agriculture Policy for the European Union. Friends of the Earth Europe: Brussels, Belgium. pp. 27.
[48] Krejcie, R.V., Morgan, D.W., 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30, 607–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
[49] IBM Corporation, 2024. IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27) [Software]. IBM Corporation: Armonk, NY, USA.
[50] S&P Europe, 2022. The S&P Europe 350 ESG Index: A Broad, Sustainable Index Solution. S&P Europe 350.January 2022. https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/education/education-sp-europe-350-esg-index-a-broad-sustainable-index-solution.pdf
[51] S&P Europe, 2022. The S&P Europe 350® ESG Index: Defining Europe's Sustainable Core. September 2021. https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/education/education-the-sp-europe-350-esg-index-defining-europes-sustainable-core.pdf
[52] IICA, 2014. Innovation in agriculture: a key process for sustainable development. Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture: San Jose, Costa Rica. p. 20.