Home
Open Access

Research on World Agricultural Economy

PDF

Issue

Volume 2 Issue 2 (June 2021)

Section

Article

How to Cite

Loading...

Assessment of Use of Improved Production Technologies among Goat Farmers in Abia State Nigeria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v2i2.382

Received: 22 April 2021; Accepted: 28 May 2021; Published Online: 31 May 2021

Copyright © 2021 S. E. Onu, L. O. Obinna, Ufomba V. U. Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.

Creative Commons LicenseThis is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Abstract

The study provided an empirical evidence on the use of improved goat production technologies among rural farmers in Abia State, Nigeria. The specific objectives of the study were to describe the socioeconomic characteristics of the respondent, ascertain the extent of use of improved goat production technologies, determine factors influencing use of improved goat production technologies and identify the constraint to access and use of improved goat production technologies in the study area. A multi-stage random sampling technique was adopted in selecting the sample size 120 respondents. Data for the study were collected through the use of questionnaire. The data collected for the study were analysed with both descriptive and inferential statistics. The result of the socioeconomic characteristics revealed the mean age of the respondents was 43 years, majority 69.16% of the respondents were married, about 45% had secondary education, a mean household size of 6 persons, majority 66.67% were farmers, mean years of arming experience at 5.7 years, mean income of #102,000, mean farm size of 11 goats and majority (78.33%) of respondents were non- members of cooperative societies. The result on extent of use of improved goat production technologies, revealed that the respondents highly used most of improved goat production technologies as affirmed with the grand mean of = 3.20. On constraint to use of improved goat production technologies, all the respondents 100% agreed that lack of access to credit was a constraint to use, 100% agrees on lack of credibility from source of technological information, 99.2% agreed that they were afraid of taking risk, 93.3% agreed on difficulty in technology application among others. The OLS regression estimates of the influence of socioeconomic characteristics the respondents on the use of improved goat production technologies in the study area, revealed that age at 10%, education at 1%, household size at 1%, farming experience at 1%, farm size at 1%, income at 1% and access to credit at 5% were the determinants of use of improved goat production technologies in the study area and the null hypotheses rejected. In conclusion, greater use of available improved technologies will promote productivity, and therefore there is need for proper sensitization and awareness by relevant agencies. The study recommended that credit should be made available to farmers by relevant governmental and non- governmental agencies to increase the level of use of available improved technologies.

Keywords: Use, Improved goat production technologies, Farmers

References

[1] Abdelmagid, S.A. and Hassan, F.K. (2012). Factors aff-ecting the adoption of wheat production technology in the Sudan: Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 35(4): 325 – 337.

[2] Adunni Sanni, S. (2008). Animal Traction: An Underused Low External Input Technology among Farming Communities in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Tropicultura 26(1): 48-52.

[3] Ani, A.O. and Undiandeye, U.C. (2010): Assessment of Farmers‘ Adoption of Improved Agricultural Technology In Soybean Production in Michika Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Arid agriculture. Vol.11. Pp. 107 – 111

[4] Bester, J., Ramsay, K.A. and Scholtz, M.M. (2010). Goat farming in South Africa: Findings of a national livestock survey. Applied Animal Husbandry and Rural Development, 2: 9–13.

[5] Christiana Augustine (2015) Analysis Of Adoption Of Improved Cassava Processing Technologies By Women In Ankpa Local Government Area Kogi State, Nigeria.

[6] Djana Babatima Mignouna (2011) Adoption and Impact of Improved Agricultural Technologies In Developing Countries: The Case Of Imazapyr-Resistant Maize In Western Kenya. Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Sokoine University of Agriculture. Morogoro, Tanzania.

[7] Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) (2012a). Aquastat, Country Profile Ghana, Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.

[8] Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) (2015a). FAOSTAT Database. Food and Agricultural Organisation of United Natiions. Accessed May 2012, available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/CB

[9] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2013). An international statistical database 1961-1998 on CD-ROM. FAO, Rome, Italy.

[10] Gertrude Dumeh (2011) Adoption of Improved Livestock Production Technologies and its Implications for Food Accessibility among Small Ruminant Farmers in Rural Wa Municipality of Ghana. Award of Degree of Master in Management of Development Specialization “Food Security

[11] Gertrude., (2011). The Role of Livestock in Rural Livelihoods in Ghana: Final Report presented by Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MOFA) and Department for International Development (DFID. Accra.

[12] Ijere, M.O, (2012) Leading Issues in Rural Development. Enugu Acena Publishers, Pp.1-8.

[13] Imonikhe, D. (2012). Effects of farmers level of education and cooperative membership on access to agricultural extension services in Abuja, Nigeria.

[14] Kansana, H. S., Sharma, R.P. and Sharma, S.K. (2010). Knowledge and adoption of wheat technology among contact and non-contact farmer. Digest Karnal. Agricultural Science 16:154 -156.

[15] Lebbie, S.H.B. (2014). Goats under household conditions. Small Ruminant Research, 51(2), 131-136.

[16] Nwaobiala, C.U. (2013). Economic analysis of small holders rice production systems in Ebonyi State South East, Nigeria.

[17] Oladoja et al, (2008). Training needs of fisherfolks on fishing technologies.

[18] Onu, S.E. and Maduka, O.A. (2017) Assessment of conservation measures of selected tree crops going into extinction adopted by rural farmers in Ohafia L.G.A of Abia State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural and Earth Science (IJAES). Vol. 2 No. 6.

[19] Onu, S.E., Ekweanya N.M. and Mbah C.G. (2016). Analysis of access to credit among rural cassava farmers in Imo State, Nigeria.

[20] Peacock, C. (2015). Goats—A pathway out of poverty. Small Ruminant Research, 60(1), 179-186.

[21] Simon, M.M.S. (2012). Adoption of Rotational Woodlot Technology in Semi-arid areas of Tanzania: The case of Tabora Region. Thesis for Award of PhD Degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 237pp.

Online ISSN: 2737-4777, Print ISSN: 2737-4785, Published by Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte. Ltd.