The Promoting Effect of Rural Enterprise Governance Structure Adjustment on Audit Quality in the Context of Digital Transformation

Yiyuan Zhang

School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

Tze San Ong

School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

Asna Abdullah Atqa

School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i1.1515

Copyright © 2024 Yiyuan Zhang, Tze San Ong, Asna Abdullah Atqa. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

Based on empirical data from 1,826 rural enterprises during 2019-2023, this study systematically examines the promoting effect and working mechanism of corporate governance structure adjustment on audit quality in the context of digital transformation. The findings reveal that digital transformation significantly optimizes rural enterprise governance structures, with each standard deviation increase in digital transformation level leading to an average increase of 0.254 standard deviations in enterprise governance structure scores. However, significant regional differences exist, with the impact coefficient in eastern regions (0.312) notably higher than in central (0.245) and western regions (0.198). The optimization of governance structure has a significant promoting effect on audit quality, with research showing that each standard deviation increase in governance structure scores leads to a 0.308 standard deviation improvement in audit quality. Moreover, governance structure exerts a 54.52% mediating effect in the process of digital transformation influencing audit quality, with this promoting effect being more pronounced in large enterprises (impact coefficient 0.385). Additionally, regional economic development levels significantly moderate the relationship between digital transformation, governance structure, and audit quality. The level of digital infrastructure (interaction coefficient 0.145) and degree of agricultural industrialization (interaction coefficient 0.132) can significantly enhance the promoting effect of governance structure on audit quality, while policy support intensity shows a significant positive correlation with transformation effectiveness (coefficient 0.156). The research findings not only deepen the understanding of the relationship between rural enterprises' digital transformation and governance optimization but also provide empirical support for formulating differentiated regional development strategies.

Keywords: Digital Transformation; Rural Enterprise; Corporate Governance; Audit Quality; Regional Economic Development


References

[1] Ye, F.T., Cheng, H.X., Shi, Y.X., 2024. Can internal control suppress the negative impact of auditor-executive hometown connections on audit quality?. Journal of Nanjing Audit University. 21(06), 32–40.

[2] Liang, B.M., Guo, Z.X., 2024. Board fault zone, internal control and audit quality—based on data from listed manufacturing companies. Journal of Nanjing Audit University. 21(01), 1–11.

[3] Zhu, G.P., Xie, X.H., Han, Y., 2023. Trade credit financing and enterprise cost stickiness: From the perspective of creditor rights governance. Wuhan Finance. 01, 8–16+42.

[4] Wu, Q.S., Wei, X.M., Jiang, Y.J., 2022. Audit result quality and key audit matters differences. Auditing and Economic Research. 37(03), 19–29.

[5] Gao, L.X., 2021. Research on the relationship between corporate governance structure and audit fees in listed companies. The Chinese Certified Public Accountant. 06, 58–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16292/j.cnki.issn1009-6345.2021.06.009

[6] Dong, Y.L., 2020. Do chairman or CEO powers affect corporate audit quality?—an empirical study based on data from chinese listed manufacturing companies. Financial Regulation Research. 11, 100–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13490/j.cnki.frr.2020.11.006

[7] Ling, S.X., 2020. Directors and executives liability insurance and audit fee increase: Supervision, incentive or connivance?—An empirical study based on China A-share market data. Auditing and Economic Research. 35(01), 51–60.

[8] Pan, Q., Wen, Q., 2017. Corporate governance structure and audit quality—an empirical test based on GEM listed companies. Modern Management Science. 03, 106–108.

[9] Olaimat, A.H.N., Hamdan, N.M., Sraheen, A.D.A.D., et al., 2024. The role of the core requirements of Basel 3 Committee’s decisions in improving internal audit quality under corporate governance in Jordanian commercial banks. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research. 35(2), 157–172.

[10] ELsayed, E.A., Khaled, H., Khaldoon, A., 2023. Covid-19 disclosure: Do internal corporate governance and audit quality matter?. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management. 31(1), 170–194.

[11] Seokyoun, H., Bharat, S., Seung-youb, H., 2022. Auditor independence: The effect of auditors’ quality control efforts and corporate governance. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 47, 100470.

[12] Chai, C.K., Cui, X.Z., Li, Q., et al., 2022. Discuss the impact of corporate governance and external auditing on the quality of corporate information disclosure based on unbalanced data. International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services. 8(4), 368–382.

[13] Alrashidi, M.F.M., 2020. Impact of audit quality on the implementation of corporate governance in the insurance companies listed in Amman Stock Exchange. Modern Applied Science. 14(5), 37.

[14] Xie, H.Y., Yu, K.X., 2020. Research on influencing factors and countermeasures of audit quality in listed companies. Journal of Beibu Gulf University 35(08), 80–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19703/j.bbgu.2096-7276.2020.08.0080

[15] Li, M., Jiang, L.Y., 2020. Measurement, influencing factors and effects of internal audit quality: A literature review. Friends of Accounting. (20), 21–25.

[16] Qiao, Y.H., Cheng, Y., 2021. OFDI diversification, returnee executives and internal control audit—selection approach of internal control auditors in OFDI enterprises. Journal of Xi’an University of Finance and Economics 34(01), 68–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.2021.01.003

[17] Liu, Y.X., Qi, H.J., Wei, Y.J., 2020. Does managerial overconfidence affect audit quality?—also on the external governance effect of margin trading system. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics (05), 42–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19681/j.cnki.jcufe.2020.05.005

[18] Zhu, W.L., Xu, J.H., 2019. CSR report assurance, audit risk and audit fees—based on empirical data from A-share listed companies. Auditing and Economic Research. 34(02), 43–53+104.

[19] Zhang, L.M., Li, Y., 2017. Going concern audit opinion, corporate governance and enterprise value—empirical evidence from financial distressed companies. Auditing and Economic Research. 32(02), 13–23.

[20] Ye, C.G., Wu, J.F., Tan, Z.D., 2015. Corporate governance structure, audit fees and audit quality—an empirical analysis based on Chinese listed companies. Contemporary Economic Management. 37(05), 18–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13253/j.cnki.ddjjgl.2015.05.004

[21] Zhou, J., Zhang, L., 2012. Research on external governance effects under different property rights—from the perspective of audit quality. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law. 06, 125–130.

[22] Mustapha, A.U., Rashid, M.N.N., Lateef, A.S., et al., 2019. The effect of corporate governance attributes on audit quality in Nigeria. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE). 8(4), 4882–4886.

[23] Handayani, D.Y., Ibrani, Y.E., 2019. Corporate governance application, audit quality and audit report lag: The moderating role of law compliance. International Journal of Financial Research. 10(4), 164.

[24] Ben-Hassoun, A., Aloui, C., Ben-Nasr, H., 2018. Demand for audit quality in newly privatized firms in MENA region: Role of internal corporate governance mechanisms audit. Research in International Business and Finance. 9(18), 45334–45348.

[25] Langgeng, A.W., BANDI, 2018. The effect of corporate governance and accruals quality on the corporate cash holdings: Study on the manufacturing companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Audit Financiar. 16(151), 415–424.

[26] Mohammed, F.M., Barakat, M.N.A., 2018. The association between enterprise risk management and corporate governance quality: The mediating role of internal audit performance. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 9(4), 1387.

[27] Huang, X., Zhang, J., Yang, R., et al., 2023. Research on higher vocational colleges serving rural enterprise development in the context of digital transformation. Proceedings of the 2023 China Bio-organic Fertilizer Industry Conference; Proceedings of the 2023 China Bio-organic Fertilizer Industry Conference; 15–17 October 2023; Nanjing, China. pp. 156–163.

[28] Liu, S., 2024. Dilemma and countermeasures of rural logistics digital transformation in the context of rural revitalization. National Circulation Economy. 19, 8–11.

[29] Liang, J., 2024. Exploration of rural e-commerce digital transformation path in the context of digital villages. Digital Communication World. 05, 149–151.

[30] Tian, F., 2024. Research on the path of digital economy driving agricultural economic development in the context of digital transformation. Shanxi Agricultural Economy. 07, 74–76.

[31] Taner, O.O., 2024. Sustainable food and agriculture production: Reducing food waste through technological advancements and assessing its economic impact. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 5(3), 144–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i3.1276

[32] Taner, O.O., 2024. Vacuum freeze dryer technology for extending the shelf life of food and protecting the environment: A scenario study of the energy efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 31, 38573–38584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30398-8

[33] Taner, O.O., Çolak, A.B., 2024. Dairy factory milk product processing and sustainable of the shelf-life extension with artificial intelligence: A model study. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8, 158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1344370

[34] Taner, O.O., Mercan, H., Çolak, A.B., et al., 2024. Application of artificial intelligence techniques for heat exchanger predictions in food industry. In: Sharma, A., Kumar, P. (eds.). Advanced Materials-Based Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 269–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-21574-2.00003-4

[35] Felix, R., Wilford, L.A., 2024. Auditor's financial stress: An inconspicuous determinant of audit outcomes. Advances in Accounting. 67100701.

[36] Qiao, X., Lele, C., Rachana, K., 2024. Auditor mood and audit quality: Evidence from music sentiment measure. Pacific Accounting Review. 36(5), 580–604.

[37] Ege, M., KimH, Y., Wang, D., 2024. Auditor distraction: The case of outside job opportunities for external auditors and audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research. 41(4), 2546–2573.

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.