Research on World Agricultural Economy

Decisive Factors Associated to Land Tenure and Plot Size in Sugarcane Fields in Mexico

Daniel Eduardo Paz-Pérez

ITS El Mante, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Ciudad Mante 89800, Mexico

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i1.1498

Received: 20 November 2024 | Revised: 2 December 2024 | Accepted: 6 December 2024 | Published Online: 10 February 2025

---

Abstract

Diversity in the sugarcane field is the result of the combination of social groups, historical processes and natural conditions, which vary in every region. Among the factors affecting agricultural production, land ownership represents the most valuable economic capital, along with other factors related to the social and cultural capital of the farmer; and women tend to have less access to this than men do. We attempted to diagnose the factors that affect land ownership in the sugarcane field in Tamaulipas, Mexico, taking a gender perspective. Data from a sample of 546 sugarcane suppliers from 6 municipalities in Tamaulipas were obtained, and the association between dichotomous variables was sought by applying statistical tests, such as Yule’s φ (phi) coefficient, tetrachoric correlations and Fisher’s test; a predictive model based on logistic regression was also constructed. The association between gender variables and land ownership, decision-making power, irrigation, sugarcane registration, other income, alternative crops, and area in hectares is evident. Women represent less than one-fifth of the total sugarcane suppliers in Tamaulipas, Mexico. They own agricultural land with available irrigation in a slightly higher proportion than men, but their plots are smaller, and they have less say in their cultivation. They lag behind in terms of being included in sugarcane registers and are less often involved in other productive activities to provide them with additional resources for subsistence; it is desirable that the government enforce gender equality and guarantee a legal framework so that women can have rent or possession and control of agricultural land, without size limitation.

Keywords: Economic Resources of Women; Agriculture in Tamaulipas; Micro Analysis of Farm Firms; Land Owner‑ ship; Regional Economic Activity

---

References

[1] Morett-Sánchez, J.C., Cosío-Ruiz, C., 2017. Overview of ejidos and agrarian communities in Mexico. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo. 14(1), 125–152. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/ZUm7i8

[2] SADER, Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, 2022. National Sugarcane Agroindustry Program PRONAC 2021-2024. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/dRXuTG (cited 4 October 2024).

[3] Ruiz Corral, J.A., Medina García, G., Ramírez Ojeda, G., et al., 2014. Production potential. In: Mata Vázquez, H., Rodríguez del Bosque, L.A., Rodríguez-Morelos, et al. (eds.). Integrated Sugarcane Management. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP): Monterrey, Mexico. pp. 67–82. (in Spanish).

[4] Aguilar Rivera, N., 2017. Productive and competitive structure of the sugar agroindustry . In: Vázquez, M., Rivera, A., Delgado, G. (eds.). Factors Affecting Sugarcane Production in Tamaulipas. Fertigation and Soil and Climate Characterization. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP): Villa Cuauhtémoc, Mexico. pp. 2–32. (in Spanish).

[5] Afghan, S., Ehsan Khan, M., Raza Arshad, W., et al., 2023. Economic importance and yield potential of sugarcane in Pakistan. In: Kumar Ghimire, B. (ed.). Sugarcane—Its Products and Sustainability. IntechOpen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105517

[6] Chávez Bermúdez, B.F., Flores Fernández, Z., 2017. Women's labor participation: Perspectives and challenges. In: Arroyo Cisneros, E.A., Montoya Zamora, R. (eds.). Labor and Human Rights. Some Contemporary Challenges. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango: Victoria de Durango, Mexico. pp. 109–130. (in Spanish).

[7] FAO, 2024. The situation of women in agrifood system. FAO: Rome, Italy. pp. 1-264. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc5343es

[8] Figueroa-Rodríguez, K.A., 2024. Women in sugarcane industry. Revista de la Asociación de Técnicos Azucareros de México. 37(2), 18–21. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/2U8GGA

[9] Ramos Salinas, R., 2020. Desarrollo social de Tamaulipas. Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas & Colofón, S.A. de C.V.: Ciudad Victoria, Mexico. pp. 1-133. (in Spanish).

[10] CEPAL: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, FAO: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, IICA: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, 2017. Outlook for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Americas: A Look at Latin America and the Caribbean 2017-2018. IICA: San José, C.R., Costa Rica. pp. 1-267. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/Rfde3f

[11] Kawarazuka, N., Doss, C.R., Farnworth, C.R., et al., 2022. Myths about the feminization of agriculture: Implications for global food security. Global Food Security. 33, 100611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100611

[12] Jerez Velasco, M.E., 2023. Gender inequalities in access to ejido land in Mexico: An obstacle to equity and empowerment of rural women. Universita Ciencia. 11(31), 43–62. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8148583

[13] Salmeron-Manzano, E., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., 2023. Worldwide research trends on land tenure. Land Use Policy. 131, 106727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106727

[14] Thiébaut, V., Hédouin, C., Legendre, A., 2013. Sugarcane and economic liberalization. Peasant strategies and territorial changes in Jalisco and Veracruz. Sociedades Rurales, Producción y Medio Ambiente. 13(25), 15–44. (in Spanish). Available from: https://sociedadesruralesojs.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/srpma/article/view/229

[15] Peraza Leal, N.P., Velázquez Torres, D., 2020. Shaping rural territory: Peasants and their persistence. A case of Mexico's southern border. Perspectiva Geográfica. 25(1), 56–76. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01233769.9259

[16] Thiébaut, V., 2014. Economic liberalization and sugarcane: Three case studies in México. Ulúa Revista de Historia, Sociedad y Cultura. 23, 95–124. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25009/urhsc.v1i23.1093

[17] Pérez, M.A., Peña, M.R., Álvarez, P., 2011. Sugarcane agro-industry and water use: Critical analysis in the context of agrofuels policy in Colombia. Ambiente & Sociedade. 14(2), 153–178. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/cfnWtJ

[18] CONADESUCA: Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Caña de Azúcar, 2024. Geoportal Map Library. (in Spanish). Avaliable from: https://acortar.link/B5ew41(cited 8 Oct 2024).

[19] López Martínez, J., Molina Vargas, A., 2018. The labor situation of women in the agricultural sector in Mexico, 2008-2016. Análisis Económico. 33(83), 100–111. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/ae/2018v33n83/Lopez

[20] De Arce, A., 2015. Gender and sugarcane production. Family labor in northwestern Argentina (1930-1960). In: Ortega López, T.M. (ed.). Day Laborers, Peasant Women and Farmers: Agrarian History from a Gender Perspective . Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain. pp. 111–141. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/782aFb

[21] Andrade, C., 2020. Sugarcane fields in Humaya, province of Huaura, Peru. Peruvian Agricultural Research. 2(1), 35–40. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.51431/par.v2i1.623

[22] Beraud-Macías, V., Sosa-Ramírez, J., Maya-Delgado, Y., et al., 2018. Agrarian reform and ejido land use changes in Aguascalientes, 1983-2013. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo. 15(3), 443–463. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v15i3.855

[23] Calatayud, S., Garrido, S., 2021. Social inequality and decision making in the commons: The governance of the largest irrigation canal in Spain (the Acequia Real del Júcar, Valencia) in the 19th century. Historia Agraria. 83, 97–128. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26882/histagrar.083e03c

[24] Leporati, M., Salcedo, S., Jara, B., et al., 2014. Family farming in numbers. In: Salcedo, S., Guzmán, L. (eds.). Family Agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean: Policy Recommendations. FAO: Santiago, Chile. pp. 35-56. (in Spanish).

[25] INEGI. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, 2023. Agricultural Census 2022. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/tYipnW (cited 22-September 2024).

[26] Mata Vázquez, H., Báez González, A.D., Ruiz Corral, J.A., et al., 2017. Climatic and edaphic characterization of the supply area of the Aarón Sáenz Garza sugar mill, Tamaulipas. In: Vázquez, M., Rivera, A., Delgado, G. (eds.). Factores que Afectan la Producción de Caña de Azúcar en Tamaulipas. Fertirrigación y Caracterización Edafoclimática. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP): Villa Cuauhtémoc, Mexico. pp. 33–63. (in Spanish).

[27] Sandoval Contreras, R., 2022. Social Construction of Reality: Sugarcane Growing Village. Carta Económica Regional. 34(129), 5–26. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/cer.v0i129.7832

[28] Procuraduría Agraria, 2014. Agrarian Law and Glossary of Agrarian Law Terms 2014. Mujica Impresor, S.A. de C.V.: México, D.F., Mexico. pp. 1-268. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/WYzeiO

[29] FAO-AUC: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, African Union Commission, 2020. Leaving no one behind – a regional outlook on gender and agrifood systems. FAO-AUC: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 1-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1086en

[30] Acuña Alvarado, M., 2020. The gender gap in access to land: a look from the agricultural policy aimed at rural women in Costa Rica. Anuario del Centro de Investigación y Estudios Políticos. 11, 162–194. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/aciep.v0i11.43257

[31] Aguilar-Rivera, N., Algara Siller, M., Olvera Vargas, L.A., 2015. Water management as a limiting factor for sugarcane productivity in Mexico . Revista de Geografía Norte Grande. 60, 135–152. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022015000100008

[32] Tigabie, A., Teferra, B., Abe, A., 2022. Access and control of resources by rural women in North Shewa Zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 3(4), 751. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v3i4.751

[33] Martínez Borrego, E., Vallejo Román, J., 2019. Pluriactivity, consumption and persistence of corn in two municipalities in the northwest of the State of Mexico. Revista Euroamericana de Antropología. 7(15). 41–53. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/rea201974153

[34] Sánchez Muñoz, N.E., García Fernández, F., Sánchez Aldape, A., 2015. The sugarcane agro-industrial chain. In: García Fernández, F. (ed.). Regional development strategies for El Mante, Tamaulipas. Building a region of knowledge. Pearson Educación de México, S.A. de C.V.: México, D.F., Mexico. pp. 77–92. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/4T0bMt

[35] García Fernández, F., Flores Flores, A.J., De la Garza Cárdenas, M., 2015. Diagnosis and specialization of El Mante region. In: García Fernández, F. (ed.). Regional development strategies for El Mante, Tamaulipas. Building a region of knowledge. Pearson Educación de México, S.A. de C.V.: México, D.F., Mexico. pp. 5–36. (in Spanish).

[36] FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013. Governing land for women and men. FAO: Rome, Italy. pp. 1-110. Available from: https://www.fao.org/4/i3114e/i3114e.pdf

[37] FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022. Tracking progress on food and agriculture-related SDG indicators 2022. FAO: Rome, Italy. pp. 1-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc1403en

[38] Paz-Pérez, D.E., 2019. Socio-demographic factors affecting sugarcane production in Tamaulipas. Revista Tecnociencia Superior. 1(2). 1–6. (in Spanish). Available from: https://rioverde.tecnm.mx/documentos/tecno_ciencia/Revista_TecnoCiencia2.pdf

[39] Akoglu, H., 2018. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine. 18, 91–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001

[40] Martínez-Abad, F., Rodríguez-Conde, M.J., 2017. Behavior of product-momentum and tetrachoric-polychoric correlations on ordinal scales: A simulation study. RELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa. 23(2), 1–21. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.23.2.9476

[41] Freiberg Hoffmann, A., Beatriz Stover, J., De la Iglesia, G., et al., 2013. Polychoric and tetrachoric correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factorial studies. Ciencias Psicológicas. 7(2), 151–164. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v7i1.1057

[42] Ochoa-Sangrador, C., 2019. Diseño y análisis en investigación. International Marketing y Comunication, S.A.: International Marketing & Comunication, S.A.: Spain. pp. 1-152. (in Spanish).

[43] Kappes, M., Riquelme, V., 2021. The p-value and measures of effect: Their interpretation in quantitative nursing research. Revista Ene de Enfermería. 15(2), 1-13. (in Spanish). Available from: http://ene-enfermeria.org/ojs/index.php/ENE/article/view/1247

[44] Berea-Baltierra, R., Rivas-Ruiz, R., Pérez-Rodríguez, M., et al., 2014. From clinical judgment to multiple logistic regression. Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. 52(2), 192–197. (in Spanish). Available from: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/imss/im-2014/im142r.pdf

[45] Ortega-Páez, E., Ochoa-Sangrador, C., Molina-Arias, M., 2022. Simple binary logistic regression. Evidencias en Pediatría. 18(11), 1-9 (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/Nz9SHx

[46] Santillán-Fernández, A., Santoyo-Cortés, V.H., García-Chávez, L.R., et al., 2016. Influence of drought and irrigation on sugarcane yields in different agroecoregions in Mexico. Agricultural Systems. 143, 126–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.013

[47] CONADESUCA: Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Caña de Azúcar, 2019. Diagnóstico de la Agroindustria de la caña de azúcar. Región Noreste. Conadesuca: Ciudad de México, México. pp. 1-65. (in Spanish). Available from: https://acortar.link/EDH8ca

[48] Campos Ortiz, F., Oviedo Pacheco, M., 2015. Agricultural land extension and productivity. The case of sugarcane fields in Mexico. El Trimestre Económico. 82(325), 147–181. (in Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20430/ete.v82i325.143

[49] Mayele, J.M., Kolleh, J.B., Saburi, J.E., 2024. The impacts and causes of land fragmentation on farm productivity: Case review of East African countries. Open Journal of Ecology. 14, 455–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2024.145027

[50] FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2008. From subsistence farming to sugar-cane monoculture: impacts on agrobiodiversity, local knowledge and food security. A case study of two irrigation and agricultural development projects in Swaziland. FAO: Rome, Italy. pp. 1-32. Available from: https://www.fao.org/4/aj042e/aj042e.pdf

[51] Sourn, T., Pok, S., Chou, P., et al., 2023. Assessing Land use and land cover (LULC) change and factors affecting agricultural land: Case study in Battambang Province, Cambodia. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 4(4), 925. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i4.925

[52] Kuldilok, K., 2021. The determination of organic practice and adoption in sugarcane farming in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 42, 694–701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.3.35

[53] Sumbele, S.A., Ngane, B.K., Fonkeng, E.E., et al., 2018. Demographics of smallholder sugarcane farmers in five regions of Cameroon. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International. 14(3), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/JAERI/2018/39521

[54] Kaunza-Nu-Dem, M.K., Tijani, B., Millar, D., et al., 2016. The complexities of women land ownership in Northern Ghana. Open Access Library Journal. 3, e2789. Available from: https://acortar.link/OhtyjD

[55] Torres Sandoval, I., Daza Ponce, D.A., 2018. Actions from the municipality of Chicontepec (State of Veracruz, Mexico) to achieve gender equality in ejido land tenure. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Rurales. 3(5), 139–164. (in Spanish). Available from: https://ojs.ceil-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/revistaalasru/article/view/365