Design and Construction and Testing of Biogas Stove
The Institute of Mechanical Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/cet.v1i1.2015
Received: 1 December 2024 | Revised: 5 January 2025 | Accepted: 10 January 2025 | Published Online: 22 January 2025
Copyright © 2025 Rabiu Ahmad Abubakar. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The performance of a domestic biogas stove was evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions to assess its thermal efficiency, gas consumption rate, and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions. The biogas used—comprising 60% methane and 40% carbon dioxide—simulated typical output from anaerobic digestion of organic waste. A standardized water boiling test, conducted three times, simulated cooking conditions. Key parameters such as gas consumption, boiling time, final water temperature, and ambient conditions were recorded. Thermal efficiency was determined by comparing the heat transferred to water with the energy content of the consumed biogas. The stove showed consistent performance, averaging a gas consumption rate of 1.5 L/min and a thermal efficiency of 54.3%, indicating effective energy use. CO emissions averaged 13 ppm, remaining below WHO indoor air quality limits, suggesting efficient combustion and safe indoor operation. Minor performance variations were attributed to operational factors like flame control and pot placement. Based on the observed consumption rate, a household cooking for about two hours daily would require 180 liters of biogas per day, ensuring a stable supply. Overall, the stove proved to be an efficient and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional biomass fuels. It offers a cleaner, safer cooking solution for rural and off-grid households by reducing harmful emissions and improving indoor air quality. These findings support the broader adoption of biogas technology for sustainable domestic energy use.
Keywords: Renewable Energy; Stove Design; Clean Cooking Technology; Sustainable Energy Systems
References
[1] United Nations, 2015. The 17 Goals. United Nations: New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (cited 5 January 2025).
[2] Taherdanak, M., Zilouei, H., 2016. Biogas production from agricultural residues: A review. Current Biochemical Engineering. 3(3), 188–199.
[3] Meegoda, J.N., Li, B., Patel, K., et al., 2018. A review of the processes, parameters, and optimization of anaerobic digestion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(10), 2224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102224
[4] Bae, J.S., Yoon, Y.M., Shin, S.K., et al., 2020. Biogas potential and methanogenic community shift in in-situ anaerobic sewage sludge digestion with food waste leachate additions. Applied Biological Chemistry. 63, 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00546-6
[5] Kumar, A., Mandal, B., Sharma, A., 2015. Advancement in biogas digester. In: Sharma, A., Kar, S.K. (eds.). Energy Sustainability Through Green Energy. Springer: New Delhi, India. pp. 351–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2337-5_14
[6] Awulu, J.O., Iyidiobu, B.N., Ugbede, J., 2020. Cooking Performance of a Developed Biogas Burner (Stove). International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology. 4(12), 11–16.
[7] Gao, H.B., Qu, Z.G., Tao, W.Q., et al., 2011. Experimental study of biogas combustion in a two-layer packed bed burner. Energy & Fuels. 25(7), 2887–2895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200500j
[8] Itodo, I.N., Agyo, G.E., Yusuf, P., 2007. Performance evaluation of a biogas stove for cooking in Nigeria. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa. 18(4), 14–18.
[9] World Health Organization, 2024. Household Air Pollution, Fact Sheet. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health (cited 13 January 2025).
[10] Mwirigi, J.W., Makenzi, P.M., Ochola, W.O., 2009. Socio-economic constraints to adoption and sustainability of biogas technology by farmers in Nakuru Districts, Kenya. Energy for Sustainable Development. 13(2), 106–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2009.05.002
[11] US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2025. Household Energy and Clean Cookstove Research. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/air-research/household-energy-and-clean-cookstove-research (cited 13 January 2025).
[12] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2019. Renewable Energy: A Gender Perspective. Available from: https://www.irena.org/publications/2019/Jan/Renewable-Energy-A-Gender-Perspective (cited 13 January 2025).
[13] Gould, C.F., Urpelainen, J., 2021. Do improved cookstoves save time and improve gender outcomes? Evidence from six developing countries. Energy Economics. 102, 105456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105456
[14] Nevzorova, T., Kutcherov, V., 2019. Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 26, 100414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100414
[15] Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India. National Biogas and Manure Management Programme (NBMMP). Available from: https://www.cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2015/Union_Civil_Performance_Renewable_Energy_Report_34_2015_chap_8.pdf (cited 5 January 2025).
[16] JV, P.T., Nakanwagi, R., JO, E.K., et al., 2019. Assessing Rural Communities’ Prospects for Biogas Technology Adoption as Clean Energy Source in Wakiso District, Uganda. African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 2(1), 1–8.
[17] Ajay, C.M., Mohan, S., Dinesha, P., 2021. Decentralized energy from portable biogas digesters using domestic organic waste. Waste Management. 125, 10–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.031
[18] Zaki, M.B.A.M., Shamsudin, R., Yusoff, M.Z.M., 2019. Portable Biodigester System for Household Use – A Review. Advances in Agricultural and Food Research Journal. 2(2), a0000148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36877/aafrj.a0000148
[19] Pandey, S., Goswami, S., Saini, P., et al., 2021. Hybrid electrical-solar oven: a new perspective. In: Tyagi, H., Chakraborty, P.R., Powar, S., et al. (eds.). New Research Directions in Solar Energy Technologies. Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. Springer: Singapore. pp. 237–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0594-9_8
[20] Mittal, S., Ahlgren, E.O., Shukla, P.R., 2018. Barriers to biogas Dissemination in India: A review. Energy Policy. 112, 361–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.027
[21] Ministry of Energy, Kenya, 2020. Bioenergy Strategy 2020–2027. Government of Kenya: Nairobi, Kenya.
[22] Shell Foundation, 2022. Demonstrating the Potential of Biogas to Contribute to the SDGs. Available from: https://shellfoundation.org/insight-report/demonstrating-the-potential-of-biogas-to-contribute-to-the-sdgs/ (cited 13 January 2025).
[23] Chaney, J., Owens, E.H., Robinson, B.L., et al., 2025. Digesting data: Improving the understanding of biogas use through remote sensing. Energy for Sustainable Development. 86, 101668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101668
[24] Fatima, N., Khanam, N., Kumari, R., 2025. Biofuels in India: Policies, Reviews, and Strategic Analysis. BioEnergy Research. 18, 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-025-10843-x
[25] Anderman, T.L., DeFries, R.S., Wood, S.A., et al., 2015. Biogas cook stoves for healthy and sustainable diets? A case study in Southern India. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2, 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2015.00028
[26] Lewis, J.J., Hollingsworth, J.W., Chartier, R.T., et al., 2016. Biogas stoves reduce firewood use, household air pollution, and hospital visits in Odisha, India. Environmental Science & Technology. 51(1), 560–569. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02466
[27] Ufuoma, O.B., Omonigho, O.B., 2022. Development of biogas burner stove from aluminum alloy scraps. Journal of Energy Technology and Environment. 4(2), 22–33.
[28] Petro, L., 2020. Optimization of domestic biogas stove burner for efficient energy utilization [Master's thesis]. Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology: Arusha, Tanzania. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58694/20.500.12479/1300
[29] Kaushik, L.K., Mahalingam, A.K., Palanisamy, M., 2020. Performance analysis of a biogas operated porous radiant burner for domestic cooking application. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 28(10), 12168–12177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10862-5
[30] Sharma, A., Chen, C.R., Lan, N.V., 2012. Solar energy in India: Strategies, policies, perspectives and future potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16(1), 933–941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.020
[31] Al-Najjar, H., Pfeifer, C., Al Afif, R., et al., 2022. Performance evaluation of a hybrid grid-connected photovoltaic biogas-generator power system. Energies, 15(9), 3151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093151
[32] Kurchania, A.K., Panwar, N.L., Pagar, S.D., 2011. Development of domestic biogas stove. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 1(2), 99–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-011-0011-5
[33] Pandit, S., Das, D.C., Das, B., et al., 2025. Design and implementation of a low-cost IoT-based real-time emission monitoring system for a thermoelectric generator-integrated biomass cookstove. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part A: Sustainable and Renewable Energy, 1(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067779
[34] Gu, C., Liu, Y., Wang, J., et al., 2023. Carbon-oriented planning of distributed generation and energy storage assets in power distribution network with hydrogen-based microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 14(2), 790–802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2022.3225314
[35] Hamid R.G., Blanchard, R.E., 2018 An assessment of biogas as a domestic energy source in rural Kenya: Developing a sustainable business model. Renewable Energy. 121, 368–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.032
[36] Orhorhoro, E.K., Oyejide, J., Abubakar, S.A., 2018. Design and construction of an improved biogas stove. Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment. 14(3), 325–335.