Research on World Agricultural Economy

Technosociopreneurship Model in Local Economic Institutions for Agricultural Commodity Business Development

Sepris Yonaldi

Doctoral Program in Agricultural Science, Universitas Andalas, Padang 25000, Indonesia

Melinda Noer

Doctoral Program in Agricultural Science, Universitas Andalas, Padang 25000, Indonesia

Yulia Hendri Yeni

Department of Management, Universitas Andalas, Padang 25000, Indonesia

Nofialdi

Agricultural Economics Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Andalas, Padang 25000, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i2.1687

Received: 19 January 2025 | Revised: 19 March 2025 | Accepted: 20 March 2025 | Published Online: 22 May 2025

---

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain the role of technosociopreneurship based on local economic institutions by testing the influence of technosociopreneurship factors on the institutional economy of KPSU Solok Radjo. This research employs a quantitative method with a cross-sectional approach. Sampling was conducted using the simple random sampling technique. The results of the study indicate that innovation does not have a significant positive effect on local economic institutions. Innovation has a significant positive effect on technosociopreneurship. Collaboration has a significant positive effect on local economic institutions. Collaboration has a significant positive effect on technosociopreneurship. Technosociopreneurship has a significant positive effect on local economic institutions. Technosociopreneurship mediates the relationship between innovation and local economic institutions. Technosociopreneurship mediates the relationship between collaboration and local economic institutions. Technosociopreneurship mediates the relationship between culture and local economic institutions. The R² value of 0.678 indicates that the variables of innovation, collaboration, and culture explain 67.8% of the factors contributing to technosociopreneurship, while the remaining 32.2% is explained by other variables not examined in this study. The R² value of 0.530 shows that technosociopreneurship, innovation, collaboration, and culture collectively explain 53% of the factors influencing local economic institutions, leaving 47% to be explained by other unexamined variables. Technosociopreneurship plays a key role in mediating the relationship between innovation and the local economic institution of KPSU Solok Radjo. Without the mediation of technosociopreneurship, innovation does not impact local economic institutions.

Keywords: Technosociopreneurship; Innovation; Collaboration; Culture; Cooperative

---

References

[1] Rivai, R.S., Anugrah, I.S., 2011. Concept and Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Development in Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. 29(1), 13–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v29n1.2011.13-25

[2] Mayang, S., 2023. Peran Kewirausahaan dalam Pengembangan Industri Pertanian dan Perkebunan. Available from: https://www.mertani.co.id/post/peran-kewirausahaan-dalam-pengembangan-industri-pertanian-dan-perkebunan#:~:text=Peran%20Penting%20Kewirausahaan%20dalam%20Sektor%20Pertanian%20dan%20Perkebunan,7%207.%20Meningkatkan%20Kesejahteraan%20Petani%20dan%20Peternak%20 (cited 9 January 2024).

[3] Silvatika, B.A., 2020. Technosociopreneur, New Model Umkm Di Era New Normal. Prosiding Seminar Stiami. 7(2), 29–35.

[4] Tenrinippi, A., 2019. Kewirausahaan Sosial di Indonesia (Apa, Mengapa, Kapan, Siapa Dan Bagaimana). Meraja Journal. 2(3), 25–40.

[5] Sutanto, O., Nurrachman, N., 2018. Makna Kewirausahaan Pada Etnis Jawa, Minang, dan Tionghoa: Sebuah Studi Representasi Sosial. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat. 5(1), 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu12018-75

[6] Yudithadewi, D., Parikesit, B., 2020. Pemberdayaan Perempuan Dalam Kewirausahaan Sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial. 21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jurnalkessos.v21i1.248

[7] Sirine, H., Andadari, R.K., Suharti, L., 2020. Kewirausahaan Sosial dan Penciptaan Nilai Bersama: Sebuah Kajian terhadap CSR Sido Muncul untuk Program Desa Rempah dan Buah. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. 8(2), 119–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v8i2.4240

[8] Bunyamin, A., Purnomo, D., Taofik, S., et al., 2016. Social Business Replication Method for Motivation Improvement of Local Based Enterprise in Banyuresmi District, Garut Regency. Journal Agroteknologi. 10 (2), 137–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/j-agt.v10i02.5044

[9] Burvill, S.M., Jones-Evans, D., Rowlands, H., 2018. Reconceptualising the principles of Penrose's (1959) theory and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 25(6), 930–959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2017-0361

[10] Mulyaningrum, M., Rusliati, E., 2019. Membangun Kewirausahaan Sosial Sektor Agribisnis Sebagai Inovasi Peluang Kerja di Pedesaan: Studi Kasus pada Usaha Jamur “Saung Suung Yuceu” Majalengka. Proceedings of Seminar dan Lokakarya Kualitatif Indonesia: Pengembangan Budaya Penelitian Menuju Indonesia 4.0; Mar 19–Mar 20, 2019; Tangerang, Indonesia. pp. 193–202.

[11] Annisa, R., Agustia Rahayuningsih, P., Maulana, R., et al., 2020. Pemanfaatan Digital Kufi Dalam Meningkatkan Technopreneurship Pada Organisasi Prisma. Widya Laksana. 9(2), 213–216.

[12] Mopangga, H., 2015. Studi Kasus Pengembangan Wirausaha Berbasis Teknologi (Technopreneurship) di Provinsi Gorontalo. Trikonomika. 14(1), 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/trikonomika.v14i1.587

[13] Syaifulloh, M., 2021. Strategi Program Technopreneurship dan Marketing Public Relation terhadap Pengembangan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Performa. 18(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/performa.v18i1.7792

[14] Ratten, V., 2018. Social entrepreneurship through digital communication in farming. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. 14(1), 99–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-07-2017-0045

[15] North, D.C., 1955. Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy. 63(3), 243–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/257668

[16] Ménard, C., Shirley, M.M., 2011. The Contribution of Douglass North to New Institutional Economics. Available from: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00624297 (cited 5 March 2024).

[17] Kassner, M., 2017. Economic process as institutionalization of values Karl Polanyi's institutional theory and its ethical consequences. Annales Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym. 20(6), 69–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.6.05

[18] Yahya, M, Abdul-Hakim, R., Abdul-Razak, N.A., 2013. Does Entrepreneurship Bring An Equal Society And Alleviate Poverty? Evidence From Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 91, 331–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.430

[19] Buang, A., Suryandari, R.Y., 2009. Pertanian Kontrak Sebagai Satu Kaedah Memajukan Petani Kecil Melayu: Tanggapan Dan Penilaian Komuniti Tani Tempatan Di Zon Utara. Semenanjung Malaysia Terhadap Prestasi Program Pertanian Kontrak Fama. 5(1), 11–22.

[20] Arsanti, T.A., 2013. Perempuan dan Pembangunan Sektor Pertanian. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship. 3(1), 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v3i1.88

[21] Rusastra, I.W., Hendiarto, Noekman, K.M., et al., 2005. Kinerja Dan Perspektif Pengembangan Model Agropolitan Dalam Mendukung Pengembangan Ekonomi Wilayah Berbasis Agribisnis. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. 5(2).

[22] Panda, Kewirausahaan pertanian sosial digital praktis dan relevan bagi masyarakat pedesaan karena kemampuan untuk memanfaatkan inovasi teknologi. Panda.id. Available from: https://bit.ly/4hWvqSK (cited 6 February 2024).

[23] Kanaan, O.A., Alsoud, M., Asad, M., 2024. A mediated moderated analysis of knowledge management and stakeholder relationships between open innovation and performance of entrepreneurial firms. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 12(4), 2383–2398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.5.028

[24] Noruzi, M.R., Westover, J.H., Rahimi, G.R., 2010. An Exploration of Social Entrepreneurship in the Entrepreneurship Era. Asian Soc Sci. 6(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n6p3

[25] Ebrashi, R.El., 2013. Social entrepreneurship theory and sustainable social impact. Social Responsibility Journal. 9(2), 188–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2011-0013

[26] Okpara, O.J., Halkias, D., 2011. Social Entrepreneurship: An Overview Of Its Theoritical Evolution And Proposed Research Model. International Journal Social Entrepreneurship And Innovation. 1(1), 4–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSEI.2011.039808

[27] Rahman, R.S.A.R., 2022. Relationship between Entrepreneurial Personality, Human Capital, and Social Capital with Social Entrepreneurial Intention (SEI) among Students in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Creat Educ. 13(12), 3873–3888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.1312248

[28] Hartono, W., 2011. Pengembangan Technopreneurship:Upaya Peningkatan Daya Saing Bangsa Di Era Global. Semantik. 1(1), 96–100.

[29] Haris, J.E., Harris, D.J., Al, E., 1995. Introduction: Development And Significance Of Nie. Routledge: London, UK. p. 8.

[30] Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press: Cambridge, UK. p.72.

[31] Wahyuni, S., 2010. Integritas Kelembagaan Petani Gapoktan dan P3A. Puslitbang Tanaman Pangan: Bogor, Indonesia. pp. 45–49.

[32] Johar, D., 2014. Peran Modal Sosial dalam Meningkatkan Peran Lembaga Keuangan Mikro dalam Pembangunan Pertanian di Sumatera Barat. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321696188 (cited 4 November 2023).

[33] Perwita, A.D., Saptana, S., 2019. The Role Of Agri-Entrepreneurs In Dealing With Disruptive Innovation. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. 37(1), 41–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v37n1.2019.41-58

[34] Erisena, M.G., 2016. Konsep Kewirausahaan Pada Petani Melalui Pendekatan Structural Equation Model (Sem). E-Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Agrowisata. 5(1).

[35] Rufaidah, E., Kodri, K., 2020. Strategi Inovasi Dan Kreativitas Berwirausaha Era Revolusi 4.0. Alfabeta: Bandung, Indonesia. p. 59.

[36] Khofiyah, N., Sutopo, W., Hisjam, M., 2020. A Framework for Developing Technopreneurship and Innovation System: A Comparative Study of Agricultural Drone Technology Development in Indonesia. Proceedings of 5th North American International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management; August 9–August 11, 2020; Detroit, MI, USA. pp. 1251–1262.

[37] Syafe, D., Jalaludin, J., 2021. Pengaruh Inovasi Dan Kreativitas Wirausaha Terhadap Keberhasilan Usaha Kecil Menengah Pada Penjahit Pakaian Di Kecamatan Baturaja Timur Kabupaten Oku. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Unbara. 2(2), 105–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54895/jmbu.v2i2.1024

[38] Susdiani, L., 2020. Analisis pengaruh inovasi terhadap kinerja UMKM pada industri kreatif di kota padang. Procuratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen. 8(4), 450–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35145/procuratio.v8i4.758

[39] Lestari, I., Astuti, M., Ridwan, H., 2019. Pengaruh Inovasi Dan Orientasi Kewirausahaan Terhadap Keunggulan Bersaing Umkm Kuliner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis. 4(1), 111–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v4i1.245

[40] Sari, L.R., 2021. Analisis Pengaruh Orientasi Kewirausahaan, Inovasi Dan Kapabilitas Pemasaran Terhadap Keunggulan Bersaing Pada Ukm Olahan Ikan Di Semarang. Jurnal Ilmiah Aset. 23(1), 21–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37470/1.23.1.174

[41] Dewi, N.W., Suparna, G., 2017. Peran Inovasi Dalam Memediasi Pengaruh Orientasi Kewirausahaan Terhadap Keunggulan Bersaing Industri Kain Endek. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud. 6(9), 5144–5174.

[42] Hadiyati, E., 2011. Kreativitas Dan Inovasi Berpengaruh Terhadap Kewirausahaan Usaha Kecil. Urnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan. 13(1), 8–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.13.1.8-16

[43] Ch, I., Andari, T.T., Mukmin, M.N., 2020. Analysis Of The Effect Of Corporate And Market Orientation And Innovation On The Productive Economic Performance Of The Joint Business Business Group (Uep Kube). Yayasan Sinergi Riset dan Edukasi, Bandung.

[44] Khouroh, U., Ratnaningsih, C.S., Rahayudi, B., 2021. Inovasi Dan Daya Saing Umkm Di Era New Normal: Dari Triple Helix Model Ke Quadruple Helix Model. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan. 9(2), 152–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v9i2.6718

[45] Hadianti, S.W., Safitri, Y., 2016. Pengembangan Potensi Pemuda. Pemudi Bandung Melalui Gerakan Kewirausahaan Sosial. 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v6i2.13214

[46] Strokosch, K., Osborne, S., 2019. If Citizen Participation Is So Important, Why Has It Not Been Achieved? Public Money And Management. 40(1), 8–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1654322

[47] Widyaningsih, H.W., 2020. Manajemen Kolaboratif Dalam Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Public Policy And Managament Inquiry. 4(2), 116–133.

[48] Calzada, G., 2021. Smart City Citizenship. Elsevier: Oxford, UK. p. 256.

[49] Lassen, A.H., Laugen, B.T., Middel, R., 2008. Collaborative entrepreneurship: On the Influence of Internal and External Collaboration on Corporate Entrepreneurial Innovation. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/17157737/Collaborative_entrepreneurship_On_the_Influence_of_Internal_and_External_Collaboration_on_Corporate_Entrepreneurial_Innovation (cited 15 January 2024).

[50] Setiawa, L.R., Soelaiman, L., 2021. Pengaruh Kolaborasi, Kecerdasan Budaya, Dan Orientasi Kewirausahaan Terhadap Kinerja Ukm Kota Sibolga. Available from: https://repository.unida.ac.id/116/ (cited 7 December 2023).

[51] Ranatiwi, M., Mulyana, M., 2018. Dampak Jejaring Kolaborasi Dan Kapabilitas Inovasi Terhadap Kinerja. Ekobis. 19(1), 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/ekobis.19.1.49-58

[52] Auna, D., Alam, H.V., Monoarfa, V., 2023. Pengaruh Efikasi Diri Dan Kolaborasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pelaku Usaha Mikro Menengah Di Kota Gorontalo. 5(3), 1064–1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37479/jimb.v5i3.18135

[53] Shome, R., 2019. Thinking Culture And Cultural Studies-From/Of The Global South. Accelerat Ing T He World's Research. 16(3), 196–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2019.1648841

[54] Jaén, I., Fernández-Serrano, J., Santos, F.A., 2017. Cultural Values And Social Entrepreneurship: A Cross- Country Efficiency Analysis. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Teulon, F., Bonet-Fernandez, D. (eds.). Social Entrepreneurship In Non-Profit And Profit Sectors. Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany. pp. 31–51.

[55] Liñán, F., Nabi, G., Krueger, N.F., 2013. British And Spanish Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Comparative Study. Revista De Economía Mundial. 33, 73–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i33.4761

[56] Hunt, S., Levie, J., 2003. Culture As A Predictor Of Entrepreneurial Activity. Babson College: Wellesley, MA, USA. pp. 171–185.

[57] Brandt, T., Wanasika, I., Suominen, S., 2021. Cultural qualities needed to become an entrepreneur. Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship; September 16–September 17, 2021; Lisbon, Portugal. pp. 154–161.

[58] Watson, P.J., 1995. Archaeology, Anthropology, and the Culture Concept. Am Anthropol. 97(4), 683–694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1995.97.4.02a00110

[59] Mohapatra, S., Khadanga, G.S., Majhi, S., 2018. Social Entrepreneurship For Agricultural Development In India. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 7(4), 204–205.

[60] Elinuari, V., Marlina, N., 2021. The Influence of Chinese Culture and Entrepreneurship Education on the Success of Chinese Ethnic Businesses in Tulung Agung. Journal of Business Education. . Jurnal Pendidikan tata Niaga. 9 (1), 1135–1145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jptn.v9n1.p1139-1145

[61] Setiawan, H., 2013. Pengaruh Orientasi Pasar, Budaya Organisasi Dan Orientasi Kewirausahaan Terhadap Kinerja Usaha (Studi Pada Usaha Kecil Pengolahan Di Kota Palembang). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya. 11(3), 181–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v11i3.3193

[62] Ferdinand, A., 2014. Metode Penelitian Manajemen, 5th ed. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro: Semarang, Indonesia. p. 54.

[63] Hair, J.F., Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., 2009. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. pp. 123–145.

[64] Sugiyono, 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Alfabeta: Bandung, Indonesia. p. 63.

[65] Pallant, J., 2016. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Open University Press: Berkshire, UK. p. 378.

[66] Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., et al., 2016. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA. pp. 45–67.

[67] Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., et al., 2012. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci. 40(3), 414–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6

[68] Abdillah, W., Hartono, J., 2011. Partial Least Square (PLS): Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Penerbit Andi: Yogyakarta, Indonesia. pp. 72–73.

[69] Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Hair, J.F., 2021. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In: Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A. (eds.). Handbook of Market Research. Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany. pp. 1–47.

[70] Diartho, H.C., 2017. Strategi Terhadap Pengembangan Kelembagaan Bumdesa Di Kabupaten Jembe. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan. 17(2), 200–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/ekonomikawan.v17i2.1801

[71] Day, S.W., Jean-Denis, H., 2016. Resource Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: Putting the Pieces Together. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability. 11(2), 59–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/JSIS.V11I2.820

[72] Hassan, Z., Lashari, M.K., Basit, A., 2021. Cultivating Entrepreneurial Culture Among Students In Malaysia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. 9(1), 119–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090108