Effect of Standards on Sub-Saharan African Countries’Agricultural Exports

Dontsi Dontsi

Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Yaounde II, Yaoundé, P.O. Box 1365, Cameroon

Alexis Nankap Seujib

University Institute of Sciences, Technologies and Ethics, Yaoundé, P.O. Box 30201, Cameroon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v5i4.1066

Received: 27 March 2024 | Revised: 6 August 2024 | Accepted: 26 August 2024 | Published Online: 26 September 2024

Copyright © 2024 Dontsi , Alexis Nankap Seujib. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.


Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of public standards (SPS, TBT) on Sub-Saharan Africa’s exports of food, which represent less than 3% of world food exports. This situation is accentuated by the standards on agricultural goods. A modest contribution has been made both theoretically and empirically. Theoretically, the basic model has been criticized and subsequently reformulated by incorporating the cost function of food production in the exporting country. This reformulation made it possible to build a model, the methodology of which was developed by several authors. Empirical analysis shows that SPS and TBT standards have a negative impact on agricultural exports of the Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries.

Keywords: Subsaharian Africa; Exports; Agricultural products; Standards; Border rejections


References

[1] OMC, 2005. World trade report: The economics of standards and trade. Available from: www.wto.org

[2] FAO, 2010. Training in management of rural associative businesses in the agri-food sector - Module 4: Post-harvest and marketing operations.

[3] OMC, 2021. Database I-TIP. Available from: www.wto.org

[4] CNUCED, 2021. Database on international trade. Available from: http://www.unctadstat.org

[5] Ganslandt, M., Markusen, J.R., 2001. Standards and related regulations in international trade: A modelling approach. Paper no. 8346, 1 June. NBER.

[6] DIN, 2000. Economic Benefits of Standardization: Summary of Results, Final Report and Practical Examples. 11 December, Beuth Verlag: Berlin. Available from www.din.de

[7] Swann, G.M., 2000. The Economics of Standardization. Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate.

[8] Moenius, J., 2004. Information versus product adaptation: The role of standards in trade. Northwestern University.

[9] Blind, K., 2004. The economics of standards: Theory, evidence, policy. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.

[10] Birg, L., Voßwinkel, J.S., 2015. Minimum quality standards and exports. Paper no. 248. CEGE.

[11] Otsuki, T., Wilson, J.S., Sewadeh, M., 2001. Saving two in a billion: Quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports. Food Policy. 26(5), 495–514.

[12] Wilson, J.S., Otsuki, T., 2004. Standards and technical regulations and firms in developing countries: New evidence from a World Bank technical barriers to trade survey. World Bank.

[13] Kalaba, M., Kristen, J., Sacolo, T., 2016. Non-tariff measures affecting agricultural trade in SADC. Agrekon. 55(4), 377–410.

[14] Da Silva-Glasgow, D., Hosein, R., 2018. Do SPS and TBT regulations inhibit Guyana’s food and agriculture exports to CARICOM markets?. Social and Economic Studies. 67(2&3), 133–175.

[15] Liu, C., Li, Y., Lin, D., et al., 2019. Quantifying the effects of non-tariff measures on African agri-food exporters. Agrekon. 58(4), 451–471.

[16] Mangelsdorf, A., 2011. The role of technical standards for trade between China and the European Union. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 23(7), 725–743.

[17] Chen, M.X., Otsuki, T., Wilson, J.S. 2006. Do standards matter for export success. Paper no. 3809. World Bank.

[18] Rios Diaz, L., Jaffee, H., 2008. Barrier, catalyst or distraction? Standards, competitiveness and Africa’s groundnut exports to Europe. Paper no. 39. World Bank.

[19] Xiong, B., Beghin, J., 2012. Aflatoxin redux: Does European aflatoxin regulation hurt groundnut exporters from Africa?. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 40(5), 589–609.

[20] OMC, 2022. Database I-TIP. Available from: www.wto.org

[21] ITC, 2011. Market analysis tools. Available from: http://www.intracen.org/marketanalysis

[22] Boyd, D.R., 2006. The foods we eat: Pesticide regulations-An international comparison. David Suzuki Foundation. Les aliments que nous mangeons: La réglementation en matière de pesticides-Une comparaison internationale. Fondation David Suzuki. (in French).

[23] Claire, L.B., Vincent, R., 2004. Standards and international trade: The cases of exports from ACP countries to the European Union. CRET editions, CIRAD, Paris.

[24] RASFF, 2021. Système d’alerte rapide aux frontières. (in French). Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu

[25] Neff, S.A., Malanoski, M.A., 1996. Trade reform increase likelihood of challenges to food standards. Food Review. 19(2), 18–22.

[26] Maertens, M., Swinnen, J.F.M., 2009. Trade, standards and poverty: Evidence from Senegal. World Development. 37(1), 161–178.

[27] Casella, A., 1996. Free trade and evolving standards. In Bhagwati, J., Hudec, R. (eds.). Harmonization and Fair Trade. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. pp. 119–156.

[28] Cheldon, I., 2009. Food standards and international trade. In Lusk J.L., Roosen J., Shogren J.F. (eds). Handbook on the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 392–415.

[29] Baltzer, K., 2011. Minimun quality standards and international trade. Review of International Economics. 19(5), 936–949.

[30] Dontsi, 2011. Does Subsaharian Africa have a comparative advantage in agriculture? in D. Lancoande: What agriculture for sustainable development in Africa. Actes du Colloque, 2010 Dec 6–8, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso, p. 525–539.

[31] Vancauteren, M., Weiserbs, D., 2003. The impact of the removal of technical barriers to trade on border effects and intra-trade in the European Union [Unpublished]. Université Catholique de Louvain.

[32] Piermartini, R., 2005. Harmonization and mutual recognition of product standards: The effect on intra-EU trade [Unpublished]. Université Catholique de Louvain.

[33] Swann, P., Temple, P., Shurmer, M., 1996. Standards and trade performance: The UK experience. Economic Journal. 106(438), 1297–1313.

[34] Beghin, J.C., Maerten, M., Swinnen, J., 2015. Nontariff measures and standard in trade and global value chains. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 7(1), 425–450.

[35] Fakhfakh, F., Grazia, C., Hammoudi, A., et al., 2009. Sanitary and phytosanitary standards and the question of access of West African countries to the European market: an empirical study. University of Panthéon-Assas Paris II. (in French).

[36] Olanike, K.F., Brümmer, B., Martinez-Zarzoso, I., 2015. Foods safety standards, compliance and European Union’s rejections of African exports: The role of domestic factors. Papers no.74. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.

[37] Yotov, V.Y., Piermartini, R., Monteiro, J.A., et al., 2017. An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. Vol 2, WTO. Available from www.unctad.org

[38] Correia, S., Guimaraes, P., Zylkin, T. 2019. Ppmlhdfe: Fast poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. The Stata Journal. 20(1), 95–115.

[39] Fontagné, L., Mimouni, M., Pasteels, J.M., 2005. Estimating the impact of environmental SPS and TBT on international trade. Integration and Trade Journal. 28(19), 7–37.

[40] Dontsi., 1994. The HOS theory and the paradox of the situation of Subsaharian African countries. La théorie HOS et le paradoxe de la situation des pays d’Afrique au Sud du Sahara. Mondes en Développement. 22(86), 45–55. (in French).

[41] FANDC, 2011. Climate change and trade: Relationship to sanitary and phytosanitary standards. Changement climatique et commerce: Relation avec les normes sanitaires et phytosanitaires. (in French). Available from: www.standardsfacility.org

[42] Djontu, B.L., 2022. Determinants and efficiency of Cameroonian exports of agricultural products: An application of the gravity model to the stochastic frontier. Déterminants et efficacité des exportations camerounaises des produits agricoles: Une application du modèle de gravité à la frontière stochastique. Paper no. 113959. University Library of Munich. (in French).

Online ISSN: 2737-4785, Print ISSN: 2737-4777, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.