Research on World Agricultural Economy

Enhancing Onion (Allium Cepa) Yields: Integrating Precision Irrigation with Real-Time Soil Moisture and Mulching Strategies for Optimum Productivity

Jean Nzuma

Biotechnology Research Institute, Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC), Harare P.O. Box 6640, Zimbabwe

Abigirl Matsaure

Chiredzi Research Station, Chiredzi P.O. Box 97, Zimbabwe

Godwin Mtetwa

Chiredzi Research Station, Chiredzi P.O. Box 97, Zimbabwe

Liana-Lisa Sakwa

Biotechnology Research Institute, Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC), Harare P.O. Box 6640, Zimbabwe

Linda Munyaradzi

Biotechnology Research Institute, Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC), Harare P.O. Box 6640, Zimbabwe

Vimbai Samukange

Biotechnology Research Institute, Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC), Harare P.O. Box 6640, Zimbabwe

Leonard Madzingaidzo

Biotechnology Research Institute, Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC), Harare P.O. Box 6640, Zimbabwe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i1.1334

---

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of various mulching conditions and irrigation techniques on the yield of Texas Grano onions (Allium cepa), a key crop for smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. The primary objective was to identify optimal practices that enhance productivity, water productivity (WP), and water use efficiency (WUE) in onion cultivation. Four mulching treatments were evaluated: control (no mulch), maize residue, soybean trash, and grass. Concurrently, three irrigation methods were assessed: drip irrigation with Chameleon sensors for real-time moisture monitoring, drip irrigation without sensors, and traditional furrow irrigation. A 3 × 4 factorial split-plot design was employed within a randomized complete block design (RCBD) framework, with three replications. The main plots were allocated for irrigation techniques, while the sub-plots comprised the mulching treatments, including a control. A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis evaluated the economic viability of each treatment. Results indicated that combining drip irrigation with Chameleon sensors and maize residue mulch significantly increased both yields and economic returns. These findings highlight the advantages of adopting precision agricultural practices, particularly real-time moisture monitoring, to improve WP and WUE while enhancing resource utilization, thereby increasing system resilience. To fully harness these benefits, farmers should be capacitated and empowered through training on precision irrigation and mulching techniques via demonstration plots and farmer field schools (FFS). Establishing innovation hubs within irrigation schemes is recommended to foster resource sharing and technology adoption, improving productivity and market access for high-value crops. Policymakers must prioritize support for these initiatives to promote sustainable agricultural practices.

Keywords: Irrigation Techniques; Mulching; Moisture Monitoring; Productivity; Economic Viability; Smallholder Farmers; Sustainability; Resource Use

---

References

[1] Moursy, M.A.M., ElFetyany, M., Meleha, A.M.I., et al., 2023. Productivity and profitability of modern irrigation methods through the application of on-farm drip irrigation on some crops in the Northern Nile Delta of Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 62, 349–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.06.063

[2] Yu, L.M., Gao, W.L., Shamshiri, R.R., et al., 2021. Review of research progress on soil moisture sensor technology. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 14(4), 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20211404.6404

[3] Yang, P., Wu, L., Cheng, M., et al., 2023. Review on Drip Irrigation: Impact on Crop Yield, Quality, and Water Productivity in China. Water, 15(9), 1733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15091733

[4] Bwambale, E., Abagale, F.K. Anornu, G.K., 2022. Smart irrigation monitoring and control strategies for improving water use efficiency in precision agriculture: A review. Agricultural Water Management. 260, 107324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107324

[5] Levidow, L., Zaccaria, D., Maia, R., et al., 2014. Improving water-efficient irrigation: Prospects and difficulties of innovative practices. Agricultural Water Management. 146, 84–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.012

[6] Zhang, X., Feng, G., Sun, X., 2024. Advanced technologies of soil moisture monitoring in precision agriculture: A Review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 18, 101473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101473

[7] Stirzaker, R., Driver, M., 2024. Soil water sensors that display colours as thresholds for action. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2024.2322153

[8] Mdemu, M., Kissoly, L., Bjornlund, H., et al., 2020. The role of soil water monitoring tools and agricultural innovation platforms in improving food security and income of farmers in smallholder irrigation schemes in Tanzania. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 36(Suppl. 1), S148–S170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1765746

[9] Vanella, D., Guarrera, S., Ferlito, F., et al., 2025. ‘Effects of organic mulching and regulated deficit irrigation on crop water status, soil and yield features in an orange orchard under Mediterranean climate’, Science of The Total Environment. 958, 177528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177528

[10] Moyo, M., Van Rooyen, A., Bjornlund, H., et al., 2020. The dynamics between irrigation frequency and soil nutrient management: transitioning smallholder irrigation towards more profitable and sustainable systems in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 36(1), 102–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1739513

[11] Chilundo, M., De Sousa, W., Christen, E.W., et al., 2020. Do agricultural innovation platforms and soil moisture and nutrient monitoring tools improve the production and livelihood of smallholder irrigators in Mozambique? International Journal of Water Resources Development. 36(1), 127–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1760799

[12] Mupangwa, W., Nyagumbo, I., Mutsamba, E., 2016. Effect of various mulching materials on maize growth and yield in conservation agriculture systems of sub-humid Zimbabwe. AIMS Agriculture and Food. 1(2), 239–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2016.2.239

[13] Bjornlund, H., Van Rooyen, A., Stirzaker, R., 2017. Profitability and productivity barriers and opportunities in small-scale irrigation schemes. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 33(5), 690–704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2016.1263552

[14] Nouri, H., Stokvis, B., Galindo, A., et al., 2019. ‘Water scarcity alleviation through water footprint reduction in agriculture: The effect of soil mulching and drip irrigation’. Science of The Total Environment. 653, 241-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.311

[15] Stirzaker, R., Mbakwe, I. , Mziray, N.R., 2017. A soil water and solute learning system for small-scale irrigators in Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 33(5), 788–803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1320981

[16] Climate-Data.org, 2022–2023. Climate: Chiredzi. Climate-Data.org. Available from: https://en.climate-data.org/africa/zimbabwe/masvingo-province/chiredzi-55090/

[17] Lakhiar, I.A., Yan, H., Zhang, C., et al., 2024. A Review of Precision Irrigation Water-Saving Technology under Changing Climate for Enhancing Water Use Efficiency, Crop Yield, and Environmental Footprints. Agriculture. 14, 1141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071141

[18] Abebe, F., Zuo, A., Wheeler, S.A., et al., 2020. Irrigators’ Willingness to Pay for the Adoption of Soil Moisture Monitoring Tools in South-Eastern Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 36(Suppl. 1), S246–S267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1755956

[19] Van Rooyen, A.F., Ramshaw, P., Moyo, M., et al., 2017. Theory and application of Agricultural Innovation Platforms for improved irrigation scheme management in Southern Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 33(5), 804–823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1321530

[20] Tiruye, A.E., Asres Belay, S., Schmitter, P., et al., 2022. Yield, water productivity and nutrient balances under different water management technologies of irrigated wheat in Ethiopia. PLoS Water. 1(12), e0000060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000060

[21] Kumar, P., Lata, S., Swapnil, S.A., et al., 2022. Effect of Tillage and Mulching on Growth, Yield and Economics of Maize Crops. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 13(4), 332–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2022.2362a

[22] Qin, W., Hu, C., Oenema, O., 2015. Soil mulching significantly enhances yields and water and nitrogen use efficiencies of maize and wheat: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 5, 16210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16210

[23] Ayala, G., Bulti, A., Muleta, B., 2023. Evaluation of Mulching and Tied Ridges on Soil Moisture and Yield of Maize at Daro Lebu District, Western Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Economics. 8(3), 116–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20230803.16

[24] Adetoro, A.A., Abraham, S., Paraskevopoulos, A.L., et al., 2020. Alleviating water shortages by decreasing water footprint in sugarcane production: The impacts of different soil mulching and irrigation systems in South Africa. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 11, 100464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100464

[25] Telila, R.G., Naneso, D.A., Diriba, M.E., et al., 2024. Evaluation of different moisture conservation practices on maize production and productivity in Dallomanna Districts of Bale Lowland Southeastern Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific Agriculture. 8, 59–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2024.v8.8995