Determinants of Technical Efficiency of Harumanis Mango Production in Perlis, Malaysia

Khairun Nisaa’ Mohd Nor

Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA Malacca Branch, Jasin Campus, Malacca 77200, Malaysia; Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis Branch, Arau Campus, Perlis 05000, Malaysia

Fazleen Abdul Fatah

Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA Malacca Branch, Jasin Campus, Malacca 77200, Malaysia

Christopher O’Donnell

School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i4.1239

Received: 14 August 2024 | Revised: 12 September 2024 | Accepted: 13 September 2024 | Published Online: 19 November 2024

Copyright © 2024 Khairun Nisaa’ Mohd Nor, Fazleen Abdul Fatah, Christopher O’Donnell. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

The Harumanis mango (Mangifera indica L.) is renowned in Malaysia for its distinctive taste and strong market appeal. Despite the potential for exporting Harumanis mangoes to Japan, productivity in Perlis remains low. This study aims to analyse the determinants of technical efficiency in Harumanis production across two key regions in Perlis, Mata Ayer and Chuping, which are known for having the highest mango yields in Malaysia. Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and the Cobb-Douglas production function, a dataset of 150 observations was collected from 50 mango farms over three consecutive growing seasons. The analysis examined the impact of various production inputs—such as labour, agrichemicals, plot size—and environmental factors, including temperature and rainfal on mango yield. The findings revealed significant disparities in the efficiency and effectiveness of inputs between Mata Ayer and Chuping. Labour positively influenced mango yield in both regions, although the magnitude of its effect differed. Agrichemical use showed positive correlations in Mata Ayer but insignificant or negative associations in Chuping. Temperature emerged as a critical environmental factor, particularly in Chuping, where higher temperatures were linked to reduced output. The interaction between inputs underscores the importance of tailored management strategies that consider specific local conditions and input combinations. The technical efficiency analysis revealed greater inefficiencies in Mata Ayer compared to Chuping. This study enhances the understanding of mango production dynamics and provides insights for targeted interventions to improve yield and sustainability in Harumanis mango cultivation.

Keywords: Mango; Stochastic Frontier Analysis; Technical Efficiency; Food Security, Malaysia


References

[1] Abu Dardak, R., 2019. Trends in production, trade, consumption, and tropical fruit in Malaysia. 1381. Available from: https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/1381 (cited 26 August 2019).

[2] Department of Statistics, Malaysia, 2023. Selected agricultural indicators 2023. Available from: https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/selected-agricultural-indicators-malaysia- (cited 27 October 2023).

[3] Miyauchi, Y., Perry, C., 1999. Marketing fresh fruit to Japanese consumers: Exploring issues for Australian exporters. European Journal of Marketing. 33(1/2), 196–205.

[4] Uda, M.N.A., Gopinath, S.C., Hashim, U., et al., 2020. Harumanis mango: Perspectives in disease management and advancement using interdigitated electrodes (IDE) nano-biosensor. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 4–5 February 2020; Thailand. p. 012180

[5] Talib, S.A.A., Hassan, M.H.M., Rashid, M.A., et al., 2020. Effects of Environmental temperature and precipitation pattern on growth stages of Magnifera indica cv. Harumanis Mango. Journal of Agricultural Science. 12(12), 26.

[6] Nawaz, R., Khan, M.A., Hafiz, I.A., et al., 2021. Climate variables’ effect on fruiting pattern of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis Lour× C. deliciosa Tenora) grown at different agro-climatic regions. Scientific Reports. 11(1), 18177.

[7] Farook, R.S.M., Aziz, A.H.A., Harun, A., et al., 2012. Data mining on climatic factors for Harumanis mango yield prediction. 2012 Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems Modelling and Simulation; 8–10 February 2012; Malaysia. pp. 115–119.

[8] Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 2021. Harumanis in Perlis: History and specialties. Report no. 61. Available from: https://itafos.upm.edu.my/artikel/sejarah_dan_keistimewaan-71620 (cited 28 February 2023).

[9] Giday, O., 2015. Soil fertility characterization in vertisols of Southern Tigray, Ethiopia. Advances in Plant & Agricultural Research. 2(1), 7–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2015.02.00034

[10] Schroth, G., Krauss, U., Gasparotto, L.J.A.D., et al., 2000. Pests and diseases in agroforestry systems of the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems. 50, 199–241.

[11] Kent, O.W., Chun, T.W., Choo, T.L., et al., 2023. Early symptom detection of basal stem rot disease in oil palm trees using a deep learning approach on UAV images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 213, 108192.

[12] Tawang, A.B., Ahmad, T.A.B.T., Abdullah, M., 2002. Stabilization of upland agriculture under El Nino induced climatic risk: Impact assessment and mitigation measures in Malaysia. 61.

[13] Zul, S.A., 2016. In Malaysia, some mango farmers thrive despite heatwave. Available from: https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/malaysian/mango-crop-05042016162706.html (cited 15 September 2024).

[14] Department of Statistics, Malaysia, 2023b. Supply and utilization accounts of selected agricultural commodities in Malaysia, 2018–2022. Available from: https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/supply-and-utilization-accounts-selected-agricultural-commodities-malaysia-- (cited 12 September 2022).

[15] Gebreegziabher, Z., Oskam, A.J., Woldehanna, T., 2004. Technical efficiency of peasant farmers in Northern Ethiopia: A stochastic frontier approach. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Ethiopian Economy, 3–5 June 2004; Ethiopia. pp. 103–123.

[16] Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society. 120(3), 253–281.

[17] O’Donnell, C.J., 2018. Productivity and efficiency analysis: An economic approach to measuring and explaining managerial performance. Springer: Berlin, Germany. pp. 1–3.

[18] Belete, A.S., 2020. Analysis of technical efficiency in maize production in Guji Zone: Stochastic frontier model. Agriculture & Food Security. 9(1), 1–15.

[19] Effiong, E.O., Idiong, C.I., 2008. Measurement and sources of economic efficiency in rabbit production in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria: A stochastic frontier profit function approach. Nigeria Agricultural Journal. 4(1), 5–8.

[20] Anang, B.T., Bäckman, S., Sipiläinen, T., 2016. Agricultural microcredit and technical efficiency: The case of smallholder rice farmers in Northern Ghana. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS). 117(2), 189–202.

[21] Coelli, T., 1995. Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: A Monte Carlo analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 6, 247–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076978

[22] Ezeh, C.I., 2004. A comparative study of Fadama and non-Fadama crop farmers in Osisioma-Ngwa LGA, Abia State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Tropical Agriculture Research. 11, 26–31.

[23] Amaza, P.S., Olayemi, J.K., 2001. Technical efficiency in food crop production in Gombe State Nigeria. Nigeria Agricultural Journal. 32, 140-151

[24] Gebrehiwot, K.G., 2017. The impact of agricultural extension on farmers’ technical efficiencies in Ethiopia: A stochastic production frontier approach. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences. 20(1), 1–8.

[25] Battese, G.E., Broca, S.S., 1997. Functional forms of stochastic frontier production functions and models for technical inefficiency effects: A comparative study for wheat farmers in Pakistan. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 8, 395–414.

[26] Aigner, D., Lovell, C.K., Schmidt, P., 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 6(1), 21–37.

[27] Meeusen, W., van Den Broeck, J., 1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review. 435–444.

[28] Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J., et al., 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany. pp. 11–12.

[29] Mensah, A., Brummer, B., 2016. Drivers of technical efficiency and technology gaps in Ghana’s mango production sector: A stochastic metafrontier approach Amos. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 11(2), 101–117.

[30] Raimondo, M., Caracciolo, F., Nazzaro, C., et al., 2021. Organic farming increases the technical efficiency of olive farms in Italy. Agriculture. 11(3), 209.

[31] Krasachat, W., 2023. The effect of good agricultural practices on the technical efficiency of chili production in Thailand. Sustainability. 15(1), 866.

[32] El Pebrian, D., Yusof, Z.B., 2016. Analysis of human energy expenditure in harvesting sugar palm (Arenga Pinnata Merr) in Malaysia. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal. 18(1), 149–157.

[33] Akter, S., Rutsaert, P., Luis, J., et al., 2017. Women’s empowerment and gender equity in agriculture: A different perspective from Southeast Asia. Food policy. 69, 270–279.

[34] Fawole, O.P., Oladele, O.I., 2007. Sustainable food crop production through multiple cropping patterns among farmers in South Western Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology. 21(4), 245–249.

[35] Ayaz, M., Mughal, M., 2024. Farm Size and Productivity: The Role of Family Labor. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 72(2), 959–995.

[36] Anríquez, G., Valdés, A., 2006. Determinants of farm revenue in Pakistan. The Pakistan development review. 281–301.

[37] Lockheed, M.E., Jamison, D.T., Lau, L.J., 1980. Farmer education and farm efficiency: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 29(1), 37–76.

[38] Saina, E.K., Rono, P.K., Kipsat, M.J., et al., 2012. Food security in Kenya: The impact of building rural farmers’ capacity through agricultural education in secondary school. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies. 3(3), 338–345.

[39] Eric, O.O., Prince, A.A., Elfreda, A.N.A., 2014. Effects of education on the agricultural productivity of farmers in the Offinso Municipality. International Journal of Development Research. 4(9), 1951–1960.

[40] Kabiru, S.A., Arshad, R., 2019. The Effect of Education on Agricultura Productivity: Implication for Rural Development. Journal of Management and Economic Studies. 1(6), 28–35.

[41] Asadullah, M.N., Rahman, S., 2009. Farm productivity and efficiency in rural Bangladesh: the role of education revisited. Applied Economics. 41(1), 17–33.

[42] Shahbaz, P., ul Haq, S., Yıldırım, Ç., et al., 2020. Impact of full time and part time farming on rural households’ labor productivity in Central Punjab, Pakistan. Custos e Agronegocio on Line. 16(3), 359–381.

[43] Obasi, P.C., Henri-Ukoha, A., Ukewuihe, I.S., et al., 2013. Factors affecting agricultural productivity among arable crop farmers in Imo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 3(2), 443–454.

[44] Mar, S., Yabe, M., Ogata, K., 2013. Technical efficiency analysis of mango production in central Myanmar. Journal of the International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences. 19(1), 49–62.

[45] Feder, G., Just, R.E., Zilberman, D., et al., 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 33(2), 255–298.

[46] Rahman, S., Rahman, M., 2009. Impact of land fragmentation on productivity and efficiency: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Research. 22(3), 83–97.

[47] Alene, A.D., Hassan, R.M., 2003. Efficiency of traditional and hybrid maize production in Western Ethiopia: An application of the stochastic frontier approach. Agricultural Economics. 29(3), 281–292.

[48] Battese, G.E., Coelli, T.J., 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics. 20(2), 325–332.

[49] Kodde, D.A., Palm, F.C., 1986. Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 54(5), 1243–1248.

[50] Kiet, T.H.V.T., Thoa, N.T.K., Nguyen, P.T., 2020. Technical efficiency of mango in Vietnam. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology. 29(11), 748–755.

[51] Isaboke, H.N., Musyoka, J.K., 2022. Analysis of the factors affecting farm-level output of mangoes among small-scale farmers in Mwala Sub-County, Kenya. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. 18(3), 991–1000.

[52] Hendricks, G.S., Shukla, S., Roka, F.M., et al., 2019. Economic and environmental consequences of overfertilization under extreme weather conditions. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 74(2), 160–171.

[53] Dambreville, A., Lauri, P.É., Trottier, C., et al., 2013. Deciphering structural and temporal interplays during the architectural development of mango trees. Journal of Experimental Botany. 64(8), 2467–2480.

[54] Normand, F., Lauri, P.E. Legave, J.M., 2013. Climate change and its probable effects on mango production and cultivation. X International Mango Symposium; 3–7 June 2013; Louvain. pp. 21–32.

[55] Sukhvibul, N., Whiley, A.W., Smith, M.K., et al., 1999. Effect of temperature on inflorescence and floral development in four mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae. 82(1–2), 67–84.

[56] Dessale, M., 2018. Measurement of technical efficiency and Its determinants in wheat production: The case of smallholder farmers in Wogidi District, South Wollo Zone Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management. 81, 86–93.

[57] Deshmukh, S., Jadhav, P., Sawant, P., et al., 2023. Climatic vulnerability, adoption of climate-resilient technologies, and its socioeconomic-institutional-agroecological determinants. Climate Services. 32, 100414.

[58] Khai, H.V., Yabe, M., 2011. Technical efficiency analysis of rice production in Vietnam. Journal of the International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences. 17(1), 135–146.

[59] Shehu, J., Mshelia, S., Tashikalma, A., 2007. Analysis of technical efficiency of small-scale rain-fed upland rice farmers in North-West agricultural zone of Adamawa state. Journal of Agriculture & Social Science. 3(4), 133–136.

[60] Murtaza, G., Thapa, G.B., 2017. Factors affecting technical efficiency of small-scale apple farms in Balochistan Plateau, Pakistan. Journal of Mountain Science. 14, 782–794.

[61] Francis, L.A., Samuel, C.M., Samuel, N.N., 2020. Technical efficiency and its determinants in sugarcane production among smallholder sugarcane farmers in Malava sub-county, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 15(3), 351–360.

[62] Ugbabe, O.O., Abdoulaye, T., Kamara, A., et al., 2017. Profitability and technical efficiency of soybean production in Northern Nigeria. Tropicultura. 35(3), 203–214.

[63] Galawat, F., Yabe, M., 2012. Evaluation of technical, allocative, and economic efficiency in rice production: A case study on rice farmers in Brunei Darussalam. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 57(1), 317–325.

[64] Bravo-Ureta, B.E., Pinheiro, A.E., 1993. Efficiency analysis of developing country agriculture: A review of the frontier function literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 22(1), 88–101.

[65] Färe, R., Grabowski, R., Grosskopf, S., 1985. Technical efficiency of Philippine agriculture. Applied Economics. 17(2), 205–214.

[66] Gitz, V., Meybeck, A., Lipper, L., et al., 2016. Climate change and food security: risks and responses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Report. Report no. 110(2), 3–36.

[67] Inkoom, E.W., Dadzie, S.K.N., Ndebugri, J., 2020. Promoting improved agricultural technologies to increase smallholder farm production efficiency: Ghanaian study of cassava farmers. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC). 8(3), 271–294.

[68] Latruffe, L., Bravo‐Ureta, B.E., Carpentier, A., et al., 2017. Subsidies and technical efficiency in agriculture: Evidence from European dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 99(3), 783–799.

[69] Fathy, M.S., Farouk, G.D., 2020. Estimating economic and technical efficiency of mango farms in new lands-Egypt. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 5(2), 106–125.

[70] Haq, S.U., Shahbaz, P., Boz, I., et al., 2017. Exploring the determinants of technical inefficiency in mango enterprise: A case of Muzafargarh, Pakistan. Custos e @gronegócio on line. 13, 218–236.

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.