Research on World Agricultural Economy

Reward Systems to Foster Sustainable Multi-Stakeholders Collective Action: Case in Organic Tea Farming in West Sumatra, Indonesia

Rika Hariance

Development Studies Doctoral Program, Graduate School Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia

Melinda Noer

Development Studies Doctoral Program, Graduate School Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia

Endrizal Ridwan

Development Studies Doctoral Program, Graduate School Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia

Hasnah Hasnah

Development Studies Doctoral Program, Graduate School Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i4.1323

Received: 13 September 2024 | Revised: 28 October 2024 | Accepted: 31 October 2024 | Published Online: 5 December 2024

---

Abstract

Cooperatives have potential to strengthen communities and benefit their members. In developing countries, cooperatives are an important component of economic development plans in the fields of microfinance, agriculture, and fisheries. In agriculture, cooperatives ensure collective bargaining power, sustainable practices, and knowledge sharing. This can support small farmers to marketing their agricultural products globally. This research is motivated by the challenges in achieving sustainable multi-stakeholder collective action aimed at improving the welfare of organic tea farmers in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Specifically, the study seeks to identify a reward system that can promote sustainability within these cooperatives. Using a qualitative research approach and content analysis of in-depth interviews with 12 key informants, we develop a reward system design to foster sustainable collective action in the context of cooperatives, which has not been widely studied before. The research findings highlight the critical role of an appropriate reward system in creating an environment that supports sustainable collective action. This study emphasizes the importance of policy development that align with the interests of all stakeholders involved, as well as the necessity for effective coordination between cooperatives, local governments, and private companies. In addition, the research suggests that the further studies should focus on implementing this reward system on a larger scale and further testing its effectiveness in enhancing the sustainability of collective action through cooperatives.

Keywords: Collective Action; Cooperatives; Multi-Stakeholders; Organic Tea; Reward System; Sustainability

---

References

[1] Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action, 12th ed. Harvard University Press: London, UK. pp. 1–199.

[2] Schiffman, H., Dedekorkut, A., 2013. Individual Action versus Collective Action. Green Issues and Debates: An A-to-Z Guide. 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412975728.n72

[3] Habermas, J., 2007. Communicative Action Theory: Critique of Functionalist Rationalis. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana. pp. 1–566.

[4] Vågsholm, I., Belluco, S., Bonardi, S., et al., 2023. Health Based Animal and Meat Safety Cooperative Communities. Food Control. 154, 110016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110016

[5] Lammers, P.L, Richter, T., Lux, M., et al., 2017. The Challenges of Community-based Conservation in Developing Countries—A Case Study from Lake Alaotra, Madagascar. Journal for Nature Conservation. 40, 100–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.08.003

[6] Malik, S., Kajale, D., 2024. Empowering Small and Marginal Farmers: Unveiling the Potential and Addressing Obstacles of Farmer Producer Organizations in India. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 5(1), 32–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i1.994

[7] Altman, M. Cooperatives, History and Theories of Cooperatives. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_102

[8] Cook, M.L., 2018. A Life Cycle Explanation of Cooperative Longevity. Sustainability. 10(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051586

[9] International Labour Organization and International Cooperative Alliance, Cooperatives and the Sustainable Development Goals, 2015. A Contribution to the Post-2015 Development Debate. ILO-COOP: Geneve, Switzerland. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/publications/cooperatives-and-sustainable-development-goals-contribution-post-2015-0

[10] Ridley-Duff, R., 2018. Cooperative Social Entrepreneurship: Reflecting on A Decade of Embedding Cooperative Studies in Social Enterprise Courses Paper to the 2018 Co-operative Education Conference, Cooperative Social Entrepreneurship: Reflections on a Decade Embedding Cooper. 5, 1–21.

[11] Tebet, G., Trimble, M., Pereira, R., 2018 Using Ostrom’s Principles to Assess Institutional Dynamics of Conservation: Lessons from A Marine Protected Area in Brazil. Mar Policy. 88, 174–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.037

[12] Ammirato, P., 2018. The Growth of Italian Cooperatives: Innovation, Resilience and Social Responsibility. Taylor and Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158785

[13] Bageneta, J.M., 2017. The Agricultural Cooperative Movement in Argentina: From the 19th Century to Contemporary Challenges. RECMA. 346(4), 74–86.

[14] Singh, S.K., 2016. Problems and Prospects of the Cooperative Movement in India under the Globalization Regime. The International Journal of Indian Psychology. 3(4), 155–165.

[15] Kurimoto, A., 2020. Consumer Cooperatives Model in Japan. In: Altman, M., Jensen., Kurimoto, A., et al. (eds.). Waking the Asian Pacific Co-Operative Potential. Academic Press. Japan. 21, 235–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816666-6.00021-5

[16] Smith, S.C., Rothbaum, J., 2013. Cooperatives in a Global Economy: Key Economic Issues, Recent Trends, and Potential for Development.

[17] Giacomo, D.A., Sabatini, F., 2017. Social Cooperatives, Social Welfare Associations and Social Networks. CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System.

[18] Hakelius, K., Nilsson, J., 2020. The Logic behind the Internal Governance of Sweden’s largest Agricultural Cooperatives. Sustainability. 12(21), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219073

[19] Rada, A.A., La Identidad Cooperativa Como Justificación de un Tratamiento Fiscal Diferenciado, Boletin de la Asociacion Internacional de Derecho Cooperativo. 50, 285–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18543/baidc-50-2016pp285-307

[20] Schamel, G.H., 2019. Structure, Organization and a Vision: Reasons for the Success of Wine Cooperatives? BIO Web Conference. 12, 03018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191203018

[21] Spognardi, A., 2019. Cooperatives and Social Capital: A Theoretically-grounded Approach, CIRIEC-Espana Revista de Economia Publica. Social y Cooperativa. 97, 313–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.97.12563

[22] Tana, W., de Mesquita, J.M.C., Gonçalves, C.A., et al., 2017. Social Networks, Social Capital and Performance: A Study with Brazilian Dairy Cooperatives. Revista de Ciências da Administração. 19(48), 38–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2017v19n48p38

[23] Yenesew, A. Challenges and Prospects of Cooperatives in Ethiopia with Reference Sough Gondar Zone- Ethiopia. European Journal of Business and Management. 11(34), 13–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/11-34-03

[24] Dhakal, D., Mueser, P. Agricultural Cooperatives and the Failure to Achieve Commercialization of Agriculture in Nepal: A Case Study of the Chitwan District. Research in Globalization. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100165

[25] Hua, M., Lai, I.K.W., Tang, H., 2019. Analysis of Advertising and a Points-exchange Incentive in A Reverse Supply Chain for Unwanted Medications in Households Based on Game Theory. International Journal Production Economics. 217, 259–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.004

[26] Declerck, C.H., BOONE, C., Emonds, G. When do People Cooperate? The Neuroeconomics of Prosocial Decision Making. Brain Cogn. 81(1), 95–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.009

[27] Narloch, N., Pauscual, U., Drucker, A.G. Collective Action Dynamics under External Rewards: Experimental Insights from Andean Farming Communities. World Development Journal. 40(10), 2096–2107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.014

[28] Ladley, D, Wilkinson, I., Young, L., 2015. The Impact of Individual versus Group Rewards on Work Group Performance and Cooperation: A Computational Social Science Approach. J Bus Res. 68(11), 2412–2425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.020

[29] Sugiyono, 2020. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitiatif, Satu. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[30] Afrizal , 2014. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, 1st ed. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

[31] BPS-Statistic of Sumatera Barat Province, , 2023. Sumatera Barat Province in Figure.

[32] BPS-Statistic Of Solok Regency, , 2023. Solok in Figure.

[33] Anauati, M.V., Feld, B., Galiani, S., et al., 2016. Collective Action: Experimental Evidence. Games Econ Behav. 99, 36–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.06.005

[34] Doyle, J., 2018. Institutionalized Collective Action and the Relationship between Beliefs about Environmental Problems and Environmental Actions: A Cross-national Analysis. Soc Sci Res. 75, 32–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.07.006

[35] Ostrom, E., 2010. Analyzing Collective Action. Agricultural Economics. 41, 155–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x

[36] Villamayor-Tomas, S., Thiel, A., Amblard, L., et al., 2019. Diagnosing the Role of the State for Local Collective Action: Types of Action Situations and Policy Instruments. Environ Sci Policy. 97, 44–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.009

[37] Ostrom, E., 2015. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, USA. pp. 1–375.

[38] Wahyudi, R., Syauqillah, M., 2022. Strengthening Cooperation among Intelligence Agencies in the Enforcement of Law on Terrorism: The Case of Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. 12(1), 23–38.

[39] Rose, D.C., Keating, C., Vrain, E., et al., 2018. Beyond Individuals: Toward a “Distributed” Approach to Farmer Decision-making Behavior. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.155

[40] Hannachi, M., Fares, M., Coleno, F., et al., 2020. The “New Agricultural Collectivism”: How Cooperatives Horizontal Coordination Drive Multi-stakeholders Self-organization. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 8(2), 100111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2020.100111

[41] Nonglait, M.L., Khundrakpam, N., Deka, P., 2024 ‘Farmers’ Income and the Driving Forces for the Switch from Shifting Cultivation to Settled Agriculture in Meghalaya, India’, Caraka Tani. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 39(1), 65–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v39i1.76129

[42] Hemmati, M., Rogers, F., 2015. Beyond Sweet-Talk and Blanket Criticism-Towards Successful Implementation. Available from: www.catalysd.com

[43] Melo, V., 2018. Collaborative Efforts for Sustainable Development: Surveying the Literature on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives to Realize the Sustainable Development Goals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19706.75209

[44] Moreno-Serna, J., Purcell, W.M., Sánchez-Chaparro, T., et al., 2020. Catalyzing transformational partnerships for the SDGs: Effectiveness and Impact of the Multi-stakeholder Initiative el Dia Despues’. Sustainability. 12(17). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177189

[45] Grashuis, N.J., 2017. Branding by U.S. Farmer Cooperatives: An Empirical Study of Trademark Ownership. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 5(2), 57–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2017.09.002

[46] Tran, Q.P., Nguyen, T.K., Dong, M.C., 2023. Understanding Factors of Households’ Circular Economy Adoption to Facilitate Sustainable Development in an Emerging Country. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 4(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i4.911

[47] Herens, M.C., Pittore, K.H., Oosterveer, P.J.M., 2022. Transforming Food Systems: Multi-stakeholder Platforms Driven by Consumer Concerns and Public Demands. Global Food Security. 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100592

[48] UNEP, FAO, UNDP, 2023. Rethinking Our Food Systems: A Guide for Multi-stakeholder Collaboration. Publisher United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya. Rome, Italy and New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc6325en

[49] Grashuis, J., Ye, S.U., 2019. A Review of The Empirical Literature on Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership and Governance, Finance, and Member Attitude. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 90(1), 77–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12205

[50] Lim-Camacho, L., Jeanneret, T., Hodgkinson, J.H., 2019. Towards Resilient, Responsive and Rewarding Mining: An Adaptive Value Chains Approach. Resources Policy. 74(8), 101465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101465

[51] Hua, S., Liu, L., 2024. Coevolutionary Dynamics of Population and Institutional Rewards in Public Goods Games. Expert Syst Appl. 237, 121579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121579

[52] Snider, A., Gutiérrez, I., Sibelet, N., et al., 2017. Small Farmer Cooperatives and Voluntary Coffee Certifications: Rewarding Progressive Farmers of Engendering Widespread Change in Costa Rica?. Food Polic. 69, 231–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.04.009

[53] Marrucci, L., Daddi, T., Iraldo, F., 2024. Creating Environmental Performance Indicators to Assess Corporate Sustainability and Reward Employees. Ecol Indic. 158, 111489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111489

[54] Le Bars, S., Devaux, A., Nevidal, T., et al., 2020. ‘Agents’ Pivotality and Reward Fairness Modulate Sense of Agency in Cooperative Joint Action. Cognition. 195, 104117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104117

[55] Badubi, R.M., 2017. Theories of Motivation and Their Application in Organizations: A Risk Analysis. International Journal of Innovation And Economic Development. 3(3), 44–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.33.2004

[56] Bornhofen, E., Ramires, T.G., Bergonci, T., et al., 2018. Associations between Global Indices of Risk Management and Agricultural Development. Agric Syst. 173, 281–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.006

[57] Hogeland, J.A., 2015. Managing Uncertainty and Expectations: The Strategic Response of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives to Agricultural Industrialization. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Managementl. 3(2), 60–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2015.06.001

[58] Harsasi, M., 2015. Mediating Role of Strategic Supply Management on Performance. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 3, 89–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.019

[59] Rokhani, T., Sumarti, D.S., Damanhuri, et al., 2016 The Dilemma of Coffee Farmers' Collectivity: A Weberian Sociological Review (The Case of Coffee Farmers in Sait Buttu Saribu Village, Pamatang Sidamanik District, Simalungun Regency, North Sumatra), Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan. 4(1), 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v4i1.14400

[60] Araral, E., 2012. A Transaction Cost Approach to Climate Adaptation : Insights from Coase, Ostrom and Williamson and Evidence from the 400-year Old Zangjeras,. Environmental Science and Policy. 25, 147–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.005

[61] Ostrom, E., 2000. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14(3), 137–158.

[62] Tirivayi, N., Nennen, L., Tesfaye, W., et al., 2018. The Benefits of Collective Action: Exploring the Role of Forest Producer Organizations in Social Protection. Forest Policy and Economics. 90(6), 106–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.010

[63] Haggar, J., Soto, G., Casanoves, F., et al., 2017. Environmental-economic Benefits and Trade-offs on Sustainably Certified Coffee Farms. Ecological Indicators. 79(4), 330–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.023

[64] Ligon, E., Sadoulet, E., 2016. Estimating the Relative Benefits of Agricultural Growth on the Distribution of Expenditures. World Development. 109, 417–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.007

[65] Ostrom, E., 2000. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspective. 14(3). 137–158. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2646923