Research on World Agricultural Economy

Evaluation of Current Farm Machinery Utilization and Farm Productivity in Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia

Darebe Yohannes

Biosystem and Water Resources Engineering Faculty, Institute of Technology, Hawassa University, Hawassa P.O. Box 05, Ethiopia

Kishor Purushottam

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama P.O. Box 1888, Ethiopia

Mihret Dananto

Biosystem and Water Resources Engineering Faculty, Institute of Technology, Hawassa University, Hawassa P.O. Box 05, Ethiopia

Markos Mathewos

Biosystem and Water Resources Engineering Faculty, Institute of Technology, Hawassa University, Hawassa P.O. Box 05, Ethiopia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i4.1169

Received: 14 July 2024 | Revised: 22 August 2024 | Accepted: 30 August 2024 | Published Online: 18 October 2024

---

Abstract

Using farm machinery to improve farming has several benefits, such as labor saving, the higher labor efficiency, and the more precise and timely operations. This study aimed to identify farmland eligible for mechanization in the Hadiya zone, central Ethiopia through formal interviews and key informant interviews in selected districts. With data from 2019 to 2023, the study used both quantitative and qualitative approaches to examine productivity and machinery usage status. According to the data, 16.98% and 20.81% of farmland was mechanized in 2019 and 2023, respectively. The productivity of cereal crops increased when they were mechanized as opposed to not. According to the mechanization index measurement result, Shashogo had the highest mechanical power (30.8%), and Misrak Badawacho had the lowest (11.88%); this showed that human work requires a large energy input per hectare for Misrak Badawacho district. The article estimated differences in productivity between mechanized and non-mechanized plots for different crops. They amounted to 34.80%, 47.85%, 29.41%, and 46.58% for respective barley, teff, wheat, and maize. There were variations of horsepower per hectare among districts in the Hadiya zone due to landscape orientation and access to the existing resources in Lemo and Misrak Badawacho districts horsepower/hectare was 0.15 and 0.20, respectively. The result showed that out of the total cultivable land in the Hadiya zone, about 146,551 ha of land is eligible for mechanization in terms of both farm production and machinery utilization. The Central regional government is advised to support the appropriate use of agricultural equipment that is affordable for subsistence farmers through rental or credit terms; to apply the cluster farming system for small landholding in an appropriate manner for each district in the Hadiya zone; and to use farm machinery, as the study found a significant relationship between farm machinery and farm productivity: the low farm productivity results from low machinery utilization, which is caused by the government, lack of focus on farmer support, environmental sustainability, and farm production declines despite machinery utilization in central Ethiopia, Hadiya zone, and to use farm machinery, as the study found a significant relationship between farm machinery and farm productivity.

Keywords: Machinery utilization; Farm productivity; Farm machinery; Mechanized farm

---

References

[1] Liao, W., Zeng, F., Chanieabate, M., 2022. Mechanization of small-scale agriculture in China: Lessons for enhancing smallholder access to agricultural machinery. Sustainability. 14(13), 7964.

[2] Özpinar, S., ÇAY, A., 2018. The role of agricultural mechanization in farming system in a continental climate. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Derg. 15(2), 58–72.

[3] Getnet, B., Kelemu, F. (Eds.), 2020. Review of pre-harvest machinery research at Melkassa Agricultural Research Center: Achievements, challenges and prospects. In Proceedings of The 50th Anniversary of Melkassa Agricultural Research Center: Fifty Years of Service for Dryland and Irrigated Agriculture; 2019 August; Melkassa-Adama, Ethiopia.

[4] Adu-Baffour, F., Daum, T., Birner, R., 2019. Can small farms benefit from big companies’ initiatives to promote mechanization in Africa? A case study from Zambia. Food Policy. 84, 133–145.

[5] Rehman, T., Khan, M.U., 2019. Early trends, current status and future prospects of farm mechanization in Asia. Agricultural Engineering International CIGR Journal. 21(3), 76–87.

[6] Bjornlund, V., Bjornlund, H., Van Rooyen, A.F., 2020. Why agricultural production in sub-Saharan Africa remains low compared to the rest of the world–a historical perspective. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 36(sup. 1), S20–S53.

[7] Getachew Cherkos, B., 2022. Evaluation and scaling of agricultural mechanization practices in smallholder farming systems in Hitosa district, Oromia region. Haramaya University.

[8] Yigezu Wendimu, G., 2021. The challenges and prospects of Ethiopian agriculture. Cogent Food Agriculture. 7(1), 1923619.

[9] de Araúujo, A.G, Sims, B., Desbiolles, J., et al., 2020. The status of mechanization in Conservation Agriculture systems. In: Kassam, A. (Ed.). Advances in conservation agriculture. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: London, UK. pp. 427–496.

[10] Emami, M., Almassi, M., Bakhoda, H., 2018. Agricultural mechanization, a key to food security in developing countries: Strategy formulating for Iran. Agriculture & Food Security. 7(1), 1–12.

[11] Ayele, S., 2022. The resurgence of agricultural mechanisation in Ethiopia: rhetoric or real commitment?. The Journal of Peasant Study. 49(1), 137–157.

[12] Pawlak, K., Kołodziejczak, M., 2020. The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: Considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sustainability. 12(13), 5488.

[13] Gitau, A., Mwangi, S.T., 2019. Agricultural mechanization Status in Africa: An overview. Journal of Engineering in Agriculture and the Environment. 5(2), 44–53.

[14] Neglo K.A.W., Gebrekidan, T., Lyu, K., 2021. The role of agriculture and non-farm economy in addressing food insecurity in Ethiopia: A Review. Sustainability. 13(7), 3874.

[15] Sandhu, H., 2021. Bottom-up transformation of agriculture and food systems. Sustainability. 13(4), 2171.

[16] Jayne, T.S., Muyanga, M., Wineman, A., et al., 2019. Are medium‐scale farms driving agricultural transformation in sub‐Saharan Africa?. Agricultural Economics. 50, 75–95.

[17] Debnath, K., 2020. Water security for a sustainable planet. In: Filo, W.L., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L. (Eds.). Zero Hunger. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 969–80.

[18] Sisay, E., Atilaw, W., Adisu, T., 2022. Impact of economic sectors on inflation rate: Evidence from Ethiopia. Cogent Economiics & Finance. 10(1), 2123889.

[19] Chinseu, E., Dougill, A., Stringer, L., 2019. Why do smallholder farmers dis‐adopt conservation agriculture? Insights from Malawi. Land Degradation & Development. 30(5), 533–543.

[20] Taale, F., 2018. Effect of farm size on efficiency, ploughing technology and food security among maize farmers in the Northern Region of Ghana [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of Cape Coast: Cape Coast (GH).

[21] Gebregziabher, S., Mouazen, A.M., Van Brussel, H., et al., 2007. Design of the Ethiopian ard plough using structural analysis validated with finite element analysis. Biosystems Engineering. 97(1), 27–39.

[22] Tefera, T., Tesfay, G., Elias, E., et al., 2016. Drivers for adoption of agricultural technologies and practices in Ethiopia—A study report from 30 woredas in four regions. CASCAPE Project. Report no. NS_DfA_2016_1, January. Addis Ababa/Wageningen.

[23] Leulseged, T.W., Hassen, I.S., Ayele, B.T., et al., 2021. Laboratory biomarkers of COVID-19 disease severity and outcome: Findings from a developing country. PLoS One. 16(3), e0246087.

[24] Rockström, J., Kaumbutho, P., Mwalley, J., et al., 2009. Conservation farming strategies in East and Southern Africa: Yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research. Soil and tillage Research. 103(1), 23–32.

[25] Prăvălie, R., Patriche, C., Borrelli, P., et al., 2021. Arable lands under the pressure of multiple land degradation processes. A global perspective. Environmental Research. 194, 110697.

[26] Muluye, M.Y., 2021. The Role of Agricultural Sector Economy for the development of Ethiopia. Budapest Business University: Budapest, Hungary.

[27] Pan, Y., Smith, S., Sulaiman, M., 2018. Low-cost cultivation improvements have big impacts on food security and resilience in Uganda. Innovation Lab for Assets and Market Access.

[28] Sims, B., Kienzle, J., 2017. Sustainable agricultural mechanization for smallholders: What is it and how can we implement it?. Agriculture. 7(6), 50.

[29] Sims, B., Corsi, S., Gbehounou, G., et al., 2018. Sustainable weed management for conservation agriculture: Options for smallholder farmers. Agriculture. 8(8), 118.

[30] Olosunde, W.A., Onwe, D., Sunday, U.N., 2019. Assessment of farm machinery utilization and food production in Akwa Ibom State. Adeleke University Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2(2), 132–140.

[31] Sims, B., Kienzle, J., 2016. Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Environments. 3(2), 11.

[32] Sibhatu, K.T., Qaim, M., 2017. Rural food security, subsistence agriculture, and seasonality. PLoS One. 12(10), e0186406.

[33] Diriba, G., 2018. Agricultural and rural transformation in Ethiopia: Obstacles, triggers and reform considerations. Ethiopian Journal of Economics. 27(2), 51–110.

[34] Meng, M., Yu, L., Yu, X., 2024. Machinery structure, machinery subsidies, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from China. Agricural Economics. 55(2), 223–46.

[35] Kalogiannidis, S., Syndoukas, D., 2024. The impact of agricultural extension services on farm output: A worldwide viewpoint. Research in World Agriculture Economics. 5(1), 96–114.

[36] Daum, T., Seidel, A., Awoke, B.G., et al., 2023. Animal traction, two-wheel tractors, or four-wheel tractors? A best-fit approach to guide farm mechanization in Africa. Experimental Agriculture. 59, e12.

[37] Mumah, E., Chen, Y., Hong, Y., et al., 2024. Machinery adoption and its effect on maize productivity among smallholder farmers in Western Kenya: Evidence from the chisel harrow tillage practice. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 5(1), 1–18.

[38] Yang, S., Li, W., 2022. The impact of socialized agricultural machinery services on land productivity: Evidence from China. Agriculture. 12(12), 2072.

[39] Almasi, G., Padua, D.A. (Eds.), 2000. MaJIC: A MATLAB just-in-time compiler. International Workshop on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing; 2000 August 10–12; Yorktown Heights, NY, USA. pp. 68–81.

[40] Carruthers, I., Rodriguez, M., 1992. Tools for agriculture. Intermediate Technology Publishers: London, UK.

[41] Olaoye, J. O., Rotimi, A.O., 2010. Measurement of agricultural mechanization index and analysis of agricultural productivity of farm settlements in Southwest Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal. 12(1).

[42] Ortiz-Canavate, J., Salvador, I., 1980. Effects of different mechanization levels in Spanish dryland farms. AMA, Agric Mech Asia. 11(3), 31–36.

[43] Ashley, P., Boyd, B.W.E., 2006. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to research in environmental management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 13(2), 70–78.

[44] Saiz-Rubio, V., Rovira-Más, F., 2020. From smart farming towards agriculture 5.0: A review on crop data management. Agronomy. 10(2), 207.

[45] Mebratu, T., 2023. Assessment of farm machinery utilization level and its determinants among private and government organization of southern regional state of Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies. 3(2), 1006–1013.

[46] Pal, B.D., Saroj, S., 2019. Do improved agricultural practices boost farm productivity? The evidence from Karnataka, India. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 32(conference), 55–75.

[47] Fentie, A., Beyene, A.D., 2019. Climate-smart agricultural practices and welfare of rural smallholders in Ethiopia: Does planting method matter? Land use policy. 85, 387–396.

[48] Järnberg, L., Kautsky, E.E., Dagerskog, L., et al., 2018. Green niche actors navigating an opaque opportunity context: Prospects for a sustainable transformation of Ethiopian agriculture. Land Use Policy. 71, 409–421.

[49] Thompson, T., Gyatso, T., 2020. Technology Adoption for Improving Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Virginia Tech.

[50] Mirpanahi, S., Almassi, M., Javadi, A., 2023. Applying multi-criteria decision making method to analyze stability and mechanization patterns in small farms. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 20, 100295.

[51] Liu, Y., Heerink, N., Li, F., et al., 2022. Do agricultural machinery services promote village farmland rental markets? Theory and evidence from a case study in the North China plain. Land Use Policy. 122, 106388.

[52] Solomon, R., Simane, B., Zaitchik, B.F., 2021. The impact of climate change on agriculture production in Ethiopia: Application of a dynamic computable general equilibrium model. American Journal of Climate Chang. 10(1), 32–50.

[53] Deribe, Y., Getnet, B., Kang, T.G., et al., 2021. Benchmarking the status of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Institute Agricultural Research (EIAR). Report no. 133.

[54] Workneh, W.A., Ujiie, K., Matsushita, S., 2021. Farmers’ agricultural tractor preferences in Ethiopia: a choice experiment approach. Discover Sustainability. 2, 1–15.

[55] Baudron, F., Misiko, M., Getnet, B., et al., 2019. A farm-level assessment of labor and mechanization in Eastern and Southern Africa. Agronomy of Sustainable Development. 39(17), 1–13.