Research on World Agricultural Economy

Economic Effects of Using Improved Maize Varieties, Inorganic Fertilizer and Goat Manure in Smallholder Farms: Evidence from Field Evaluations in Southern Ghana

Esther Marfo-Ahenkora

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) – Animal Research Institute, Achimota, Accra P.O. Box AH 20, Ghana; Department of Crop Science, School of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast, P.M.B, University Post Office, Cape Coast, Ghana

Godwin Y. Ameleke

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) – Animal Research Institute, Achimota, Accra P.O. Box AH 20, Ghana

Kingsley J. Taah

Department of Crop Science, School of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast, P.M.B, University Post Office, Cape Coast, Ghana

Elvis Asare-Bediako

Department of Crop Science, School of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast, P.M.B, University Post Office, Cape Coast, Ghana; University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani P.O. Box 214, Ghana

Charles Y.F. Domozoro

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) – Animal Research Institute, Achimota, Accra P.O. Box AH 20, Ghana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i1.1365

Received: 2 October 2024 | Revised: 26 November 2024 | Accepted: 28 November 2024 | Published Online: 19 December 2024

---

Abstract

Maize is a key cereal which contributes to food security with an ever-growing demand in Africa. Therefore, production must be continuously increased to meet demand.  One way to achieve increased production is to use improved varieties and soil amendments to enhance productivity. However, the usage of these inputs is low in sub-Saharan Africa including Ghana. To contribute to the literature on the economics of applying soil amendments, especially from season to season, on-farm trials were undertaken in the coastal savannah and semi-deciduous forest zones of Ghana to demonstrate profitability of adopting improved maize varieties and soil amendments. Partial budgeting techniques were employed to compute net benefits and marginal rates of return resulting from a shift in strategy from farmer practice to the use of improved maize varieties and soil amendments.  Significantly higher yields were obtained with the improved technologies. Maize plants on the sole inorganic fertilizer had significantly (P < 0.05) higher grain yields for all varieties in the two agro-ecological zones in the major season. In the minor season however, grain yields of maize on the combined treatment of inorganic fertilizer + goat manure was significantly (P< 0.05) higher than the rest of the soil amendments for all varieties in both agro-ecological zone. The fertilizer + manure combination yielded the highest net income in both the major and minor seasons. The marginal rates of return for the shift from farmer practice to soil amendments were highest for the fertilizer + manure combination, irrespective of the maize variety and agro-ecological zone. However, the marginal rates of return were minimal for the local maize variety (landrace). In the minor rainy season, net benefit was greater with soil amendment application than with reliance on residual nutrients from the previous season. Thus, residual soil amendment effects alone cannot sustain maize yields and profitability- soil amendments need to be applied continuously.

Keywords: Economic Analysis; Ghana; Maize; Marginal Rate of Return; Partial Budgeting; Soil Amendments

---

References

[1] Ministry of Food and Agriculture, 2016. Agriculture in Ghana: Facts and Figures 2016. Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Statistics Research and Information Directorate: Accra, Ghana.

[2] Ragasa, C., Chapoto, A., Kolavalli, S., 2014. Maize productivity in Ghana. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.: Washington, DC, USA.

[3] Acquah, H.D., Kyei, C.K., 2012. The effects of climatic variables and crop area on maize yield and variability in Ghana. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 10(10), 10–13.

[4] Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, 2018. Statistical databases and data-sets. Available from: www.fao.org/faostat/eg/#data/QCL

[5] Marfo-Ahenkora, E., 2020. Strategies for Sustainable Productivity of Maize (Zea mays L.)-Based Farming Systems of Smallholder Farmers in Ghana. University of Cape Coast.

[6] Henao, J., Baanante, C., 2006. Agricultural production and soil nutrient mining in Africa: Implications for resource conservation and policy development. IFDC: Muscle Shoals, AL, USA.

[7] Fuentes, M., Hidalgo, C., Etchevers, J., et al., 2012. Conservation agriculture, increased organic carbon in the top-soil macro-aggregates and reduced soil CO2 emissions. Plant and Soil. 355(1), 183–197.

[8] Wiredu, A.N., Gyasi, K.O., Abdoulaye, T., et al., 2010. Characterization of maize producing households in the Northern Region of Ghana. IITA: Ibadan, Nigeria. Report No.: 9785000451.

[9] Adu, G.B., Abdulai, M.S., Alidu, H., et al., 2014. Recommended production practices for maize in Ghana. AGRA/CSIR: Accra, Ghana.

[10] Zingore, S., Murwira, H.K., Delve, R.J., et al., 2007. Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 119(1–2), 112–126.

[11] Kpotor, P., 2012. Evaluation of newly released maize varieties in Ghana for yield and stability under three nitrogen application rates in two agroecological zones. Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology.

[12] Ewool, M., Dankyi, A.A., Akromah, R., 2016. Marginal Rate Of Returns of Local and Improved Open Pollinated Maize Varieties Compared With Quality Protein Maize Hybrids in Ghana. International Journal of Science and Technology. 5(3), 123–129.

[13] Pixley, K., Banziger, M., Cordova, H., et al., 2009. Past and future innovations in tropical maize improvement. CIMMYT report: Mexico.

[14] Ayuke, F., Rao, M., Swift, M., et al., 2004. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on soil mineral nitrogen and maize yields in western Kenya. Bationo, A. (ed.). Academic Science Publishers: Nairobi.

[15] Abunyewa, A., Karbo, K., 2005. Improved fallow with pigeon pea for soil fertility improvement and to increase maize production in a smallholder crop–livestock farming system in the subhumid zone of Ghana. Land Degradation & Development. 16(5), 447–454.

[16] Ragasa, C., Dankyi, A., Acheampong, P., et al., 2013. Patterns of adoption of improved rice technologies in Ghana. International Food Policy Research Institute Working Paper. 35(2), 6–8.

[17] Sanginga, N., 2012. Closing the yield gap through integrated soil fertility management. Canberra, Australia: Crawford Fund for International Agricultural Research. 9–10.

[18] Dapaah, H., Ennin, S., Asafu-Agyei, J., 2008. Combining inorganic fertilizer with poultry manure for sustainable production of quality protein maize in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science. 41(1), 1–12.

[19] Franke, A., Schulz, S., Oyewole, B., et al., 2008. The role of cattle manure in enhancing on-farm productivity, macro-and micro-nutrient uptake, and profitability of maize in the Guinea savanna. Experimental Agriculture. 44(3), 313–328.

[20] Chamberlin, J., Jayne, T.S., Snapp, S., 2021. The role of active soil carbon in influencing the profitability of fertilizer use: Empirical evidence from smallholder maize plots in Tanzania. Land Degradation & Development. 32(9), 2681–2694.

[21] Alemayehu, M., Jemberie, M., Yeshiwas, T., et al., 2020. Integrated application of compound NPS fertilizer and farmyard manure for economical production of irrigated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in highlands of Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 6(1), 1724385.

[22] Wanjiku, J., Kimenye, L.N., 2007. Profitability of kale and tomato production under different soil fertility replenishment technologies in Western Kenya. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 29(3), 135–148.

[23] Habte Werede, M., Smith, J.U., Boke Ambaye, S., 2018. Integrated soil fertility management for sustainable teff (Eragrostis tef) production in Halaba, Southern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 4(1), 1519008.

[24] Marfo-Ahenkora, E., Taah, K., Owusu Danquah, E., et al., 2023. On-farm experimentation with improved maize seed and soil amendments in Southern Ghana: Productivity effects in smallholder farms. International Journal of Agronomy. 2023.

[25] CIMMYT, 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT).

[26] Soha, M.E.-D., 2014. The partial budget analysis for sorghum farm in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 59(1), 77–81.

[27] Micheni, A., Kanampiu, F., Kitonyo, O., et al., 2016. On-farm experimentation on conservation agriculture in maize-legume based cropping systems in Kenya: Water use efficiency and economic impacts. Experimental Agriculture. 52(1), 51–68.

[28] Kay, R.D., Edwards, W.M., Duffy, P.A., 2020. Farm management. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA.

[29] Marenya, P.P., Barrett, C.B., 2009. State‐conditional fertilizer yield response on western Kenyan farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 91(4), 991–1006.

[30] Awunyo-Vitor, D., Wongnaa, C.A., Aidoo, R., 2016. Resource use efficiency among maize farmers in Ghana. Agriculture & Food Security. 5(1), 1–10.

[31] Tsiboe, F., Egyir, I.S., Anaman, G., 2021. Effect of fertilizer subsidy on household level cereal production in Ghana. Scientific African. 13, e00916.

[32] Theriault, V., Smale, M., Haider, H., 2018. Economic incentives to use fertilizer on maize under differing agro-ecological conditions in Burkina Faso. Food Security. 10(5), 1263–1277.