Research on World Agricultural Economy

Enhancing the Public-Private-Community Partnerships in the Banana Value Chain in Mutasa District, Zimbabwe

Brighton Shoniwa

Social Sciences Department, Women’s University in Africa, P.O. GD 32 Greendale, Harare, Zimbabwe

Kumbirai Gift Terera

Commerce and Management Department, Women’s University in Africa, P.O. GD 32 Greendale, Harare, Zimbabwe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i4.1252

Received: 19 August 2024 | Revised: 13 September 2024 | Accepted: 20 September 2024 | Published Online: 26 November 2024

---

Abstract

The paradigm shift from the New Public Administration to the New Public Governance underlines the significance of multi-stakeholder collaborations in attending to complex societal challenges. In this vein, Public-Private-Community Partnerships are a feasible mechanism for enhancing the banana value chain in Mutasa District of Zimbabwe. Bananas are extensively eaten fruits in the world with smallholder farmers playing a vital role in production, particularly in developing nations like Zimbabwe. Yet smallholder farmers’ economic returns in the banana value chain are a cause of concern. Thus, this study focuses on enhancing Public-Private-Community Partnerships in the smallholder banana value chain. A concurrent mixed methods research design allowed for both objectivity and detailed analysis. The target population comprised public, private, and community stakeholders in the banana value chain. The multiplicity of stakeholders motivated a mixture of quota, purposive, and snowball sampling techniques to ensure representation. Questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions were the data collection methods. There was descriptive analysis of quantitative data, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically, and related findings were grouped together. Public-Private-Community Partnerships are attractive because they reduce information asymmetry, enhance transparency, ensure fairness in pricing, facilitate risk sharing, increase productivity, and enhance value addition. Public-Private-Community Partnerships are not “magic bullets”, necessitating attention to their potential deficits, which include power imbalances, conflicts of interest among partners, and challenges associated with ensuring active participation by diverse stakeholder groups. Pathways for strengthening Public-Private-Community Partnerships include consensus building, clear definition of partners’ roles, fair sharing of risks and benefits, monitoring and evaluation, selection of competent actors, and farmer capacity building. Effective Public-Private-Community Partnerships facilitate active participation among the public, private, and community actors along the entire value chain.

Keywords: Banana Value Chain; Collaboration; Public‑Private‑Community Partnerships; Smallholder Farmers

---

References

[1] Shoniwa, B.M., 2024. Public-Private-Community Partnerships as pathways for climate governance in Zimbabwe. In: Haruna, P.F., El Baradei, L., Benavides, A., et al. (eds). Climate Governance in International and Comparative Perspective: Issues and Experiences in Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA. pp. 157–183.

[2] High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition, 2018. Multi-stakeholder partnerships to finance and improve food security and nutrition in the framework of the 2030 Agenda. HLPE Report 13, June 2018.

[3] Ngenchi, S., 2016. Building sustainable and inclusive smallholder farming food value chains in Cameroon: Case of the North West Farmers’ Organization (NOWEFOR). Abstracts for the Proceedings of the FAO/UNEP Programme on Sustainable Food Systems; Rome, Italy; 8–9 June 2016. p. 11

[4] Ruhela, A., Singh, J., Singh, H.N., 2021. Impact assessment of ‘potash for life’ project: Accelerating adoption of balanced use of fertilizers and enhancing farm income of farmers’ in Chhattisgarh, India. The Pharma Innovation. 10(10), 1453–1472.

[5] Food and Agriculture Organization, 2023. Banana market review: Preliminary results 2023. CC9120EN/1/12.23.

[6] Mugwagwa, I., Bijman, J., Trienekens, J., 2020. Typology of contract farming arrangements: A transaction cost perspective. Agrekon. 59(2), 169–187.

[7] Olounlade, O.A., Li, G.C., Kokoye, S.E.H., et al., 2020. Impact of participation in contract farming on smallholder farmers’ income and food security in rural Benin: PSM and LATE parameter combined. Sustainability. 12(3), 901–920.

[8] Kumbirai, B., Zedias, K., Upenyu, M., 2022. Banana production in Zimbabwe: An analysis from a biotechnological perspective. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 9(7), 28–36.

[9] Maganga-Nsimbila, P., 2021. Determinants of contract farming adoption and its impact on productivity of smallholder cotton producers in Tanzania. International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences. 6(2), 55–69.

[10] Marongwe, N., 2022. Challenges facing smallholder banana farmers in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 17(4), 647–657.

[11] Muchara, B., Mbata, C.N., 2016. Role of institutional innovations on smallholder agricultural entrepreneurship in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology. 55(2). 41–50.

[12] Olufemi, O.S., 2024. Exploring banana production in Africa for food security and economic growth: A short review. Food Nutrition Chemistry. 2(1, 125), 1–8.

[13] Gebre, G.G., Rik, E., Kijne, A., 2020. Analysis of banana value chain in Ethiopia: Approaches to sustainable value chain development. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 6(1), 1–31.

[14] Dassou, A.G., Tovignan, S., Vodouhè, F., et al., 2021. Constraints and implications of organic farming in bananas and plantains production sustainability in Benin. Agricultural Sciences. 12(6), 645–665.

[15] High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition, 2018. Multi-stakeholder partnerships to finance and improve food security and nutrition in the framework of the 2030 Agenda. HLPE Report 13, June 2018.

[16] Post, L., Schmitz, A., Issa, T., et al., 2021. Enabling the environment for private sector investment: Impact on food security and poverty. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organisation. 19(1), 25–37.

[17] Food and Agriculture Organization, 2021. The state of food and agriculture 2021.

[18] Post, L., Schmitz, A., Issa, T., et al., 2021. Enabling the environment for private sector investment: Impact on food security and poverty. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organisation. 19(1), 25–37.

[19] Shoniwa, B.M., Musanzikwa, M., 2022. Comprehensive policy framework for procurement in agriculture: An invisible hand for effective maize production in Zimbabwe. In: Zhou, G., Zvoushe, H. (eds). The Public Policy Question in Zimbabwe’s Evolving Development Agenda: Policy as the Hub of National Development. South African Association of Public Administration and Management (SAAPAM): Soshanguve, South Africa. pp. 149–162.

[20] Sarkar, B., Basu, D., Jana, H., et al., 2022. Profitability analysis and stakeholders perception of banana value chain in Nadia district of West Bengal. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 58(2), 124–145.

[21] Shoniwa, B.M., 2023. Public-Private-Community Partnerships (PPCPs) as a mechanism in enhancing food security during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Zimbabwe. Public Administration and Policy. 26(2), 199–212.

[22] Kanniainen, J.P., 2017. New Public Governance and New Public Management in the Funding and Contractual Steering of the Finnish Higher Education System [Master’s thesis]. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere. pp. 1–111.

[23] Osborne, S.P., 2010. The New Public Governance: A Suitable Case for Treatment. In: Osborne, S.P. (ed). The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–16.

[24] Klijn, E.H., Koppenjan, J., 2012. Governance network theory: Past, present and future. Policy and Politics. 40(4), 187–206.

[25] Dickinson, H., 2016. From new public management to new public governance: The implications for a ‘new public service’. In: Butcher, J., Gilchrist, D. (eds). The Three Sector Solution: Delivering Public Policy in Collaboration with Not-for-Profits and Business. The Australian National University Press: Canberra, Australia. pp. 234–256.

[26] McQuaid, R.W., 2010. Theory of organisational partnerships: Partnerships advantages, disadvantages, and success factors. In: Osborne, S.P. (ed.). The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 127–148.

[27] Soullier, G., Moustier, P., 2018. Impacts of contract farming in domestic grain chains on farmer income and food insecurity: Contrasted evidence from Senegal. Food Policy. 79(1), 179–198.

[28] Mehazabeen, A., Srinivasan, G., Radhakrishnan, S., 2021. A constraint analysis on production and marketing of banana in Andhra Pradesh, India. Plant Archives. 21(1), 2215–2216.

[29] Gill, R., 2019. The Farm Credit System. June 2019.

[30] Bragdon, S.H., Hayes, C., 2018. Reconceiving public-private partnerships to eradicate hunger: Recognizing small-scale farmers and agricultural biological diversity as the foundation of global food security. Georgetown Journal of International Law. 49(4), 1271–1319.

[31] Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa, 2021. A decade of action: Building sustainable and resilient food systems in Africa. Report no. 9, 2021.

[32] United Nations, 2024. Sustainable development goals report 2024.

[33] Voora, V., Bermúdez, S., Farrell, J.J., et al., 2023. Banana prices and sustainability.

[34] Muchara, B., Mbata, C.N., 2016. Role of institutional innovations on smallholder agricultural entrepreneurship in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology. 55(2), 41–50.

[35] Olufemi, O.S., 2024. Exploring banana production in Africa for food security and economic growth: A short review. Food Nutrition Chemistry. 2(1), 125.

[36] Khadka, P., Solberg, S.O., 2020. Apple value chain analysis in two mountainous districts in Nepal. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research. 8(1), 1–10.

[37] Post, L., Schmitz, A., Issa, T., et al., 2021. Enabling the environment for private sector investment: Impact on food security and poverty. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organisation. 19(1), 25–37.

[38] Warshini, A., Raut, A.A., Jaiswal, D.K., 2022. Adoption of banana production technology among banana growers in Vaishali district of Bihar. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education. 22(5), 137–141.

[39] Marquez-Feliciano, M., Marquez-Feliciano, C., Feliciano-Cruz, M., 2021. Banana production and trade: Global trends and opportunities for Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. 11(2), 245–263.

[40] Mehazabeen, A., Srinivasan, G., Radhakrishnan, S., 2021. A constraint analysis on production and marketing of banana in Andhra Pradesh, India. Plant Archives. 21(1), 2215–2216.

[41] Ruhela, A., Singh, J., Singh, H.N., 2021. Impact assessment of ‘potash for life’ project: Accelerating adoption of balanced use of fertilizers and enhancing farm income of farmers’ in Chhattisgarh, India. The Pharma Innovation. 10(10), 1453–1472.

[42] Olounlade, O.A., Li, G.C., Kokoye, S.E.H., et al., 2020. Impact of participation in contract farming on smallholder farmers’ income and food security in rural Benin: PSM and LATE parameter combined. Sustainability. 12(3), 901–920.

[43] Mugwagwa, I., Bijman, J., Trienekens, J., 2020. Typology of contract farming arrangements: A transaction cost perspective. Agrekon. 59(2), 169–187.