Synergizing Policies and Farmers’ Willingness in Arable Land Protection for Food Security in East Java Indonesia
Department of Environment Science, Graduate School, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
Department of Agriculture Socio‑Economic, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
Rika Kurniaty
Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
Department of Environment Science, Graduate School, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v7i1.1646
Received: 3 January 2025 | Revised: 20 February 2025 | Accepted: 25 February 2025 | Published Online: 29 January 2026
Copyright © 2025 Yuvita Isnania, Aminudin Afandhi, Nuhϔil Hanani, Rika Kurniaty, Reny Tiarantika. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Abstract
This study examines the role of Farmers’ Willingness in Arable Land Protection Cooperation (FWALPC) as a key factor influencing food security, taking into account the impact of government propaganda, government regulations, subsidy policies, ecological benefits, economic benefits, and social benefits. The study employs a quantitative survey method involving 200 farmers from key agricultural regions, and the data is analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to evaluate the direct and indirect relationships between variables. The findings reveal that FWALPC has a significant impact on food security and serves as a crucial mediating variable linking external factors to food security outcomes. Factors such as government propaganda, social benefits, and subsidy policies significantly influence food security both directly and indirectly, whereas ecological and economic benefits contribute more indirectly through FWALPC. Conversely, government regulations significantly affect FWALPC but do not show a direct significant impact on food security. This study makes a theoretical contribution by highlighting the importance of FWALPC as a connector between external factors and food security, while emphasizing incentive-based approaches, effective communication campaigns, and strengthening farmers’ social networks as strategies to enhance their participation in land protection. These findings offer practical insights for policymakers in designing sustainable land protection policies to support food security. Moreover, the results underscore the importance of a holistic approach that integrates policy, ecological, social, and economic factors to strengthen food security through farmer participation in agricultural land protection.
Keywords: Arable Land Protection: Policy; Perceptions; Farmer; Food Security
References
[1] Hendayana, R., 2013. Application Method of Logistic Regression Analyze the Agricultural Technology Adoption. Informatika Pertanian. 22(1), 1–9.
[2] Zhang, T., Chen, J., Hu, B., 2019. Authenticity, Quality, and Loyalty: Local Food and Sustainable Tourism Experience. Sustainability. 11(12), 3437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123437
[3] Efani, A., Manzilati, A., Wardana, F.C., et al., 2024. Prospective Variable Design for Agribusiness Success: Sustainability and Food Security Prospects in the Coastal Areas of East Java. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering. 14(5), 1419–1429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.140509
[4] Budiono, A., 2019. Utilitarianism Theory and the Legal Protection of Agricultural Land from Conversion. 9(1), 102–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jjr.v9i1.8294 (in Indonesian)
[5] Luu, T.H., Tam, N.T., Phuc, P.N.K., et al., 2023. Evaluation of land roughness and weather effects on paddy field using cameras mounted on drone: A comprehensive analysis from early to mid-growth stages. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences. 35(10), 101853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101853
[6] Mulyani, A., Kuncoro, D., Nursyamsi, D., et al., 2016. Analysis of Paddy Field Conversion: The Use of High-Resolution Spatial Data Reveals an Alarming Rate of Conversion. Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim. 40(40), 121–133. (in Indonesian)
[7] Zinngrebe, Y., Borasino, E., Chiputwa, B., et al., 2020. Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: connecting conservation and farming actors. Sustainability Science. 15(5), 1417–1434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8
[8] Pitaloka, E.D.A., 2020. Policy for the Protection of Sustainable Agricultural Land in the Political Dimensions of Spatial Planning Law. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan. 8(1), 49–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i1.718 (in Indonesian)
[9] Dewi, C.K., Wulansari, H., 2024. Agricultural Land Protection for Food Security: Policy Integration of Protected Rice Field Map in Spatial Planning in Demak Regency. Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan. 3(2), 81–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31292/mj.v3i2.52
[10] Inopianti, N., Munibah, K., Purwanto, M.Y.J., 2021. Implementation of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land Protection Policy in Sukabumi City, West Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development. 2(3), 107–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v2i3.161
[11] Joko, P., Terpadu, T., Alih, P., et al., 2019. Presidential Regulation (Perpres) Number 59 of 2019 Concerning Control of Conversion of Paddy Fields. Central Government: Jakarta, Indonesia. (in Indonesian)
[12] Zhou, T., Hu, H., Hu, J., et al., 2024. Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems. Ecosystem Services. 70, 101682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101682
[13] Zhou, T., Lv, Q., Zhang, L., et al., 2024. Converted paddy to upland in saline-sodic land could improve soil ecosystem multifunctionality by enhancing soil quality and alleviating microbial metabolism limitation. Science of The Total Environment. 924, 171707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171707
[14] Liu, X., Wang, Y., Costanza, R., et al., 2019. Rice paddy fields’ hidden value for typhoon protection in coastal areas. Ecological Indicators. 107, 105610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105610
[15] Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Zhang, M., et al., 2022. Understanding farmers’ willingness in arable land protection cooperation by using fsQCA: Roles of perceived benefits and policy incentives. Journal for Nature Conservation. 68(1), 126234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126234
[16] Tufa, A.H., Alene, A. D., Manda, J., et al., 2019. The productivity and income effects of adoption of improved soybean varieties and agronomic practices in Malawi. World Development. 124, 104631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104631
[17] Wu, T., Yi, M., Zhang, Y., 2024. Towards Cities’ Green Growth: The Combined Influence of Economic Growth Targets and Environmental Regulations. Cities. 146(3), 104759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104759
[18] Bwire, D., Saito, H., Sidle, R.C., 2024. Water Management and Hydrological Characteristics of Paddy-Rice Fields under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation Practice as Climate Smart Practice : A Review. Agronomy. 14(7), 1421.
[19] Lohan, S.K., Jat, H.S., Yadav, A.K., et al., 2018. Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81, 693–706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.057
[20] Zulfikar, M., Barus, B., Sutadi, A., 2013. Mapping Paddy Field and its Potential for Protection of Food Agricultural Land Sustainability in West Pasaman Regency, West Sumatra. 15(1), 20–28.
[21] Mudzengi, B.K., Gandiwa, E., Muboko, N., et al., 2021. Towards Sustainable Community Conservation in Tropical Savanna Ecosystems: a Management Framework for Ecotourism Ventures in a Changing Environment. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 23(3), 3028–3047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00772-4
[22] Efani, A., Tiarantika, R., Manzilati, A., et al., 2024. Complex Solutions Collaborative-Based Mangrove Ecosystem Management Model for Development Ecotourism in South Coastal East Java Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 19(10), 3821–3835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.191011
[23] Gyimah, A.B.K., Bagbohouna, M., Sanogo, N.d.M., et al., 2020. Climate Change Adaptation among Smallholder Farmers: Evidence from Ghana. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences. 10(4), 614–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2020.104032
[24] Tiarantika, R., Soemarno, Efani, A., et al., 2024. Developing a Decision Support System for Sustainable Management of Community-Based Ecotourism: A Case Study of CMC Tiga Warna. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 19(6), 2205–2219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190620
[25] Wu, X., Nie, X., Chen, Z., et al., 2023. How to improve the adaptive capacity of coastal zone farm households?-explanation based on complementary and alternative relationships of livelihood capital in a sustainable livelihood framework. Ocean and Coastal Management. 245(100), 106853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106853
[26] la Rosa-Velázquez, M.I.D., Espinoza-Tenorio, A., Díaz-Perera, M.Á., et al., 2017. Development stressors are stronger than protected area management: A case of the Pantanos de Centla Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Land Use Policy. 67(12), 340–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.009
[27] Feng, S., Zhang, R., Li, G., 2022. Environmental Decentralization, Digital Finance and Green Technology Innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 61(1), 70–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.02.008
[28] Mohajan, H.K., 2020. Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences. 9(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679
[29] Solimun, A.A.R., Fernandes, N.N., Nurjannah, N., 2017. Multivariate Statistical Method: Structural Equation Modeling based on WarpPLS. UB Press: Malang, Indonesia.
[30] Ketchen, D.J., 2023. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. 46(1–2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
[31] Agboola, O.P., Bashir, F.M., Dodo, Y.A., et al., 2023. The Influence of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on Stakeholders’ Involvement and Smart Urban Sustainability. Environmental Advances. 13, 100431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100431
[32] Etikan, I., 2016. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 5(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
[33] Siphephisiwe, D., 2023. Urban Sprawl: A Cause of Concern for Solid Waste Management in Peri-Urban Areas: A Case of Emthunzini Township in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Journal of Waste Management & Recycling Technology. 1(3), 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47363/JWMRT/2023(1)111
[34] Dubé, L., McRae, C., Wu, Y.H., et al., 2020. Impact of the eKutir ICT-enabled social enterprise and its distributed micro-entrepreneur strategy on fruit and vegetable consumption: A quasi-experimental study in rural and urban communities in Odisha, India. Food Policy. 90, 101787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101787
[35] Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., et al., 2021. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany.
[36] Mwangi, M., Kariuki, S., 2015. Factors Determining Adoption of New Agricultural Technology by Smallholder Farmers in Developing Countries. Journal of Economics and sustainable development. 6(5). Available from: https://files01.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234646919.pdf
[37] Rastogi, M., Kolur, S.M., Burud, A., et al., 2024. Advancing Water Conservation Techniques in Agriculture for Sustainable Resource Management: A review. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International. 28(3), 41–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2024/v28i3755
[38] Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Zou, Y., 2021. Evaluation the effect of cultivated land protection policies based on the cloud model: A case study of Xingning, China. Ecological Indicators. 131, 108247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108247
[39] Chandrasekara, C., Rajapaksha, I., Dissanayake, S., et al., 2024. Effects of climate, soil and water source on the distribution of bioavailable iron in low-land paddy soils of Sri Lanka. Applied Geochemistry. 160, 105875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105875
[40] Wang, S., Li, B., Zhao, X., et al., 2024. Assessing fossil energy supply security in China using ecological network analysis from a supply chain perspective. Energy. 288, 129772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129772
[41] Kim, G.W., Lim, J.Y., Bhuiyan, M.S.I., et al., 2022. Investigating the arable land that is the main contributor to global warming between paddy and upland vegetable crops under excessive nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Cleaner Production. 346, 131197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131197
[42] Maniruzzaman, M., Sarangi, S.K., Mainuddin, M., et al., 2024. A novel system for boosting land productivity and income of smallholder farmers by intercropping vegetables in waterlogged paddy fields in the coastal zone of the Ganges Delta. Land Use Policy, 139, 107066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107066
[43] Makungwe, M., Chabala, L.M., Van Dijk, M., et al., 2021. Assessing land suitability for rainfed paddy rice production in Zambia. Geoderma Regional. 27, e00438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00438
[44] Wu, D., Ren, C., Ren, D., et al., 2023. New insights into carbon mineralization in tropical paddy soil under land use conversion: Coupled roles of soil microbial community, metabolism, and dissolved organic matter chemodiversity. Geoderma. 432, 116393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116393
[45] Nguyen Thanh, B., Le Van Thuy, T., Nguyen Anh, M., et al., 2021. Drivers of agricultural transformation in the coastal areas of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Environmental Science & Policy. 122, 49–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.010
[46] Sibhatu, K.T., Qaim, M., 2017. Rural food security, subsistence agriculture, and seasonality. PLoS ONE. 12(10), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186406
[47] Solaja, S., Kolawole, A., Awe, T., et al., 2024. Assessment of smallholder rice farmers’ adaptation strategies to climate change in Kebbi state, Nigeria. Heliyon. 10(15), e35384.
[48] Bopp, C., Engler, A., Jordán, C., et al., 2023. What is behind water users’ satisfaction? An empirical analysis of Water Users Associations under different water availability conditions. Research Square. 1–21.
[49] Tesfaye, W., Blalock, G., Tirivayi, N., 2021. Climate‐Smart Innovations and Rural Poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring Impacts and Pathways. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 103(3), 878–899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12161
[50] Ha, L.T., Thanh, T.T., 2022. Global value chains and energy security: Evidence from global sample. Energy Strategy Reviews. 42, 100870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100870
[51] Wicaksono, E., 2014. The Impact of Agricultural Credit on Rice Productivity. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. 4(5), 322.
[52] Efani, A., Sambah, A.B., Sari, M., et al., 2024. Optimizing Market Efficiency through Blue Economy: Supply Chain and Risk Analysis of Tuna Fisheries in South Coastal East Java. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. 28(5), 961–980.
[53] Jin, Y., Li, W., Gil, J.M., 2024. Forecasting fish prices with an artificial neural network model during the tuna fraud. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 18, 101340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101340
[54] Ticau, I.R., Dan, M.C., Hadad, S., et al., 2023. Sustainable Development in Peri-Urban Regions: A Triangulation Analysis. Sustainability. 15(20), 14837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014837